September 2016 - mice-discuss

Re: 1G Fiber Port Moves

by Jeremy Lumby

Thanks, that will make the move quicker/easier -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Doug McIntyre Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 4:56 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] 1G Fiber Port Moves On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 03:32:40PM -0500, Jason Hanke wrote: > The following ports will be moved from the existing EX4200-24T to the EX4550 > > from ge-1/1/0 to ge-2/0/28 --- 5 Nines 1G SFP > from ge-1/1/1 to ge-2/0/29 --- ClaimLynx 1G SFP > from ge-1/1/2 to ge-2/0/30 --- CDW Berbee 1G SFP > from ge-1/1/3 to ge-2/0/31 --- Velocity Telephone 1G SFP I've config'd the switch over from 10G ports (ie. xe-2/0/0) over to 1G ports now for these four members + ge-2/0/0 for Route Server #2. (initial setup assumed everything would be 10G on the new EX4550). -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> ~.~ ipHouse ~.~ Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades

Sept. 30, 2016

Re: 1G Fiber Port Moves

by Doug McIntyre

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 03:32:40PM -0500, Jason Hanke wrote: > The following ports will be moved from the existing EX4200-24T to the EX4550 > > from ge-1/1/0 to ge-2/0/28 --- 5 Nines 1G SFP > from ge-1/1/1 to ge-2/0/29 --- ClaimLynx 1G SFP > from ge-1/1/2 to ge-2/0/30 --- CDW Berbee 1G SFP > from ge-1/1/3 to ge-2/0/31 --- Velocity Telephone 1G SFP I've config'd the switch over from 10G ports (ie. xe-2/0/0) over to 1G ports now for these four members + ge-2/0/0 for Route Server #2. (initial setup assumed everything would be 10G on the new EX4550). -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> ~.~ ipHouse ~.~ Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades

Sept. 30, 2016

Re: NebraskaLink LAG Migration

by Jason Hanke

ae1 On Sep 29, 2016 8:40 PM, "Richard Laager" <rlaager(a)wiktel.com> wrote: > On 09/29/2016 08:37 PM, Richard Laager wrote: > > On 09/29/2016 04:34 PM, Jason Hanke wrote: > >> Nebraskalink is adding a second 10G to their MICE connection. > >> > >> The additional port is xe-0/0/4 > > > > Will this be ae12 or non-LAG? > > Sorry, I see this is on the Neutral Path switch. Let me rephrase > accordingly: > > Which ae interface is this, or is this non-LAG? > > -- > Richard >

Sept. 30, 2016

Re: Hurricane and route servers

by Jason Hanke

I'm not set up in the new peeringdb system for MICE yet. Old system for IX was you send in an email and ask for changes. I'll make the updates as soon as I'm approved. On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Richard Laager <rlaager(a)wiktel.com> wrote: > On 09/29/2016 01:26 PM, Andrew Hoyos wrote: >> On Sep 29, 2016, at 11:42 AM, Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> wrote: >>> >>> I've bumped up the route servers to 55k for HE's connection. (Normal >>> connections are limited to 1k without an override). >> >> Can we document that here (perhaps with any other relevant technical detail about route-servers… OS/versions/config/etc)? I was not aware of any max-prefix settings on the route-servers. >> >> http://micemn.net/technical.html > > Done. I wasn't aware of this limit either. > > I'm not personally in favor of documenting version numbers. It is likely > to get out-of-date, and I don't see the reason. That said, if someone > sends the information and we have more ACKs than NAKs, I'll add it. > >> A peering DB record maybe a good idea here as well, for the route-servers, so folks have a general idea of what to set max-pfx to, etc. >> IE: https://peeringdb.com/net/6834 > > I think this is a great idea. > > Jay, if you agree, can you set this up? I'm assuming you're managing the > existing MICE entry in peeringdb, as I believe you handle the > peering(a)micemn.net email account. > > -- > Richard -- Jay Hanke CTO Neutral Path Communications 3 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 204 Mankato, MN 56001 (507) 327-2398 mobile jayhanke(a)neutralpath.net www.neutralpath.net

