- mice-discuss - lists.micemn.net

Re: IPv6 routing issue

by James Stahr

On 4/3/2013 6:59 AM, Anthony Anderberg wrote: > By my notes HE did have a maintenance window scheduled this morning to do a "Router hardware upgrade to provide for expanded services and upgrades." > > I saw the flaps this morning, but I don't recall receiving a maintenance notification. Do you buy transit from HE? James Stahr CDW ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

April 3, 2013

Re: IPv6 routing issue

by Anthony Anderberg

By my notes HE did have a maintenance window scheduled this morning to do a "Router hardware upgrade to provide for expanded services and upgrades." I see our traffic levels from them dropped quite a bit just after 1:00am and have more-or-less returned to normal now. Anthony Anderberg Sr. Systems Analyst 320-234-5239 anthonyanderberg(a)nu-telecom.net ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

April 3, 2013

IPv6 routing issue

by David Farmer

This morning at approximately 1:30 our peering session with HE reset, I assume for some kind of normal maintenance on their end. This triggered a weird issue on our end. Because of some crufty route policy we were preferring the routes we learned from the MICE route server over the routes we learned directly from HE. And for some reason the routes we were learning from the route server had a different link-local address associated with them than the routes we learned directly. And this address no longer seems to be valid, and this caused traffic to be black holed. From below FE80::224:38FF:FEA7:EA03 - address on routes learned from MICE RS FE80::224:38FF:FEA7:EA36 - address on routes direct from HE I changed my route policy to ignore the routes from HE through the MICE Route Server and things are working again. I'm not sure what changed and why the routes from the MICE Route server have an bogus link-local address. But I though I would warn you all. MTC-GR-01#sh ipv6 ro 2001:470:0:1C2::1 Routing entry for 2001:470::/32 Known via "bgp 57", distance 20, metric 1, type external Route count is 1/1, share count 0 Routing paths: FE80::224:38FF:FEA7:EA03, Vlan300 MPLS label: nolabel MPLS Flags: NSF Last updated 01:43:15 ago MTC-GR-01#sh ipv6 ro 2600:0:2:1239:144:232:26:11 Routing entry for 2600::/29 Known via "bgp 57", distance 20, metric 0, type external Route count is 1/1, share count 0 Routing paths: FE80::224:38FF:FEA7:EA36, Vlan300 MPLS label: nolabel MPLS Flags: NSF Last updated 01:43:52 ago -- ================================================ David Farmer Email: farmer(a)umn.edu Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 1-612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 1-612-812-9952 ================================================ ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

