- mice-discuss - lists.micemn.net

MICE People (Was: Re: MICE core switch maintenance window - 10/27/2016 12:30AM-1:00AM CDT)

by Richard Laager

On 10/25/2016 01:56 PM, Richard Laager wrote: > On 10/25/2016 09:40 AM, Andrew Hoyos wrote: >> My suggestion would be for the formal creation of a technical committee by the board > > This is something I intend to work on soon, but the tax-exempt thing is > higher priority. > > I'm envisioning: > > 1) making a page on the MICE website like the following page: > https://www.seattleix.net/whos-who This is now done, and was reviewed by the people mentioned: http://micemn.net/people.html > 2) asking the board to ACK its contents The officers were previously appointed by board vote. We just now ACK'ed the committees. It's definitely all official now. > 3) asking for a MICE-TECH and/or MICE-OPS list be created (depending on > whether we have distinct groups and what those people want). I expect at > least one list will be closed to members only. This was discussed previously and there wasn't a lot of interest. -- Richard

March 1, 2017

Arista

by Jason Hanke

Did the switch arrive in one piece? -- Jay Hanke CTO Neutral Path Communications 3 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 204 Mankato, MN 56001 (507) 327-2398 mobile jayhanke(a)neutralpath.net www.neutralpath.net

March 1, 2017

Re: Arista switch!

by Scott Strelitz

Jay- Let me know if you need any help with anything as you get it set up. Make sure you have your account with Arista TAC all set as well and we can get you all lit up! Thanks, Scott *Scott Strelitz* Sales Director North Central *Arista Networks, Inc. * Ph: 1-847-833-5330 Email: sstrelitz(a)arista.com Web: www.arista.com Software Driven Cloud Networking <https://www.linkedin.com/company/arista-networks-inc> <https://www.facebook.com/AristaNW/> <https://twitter.com/aristanetworks> <https://www.youtube.com/user/AristaNetworks>2016 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Data Center Networking <https://www.gartner.com/doc/reprints?ct=160517&id=1-36UFTCZ&st=sb> On February 28, 2017 at 9:37:04 AM, Jason Hanke (jayhanke(a)neutralpath.net) wrote: FedEx says it's going to deliver today! https://www.fedex.com/apps/fedextrack/?tracknumbers=674799919944&language=e… -- Jay Hanke CTO Neutral Path Communications 3 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 204 Mankato, MN 56001 (507) 327-2398 mobile jayhanke(a)neutralpath.net www.neutralpath.net ------------------------------ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Feb. 28, 2017

Arista switch!

by Jason Hanke

FedEx says it's going to deliver today! https://www.fedex.com/apps/fedextrack/?tracknumbers=674799919944&language=e… -- Jay Hanke CTO Neutral Path Communications 3 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 204 Mankato, MN 56001 (507) 327-2398 mobile jayhanke(a)neutralpath.net www.neutralpath.net

Feb. 28, 2017

Re: Youtube issues

by Shaun Carlson

I did notice that the local cache seems to have a little more traffic than usual lately. I wonder if that's related. s Shaun Carlson Director of Information Technology | Arvig ph: (218) (tel:(218)%C2%A0346-8673)346-8673 (tel:(218)%C2%A0346-8673) | em: shaun.carlson(a)arvig.com (mailto:shaun.carlson@arvig.com) On Feb 24, 2017, 21:00 -0600, Ben Wiechman <ben.wiechman(a)arvig.com>, wrote: > We're trying to track down specific reports. We have a local cache so I think that is masking most of the potential issues. One or two folks mentioned some Youtube buffering after being informed of a potential issue so it seems likely there is some impact, but I couldn't say with complete certainty that congestion through MICE is the cause. > > I did open a ticket with Google as well to see if they would make a specific recommendation or otherwise comment on their suggested course of action to minimize customer impact. We'll see what they say. > > We've needed an excuse to review how we are advertising our prefixes to Google anyway. > > Our interest was in taking a (semi) proactive stance to attempt to prioritize other sources until this issue is resolved. > > > Ben Wiechman > Network Engineer IV | Arvig > Direct: 320.256.0184 (tel:320.256.0184) > Cell: 320.247.3224 (tel:320.247.3224) > Office: 320.256.7471 (tel:320.256.7471) > ben.wiechman(a)arvig.com (mailto:ben.wiechman@arvig.com) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Andrew Hoyos <hoyosa(a)gmail.com (mailto:hoyosa@gmail.com)> wrote: > > Ben, is Arvig seeing problems too? > > > > Seems like at this scale and number of complaints, Google should work their black magic to shed some traffic to different GGC nodes, rather than all of us having to actively try and coerce traffic elsewhere. > > > > There clearly seems to be an issue here, and Google has yet to ack. > > > > -- > > Andrew Hoyos > > hoyosa(a)gmail.com (mailto:hoyosa@gmail.com) > > > > > > On Feb 24, 2017, at 8:46 PM, Ben Wiechman <ben.wiechman(a)ARVIG.COM (mailto:ben.wiechman@ARVIG.COM)> wrote: > > > > > To confirm what others have found to be effective. > > > > > > Are you advertising community 15169:13000 to the route servers, and on any direct peering sessions with AS36040? > > > > > > > > > Ben Wiechman > > > Network Engineer IV | Arvig > > > Direct: 320.256.0184 (tel:(320)%20256-0184) > > > Cell: 320.247.3224 (tel:(320)%20247-3224) > > > Office: 320.256.7471 (tel:(320)%20256-7471) > > > ben.wiechman(a)arvig.com (mailto:ben.wiechman@arvig.com) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Mike Horwath <drechsau(a)geeks.org (mailto:drechsau@geeks.org)> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:38:43AM -0600, Andrew Hoyos wrote: > > > > > > On Feb 24, 2017, at 10:26 AM, Mike Horwath <drechsau(a)Geeks.ORG (mailto:drechsau@Geeks.ORG)> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 08:56:33AM -0600, Andrew Hoyos wrote: > > > > > >> 36040 is a customer of HE.net (http://HE.net) in MSP, so you'd need to send those to > > > > > >> HE as well if you peer with them or are a customer. Otherwise they > > > > > >> will learn your prefixes that way too, sans communities. > > > > > > > > > > > > Why is a customer sending other peoples' routes into HE to then go > > > > > > into the exchange? > > > > > > > > > > 36040 is a customer of HE.net (http://HE.net) So, HE.net (http://HE.net) is sending them a full > > > > > table or some subset (including their peers and customers), as > > > > > expected. > > > > > > > > I misread and now understand. > > > > > > > > Thank you! > > > > > > > > I had taken it the other way which was making no freakin' sense at all > > > > in todays world of interconnectivity. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau(a)Geeks.ORG (mailto:drechsau@Geeks.ORG) > > > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > > > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 >

