- mice-discuss - lists.micemn.net

Re: Facebook DNS issues

by Frank Bulk

Thanks for sharing. Some other reports have shared the same kind of thing -- the edge seemed to advertise their address space, but traffic didn't traverse all the way inside their network. Frank -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> On Behalf Of Jeremy Lumby Sent: Monday, October 4, 2021 8:17 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Facebook DNS issues No, I still had the prefixes, and could ping them/traceroute to them across MICE. One interesting thing I observed is that www.facebook.com remained pointed at Minneapolis the entire time, however facebook.com resolved to Hong Kong however now that things are working again it resolves to Seattle. -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk Sent: Monday, October 04, 2021 8:11 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Facebook DNS issues Did facebook's prefixes withdraw from MICE during the outage? Frank -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> On Behalf Of Jay Hanke Sent: Monday, October 4, 2021 11:17 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Facebook DNS issues Looks like Facebook is having large scale DNS issues. -- Jay Hanke, President South Front Networks jayhanke(a)southfront.io Phone 612-204-0000

Oct. 5, 2021

Re: Facebook DNS issues

by Jeremy Lumby

No, I still had the prefixes, and could ping them/traceroute to them across MICE. One interesting thing I observed is that www.facebook.com remained pointed at Minneapolis the entire time, however facebook.com resolved to Hong Kong however now that things are working again it resolves to Seattle. -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk Sent: Monday, October 04, 2021 8:11 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Facebook DNS issues Did facebook's prefixes withdraw from MICE during the outage? Frank -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> On Behalf Of Jay Hanke Sent: Monday, October 4, 2021 11:17 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Facebook DNS issues Looks like Facebook is having large scale DNS issues. -- Jay Hanke, President South Front Networks jayhanke(a)southfront.io Phone 612-204-0000

Oct. 5, 2021

Re: Facebook DNS issues

by Ryan Malek

I showed 38 prefixes coming from both Facebook peers during and after the outage. Ryan Malek - Router12 Networks LLC Internet, Phone, and Hosted Services Ph. 641.420.7180 On 10/4/2021 8:11 PM, Frank Bulk wrote: > Did facebook's prefixes withdraw from MICE during the outage? > > Frank > > -----Original Message----- > From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> On Behalf Of Jay Hanke > Sent: Monday, October 4, 2021 11:17 AM > To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET > Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Facebook DNS issues > > Looks like Facebook is having large scale DNS issues. >

Oct. 5, 2021

Re: Facebook DNS issues

by Frank Bulk

Did facebook's prefixes withdraw from MICE during the outage? Frank -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> On Behalf Of Jay Hanke Sent: Monday, October 4, 2021 11:17 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Facebook DNS issues Looks like Facebook is having large scale DNS issues. -- Jay Hanke, President South Front Networks jayhanke(a)southfront.io Phone 612-204-0000

Oct. 5, 2021

Facebook DNS issues

by Jay Hanke

Looks like Facebook is having large scale DNS issues. -- Jay Hanke, President South Front Networks jayhanke(a)southfront.io Phone 612-204-0000

Oct. 4, 2021

Global Net (AS395466) - Upcoming Maintenance 10/11/2021

by Global Net NOC

MICEMN Members - We have a maintenance window scheduled for Monday, October 11th. BGP sessions will go down during the window. Start: 10/11/21 0601 GMT (00:01 MDT) End: 10/11/21 1200 GMT (06:00 MDT) GLOBAL NET AS 395466 IPV4 206.108.255.97 IPV6 2001:504:27:0:6:8ca:0:1 Thanks, Global Net NOC noc(a)theglobal.net Global Net Peering peering

Oct. 4, 2021

Re: MICE UG 39

by Richard Laager

The UG 39 minutes and attendance sheet are now on the website. Thanks Anthony for taking the minutes! -- Richard