Sept. 30, 2016

Re: EX4200 (1G Switch) Packet Loss -> 10G Participants

by Mike Horwath

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:01:00PM -0500, Jeremy Lumby wrote: > 2PM Sent. -- Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau(a)Geeks.ORG

Sept. 30, 2016

Re: EX4200 (1G Switch) Packet Loss -> 10G Participants

by Jeremy Lumby

2PM -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Mike Horwath Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 9:07 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] EX4200 (1G Switch) Packet Loss -> 10G Participants On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 03:45:55PM -0500, Jason Hanke wrote: > Please allocate ge-2/0/0 to route server 2. There is no change in IP address. > > I'm blocked from announce. Can someone else get the notification > together for the announce list? I can do that. What time Tuesday afternoon? -- Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau(a)Geeks.ORG

Sept. 30, 2016

Re: Election

by Richard Laager

On 09/27/2016 05:03 PM, DeLong, Owen wrote: > Congratulations, Richard. On 09/27/2016 05:12 PM, Levi Pederson wrote: > Congrats On 09/28/2016 08:15 AM, John Unger wrote: > Congrats Richard!!! Thanks everyone! I am grateful for this opportunity to help the exchange. -- Richard

Sept. 30, 2016

Re: EX4200 (1G Switch) Packet Loss -> 10G Participants

by Richard Laager

On 09/29/2016 09:34 PM, Jeremy Lumby wrote: > On the new 4200 side ae0 is made up of xe-0/1/0 and xe-0/1/2 > On the existing stack ae11 is made up of xe-0/2/2 and xe-2/0/16 > xe-0/1/0 is connected to xe-0/2/2 and xe-0/1/2 is connected to xe-2/0/16 via 10G DAC cables (which I donated) > With the exception of the 4 SFP ports and route server #2 that Jay mentioned, all moves will be to the same numbered port on the switch. In the old stack, they are all ge-1/0/x, and on the new 4200, they will all be ge-0/0/x I will keep the x the same so I moved my port from ge-1/0/11 to ge-0/0/11 and the looking glass has also been moved to ge-0/0/0 All other moves will happen during the Tuesday afternoon maintenance window. Thanks! I've updated the website. And thanks for the donation of the DAC cables! -- Richard

Sept. 30, 2016

Re: EX4200 (1G Switch) Packet Loss -> 10G Participants

by Mike Horwath

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 09:34:00PM -0500, Jeremy Lumby wrote: > All other moves will happen during the Tuesday afternoon maintenance > window. When? 1200-1700? (trolling for someone to commit to a time so I can get the announcement posted) -- Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau(a)Geeks.ORG

Sept. 30, 2016

Re: EX4200 (1G Switch) Packet Loss -> 10G Participants

by Jeremy Lumby

On the new 4200 side ae0 is made up of xe-0/1/0 and xe-0/1/2 On the existing stack ae11 is made up of xe-0/2/2 and xe-2/0/16 xe-0/1/0 is connected to xe-0/2/2 and xe-0/1/2 is connected to xe-2/0/16 via 10G DAC cables (which I donated) With the exception of the 4 SFP ports and route server #2 that Jay mentioned, all moves will be to the same numbered port on the switch. In the old stack, they are all ge-1/0/x, and on the new 4200, they will all be ge-0/0/x I will keep the x the same so I moved my port from ge-1/0/11 to ge-0/0/11 and the looking glass has also been moved to ge-0/0/0 All other moves will happen during the Tuesday afternoon maintenance window. -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Richard Laager Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 8:59 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] EX4200 (1G Switch) Packet Loss -> 10G Participants I'm assuming these are named "ge-0/0/X", for X in 0 to 23 inclusive; is that correct? Jeremy, which port are you (well, Minnesota VoIP) using on the new switch? What are the port names of two 10G uplinks on the new switch? Of those, which 10G port on the new switch is connected to xe-0/2/2 in the core stack and which is connected to xe-2/0/16? What is the name of the LAG on the new EX4200-24T switch (the other side of ae11 on the core stack)? Is it ae0? -- Richard

Sept. 30, 2016