April 3, 2013

Re: Integra's Status

by Mike Bushard, Jr

Thanks Tony. On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Radzwon, Tony < Tony.Radzwon(a)integratelecom.com> wrote: > Jay is correct, it specifically affected Arvig and possibly others in > Northern Minnesota, we have an older Cisco 7600 in St.Cloud that needed to > have Next-Hop-Self turned on to be able to reach those specific customers > via BGP. The Integra NOC is suppose to make the addition during a > Maintenance window, sorry for this not going faster, we are trying to > slowly integrate the MICE & other Sites into being Maintained by our NOC > rather than Engineering. > > Regards, > > Tony > > Tony Radzwon | Network Engineer > direct 612.436.8009 | mobile 612.986.5715 > Integra | 511 11th ave. s. | Suite 340 > | Minneapolis, MN 55415 > www.integratelecom.com <http://www.integratelecom.com> > > <http://www.integratelecom.com/> <http://www.facebook.com/IntegraTelecom> > <http://twitter.com/Integra_Telecom> > <http://www.linkedin.com/company/integra> > > > > > > > > > > On 3/25/13 8:15 AM, "Jay Hanke" <jayhanke(a)MANKATONETWORKS.NET> wrote: > > >IIRC, the issue was with a specific prefix within Integra. The > >traceroutes indicated that the problem was after the MICE portion so > >one only saw the issue if they were talking to a specific IP range. > > > >Jay > > > >On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Mike Bushard, Jr > ><mike.bushard(a)arvig.com> wrote: > >> We did have complaints from customers. > >> > >> Mike Bushard Jr > >> | Network Engineer IV > >> | Arvig > >> | 320.256.0178 direct > >> | 320.429.0837 Mobile > >> > >> Sent from my Verizon Wireless DROID RAZR by Motorola > >> > >> Please excuse short responses and spelling errors. > >> > >> On Mar 24, 2013 12:47 PM, "Jeremy Lumby" <jlumby(a)mnvoip.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Just checking to see if anyone knows what is going on with Integra. > >>>After > >>> the issues they had over a week ago, they have not responded to emails > >>>I > >>> sent to their peering address, as well as they never seemed to give a > >>>clear > >>> indication of what the issue really was in the first place. I was > >>>running > >>> RTP across the MICE connection to them at the time that they > >>>supposedly had > >>> 50% packet loss. I sure would have expected a whole lot of complaints > >>>if > >>> there was 50% loss. I never got a single complaint. Did anyone see > >>>this > >>> loss on their end? > >>> > >>> > >>>######################################################################## > >>> > >>> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > >>> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > >> > >> > >> ________________________________ > >> > >> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > >> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > > > > > > >-- > >Jay Hanke > >CTO, CCIE #19093 > >Mankato Networks LLC > >PO Box 54 > >619 S Front St > >Mankato, MN 56001-3838 > >Google 530-618-2398 > >jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net > >http://www.mankatonetworks.com > >http://www.neutralpath.net > > > >######################################################################## > > > >To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > >http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > -- Mike Bushard Jr | Network Engineer IV *| *Arvig | 320.256.7471 Office | 320.256.0178 Direct | 320.429.0837 Mobile | 320.256.7555 Fax ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 25, 2013

Re: Integra's Status

by David Farmer

Thanks for the explanation. However, is there an ETA for Integra to restore its peering at MICE? Thanks again. On 3/25/13 08:30 , Radzwon, Tony wrote: > Jay is correct, it specifically affected Arvig and possibly others in > Northern Minnesota, we have an older Cisco 7600 in St.Cloud that needed to > have Next-Hop-Self turned on to be able to reach those specific customers > via BGP. The Integra NOC is suppose to make the addition during a > Maintenance window, sorry for this not going faster, we are trying to > slowly integrate the MICE & other Sites into being Maintained by our NOC > rather than Engineering. > > Regards, > > Tony > > Tony Radzwon | Network Engineer > direct 612.436.8009 | mobile 612.986.5715 > Integra | 511 11th ave. s. | Suite 340 > | Minneapolis, MN 55415 > www.integratelecom.com <http://www.integratelecom.com> > > <http://www.integratelecom.com/> <http://www.facebook.com/IntegraTelecom> > <http://twitter.com/Integra_Telecom> > <http://www.linkedin.com/company/integra> > > > > > > > > > > On 3/25/13 8:15 AM, "Jay Hanke" <jayhanke(a)MANKATONETWORKS.NET> wrote: > >> IIRC, the issue was with a specific prefix within Integra. The >> traceroutes indicated that the problem was after the MICE portion so >> one only saw the issue if they were talking to a specific IP range. >> >> Jay >> >> On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Mike Bushard, Jr >> <mike.bushard(a)arvig.com> wrote: >>> We did have complaints from customers. >>> >>> Mike Bushard Jr >>> | Network Engineer IV >>> | Arvig >>> | 320.256.0178 direct >>> | 320.429.0837 Mobile >>> >>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless DROID RAZR by Motorola >>> >>> Please excuse short responses and spelling errors. >>> >>> On Mar 24, 2013 12:47 PM, "Jeremy Lumby" <jlumby(a)mnvoip.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Just checking to see if anyone knows what is going on with Integra. >>>> After >>>> the issues they had over a week ago, they have not responded to emails >>>> I >>>> sent to their peering address, as well as they never seemed to give a >>>> clear >>>> indication of what the issue really was in the first place. I was >>>> running >>>> RTP across the MICE connection to them at the time that they >>>> supposedly had >>>> 50% packet loss. I sure would have expected a whole lot of complaints >>>> if >>>> there was 50% loss. I never got a single complaint. Did anyone see >>>> this >>>> loss on their end? >>>> >>>> >>>> ######################################################################## >>>> >>>> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: >>>> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> >>> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: >>> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 >> >> >> >> -- >> Jay Hanke >> CTO, CCIE #19093 >> Mankato Networks LLC >> PO Box 54 >> 619 S Front St >> Mankato, MN 56001-3838 >> Google 530-618-2398 >> jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net >> http://www.mankatonetworks.com >> http://www.neutralpath.net >> >> ######################################################################## >> >> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: >> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > -- ================================================ David Farmer Email: farmer(a)umn.edu Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 1-612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 1-612-812-9952 ================================================ ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 25, 2013