Oct. 1, 2021

Re: Microsoft peering at 511 - packet loss

by Frank Bulk

We saw them bounce a few days ago: Sep 20 04:02:18 207.32.15.14 Rib: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: peer 206.108.255.156 (AS 8075) old state Established event Closed new state Idle Sep 20 04:02:18 207.32.15.14 Rib: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor 206.108.255.156 (AS 8075) 6/0 (Cease/Unspecified) 0 bytes Sep 20 04:10:00 207.32.15.14 Rib: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: peer 206.108.255.156 (AS 8075) old state OpenConfirm event RecvKeepAlive new state Established Sep 26 13:30:44 207.32.15.14 Rib: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: peer 206.108.255.157 (AS 8075) old state Established event Closed new state Idle Sep 26 13:30:44 207.32.15.14 Rib: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor 206.108.255.157 (AS 8075) 6/0 (Cease/Unspecified) 0 bytes Sep 26 13:38:23 207.32.15.14 Rib: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: peer 206.108.255.157 (AS 8075) old state OpenConfirm event RecvKeepAlive new state Established Frank From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> On Behalf Of Fridlington, Anthony Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 1:16 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Microsoft peering at 511 - packet loss We seem to be having issues with both of our Microsoft peers at 511, but no others. Is anybody experiencing similar issues? 206.108.255.156 and 206.108.255.157. Thank you, Anthony Fridlington Network Manager Essentia Health Information Services | P240 532 E 1st St, Duluth, MN 55805 218-786-5360 | Anthony.Fridlington(a)EssentiaHealth.org<mailto:Anthony.Fridlington@EssentiaHealth.org> ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Oct. 1, 2021

Re: Microsoft peering at 511 - packet loss

by Richard Laager

On 9/29/21 1:15 PM, Fridlington, Anthony wrote: > > We seem to be having issues with both of our Microsoft peers at 511, > but no others. Is anybody experiencing similar issues? > Someone mentioned to me on Saturday that their customer was reporting one-way communication with Microsoft Azure Cloud. It was not known whether that traffic was going through MICE. I also am not aware which direction was working vs broken. So not much go to on, but this is to say you might not be the only one. -- Richard

Sept. 29, 2021

Re: Microsoft peering at 511 - packet loss

by David Farmer

Microsoft is going strong for us, with both in and out, 7.6G peak and 6.6G for 95 percentile so far for today. On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 4:25 PM Steve Howard <showard(a)paulbunyan.net> wrote: > We have no reports of packet loss to either of those Microsoft IP > addresses. A few thousand packets of icmp traffic showed no loss. > > > On 9/29/21 1:15 PM, Fridlington, Anthony wrote: > > We seem to be having issues with both of our Microsoft peers at 511, but > no others. Is anybody experiencing similar issues? > > > > 206.108.255.156 and 206.108.255.157. > > > > Thank you, > > > > > *Anthony Fridlington * > *Network Manager * > *Essentia Health *Information Services | P240 > 532 E 1st St, Duluth, MN 55805 > 218-786-5360 | *Anthony.Fridlington(a)EssentiaHealth.org > <Anthony.Fridlington(a)EssentiaHealth.org>* > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > -- =============================================== David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 ===============================================

Sept. 29, 2021

Re: Microsoft peering at 511 - packet loss

by Steve Howard

Sept. 29, 2021

Microsoft peering at 511 - packet loss

by Fridlington, Anthony

We seem to be having issues with both of our Microsoft peers at 511, but no others. Is anybody experiencing similar issues? 206.108.255.156 and 206.108.255.157. Thank you, Anthony Fridlington Network Manager Essentia Health Information Services | P240 532 E 1st St, Duluth, MN 55805 218-786-5360 | Anthony.Fridlington(a)EssentiaHealth.org

Sept. 29, 2021

Re: Midco Upgrade 1x1x100G

by Jeremy Lumby

The switch has been configured with Portchannel 23 for them -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Jay Hanke Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 9:01 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Midco Upgrade 1x1x100G Please allocate the following port to Midco. MICE MAIN :: Ethernet3/25/1 Port should be provisioned as a single member LAG group. This port was previously allocated to Midco and then converted to a 10G port. IP info will remain the same. Welcome aboard! -- Jay Hanke, President South Front Networks jayhanke(a)southfront.io Phone 612-204-0000