Feb. 25, 2017

Re: Youtube issues

by Ben Wiechman

We're trying to track down specific reports. We have a local cache so I think that is masking most of the potential issues. One or two folks mentioned some Youtube buffering after being informed of a potential issue so it seems likely there is some impact, but I couldn't say with complete certainty that congestion through MICE is the cause. I did open a ticket with Google as well to see if they would make a specific recommendation or otherwise comment on their suggested course of action to minimize customer impact. We'll see what they say. We've needed an excuse to review how we are advertising our prefixes to Google anyway. Our interest was in taking a (semi) proactive stance to attempt to prioritize other sources until this issue is resolved. Ben Wiechman Network Engineer IV | Arvig Direct: 320.256.0184 Cell: 320.247.3224 Office: 320.256.7471 ben.wiechman(a)arvig.com On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 8:54 PM, Andrew Hoyos <hoyosa(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Ben, is Arvig seeing problems too? > > Seems like at this scale and number of complaints, Google should work > their black magic to shed some traffic to different GGC nodes, rather than > all of us having to actively try and coerce traffic elsewhere. > > There clearly seems to be an issue here, and Google has yet to ack. > > -- > Andrew Hoyos > hoyosa(a)gmail.com > > On Feb 24, 2017, at 8:46 PM, Ben Wiechman <ben.wiechman(a)ARVIG.COM> wrote: > > To confirm what others have found to be effective. > > Are you advertising community 15169:13000 to the route servers, and on any > direct peering sessions with AS36040? > > > Ben Wiechman > Network Engineer IV | Arvig > Direct: 320.256.0184 <(320)%20256-0184> > Cell: 320.247.3224 <(320)%20247-3224> > Office: 320.256.7471 <(320)%20256-7471> > ben.wiechman(a)arvig.com > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Mike Horwath <drechsau(a)geeks.org> wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:38:43AM -0600, Andrew Hoyos wrote: >> > > On Feb 24, 2017, at 10:26 AM, Mike Horwath <drechsau(a)Geeks.ORG> >> wrote: >> > > >> > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 08:56:33AM -0600, Andrew Hoyos wrote: >> > >> 36040 is a customer of HE.net in MSP, so you'd need to send those to >> > >> HE as well if you peer with them or are a customer. Otherwise they >> > >> will learn your prefixes that way too, sans communities. >> > > >> > > Why is a customer sending other peoples' routes into HE to then go >> > > into the exchange? >> > >> > 36040 is a customer of HE.net. So, HE.net is sending them a full >> > table or some subset (including their peers and customers), as >> > expected. >> >> I misread and now understand. >> >> Thank you! >> >> I had taken it the other way which was making no freakin' sense at all >> in todays world of interconnectivity. >> >> -- >> Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau(a)Geeks.ORG >> > > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 >

Feb. 25, 2017

Re: Youtube issues

by Andrew Hoyos

Ben, is Arvig seeing problems too? Seems like at this scale and number of complaints, Google should work their black magic to shed some traffic to different GGC nodes, rather than all of us having to actively try and coerce traffic elsewhere. There clearly seems to be an issue here, and Google has yet to ack. -- Andrew Hoyos hoyosa(a)gmail.com > On Feb 24, 2017, at 8:46 PM, Ben Wiechman <ben.wiechman(a)ARVIG.COM> wrote: > > To confirm what others have found to be effective. > > Are you advertising community 15169:13000 to the route servers, and on any direct peering sessions with AS36040? > > > Ben Wiechman > Network Engineer IV | Arvig > Direct: 320.256.0184 > Cell: 320.247.3224 > Office: 320.256.7471 > ben.wiechman(a)arvig.com > >> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Mike Horwath <drechsau(a)geeks.org> wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:38:43AM -0600, Andrew Hoyos wrote: >> > > On Feb 24, 2017, at 10:26 AM, Mike Horwath <drechsau(a)Geeks.ORG> wrote: >> > > >> > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 08:56:33AM -0600, Andrew Hoyos wrote: >> > >> 36040 is a customer of HE.net in MSP, so you'd need to send those to >> > >> HE as well if you peer with them or are a customer. Otherwise they >> > >> will learn your prefixes that way too, sans communities. >> > > >> > > Why is a customer sending other peoples' routes into HE to then go >> > > into the exchange? >> > >> > 36040 is a customer of HE.net. So, HE.net is sending them a full >> > table or some subset (including their peers and customers), as >> > expected. >> >> I misread and now understand. >> >> Thank you! >> >> I had taken it the other way which was making no freakin' sense at all >> in todays world of interconnectivity. >> >> -- >> Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau(a)Geeks.ORG > > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Feb. 25, 2017

