November 2020 - mice-discuss - lists.micemn.net

Re: MICE Blackhole IP Allocation

by Richard Laager

On 11/22/20 8:11 AM, Jay Hanke wrote: > SIX has a /23 for the peering subnet and the blackhole address sits on > the middle .0 which is old school cidr legal. Good point. > The mice 0 is also the network address which could cause issues arping > with some gear. Fair enough. -- Richard

Nov. 22, 2020

Re: MICE Blackhole IP Allocation

by Jay Hanke

> > Why not .0, as SIX does? > SIX has a /23 for the peering subnet and the blackhole address sits on the middle .0 which is old school cidr legal. The mice 0 is also the network address which could cause issues arping with some gear.

Nov. 22, 2020

Re: MICE Blackhole IP Allocation

by Richard Laager

On 11/21/20 2:20 PM, Jay Hanke wrote: > The following IP addresses have been allocated for the upcoming > blackhole project on the MICE Internet Exchange. > > MICE-BH > IPv4: 206.108.255.228/24 Why not .0, as SIX does? > IPv6: 2001:504:27::6666:dead:beef/64 > > We will be using 66:66:de:ad:be:ef as the mac-address and inject the > arp entry from a virtual machine on the SFN-Remote until a permanent > solution on the main switch is worked out. A VM on the same setup as the route server is a reasonable permanent plan (and I believe was the plan). -- Richard

Nov. 22, 2020

MICE Blackhole IP Allocation

by Jay Hanke

The following IP addresses have been allocated for the upcoming blackhole project on the MICE Internet Exchange. MICE-BH IPv4: 206.108.255.228/24 IPv6: 2001:504:27::6666:dead:beef/64 We will be using 66:66:de:ad:be:ef as the mac-address and inject the arp entry from a virtual machine on the SFN-Remote until a permanent solution on the main switch is worked out. Thanks! -- Jay Hanke, President South Front Networks jayhanke(a)southfront.io Phone 612-204-0000

Nov. 21, 2020

Re: Update PTR

by Frank Bulk

Great, thank you. Frank -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> On Behalf Of Doug McIntyre Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2020 5:00 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Update PTR On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 10:02:16PM +0000, Frank Bulk wrote: >Premier is no longer a part of MICE. > >Can the PTR for 206.108.255.67 be updated so that it doesn't list AS53347.micemn.net? Okay, that is done. I also removed the IPv6 reverse that was setup as well.

Nov. 20, 2020

Re: Update PTR

by Doug McIntyre

On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 10:02:16PM +0000, Frank Bulk wrote: >Premier is no longer a part of MICE. > >Can the PTR for 206.108.255.67 be updated so that it doesn't list AS53347.micemn.net? Okay, that is done. I also removed the IPv6 reverse that was setup as well.

Nov. 18, 2020

Update PTR

by Frank Bulk

Premier is no longer a part of MICE. Can the PTR for 206.108.255.67 be updated so that it doesn't list AS53347.micemn.net? Thanks, Frank

Nov. 18, 2020

Re: PeeringDB Audit Emails

by Jay Hanke

Yes, we have been through this process without progress. :( On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 2:56 PM James Urwiller <james.urwiller(a)turnkey-telecom.com> wrote: > > After talking to a few people at Zayo through normal support channels. They > said that an email has to be sent to peering(a)zayo.com to get this the > visibility it needs. Sorry I couldn’t get any further with this! > > James Urwiller > Network Architect > Stealth Broadband > james.urwiller(a)stealthbroadband.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> On Behalf Of Jay Hanke > Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2020 11:52 > To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET > Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] PeeringDB Audit Emails > > I've gotten several emails from MICE members about IX-F export issues on > PeeringDB. > > MICE provides a list of port/peering information to PeeringDB in JSON format > and they started auditing against what users have entered into the site. The > export is generated from our IXP Manager platform we deployed a couple > months ago. > > The most common mismatch is the user not having the IPv6 address loaded in > PeeringDB. MICE allocates an IPv6 address with every IPv4 allocation. > [insert ipv6 pitch here] > > Members on the Zayo Remote switch in Belle Plaine are currently not > currently included in the export. There is an issue with loading the ports > into IXP manager and we need an admin at Zayo to make a couple of > routing/snmp changes. All of the other switches were completed and loaded > several months ago. > > If someone has a good contact at Zayo for this please let me know. > > -- > Jay Hanke, President > South Front Networks > jayhanke(a)southfront.io > Phone 612-204-0000 -- Jay Hanke, President South Front Networks jayhanke(a)southfront.io Phone 612-204-0000

Nov. 18, 2020

Re: PeeringDB Audit Emails

by James Urwiller

After talking to a few people at Zayo through normal support channels. They said that an email has to be sent to peering(a)zayo.com to get this the visibility it needs. Sorry I couldn’t get any further with this! James Urwiller Network Architect Stealth Broadband james.urwiller(a)stealthbroadband.com -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> On Behalf Of Jay Hanke Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2020 11:52 To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] PeeringDB Audit Emails I've gotten several emails from MICE members about IX-F export issues on PeeringDB. MICE provides a list of port/peering information to PeeringDB in JSON format and they started auditing against what users have entered into the site. The export is generated from our IXP Manager platform we deployed a couple months ago. The most common mismatch is the user not having the IPv6 address loaded in PeeringDB. MICE allocates an IPv6 address with every IPv4 allocation. [insert ipv6 pitch here] Members on the Zayo Remote switch in Belle Plaine are currently not currently included in the export. There is an issue with loading the ports into IXP manager and we need an admin at Zayo to make a couple of routing/snmp changes. All of the other switches were completed and loaded several months ago. If someone has a good contact at Zayo for this please let me know. -- Jay Hanke, President South Front Networks jayhanke(a)southfront.io Phone 612-204-0000

Nov. 18, 2020

Re: PeeringDB Audit Emails

by James Urwiller

I have zero good contacts there.. I will just create a service ticket and see where it gets me James Urwiller Network Architect Stealth Broadband james.urwiller(a)stealthbroadband.com -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> On Behalf Of Jay Hanke Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2020 11:52 To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] PeeringDB Audit Emails I've gotten several emails from MICE members about IX-F export issues on PeeringDB. MICE provides a list of port/peering information to PeeringDB in JSON format and they started auditing against what users have entered into the site. The export is generated from our IXP Manager platform we deployed a couple months ago. The most common mismatch is the user not having the IPv6 address loaded in PeeringDB. MICE allocates an IPv6 address with every IPv4 allocation. [insert ipv6 pitch here] Members on the Zayo Remote switch in Belle Plaine are currently not currently included in the export. There is an issue with loading the ports into IXP manager and we need an admin at Zayo to make a couple of routing/snmp changes. All of the other switches were completed and loaded several months ago. If someone has a good contact at Zayo for this please let me know. -- Jay Hanke, President South Front Networks jayhanke(a)southfront.io Phone 612-204-0000

Nov. 18, 2020