January 2012 - mice-discuss - lists.micemn.net

Re: 218.147.69.in-addr.arpa + 0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.f.f.f.f.0.1.e.f.7.0.6.2.ip6.arpa

by Doug McIntyre

On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 04:55:31PM -0600, Matthew Beckwell wrote: > I'm curious how we're maintaining reverse DNS-- (historically and going forward). > I noticed some potential housekeeping... I'd like to see ipHouse and (even though I'm not) HE's entries in 0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.f.f.f.f.0.1.e.f.7.0.6.2.ip6.arpa at least updated.. > IP ASN IPv4 Host IPv6 Host > 3 7753 AS7753.micemn.net AS53679-MRS-3.micemn.net > 52 AS6939.micemn.net Since ::3 isn't AS 53679 at all. -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> -- ipHouse/Goldengate/Bitstream/ProNS -- Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Jan. 30, 2012

Re: LAG use

by Doug McIntyre

On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 11:40:19PM +0000, Ryan Goldberg wrote: > Going slightly OT here, but do folks like to use LACP negotiated LAGs, or static LAGs? Just curious.. I prefer static LAGs for setup, although there have been a couple vendors that only do LACP setups that I have to match to make happy. Although typically I'd prefer static setups for most things. No auto-magic for me. -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> -- ipHouse/Goldengate/Bitstream/ProNS -- Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Jan. 28, 2012

Re: LAG use

by Ryan Goldberg

Going slightly OT here, but do folks like to use LACP negotiated LAGs, or static LAGs? Just curious.. Ryan From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 4:22 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] LAG use Sounds like Jay is the only one that has used them on carrier NNIs - can you share a tier 1 or 2 name with me, off-list if you prefer? So far I have HE as the only documented Tier 1/2 carrier that uses them with customers/other providers. Thanks, Frank From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET]<mailto:[mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET]> On Behalf Of Jay Hanke Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 1:13 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET<mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] LAG use On Jan 25, 2012 12:54 PM, "Frank Bulk" <fbulk(a)mypremieronline.com<mailto:fbulk@mypremieronline.com>> wrote: Ok, Reid responded, but he's the only one. Anyone else use LAG to connect for Ethernet circuits? Yes, all the time. Works well but nothin' beats a 10G. :) Jay ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Jan. 27, 2012

218.147.69.in-addr.arpa + 0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.f.f.f.f.0.1.e.f.7.0.6.2.ip6.arpa

by Matthew Beckwell

I'm curious how we're maintaining reverse DNS-- (historically and going forward). I noticed some potential housekeeping... ~Matthew IP ASN IPv4 Host IPv6 Host 1 53679 AS53679-MRS-1.micemn.net AS53679-MRS-1.micemn.net 2 53679 AS53679-MRS-2.micemn.net AS53679-MRS-2.micemn.net 3 7753 AS7753.micemn.net AS53679-MRS-3.micemn.net 4 4181 AS4181.micemn.net 5 21709 6 8015 7 16904 8 22402 9 46131 AS4181.micemn.net 10 11796 AS11796.micemn.net 11 32621 12 33125 13 14 15 16 17 18 12042 AS12042.micemn.net 19 10242 g1-43.usi-cr03-mpls.usinternet.com ip6.g1-43.usi-cr03-mpls.usinternet.com 20 21 22 23 24 25 13746 26 AS3599.micemn.net 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 AS-TBD-44.micemn.net 45 46 47 48 49 AS13576.micemn.net 50 AS32609.micemn.net 51 AS57.micemn.net 52 AS6939.micemn.net 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 53480 ASN53545.micemn.net 101 47096 ASN-TBD-101.micemn.net 102 20338 ASN-TBD-102.micemn.net 103 30032 104 46692 105 15011 106 25852 -- Matthew Beckwell - Senior Network and Application Engineer Advanced Integrated Technologies Office: 952-829-5511 x204 matthewb(a)aitech.net ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Jan. 26, 2012