Sept. 28, 2021

Midco Upgrade 1x1x100G

by Jay Hanke

Please allocate the following port to Midco. MICE MAIN :: Ethernet3/25/1 Port should be provisioned as a single member LAG group. This port was previously allocated to Midco and then converted to a 10G port. IP info will remain the same. Welcome aboard! -- Jay Hanke, President South Front Networks jayhanke(a)southfront.io Phone 612-204-0000

Sept. 28, 2021

Re: MICE UG39 Election Results

by Mike Horwath

On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 01:40:08PM -0400, Reid Fishler wrote: > Thanks everyone. So many mice. Now do you have enough cats for all of them?! -- Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau(a)Geeks.ORG

Sept. 23, 2021

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE UG39 Election Results

by Kittel, Brady

Man, someone is in cat toys for the next year I guess? 😄 ---- Brady Kittel Systems Architect - Server Team Hennepin County Medical Center 612-873-2150 Brady.Kittel(a)hcmed.org ________________________________ From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> on behalf of Reid Fishler <0000000c9d62e487-dmarc-request(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2021 12:40 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE UG39 Election Results CAUTION: This email originated from outside of HCMC. DO NOT CLICK links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Thanks everyone. So many mice. Reid On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 1:36 PM AnthonyAnderberg(a)nuvera.net<mailto:AnthonyAnderberg@nuvera.net> <AnthonyAnderberg(a)nuvera.net<mailto:AnthonyAnderberg@nuvera.net>> wrote: Congratulations to Reid Fishler, who was re-elected to the MICE Board of Directors yesterday for another 3 year term - we thank him for his ongoing service to the community. Since most members were joining remotely we did the election as a voice vote but I continued the tradition of recording everyone’s votes with tokens none-the-less. [A picture containing indoor, stuffed Description automatically generated] Cheers, anthony [signature_2070010193] ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1<https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.ipho…> -- Reid Fishler Senior Director Hurricane Electric +1-510-580-4178 ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1<https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.ipho…>

Sept. 23, 2021

Re: MICE UG39 Election Results

by Reid Fishler

Thanks everyone. So many mice. Reid On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 1:36 PM AnthonyAnderberg(a)nuvera.net < AnthonyAnderberg(a)nuvera.net> wrote: > Congratulations to Reid Fishler, who was re-elected to the MICE Board of > Directors yesterday for another 3 year term - we thank him for his ongoing > service to the community. > > > > Since most members were joining remotely we did the election as a voice > vote but I continued the tradition of recording everyone’s votes with > tokens none-the-less. > > > > [image: A picture containing indoor, stuffed Description automatically > generated] > > > > Cheers, > > anthony > > > > [image: signature_2070010193] > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > -- Reid Fishler Senior Director Hurricane Electric +1-510-580-4178

Sept. 23, 2021

MICE UG39 Election Results

by AnthonyAnderberg＠nuvera.net

Congratulations to Reid Fishler, who was re-elected to the MICE Board of Directors yesterday for another 3 year term - we thank him for his ongoing service to the community. Since most members were joining remotely we did the election as a voice vote but I continued the tradition of recording everyone’s votes with tokens none-the-less. [A picture containing indoor, stuffed Description automatically generated] Cheers, anthony [signature_2070010193]

