- mice-discuss - lists.micemn.net

Re: Fwd: Urgent - seeing routing issues with subnet 64.122.xx.xx through peering point 206.108.255.62/24

by Doug McIntyre

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 05:19:36PM -0500, Mark Bauman <Mark.Bauman(a)integratelecom.com> wrote: > Hello MICE, > Packets sourced from Integra?s 64.122.xx.xx subnet are experiencing 50+% > loss when going through our peering point with MICE at MPLSMNCD. It looks like you pulled the plug, so it is a bit difficult to diagnose right now. The error counters on the port are pretty clean over all though. Interface: xe-0/0/2, Enabled, Link is Down Encapsulation: Ethernet, Speed: 10000mbps Traffic statistics: Current delta Input bytes: 29263828475919 (0 bps) [0] Output bytes: 20763155160434 (0 bps) [0] Input packets: 36106842252 (0 pps) [0] Output packets: 29187411842 (0 pps) [0] Error statistics: Input errors: 0 [0] Input drops: 0 [0] Input framing errors: 0 [0] Policed discards: 0 [0] L3 incompletes: 0 [0] L2 channel errors: 0 [0] L2 mismatch timeouts: 0 [0] Carrier transitions: 18 [0] Output errors: 0 [0] Output drops: 0 [0] Aged packets: 0 [0] Active alarms : LINK Active defects: LINK It would probably be helpful if the link could come up with BGP down if you don't want traffic to flow, we could do some ping tests to you. -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> -- ipHouse/Goldengate/Bitstream/ProNS -- Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 15, 2013

Re: Fwd: Urgent - seeing routing issues with subnet 64.122.xx.xx through peering point 206.108.255.62/24

by Mike Bushard, Jr

We saw some loss to integra today also. Mike Bushard Jr | Network Engineer IV | Arvig | 320.256.0178 direct | 320.429.0837 Mobile Sent from my Verizon Wireless DROID RAZR by Motorola Please excuse short responses and spelling errors. On Mar 15, 2013 5:19 PM, "Jay Hanke" <jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net> wrote: > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Bauman, Mark <Mark.Bauman(a)integratelecom.com> > Date: Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:20 PM > Subject: Urgent - seeing routing issues with subnet 64.122.xx.xx through > peering point 206.108.255.62/24 > To: "peering(a)micemn.net" <peering(a)micemn.net> > Cc: NOC Network Repair <NOCNetworkRepair(a)integratelecom.com>, "[DL] NOC > Tier 3 Data" <NOCTier3Data(a)integratelecom.com> > > > Hello MICE,**** > > ** ** > > Packets sourced from Integra’s 64.122.xx.xx subnet are experiencing 50+% > loss when going through our peering point with MICE at MPLSMNCD.**** > > ** ** > > Can you investigate from your end?**** > > ** ** > > Thanks,**** > > ** ** > > *Mark J. Bauman *| NRT**** > > 888-611-6621**** > > 4400 NE 77th Ave | Vancouver, WA 98662**** > > [image: cid:image001.jpg@01CE1513.E60062F0]<http://www.integratelecom.com/> > ** > > ** ** > > > > -- > Jay Hanke > CTO, CCIE #19093 > Mankato Networks LLC > PO Box 54 > 619 S Front St > Mankato, MN 56001-3838 > Google 530-618-2398 > jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net > http://www.mankatonetworks.com > http://www.neutralpath.net > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 15, 2013

Fwd: Urgent - seeing routing issues with subnet 64.122.xx.xx through peering point 206.108.255.62/24

by Jay Hanke

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Bauman, Mark <Mark.Bauman(a)integratelecom.com> Date: Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:20 PM Subject: Urgent - seeing routing issues with subnet 64.122.xx.xx through peering point 206.108.255.62/24 To: "peering(a)micemn.net" <peering(a)micemn.net> Cc: NOC Network Repair <NOCNetworkRepair(a)integratelecom.com>, "[DL] NOC Tier 3 Data" <NOCTier3Data(a)integratelecom.com> Hello MICE,**** ** ** Packets sourced from Integra’s 64.122.xx.xx subnet are experiencing 50+% loss when going through our peering point with MICE at MPLSMNCD.**** ** ** Can you investigate from your end?**** ** ** Thanks,**** ** ** *Mark J. Bauman *| NRT**** 888-611-6621**** 4400 NE 77th Ave | Vancouver, WA 98662**** [image: cid:image001.jpg@01CE1513.E60062F0] <http://www.integratelecom.com/> ** ** ** -- Jay Hanke CTO, CCIE #19093 Mankato Networks LLC PO Box 54 619 S Front St Mankato, MN 56001-3838 Google 530-618-2398 jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net http://www.mankatonetworks.com http://www.neutralpath.net ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 15, 2013

Re: MICE Route Server #1 offline?