Re: Youtube issues

by Ben Wiechman

To confirm what others have found to be effective. Are you advertising community 15169:13000 to the route servers, and on any direct peering sessions with AS36040? Ben Wiechman Network Engineer IV | Arvig Direct: 320.256.0184 Cell: 320.247.3224 Office: 320.256.7471 ben.wiechman(a)arvig.com On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Mike Horwath <drechsau(a)geeks.org> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:38:43AM -0600, Andrew Hoyos wrote: > > > On Feb 24, 2017, at 10:26 AM, Mike Horwath <drechsau(a)Geeks.ORG> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 08:56:33AM -0600, Andrew Hoyos wrote: > > >> 36040 is a customer of HE.net in MSP, so you'd need to send those to > > >> HE as well if you peer with them or are a customer. Otherwise they > > >> will learn your prefixes that way too, sans communities. > > > > > > Why is a customer sending other peoples' routes into HE to then go > > > into the exchange? > > > > 36040 is a customer of HE.net. So, HE.net is sending them a full > > table or some subset (including their peers and customers), as > > expected. > > I misread and now understand. > > Thank you! > > I had taken it the other way which was making no freakin' sense at all > in todays world of interconnectivity. > > -- > Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau(a)Geeks.ORG >

Feb. 25, 2017

Re: Youtube issues

by Mike Horwath

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:38:43AM -0600, Andrew Hoyos wrote: > > On Feb 24, 2017, at 10:26 AM, Mike Horwath <drechsau(a)Geeks.ORG> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 08:56:33AM -0600, Andrew Hoyos wrote: > >> 36040 is a customer of HE.net in MSP, so you'd need to send those to > >> HE as well if you peer with them or are a customer. Otherwise they > >> will learn your prefixes that way too, sans communities. > > > > Why is a customer sending other peoples' routes into HE to then go > > into the exchange? > > 36040 is a customer of HE.net. So, HE.net is sending them a full > table or some subset (including their peers and customers), as > expected. I misread and now understand. Thank you! I had taken it the other way which was making no freakin' sense at all in todays world of interconnectivity. -- Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau(a)Geeks.ORG

Feb. 24, 2017

Re: Youtube issues

by Andrew Hoyos

> On Feb 24, 2017, at 10:26 AM, Mike Horwath <drechsau(a)Geeks.ORG> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 08:56:33AM -0600, Andrew Hoyos wrote: >> 36040 is a customer of HE.net in MSP, so you'd need to send those to >> HE as well if you peer with them or are a customer. Otherwise they >> will learn your prefixes that way too, sans communities. > > Why is a customer sending other peoples' routes into HE to then go > into the exchange? 36040 is a customer of HE.net. So, HE.net is sending them a full table or some subset (including their peers and customers), as expected. In turn, HE.net will advertise to *you*, their customer routes (including 36040, note the _6939_36040 path there), being learned via HE.net 208.117.253.0/24 *[BGP/170] 19:20:53, MED 0, localpref 200 AS path: 6939 36040 I, validation-state: unverified > to 206.108.255.52 via xe-0/0/0.0 Just saying, that if you depeer 36040, or add communities on a bilateral session to them, you’ll need to do the same if peering with HE.net or a customer of HE.net, as 36040 will learn your prefixes from 6939 too.

Feb. 24, 2017

Re: Youtube issues

by Mike Horwath

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 08:56:33AM -0600, Andrew Hoyos wrote: > 36040 is a customer of HE.net in MSP, so you'd need to send those to > HE as well if you peer with them or are a customer. Otherwise they > will learn your prefixes that way too, sans communities. Why is a customer sending other peoples' routes into HE to then go into the exchange? -- Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau(a)Geeks.ORG

Feb. 24, 2017

Re: Youtube issues

by Andrew Hoyos

36040 is a customer of HE.net in MSP, so you'd need to send those to HE as well if you peer with them or are a customer. Otherwise they will learn your prefixes that way too, sans communities. -- Andrew Hoyos hoyosa(a)gmail.com > On Feb 24, 2017, at 8:53 AM, Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)IPHOUSE.NET> wrote: > > FWIW: in discussion with others, using communities back to the route-servers that > tell them to not pass your prefix onto Google does NOT seem to work. They seem > to cache and hold onto your information even after BGP prefix withdrawl. > > Going more active like below seems to be more effective. > > > >> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 07:57:00AM -0600, Jeremy Lumby wrote: >> Matthew, >> >> As part of the tech committee, I recommend Colin's solution of Community Strings that I have copied in below. This should give everyone the control they need to help their connection until Google completes the upgrade. >> >> Jeremy >> >> >> We've had success with the action communities documented here: >> >> https://isp.google.com/static/downloads/BGPCommunitySupport.pdf >> >> Sending 15169:* to 36040 seems to work, including via route servers. >> >> -- >> Colin Baker >> SupraNet Communications, Inc. >> (608) 572-7634 >> colinb(a)supranet.net >> >> >> From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Matthew Beckwell >> Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 7:48 AM >> To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET >> Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Youtube issues >> >> If it's creating issues for other members, it's time to take action until the 2 new 10G's are in place. >> >> What are our options? >> Remove from the route server? Ask large users to take one for the team and use their own transit for awhile? >> >> We need the technical committee to take the lead here. >> ~Matthew >> >> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 11:47 PM, Richard Laager <rlaager(a)wiktel.com> wrote: >> I would imagine it is related to the Google congestion. We were seeing YouTube buffering yesterday. >> >> -- >> Richard >> >> >> >> >> >> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: >> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > -- > Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> > ~.~ ipHouse ~.~ > Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades

Feb. 24, 2017

Re: Youtube issues

by Doug McIntyre

FWIW: in discussion with others, using communities back to the route-servers that tell them to not pass your prefix onto Google does NOT seem to work. They seem to cache and hold onto your information even after BGP prefix withdrawl. Going more active like below seems to be more effective. On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 07:57:00AM -0600, Jeremy Lumby wrote: > Matthew, > > As part of the tech committee, I recommend Colin's solution of Community Strings that I have copied in below. This should give everyone the control they need to help their connection until Google completes the upgrade. > > Jeremy > > > We've had success with the action communities documented here: > > https://isp.google.com/static/downloads/BGPCommunitySupport.pdf > > Sending 15169:* to 36040 seems to work, including via route servers. > > -- > Colin Baker > SupraNet Communications, Inc. > (608) 572-7634 > colinb(a)supranet.net > > > From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Matthew Beckwell > Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 7:48 AM > To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET > Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Youtube issues > > If it's creating issues for other members, it's time to take action until the 2 new 10G's are in place. > > What are our options? > Remove from the route server? Ask large users to take one for the team and use their own transit for awhile? > > We need the technical committee to take the lead here. > ~Matthew > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 11:47 PM, Richard Laager <rlaager(a)wiktel.com> wrote: > I would imagine it is related to the Google congestion. We were seeing YouTube buffering yesterday. > > -- > Richard > > > > > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> ~.~ ipHouse ~.~ Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades

Feb. 24, 2017

Re: Youtube issues

by Jeremy Lumby

Matthew, As part of the tech committee, I recommend Colin's solution of Community Strings that I have copied in below. This should give everyone the control they need to help their connection until Google completes the upgrade. Jeremy We've had success with the action communities documented here: https://isp.google.com/static/downloads/BGPCommunitySupport.pdf Sending 15169:* to 36040 seems to work, including via route servers. -- Colin Baker SupraNet Communications, Inc. (608) 572-7634 colinb(a)supranet.net From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Matthew Beckwell Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 7:48 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Youtube issues If it's creating issues for other members, it's time to take action until the 2 new 10G's are in place. What are our options? Remove from the route server? Ask large users to take one for the team and use their own transit for awhile? We need the technical committee to take the lead here. ~Matthew On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 11:47 PM, Richard Laager <rlaager(a)wiktel.com> wrote: I would imagine it is related to the Google congestion. We were seeing YouTube buffering yesterday. -- Richard To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Feb. 24, 2017

Re: Youtube issues

by Matthew Beckwell

If it's creating issues for other members, it's time to take action until the 2 new 10G's are in place. What are our options? Remove from the route server? Ask large users to take one for the team and use their own transit for awhile? We need the technical committee to take the lead here. ~Matthew On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 11:47 PM, Richard Laager <rlaager(a)wiktel.com> wrote: > I would imagine it is related to the Google congestion. We were seeing > YouTube buffering yesterday. > > -- > Richard

Feb. 24, 2017

Re: Youtube issues

by Richard Laager

I would imagine it is related to the Google congestion. We were seeing YouTube buffering yesterday. -- Richard

Feb. 24, 2017

Youtube issues

by Jason Hanke

I'm seeing intermittent youtube issues on charter. Is anyone else seeing it? Mostly audio issues.

Feb. 24, 2017

Re: Google congestion?

by Colin Baker

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 5:09 PM, Richard Laager <rlaager(a)WIKTEL.COM> wrote: > I'm guessing this did not happen. > > Google's MICE LAG is flat-topped at 40G again, and the complaints have > restarted from my customers. > > I'm trying to re-route my traffic through the use of route server > communities, but so far no luck according to: > http://redirector.c.youtube.com/report_mapping We've had success with the action communities documented here: https://isp.google.com/static/downloads/BGPCommunitySupport.pdf Sending 15169:* to 36040 seems to work, including via route servers. -- Colin Baker SupraNet Communications, Inc. (608) 572-7634 colinb(a)supranet.net

Feb. 22, 2017

Re: Google congestion?

by Andrew Hoyos

> On Feb 22, 2017, at 5:09 PM, Richard Laager <rlaager(a)WIKTEL.COM> wrote: > > I'm guessing this did not happen. > > Google's MICE LAG is flat-topped at 40G again, and the complaints have > restarted from my customers. > > I'm trying to re-route my traffic through the use of route server > communities, but so far no luck according to: > http://redirector.c.youtube.com/report_mapping Good to hear we’re not the only ones. Google claiming their magic sauce should spread the load around if congestion, but that doesn’t seem to be happening. We’ve got few tickets open. One caveat, is that HE.net appears to be providing transit to 36040 there, so if you’re a direct/indirect customer or peer of HE.net (which you appear to be via CNS, and I’m guessing via MICE too) they are advertising your prefixes to 36040 anyway. -- Andrew Hoyos hoyosa(a)gmail.com

Feb. 22, 2017

Re: Google congestion?

by Doug McIntyre

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 05:09:38PM -0600, Richard Laager wrote: > On 02/21/2017 05:12 PM, Jason Hanke wrote: > > They're in the process of adding 2x10g right now. > > I'm guessing this did not happen. In process, as in lines are being ordered, optics being ordered.. Not to the point yet of just plugging it in. due date unknown.. -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> ~.~ ipHouse ~.~ Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades

Feb. 22, 2017

Re: Google congestion?

by Richard Laager

On 02/21/2017 05:12 PM, Jason Hanke wrote: > They're in the process of adding 2x10g right now. I'm guessing this did not happen. Google's MICE LAG is flat-topped at 40G again, and the complaints have restarted from my customers. I'm trying to re-route my traffic through the use of route server communities, but so far no luck according to: http://redirector.c.youtube.com/report_mapping -- Richard

Feb. 22, 2017

Re: Google congestion?

by Jason Hanke

They're in the process of adding 2x10g right now. On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Andrew Hoyos <hoyosa(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Is Google currently 4x10g? > Looks like it’s full. > > We’ve had various customer complaints about youtube stuff not working, and have shut down our peering session with them. > > -- > Andrew Hoyos > hoyosa(a)gmail.com -- Jay Hanke CTO Neutral Path Communications 3 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 204 Mankato, MN 56001 (507) 327-2398 mobile jayhanke(a)neutralpath.net www.neutralpath.net

Feb. 21, 2017

Google congestion?

by Andrew Hoyos

Is Google currently 4x10g? Looks like it’s full. We’ve had various customer complaints about youtube stuff not working, and have shut down our peering session with them. -- Andrew Hoyos hoyosa(a)gmail.com

Feb. 21, 2017

Re: BGP Large Communities

by Doug McIntyre

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 03:54:21PM -0600, Jonathan Stewart wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:37 AM, David Farmer <farmer(a)umn.edu> wrote: > > > BIRD 1.6.3 support it, <snip> > > > What version of BIRD is MICE running now? > > We are running 1.6.3, but no members are asking for large BGP community > support yet. Version 1.6.0 -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> ~.~ ipHouse ~.~ Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades

Feb. 17, 2017

Re: BGP Large Communities

by Jonathan Stewart

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:37 AM, David Farmer <farmer(a)umn.edu> wrote: > BIRD 1.6.3 support it, <snip> > What version of BIRD is MICE running now? We are running 1.6.3, but no members are asking for large BGP community support yet. Jonathan MBIX.ca

Feb. 17, 2017

Re: BGP Large Communities

by Andrew Hoyos

> On Feb 17, 2017, at 7:43 AM, Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 07:25:14AM -0600, Mike Horwath wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:37:05AM -0600, David Farmer wrote: >>> BIRD 1.6.3 support it, so I'd like to suggest we think about a third route >>> server for testing with BGP Large Communities. If that goes well then >>> phase it in with the production servers maybe toward the end of 2017 when >>> more of the implementations for big iron routers make it in to production >>> code, >>> >>> What do others think? >> >> Quick view: I don't see why upgrading to 1.6.3 and turning it on for >> just folks wanting it could be done - just don't pass them onto other >> users. > > I would think as well just to upgrade the BIRD code all around anyway > at some point, and let people test. AFAIK, the source end has to > enable them and specificly configure them in order to use them. They > haven't fundementally changed anything, just added on new attributes. I’d agree with this as well. This is a relatively low risk upgrade, and don’t see the need to wait or have a third route server. Many IX’s are already running this same code in production. -- Andrew Hoyos hoyosa(a)gmail.com

Feb. 17, 2017

Re: BGP Large Communities

by Doug McIntyre

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 07:25:14AM -0600, Mike Horwath wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:37:05AM -0600, David Farmer wrote: > > BIRD 1.6.3 support it, so I'd like to suggest we think about a third route > > server for testing with BGP Large Communities. If that goes well then > > phase it in with the production servers maybe toward the end of 2017 when > > more of the implementations for big iron routers make it in to production > > code, > > > > What do others think? > > Quick view: I don't see why upgrading to 1.6.3 and turning it on for > just folks wanting it could be done - just don't pass them onto other > users. I would think as well just to upgrade the BIRD code all around anyway at some point, and let people test. AFAIK, the source end has to enable them and specificly configure them in order to use them. They haven't fundementally changed anything, just added on new attributes. Large Communities has already rolled out in most hardware's code, even if the RFC just came out, they've already been doing it in some fashion for a while. https://labs.ripe.net/Members/emileaben/large-bgp-communities-largely-accep… As somebody was discussing with me, there are several ways of doing setup with them (especially in the Cisco universe), and the BIRD documentation has absolutely zero info on doing any of it right now. Any information is only embedded in the source code. -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> ~.~ ipHouse ~.~ Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades

Feb. 17, 2017

Re: BGP Large Communities

by Mike Horwath

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:37:05AM -0600, David Farmer wrote: > BIRD 1.6.3 support it, so I'd like to suggest we think about a third route > server for testing with BGP Large Communities. If that goes well then > phase it in with the production servers maybe toward the end of 2017 when > more of the implementations for big iron routers make it in to production > code, > > What do others think? Quick view: I don't see why upgrading to 1.6.3 and turning it on for just folks wanting it could be done - just don't pass them onto other users. Unless I missed something. -- Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau(a)Geeks.ORG

Feb. 17, 2017

BGP Large Communities

by David Farmer

The RFC for BGP Large Communities has just been published; https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8092 There is also a draft discussing their use; https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-grow-large-communities-usage-02 There are more details on the BGP Large Communities work and an implementation tracker at; http://largebgpcommunities.net/ BIRD 1.6.3 support it, so I'd like to suggest we think about a third route server for testing with BGP Large Communities. If that goes well then phase it in with the production servers maybe toward the end of 2017 when more of the implementations for big iron routers make it in to production code, What do others think? -- =============================================== David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 <(612)%20626-0815> Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 <(612)%20812-9952> ===============================================

Feb. 17, 2017

Re: Please welcome Limelight Networks to MICE!

by Kayla Olsen

Welcome, Limelight! Please provide contact information for your accounts payable team. Thank you! *Kayla Olsen* Senior Manager of Finance and Operations Neutral Path Communications 3 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 204 Mankato, MN 56001 612.877.6500 Office 320.894.3125 Mobile kolsen(a)neutralpath.net <kpowers(a)neutralpath.net> www.neutralpath.com Twitter: @NeutralPath [image: logo] *Please note my new name and email address: kolsen(a)neutralpath.net <kolsen(a)neutralpath.net> * On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 09:25:13AM -0600, Jason Hanke wrote: > > Name: Limelight Networks > > ASN: 22822 > > IPv4: 206.108.255.43/24 > > IPv6: 2001:504:27:0:0:5926::1/64 > > Port: Main Switch xe-2/0/1 (Single Member LAG) > > Contact: peering-team(a)llnw.com > > BFD: NO > > Route Server: NO > > > > Limelight will upgrade to 2x10G LAG as soon as the new switch is > available. > > Okay, route servers setup to talk to them, and ae16.0 has been created on > core-sw1 > to bind xe-2/0/1 into a LAG running LACP for when they are ready in the > future. > > Welcome! > > -- > Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> > ~.~ ipHouse ~.~ > Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades >

Feb. 14, 2017

Current Consolidated Contact

by Jason Hanke

Could the current Consolidated MICE contact reach out to me off list? -- Jay Hanke CTO Neutral Path Communications 3 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 204 Mankato, MN 56001 (507) 327-2398 mobile jayhanke(a)neutralpath.net www.neutralpath.net

Feb. 11, 2017

Re: Additional Google Ports

by Doug McIntyre

On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 02:17:15PM -0600, Jason Hanke wrote: > Please allocate the following ports to Google. They can be added to > the existing LAG. > > xe-2/0/29 > xe-0/1/3 > > Google will move to 100G as soon as it is available. Okay, two more links added onto LAG AE4 for whenever they have optics and are ready to plugin. -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> ~.~ ipHouse ~.~ Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades

Feb. 10, 2017

Additional Google Ports

by Jason Hanke

Please allocate the following ports to Google. They can be added to the existing LAG. xe-2/0/29 xe-0/1/3 Google will move to 100G as soon as it is available. -- Jay Hanke CTO Neutral Path Communications 3 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 204 Mankato, MN 56001 (507) 327-2398 mobile jayhanke(a)neutralpath.net www.neutralpath.net

Feb. 10, 2017

Re: Unknown Unicast

by Jeremy Lumby

It is looking good now -----Original Message----- From: Seth Von Helmst [mailto:svonhelmst@nextera.net] Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2017 8:54 AM To: Jeremy Lumby; MICE Discuss Cc: peering; peering(a)google.com Subject: RE: [MICE-DISCUSS] Unknown Unicast Nextera has resolved the issue and things should now be normalized please let me know if you see differently. Thank you, Seth -----Original Message----- From: Jeremy Lumby [mailto:jlumby@mnvoip.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 11:27 PM To: MICE Discuss Cc: Seth Von Helmst; peering; peering(a)google.com Subject: RE: [MICE-DISCUSS] Unknown Unicast I just did a quick packet capture, and it is all Google traffic headed for Nextera. Nextera had fixed their issue around 3 this past afternoon, however it looks like it has re-occurred. The issue is two fold. Nextera's interface has an issue, and has gone down. Google's BGP session with them is stuck in established, so they continue to send traffic towards a down interface. Since the MAC of Nextera's interface has timed out of MICE's switches, the traffic is being flooded to all ports. I am adding Nextera, and Google to this. Jeremy -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Jason Hanke Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2017 10:44 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Unknown Unicast I'm seeing a lot of what I think is unknown unicast on my remote. Looks like its coming from the main switch. Is this still from the Nextera issue today? -- Jay Hanke CTO Neutral Path Communications 3 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 204 Mankato, MN 56001 (507) 327-2398 mobile jayhanke(a)neutralpath.net www.neutralpath.net

Feb. 8, 2017

Re: Unknown Unicast

by Seth Von Helmst

Nextera has resolved the issue and things should now be normalized please let me know if you see differently. Thank you, Seth -----Original Message----- From: Jeremy Lumby [mailto:jlumby@mnvoip.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 11:27 PM To: MICE Discuss Cc: Seth Von Helmst; peering; peering(a)google.com Subject: RE: [MICE-DISCUSS] Unknown Unicast I just did a quick packet capture, and it is all Google traffic headed for Nextera. Nextera had fixed their issue around 3 this past afternoon, however it looks like it has re-occurred. The issue is two fold. Nextera's interface has an issue, and has gone down. Google's BGP session with them is stuck in established, so they continue to send traffic towards a down interface. Since the MAC of Nextera's interface has timed out of MICE's switches, the traffic is being flooded to all ports. I am adding Nextera, and Google to this. Jeremy -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Jason Hanke Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2017 10:44 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Unknown Unicast I'm seeing a lot of what I think is unknown unicast on my remote. Looks like its coming from the main switch. Is this still from the Nextera issue today? -- Jay Hanke CTO Neutral Path Communications 3 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 204 Mankato, MN 56001 (507) 327-2398 mobile jayhanke(a)neutralpath.net www.neutralpath.net

Feb. 8, 2017

Re: Unknown Unicast

by Jeremy Lumby

I just did a quick packet capture, and it is all Google traffic headed for Nextera. Nextera had fixed their issue around 3 this past afternoon, however it looks like it has re-occurred. The issue is two fold. Nextera's interface has an issue, and has gone down. Google's BGP session with them is stuck in established, so they continue to send traffic towards a down interface. Since the MAC of Nextera's interface has timed out of MICE's switches, the traffic is being flooded to all ports. I am adding Nextera, and Google to this. Jeremy -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Jason Hanke Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2017 10:44 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Unknown Unicast I'm seeing a lot of what I think is unknown unicast on my remote. Looks like its coming from the main switch. Is this still from the Nextera issue today? -- Jay Hanke CTO Neutral Path Communications 3 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 204 Mankato, MN 56001 (507) 327-2398 mobile jayhanke(a)neutralpath.net www.neutralpath.net

Feb. 8, 2017

Unknown Unicast

by Jason Hanke

I'm seeing a lot of what I think is unknown unicast on my remote. Looks like its coming from the main switch. Is this still from the Nextera issue today? -- Jay Hanke CTO Neutral Path Communications 3 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 204 Mankato, MN 56001 (507) 327-2398 mobile jayhanke(a)neutralpath.net www.neutralpath.net

Feb. 8, 2017

MICE Remote Moves

by Jason Hanke

Are there any members planning to move to a remote switch in the next 6 months? We are running short on ports to accommodate growth until the new fabric is installed. -- Jay Hanke CTO Neutral Path Communications 3 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 204 Mankato, MN 56001 (507) 327-2398 mobile jayhanke(a)neutralpath.net www.neutralpath.net

Feb. 8, 2017

8am 10x Route Server Traffic Increase?

by Matthew Beckwell

Noticed at 8am this morning, traffic to the MICE route servers has gone from it's usual ~60k bi-directional traffic, to a sustained 800k-1000k of mostly traffic out to both route server ports. Might be nothing. Might be something (misconfigured?) ~Matthew

Feb. 7, 2017

Re: Please welcome Limelight Networks to MICE!

by Doug McIntyre

On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 09:25:13AM -0600, Jason Hanke wrote: > Name: Limelight Networks > ASN: 22822 > IPv4: 206.108.255.43/24 > IPv6: 2001:504:27:0:0:5926::1/64 > Port: Main Switch xe-2/0/1 (Single Member LAG) > Contact: peering-team(a)llnw.com > BFD: NO > Route Server: NO > > Limelight will upgrade to 2x10G LAG as soon as the new switch is available. Okay, route servers setup to talk to them, and ae16.0 has been created on core-sw1 to bind xe-2/0/1 into a LAG running LACP for when they are ready in the future. Welcome! -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> ~.~ ipHouse ~.~ Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades

Feb. 6, 2017

Please welcome Limelight Networks to MICE!

by Jason Hanke

Name: Limelight Networks ASN: 22822 IPv4: 206.108.255.43/24 IPv6: 2001:504:27:0:0:5926::1/64 Port: Main Switch xe-2/0/1 (Single Member LAG) Contact: peering-team(a)llnw.com BFD: NO Route Server: NO Limelight will upgrade to 2x10G LAG as soon as the new switch is available. Welcome aboard! -- Jay Hanke CTO Neutral Path Communications 3 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 204 Mankato, MN 56001 (507) 327-2398 mobile jayhanke(a)neutralpath.net www.neutralpath.net

Feb. 6, 2017

Compudyne (AS47096) Maintenance 2017-02-06

by Ryan Nelson

Hi All, FYI, On Monday morning (2017-02-06) the prefixes and peering sessions for Compduyne (AS47096) will be turned off for maintenance at 4:00am CST. They should be back online by 7:00am CST. Ryan Nelson | Network Services Architect Compudyne | 306 W Michigan Street - Suite 200 | Duluth, MN 55802 rnelson(a)compudyne.com<mailto:rnelson@compudyne.com> | 218.336.2220 | compudyne.com<http://www.compudyne.com/> Duluth | Hibbing | Saint Paul | Marquette | Houghton | Anchorage ________________________________ [cid:image002.png@01D0BA36.584BB020]

Feb. 3, 2017

Interesting tool for bird filters

by Jason Hanke

https://github.com/pierky/arouteserver -- Jay Hanke CTO Neutral Path Communications 3 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 204 Mankato, MN 56001 (507) 327-2398 mobile jayhanke(a)neutralpath.net www.neutralpath.net

Feb. 3, 2017

Re: UG 23

by Shaun Carlson

I would like to revisit the infrastructure and growth plan again now that we've implemented the fees. Specifically, I'd think we should talk about the long-term strategy and not necessarily the immediate needs as the focus of the discussion. *Shaun Carlson*Director of Information Technology | Arvig ph: (218) 346-8673 | em: shaun.carlson(a)arvig.com On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 11:13 PM, Richard Laager <rlaager(a)wiktel.com> wrote: > If you have any agenda items for the upcoming meeting, please send them > to me. > > -- > Richard >

Feb. 2, 2017

Re: Anyone else who is peering with Amazon having issues with pulling up www.bop.gov?

by Frank Bulk

David, Thanks for sharing. Pretty disappointing to learn that this has been a known issue for several weeks and that that the BOP still hasn’t resolved it. Since this behavior was seen across multiple iSPs (some who probably don’t peer with Amazon at MICE), do you think it’s “lucky” that ISU regained connectivity when you stopped advertising ISU’s prefixes to Amazon at MICE? Frank From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of David Farmer Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2017 12:24 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Anyone else who is peering with Amazon having issues with pulling up www.bop.gov? A couple weeks ago ISU was having issues with this site, we contacted Amazon about it. They looked into it and it was an issue with the Bureau of Prisons site, and not the Minneapolis CloudFront node. ISU tried contacting Bureau of Prisons about this issue, but never really got a response. As a work around we stop announcing some Iowa Government prefixes to Amazon at MICE. On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Frank Bulk <fbulk(a)mypremieronline.com<mailto:fbulk@mypremieronline.com>> wrote: Not yet – I wanted to make sure it was something broader than us. Apparently works fine via AT&T Mobility and i wireless mobile phones, and works fine on my Verizon Wireless phone. Before sending the email I checked Amazon’s network status and it’s all green. Frank From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET<mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET>] On Behalf Of Jason Hanke Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 3:35 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET<mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Anyone else who is peering with Amazon having issues with pulling up www.bop.gov<http://www.bop.gov>? Have you opened a ticket with Amazon peering? On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Frank Bulk <fbulk(a)mypremieronline.com<mailto:fbulk@mypremieronline.com>> wrote: Anyone else who is peering with Amazon having issues with pulling up https://www.bop.gov? We have a customer who said they could access it last week, but not this week. We get the error listed below my signature. All the IPs for www.bop.gov<http://www.bop.gov> resolve to something in 52.222.217.0/24<http://52.222.217.0/24>, which is within the 52.222.216.0/22<http://52.222.216.0/22> that the Amazon peer is advertising to use Frank ERROR The request could not be satisfied. CloudFront attempted to establish a connection with the origin, but either the attempt failed or the origin closed the connection. Generated by cloudfront (CloudFront) Request ID: f2Kv9B8881U7CmCAYLlbbW9rVfp0adGMpb2sTt5fepCYfdOsx5vuhA== -- Jay Hanke CTO Neutral Path Communications 3 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 204 Mankato, MN 56001 (507) 327-2398<tel:(507)%20327-2398> mobile jayhanke(a)neutralpath.net<mailto:jayhanke@neutralpath.net> www.neutralpath.net<http://www.neutralpath.net> ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 -- =============================================== David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu<mailto:Email%3Afarmer@umn.edu> Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 =============================================== ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Feb. 2, 2017

Re: UG 23

by Richard Laager

If you have any agenda items for the upcoming meeting, please send them to me. -- Richard

Feb. 2, 2017

511->Mankato Mail run

by Jason Hanke

If anyone is going from 511 towards the Mankato area in the next couple of days. Jake at Cologix has MICE some mail for Kayla. -- Jay Hanke CTO Neutral Path Communications 3 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 204 Mankato, MN 56001 (507) 327-2398 mobile jayhanke(a)neutralpath.net www.neutralpath.net

Feb. 1, 2017

Re: Anyone else who is peering with Amazon having issues with pulling up www.bop.gov?