Re: Integra's Status

by Radzwon, Tony

Jay is correct, it specifically affected Arvig and possibly others in Northern Minnesota, we have an older Cisco 7600 in St.Cloud that needed to have Next-Hop-Self turned on to be able to reach those specific customers via BGP. The Integra NOC is suppose to make the addition during a Maintenance window, sorry for this not going faster, we are trying to slowly integrate the MICE & other Sites into being Maintained by our NOC rather than Engineering. Regards, Tony Tony Radzwon | Network Engineer direct 612.436.8009 | mobile 612.986.5715 Integra | 511 11th ave. s. | Suite 340 | Minneapolis, MN 55415 www.integratelecom.com <http://www.integratelecom.com> <http://www.integratelecom.com/> <http://www.facebook.com/IntegraTelecom> <http://twitter.com/Integra_Telecom> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/integra> On 3/25/13 8:15 AM, "Jay Hanke" <jayhanke(a)MANKATONETWORKS.NET> wrote: >IIRC, the issue was with a specific prefix within Integra. The >traceroutes indicated that the problem was after the MICE portion so >one only saw the issue if they were talking to a specific IP range. > >Jay > >On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Mike Bushard, Jr ><mike.bushard(a)arvig.com> wrote: >> We did have complaints from customers. >> >> Mike Bushard Jr >> | Network Engineer IV >> | Arvig >> | 320.256.0178 direct >> | 320.429.0837 Mobile >> >> Sent from my Verizon Wireless DROID RAZR by Motorola >> >> Please excuse short responses and spelling errors. >> >> On Mar 24, 2013 12:47 PM, "Jeremy Lumby" <jlumby(a)mnvoip.com> wrote: >>> >>> Just checking to see if anyone knows what is going on with Integra. >>>After >>> the issues they had over a week ago, they have not responded to emails >>>I >>> sent to their peering address, as well as they never seemed to give a >>>clear >>> indication of what the issue really was in the first place. I was >>>running >>> RTP across the MICE connection to them at the time that they >>>supposedly had >>> 50% packet loss. I sure would have expected a whole lot of complaints >>>if >>> there was 50% loss. I never got a single complaint. Did anyone see >>>this >>> loss on their end? >>> >>> >>>######################################################################## >>> >>> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: >>> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: >> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > > >-- >Jay Hanke >CTO, CCIE #19093 >Mankato Networks LLC >PO Box 54 >619 S Front St >Mankato, MN 56001-3838 >Google 530-618-2398 >jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net >http://www.mankatonetworks.com >http://www.neutralpath.net > >######################################################################## > >To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: >http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 25, 2013