Fwd: AS4181 TDS Telecom router maintenance at MICE

by Jay Hanke

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: TDSNET ISP Administration <ispadmin(a)tdstelecom.com> Date: Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:52 PM Subject: AS4181 TDS Telecom router maintenance at MICE To: TDSNET ISP Administration <ispadmin(a)tdstelecom.com> Hello peering partners, TDS Telecom, AS4181, will be completing router maintenance on our equipment connected to MICE on January 27, 2012, starting at 22:01 CST. We expect to be offline for approximately 1 hour. You can expect to see your BGP sessions to our network go down during our work. MICE TDS ASN 4181 TDS IPs 69.147.218.4 2607:fe10:ffff::4 If we have reached an incorrect address for this notice, please let us know so that we can update our records. Best Regards, TDS Telecom IP Network Operations ispadmin(a)tdstelecom.com -- Jay Hanke CTO, CCIE #19093 Mankato Networks LLC 619 S Front St Mankato, MN 56001-3838 Google 530-618-2398 jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net http://www.mankatonetworks.com ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Jan. 26, 2012

Re: LAG use

by Owen DeLong

Well, there's always 40GE or 100GE, too. Owen On Jan 25, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Reid Fishler wrote: > Other than 2 10G's LAGed together, of course! > > Reid > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Jay Hanke <jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net> wrote: > On Jan 25, 2012 12:54 PM, "Frank Bulk" <fbulk(a)mypremieronline.com> wrote: > > Ok, Reid responded, but he's the only one. Anyone else use LAG to connect for Ethernet circuits? > > Yes, all the time. Works well but nothin' beats a 10G. :) > > Jay > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > > > > -- > Reid Fishler > Director > Hurricane Electric > +1-510-580-4178 > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Jan. 25, 2012

Re: LAG use

by Frank Bulk

Sounds like Jay is the only one that has used them on carrier NNIs - can you share a tier 1 or 2 name with me, off-list if you prefer? So far I have HE as the only documented Tier 1/2 carrier that uses them with customers/other providers. Thanks, Frank From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Jay Hanke Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 1:13 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] LAG use On Jan 25, 2012 12:54 PM, "Frank Bulk" <fbulk(a)mypremieronline.com<mailto:fbulk@mypremieronline.com>> wrote: Ok, Reid responded, but he's the only one. Anyone else use LAG to connect for Ethernet circuits? Yes, all the time. Works well but nothin' beats a 10G. :) Jay ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Jan. 25, 2012

Re: LAG use

by Frank Bulk

Sounds like Jay is the only one that has used them on carrier NNIs - can you share a tier 1 or 2 name with me, off-list if you prefer? So far I have HE as the only documented Tier 1/2 carrier that uses them with customers/other providers. Thanks, Frank From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Jay Hanke Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 1:13 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] LAG use On Jan 25, 2012 12:54 PM, "Frank Bulk" <fbulk(a)mypremieronline.com<mailto:fbulk@mypremieronline.com>> wrote: Ok, Reid responded, but he's the only one. Anyone else use LAG to connect for Ethernet circuits? Yes, all the time. Works well but nothin' beats a 10G. :) Jay ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Jan. 25, 2012

Re: LAG use

by Anthony Anderberg

The only thing I can think of is that you'd probably want the members of a LAG group to always have very similar performance characteristics (capacity, latency, ect). That's pretty easy with a dedicated lambda/fiber but may require some thought in shared transport environments - for example you'd want to ensure one member couldn't take a longer path and incur a lot more latency than other members. But that's just traffic engineering... We haven't had any requests for such things, but I certainly wouldn't be scared of doing them. Anthony Anderberg Sr. Systems Analyst 320-234-5239 anthonyanderberg(a)nu-telecom.net NU-Telecom -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 12:54 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] LAG use Ok, Reid responded, but he's the only one. Anyone else use LAG to connect for Ethernet circuits? Frank -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 4:44 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] LAG use I've been working with our state's telco coop to enhance our Ethernet circuit redundancy. (This is not for Internet circuits, but Ethernet circuits like wireless backhaul). The coop doesn't do a lot of LAG today, except for large customers that have purchased many circuits. Since our transport gear has that capability and we have the ports we'd like to do it, too. To help bolster our case, we're looking for examples where tier 1/2 carriers do LAG with their customers. Can anyone on this list share (on or off list) some examples)? Frank ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Jan. 25, 2012

Re: LAG use

by Reid Fishler

Other than 2 10G's LAGed together, of course! Reid On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Jay Hanke <jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net>wrote: > On Jan 25, 2012 12:54 PM, "Frank Bulk" <fbulk(a)mypremieronline.com> wrote: > >> Ok, Reid responded, but he's the only one. Anyone else use LAG to >> connect for Ethernet circuits? >> > > Yes, all the time. Works well but nothin' beats a 10G. :) > > Jay > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > -- Reid Fishler Director Hurricane Electric +1-510-580-4178 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Jan. 25, 2012