Sept. 23, 2021

FW: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE UG 39

by AnthonyAnderberg＠nuvera.net

A reminder that MICE UG39 is this afternoon - please attend one way or the other so we get a quorum and conduct this year’s elections and business, details below: From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> on behalf of Richard Laager <rlaager(a)WIKTEL.COM> Reply-To: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> Date: Monday, September 20, 2021 at 12:38 AM To: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE UG 39 [Resending with correct Subject and Agenda attachment.] MICE UG 39 is this week (Wednesday, September 22). It will be in person and Zoom; details for both below. I've attached an agenda, which is just our stock agenda, plus the quorum topic and the election. UG 38 minutes are attached. As promised, I made a specific quorum proposal for discussion on the list: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind2109&L=MICE-DISCUSS&T=0&F=&S=&P=9… For the election, the only nomination was Reid FIshler, so he is running unopposed. As has been our practice, we will still hold the vote for procedural reasons, even though the result is known. Updated meeting information: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind2108&L=MICE-DISCUSS&D=0&T=0&P=5908 Notable points: * Masks required for all in-person attendees. * Zoom Details: https://umn.zoom.us/j/95578944919?pwd=Nk1pQXkyZ3dvNkdHTEFoeVNrblFLUT09 Meeting ID: 955 7894 4919 Passcode: 0dKX6f Venue information from last time: -------- Forwarded Message -------- MICE UG 38 will be held at the University’s Information Technology Building, 2218 University Ave SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414, Room 185. It is across University Ave SE from Huntington Bank Stadium (Formerly TCF Bank Stadium), see the link to the Campus Map below. This room has a video room system and remote access will be made available via Zoom video or phone audio, see Zoom details below. [snip superceded mask policy] Bring your own refreshments, the building's vending machines are still empty due to COVID precautions. There is a Caribou Coffee, just to the southeast of the building, and a CVS on the southwest corner of Ontario St SE and Washington Ave SE, less than a half a block away, and many other options are within easy walking distance. Please enter the building through the middle of three doors on the Ontario St SE side of the building, it will be open after 2:30 and will have a sign on it, if not please knock hard, or call my cell phone(612-812-9952). This door is right outside the meeting room, this avoids everyone traipsing through the building. The Stadium Village Green Line Light Rail Station is less than a block east of the building, kitty-corner at the intersection of University Ave SE and Huron Blvd SE, see the link below for the station's info page. Limited Street Parking is available on Ontario St SE and Beacon St SE. Otherwise, public parking is available in the Oak St and University Ave Ramps, each a little over two blocks away. Also, there is the Maroon and Gold Lots, which are a little further, on the north side of the Stadium, see the links below for more details on these ramps and lots. DO NOT park in University Parking Lot 70 on the north of the building, by the front door, between University Ave SE and the building, or Parking Lot 71 near the loading dock to the east of the building, they are contract parking only and you be ticketed. Also, DO NOT park in the private parking lot to the south of the building, you will likely be tagged, booted, and towed from that parking lot. https://campusmaps.umn.edu/information-technology https://safe-campus.umn.edu/return-campus/covid-19-updates https://www.metrotransit.org/stadium-village-station https://www.pts.umn.edu/park/facilities/oakstreet https://www.pts.umn.edu/park/facilities/univave https://www.pts.umn.edu/park/facilities/maroon https://www.pts.umn.edu/park/facilities/gold ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 22, 2021