Re: Integra's Status

by Jay Hanke

IIRC, the issue was with a specific prefix within Integra. The traceroutes indicated that the problem was after the MICE portion so one only saw the issue if they were talking to a specific IP range. Jay On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Mike Bushard, Jr <mike.bushard(a)arvig.com> wrote: > We did have complaints from customers. > > Mike Bushard Jr > | Network Engineer IV > | Arvig > | 320.256.0178 direct > | 320.429.0837 Mobile > > Sent from my Verizon Wireless DROID RAZR by Motorola > > Please excuse short responses and spelling errors. > > On Mar 24, 2013 12:47 PM, "Jeremy Lumby" <jlumby(a)mnvoip.com> wrote: >> >> Just checking to see if anyone knows what is going on with Integra. After >> the issues they had over a week ago, they have not responded to emails I >> sent to their peering address, as well as they never seemed to give a clear >> indication of what the issue really was in the first place. I was running >> RTP across the MICE connection to them at the time that they supposedly had >> 50% packet loss. I sure would have expected a whole lot of complaints if >> there was 50% loss. I never got a single complaint. Did anyone see this >> loss on their end? >> >> ######################################################################## >> >> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: >> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > > ________________________________ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 -- Jay Hanke CTO, CCIE #19093 Mankato Networks LLC PO Box 54 619 S Front St Mankato, MN 56001-3838 Google 530-618-2398 jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net http://www.mankatonetworks.com http://www.neutralpath.net ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 25, 2013

Re: Integra's Status

by Mike Bushard, Jr

We did have complaints from customers. Mike Bushard Jr | Network Engineer IV | Arvig | 320.256.0178 direct | 320.429.0837 Mobile Sent from my Verizon Wireless DROID RAZR by Motorola Please excuse short responses and spelling errors. On Mar 24, 2013 12:47 PM, "Jeremy Lumby" <jlumby(a)mnvoip.com> wrote: > Just checking to see if anyone knows what is going on with Integra. After > the issues they had over a week ago, they have not responded to emails I > sent to their peering address, as well as they never seemed to give a clear > indication of what the issue really was in the first place. I was running > RTP across the MICE connection to them at the time that they supposedly had > 50% packet loss. I sure would have expected a whole lot of complaints if > there was 50% loss. I never got a single complaint. Did anyone see this > loss on their end? > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 24, 2013

Integra's Status

by Jeremy Lumby

Just checking to see if anyone knows what is going on with Integra. After the issues they had over a week ago, they have not responded to emails I sent to their peering address, as well as they never seemed to give a clear indication of what the issue really was in the first place. I was running RTP across the MICE connection to them at the time that they supposedly had 50% packet loss. I sure would have expected a whole lot of complaints if there was 50% loss. I never got a single complaint. Did anyone see this loss on their end? ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 24, 2013

Re: [OFF-TOPIC] 24x7 Outsourced NOC

by John Unger

They are an excellent resource! Their NOC is very nice. Minneapolis MN | Alexandria MN | St. Cloud MN| Fargo ND | Milwaukee WI John Unger President d: 612.238.1601 c: 612.325.2909 john(a)vaultas.com www.vaultas.com This message is intended only for the named recipient(s) and may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any misdirected transmission. If you received this message in error, please notify us immediately by telephone at 612.325.2909 and immediately delete this message from your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose, distribute or copy any part of this message. -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Chris Scheidecker Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2013 8:39 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] [OFF-TOPIC] 24x7 Outsourced NOC What sort of requirements do you have? Atomic Data provides this service to several customers already. Chris Scheidecker - Infrastructure Engineer Atomic Data 615 North 3rd Street Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.466.2000 Main Line 612.466.2044 Direct Dial Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn Simple. Safe. Smart. www.atomicdata.com This message and any information or attachments included therewith is intended only for the individual or entity named above. If the reader is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copy of this message or any information attached or contained therein is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the message and any attachments. Thank you. Please consider the environment before printing this email. On Mar 23, 2013, at 3:39 PM, "Jay Hanke" <jayhanke(a)MANKATONETWORKS.NET> wrote: > Does anyone here work with an outsourced NOC? It needs to be 24x7 and > located within the US. > > -- > Jay Hanke > CTO, CCIE #19093 > Mankato Networks LLC > PO Box 54 > 619 S Front St > Mankato, MN 56001-3838 > Google 530-618-2398 > jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net > http://www.mankatonetworks.com > http://www.neutralpath.net > > ###################################################################### > ## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 24, 2013