by Mike Horwath

On Mar 10, 2013, at 12:41 AM, Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> wrote: > Guess I should head out when I can in order to configure and plug > them into something so they can be utilized since this lockup has > now happened twice in their 2.5 year run. The sky is falling! :) -- Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau(a)Geeks.ORG ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 10, 2013

Re: MICE Route Server #1 offline?

by Doug McIntyre

On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 12:27:57AM -0600, Nevin Lyne wrote: > For some reason I thought they already had DRAC cards, but if not I > have a drawer full of them for those model systems. That does appear to be the case (at least on the active -02 unit) micemn-02# ipmitool fru print ... FRU Device Description : DRAC 5 (ID 0) Chassis Type : Unknown Board Mfg Date : Sun Dec 31 17:00:00 1995 Board Mfg : DELL Board Product : FRU16K,DELL P/N Board Serial : CN6970267G0720 Board Part Number : 0D8635A04 Product Manufacturer : DELL Guess I should head out when I can in order to configure and plug them into something so they can be utilized since this lockup has now happened twice in their 2.5 year run. -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> -- ipHouse/Goldengate/Bitstream/ProNS -- Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 10, 2013

Re: MICE Route Server #1 offline?

by Nevin Lyne

On Sunday, March 10, 2013 12:20am, "Doug McIntyre" <merlyn(a)IPHOUSE.NET> said: > On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 09:42:56PM -0600, Brady Kittel wrote: >> Otherwise I think we could probably just provide a pair of new servers if >> someone can recommend minimum specs and it can wait for another month or >> two. I'm assuming 1u, maybe a single quad core low power processor, 12GB >> mem, mirrored 100GB drives, dial ps, and ilo would work? > > The requirements are minimalist. Current running system uses 52MB and is > 99.99% idle. It could just need a DIMM reseat or something. Or apparently > a DRAC card implant or switched PDU. For some reason I thought they already had DRAC cards, but if not I have a drawer full of them for those model systems. -- Nevin Lyne -- Founder / Director of Technology -- Gippy's Internet Solutions, LLC. / EngineHosting.com ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 10, 2013

Re: MICE Route Server #1 offline?

by Doug McIntyre

On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 09:42:56PM -0600, Brady Kittel wrote: > Otherwise I think we could probably just provide a pair of new servers if > someone can recommend minimum specs and it can wait for another month or > two. I'm assuming 1u, maybe a single quad core low power processor, 12GB > mem, mirrored 100GB drives, dial ps, and ilo would work? The requirements are minimalist. Current running system uses 52MB and is 99.99% idle. It could just need a DIMM reseat or something. Or apparently a DRAC card implant or switched PDU. -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> -- ipHouse/Goldengate/Bitstream/ProNS -- Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 10, 2013

Re: MICE Route Server #1 offline?

by Brady Kittel

I have quite a few HP dl360s g5s with lights out remote management remote management licensed. I could provide a pair along with hot spare drives, mirrored memory, and redundant ps. Otherwise I think we could probably just provide a pair of new servers if someone can recommend minimum specs and it can wait for another month or two. I'm assuming 1u, maybe a single quad core low power processor, 12GB mem, mirrored 100GB drives, dial ps, and ilo would work? On Mar 9, 2013 9:17 PM, "Nevin Lyne" <nevin(a)enginehosting.com> wrote: > > > On Saturday, March 9, 2013 9:12pm, "Mike Horwath" <drechsau(a)GEEKS.ORG> > said: > > > Free doesn't always include the crutches. > > > > Might be time for hardware less than 7-8 years old. > > > > -- > > Mike, via phone > > Not sure those 1950s were quite 7 or 8 years old, but I would be happy to > donate some newer boxes to the MICE cause if needed. > > -- Nevin Lyne > -- Founder / Director of Technology > -- Gippy's Internet Solutions, LLC. / EngineHosting.com > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 10, 2013

Re: MICE Route Server #1 offline?

by Ryan Goldberg

I can likely produce recent hardware and/or a managed PDU and/or misc hardware/services. Throw reqs out and I'll dig in. Ryan On Mar 9, 2013, at 9:14 PM, "Mike Horwath" <drechsau(a)GEEKS.ORG> wrote: > Free doesn't always include the crutches. > > Might be time for hardware less than 7-8 years old. > > -- > Mike, via phone > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 10, 2013

Re: MICE Route Server #1 offline?

by Nevin Lyne

On Saturday, March 9, 2013 9:12pm, "Mike Horwath" <drechsau(a)GEEKS.ORG> said: > Free doesn't always include the crutches. > > Might be time for hardware less than 7-8 years old. > > -- > Mike, via phone Not sure those 1950s were quite 7 or 8 years old, but I would be happy to donate some newer boxes to the MICE cause if needed. -- Nevin Lyne -- Founder / Director of Technology -- Gippy's Internet Solutions, LLC. / EngineHosting.com ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 10, 2013