by David Farmer

A couple weeks ago ISU was having issues with this site, we contacted Amazon about it. They looked into it and it was an issue with the Bureau of Prisons site, and not the Minneapolis CloudFront node. ISU tried contacting Bureau of Prisons about this issue, but never really got a response. As a work around we stop announcing some Iowa Government prefixes to Amazon at MICE. On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Frank Bulk <fbulk(a)mypremieronline.com> wrote: > Not yet – I wanted to make sure it was something broader than us. > > > > Apparently works fine via AT&T Mobility and i wireless mobile phones, and > works fine on my Verizon Wireless phone. > > > > Before sending the email I checked Amazon’s network status and it’s all > green. > > > > Frank > > > > *From:* MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] *On Behalf > Of *Jason Hanke > *Sent:* Monday, January 30, 2017 3:35 PM > *To:* MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET > *Subject:* Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Anyone else who is peering with Amazon > having issues with pulling up www.bop.gov? > > > > Have you opened a ticket with Amazon peering? > > > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Frank Bulk <fbulk(a)mypremieronline.com> > wrote: > > Anyone else who is peering with Amazon having issues with pulling up > https://www.bop.gov? We have a customer who said they could access it > last week, but not this week. We get the error listed below my signature. > > All the IPs for www.bop.gov resolve to something in 52.222.217.0/24, > which is within the 52.222.216.0/22 that the Amazon peer is advertising > to use > > Frank > > > ERROR > > The request could not be satisfied. > > CloudFront attempted to establish a connection with the origin, but either > the attempt failed or the origin closed the connection. > Generated by cloudfront (CloudFront) > Request ID: f2Kv9B8881U7CmCAYLlbbW9rVfp0adGMpb2sTt5fepCYfdOsx5vuhA== > > > > > > -- > > Jay Hanke > > CTO > > Neutral Path Communications > > 3 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 204 > > Mankato, MN 56001 > > (507) 327-2398 mobile > > jayhanke(a)neutralpath.net > > www.neutralpath.net > > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > -- =============================================== David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 ===============================================

Feb. 1, 2017

Re: Anyone else who is peering with Amazon having issues with pulling up www.bop.gov?

by Mike O'Connor

working for me -- coming in through Airstream. m > On Jan 30, 2017, at 3:43 PM, Frank Bulk <fbulk(a)MYPREMIERONLINE.COM> wrote: > > Not yet – I wanted to make sure it was something broader than us. > > Apparently works fine via AT&T Mobility and i wireless mobile phones, and works fine on my Verizon Wireless phone. > > Before sending the email I checked Amazon’s network status and it’s all green. > > Frank > > From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET <mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET>] On Behalf Of Jason Hanke > Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 3:35 PM > To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET <mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@lists.iphouse.net> > Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Anyone else who is peering with Amazon having issues with pulling up www.bop.gov <http://www.bop.gov/>? > > Have you opened a ticket with Amazon peering? > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Frank Bulk <fbulk(a)mypremieronline.com <mailto:fbulk@mypremieronline.com>> wrote: > Anyone else who is peering with Amazon having issues with pulling up https://www.bop.gov <https://www.bop.gov/>? We have a customer who said they could access it last week, but not this week. We get the error listed below my signature. > > All the IPs for www.bop.gov <http://www.bop.gov/> resolve to something in 52.222.217.0/24 <http://52.222.217.0/24>, which is within the 52.222.216.0/22 <http://52.222.216.0/22> that the Amazon peer is advertising to use > > Frank > > > ERROR > > The request could not be satisfied. > > CloudFront attempted to establish a connection with the origin, but either the attempt failed or the origin closed the connection. > Generated by cloudfront (CloudFront) > Request ID: f2Kv9B8881U7CmCAYLlbbW9rVfp0adGMpb2sTt5fepCYfdOsx5vuhA== > > > > -- > Jay Hanke > CTO > Neutral Path Communications > 3 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 204 > Mankato, MN 56001 > (507) 327-2398 mobile > jayhanke(a)neutralpath.net <mailto:jayhanke@neutralpath.net> > www.neutralpath.net <http://www.neutralpath.net/> > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 <http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1> > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 <http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1> WI:(715) 598-4284 MN:(651) 647-6109 Toll Free:(800) 896-0907 Fax:(866)-280-2356

Jan. 30, 2017

Re: Anyone else who is peering with Amazon having issues with pulling up www.bop.gov?

by Frank Bulk

Not yet – I wanted to make sure it was something broader than us. Apparently works fine via AT&T Mobility and i wireless mobile phones, and works fine on my Verizon Wireless phone. Before sending the email I checked Amazon’s network status and it’s all green. Frank From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Jason Hanke Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 3:35 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Anyone else who is peering with Amazon having issues with pulling up www.bop.gov? Have you opened a ticket with Amazon peering? On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Frank Bulk <fbulk(a)mypremieronline.com<mailto:fbulk@mypremieronline.com>> wrote: Anyone else who is peering with Amazon having issues with pulling up https://www.bop.gov? We have a customer who said they could access it last week, but not this week. We get the error listed below my signature. All the IPs for www.bop.gov<http://www.bop.gov> resolve to something in 52.222.217.0/24<http://52.222.217.0/24>, which is within the 52.222.216.0/22<http://52.222.216.0/22> that the Amazon peer is advertising to use Frank ERROR The request could not be satisfied. CloudFront attempted to establish a connection with the origin, but either the attempt failed or the origin closed the connection. Generated by cloudfront (CloudFront) Request ID: f2Kv9B8881U7CmCAYLlbbW9rVfp0adGMpb2sTt5fepCYfdOsx5vuhA== -- Jay Hanke CTO Neutral Path Communications 3 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 204 Mankato, MN 56001 (507) 327-2398 mobile jayhanke(a)neutralpath.net<mailto:jayhanke@neutralpath.net> www.neutralpath.net<http://www.neutralpath.net> ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Jan. 30, 2017