Re: Quorum

by Daniel Petsinger

I would like to see something like if only 10 members are present and not the quorum that is now set, that no action can take place until the next meeting or the next full quorum. This way we all have time to look at what changes or actions want to be taken. Thank you, Daniel Petsinger Owner, Radio Link Internet 8162 SW 81st ST Ellendale, MN 56026 507-417-4176 daniel.petsinger(a)radiolinkinternet.com _____ From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Kittel, Brady Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2021 11:49 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Quorum We (HCMC/HHS) support this as well with one suggestion/comment: Can we maintain a higher quorum requirement for specific actions that pertain to changing the makeup of the actual board or how it votes outside of an election if that isn't already in place? I'd hate to see the low member quorum be used against the MICE by a handful of orgs for the purposes of changing the nature of MICE. I don't have any concerns about that right now, but I've seen it happen in other non-profit orgs where a handful of members essentially took over the non-profit for their own commercial/personal benefit. ---- Brady Kittel Systems Architect - Server Team Hennepin County Medical Center 612-873-2150 Brady.Kittel(a)hcmed.org On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 12:00 AM Frank Bulk <fbulk(a)mypremieronline.com> wrote: I support as well, for all the reasons others have mentioned. Frank From: MICE Discuss < <mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> On Behalf Of Reid Fishler Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 9:55 AM To: <mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Quorum I support this proposal as well. If we get to the point where we are in another lockdown, or where people don't want to travel, we will need this in force as well. All meetings will continue to be announced, but the board should not have to try to call people as the meeting starts to try to make sure the meeting will count (this has happened before). Reid On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 10:48 AM Jonathan Stewart < <mailto:jonathan@les.net> jonathan(a)les.net> wrote: On Mon., 2021-09-20 12:13 a.m., Richard Laager wrote: I propose that section 1.11 of the bylaws be amended to read as follows: Members representing ten percent (10%) of the voting power of the membership interests entitled to vote at a meeting of the members, or at least ten (10) members, whichever is less, are a quorum for the transaction of business. I support Richard's proposal. Not having quorum is a real governance problem, and if faced, it's a problem that the board and assembled members at the AGM would not be able to resolve. The only option would be to call a new meeting and hope for more attendees. 10 members seems sufficient to ensure there's reasonable oversight of business. And as Dean Bahls pointed out, nothing about this change would limit the ability of any member to participate. Thanks to Richard for the proposal. Jonathan Jonathan Stewart Network Engineer <http://les.net/> LES.NET - AS18451 Desk: 1-204-666-6191 Mobile: 1-204-990-2120 130 Portage Avenue E Winnipeg, MB R3C 0A1 CANADA _____ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: <http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 -- Reid Fishler Senior Director Hurricane Electric +1-510-580-4178 _____ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: <http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 _____ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: <http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 Confidentiality Notice: Information contained in this e-mail is being sent to you after appropriate authorization or by legal exception. You are obligated to maintain it in a safe, secure and confidential manner. Re-disclosure without patient consent or as permitted by law is prohibited and may subject you to state and/or federal penalties. This information may also be legally privileged, the disclosure of which is governed by law. This information is intended for the use of the person or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any access, disclosure, copying or distribution of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message by error, please notify the sender immediately to arrange for return or proof of destruction of the information contained in this message. _____ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS <http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1> &A=1

Sept. 21, 2021

Re: Quorum

by Kittel, Brady

We (HCMC/HHS) support this as well with one suggestion/comment: Can we maintain a higher quorum requirement for specific actions that pertain to changing the makeup of the actual board or how it votes outside of an election if that isn't already in place? I'd hate to see the low member quorum be used against the MICE by a handful of orgs for the purposes of changing the nature of MICE. I don't have any concerns about that right now, but I've seen it happen in other non-profit orgs where a handful of members essentially took over the non-profit for their own commercial/personal benefit. ---- Brady Kittel Systems Architect - Server Team Hennepin County Medical Center 612-873-2150 Brady.Kittel(a)hcmed.org On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 12:00 AM Frank Bulk <fbulk(a)mypremieronline.com> wrote: I support as well, for all the reasons others have mentioned. Frank From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET<mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET>> On Behalf Of Reid Fishler Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 9:55 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET<mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Quorum I support this proposal as well. If we get to the point where we are in another lockdown, or where people don't want to travel, we will need this in force as well. All meetings will continue to be announced, but the board should not have to try to call people as the meeting starts to try to make sure the meeting will count (this has happened before). Reid On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 10:48 AM Jonathan Stewart <jonathan(a)les.net<mailto:jonathan@les.net>> wrote: On Mon., 2021-09-20 12:13 a.m., Richard Laager wrote: I propose that section 1.11 of the bylaws be amended to read as follows: Members representing ten percent (10%) of the voting power of the membership interests entitled to vote at a meeting of the members, or at least ten (10) members, whichever is less, are a quorum for the transaction of business. I support Richard's proposal. Not having quorum is a real governance problem, and if faced, it's a problem that the board and assembled members at the AGM would not be able to resolve. The only option would be to call a new meeting and hope for more attendees. 10 members seems sufficient to ensure there's reasonable oversight of business. And as Dean Bahls pointed out, nothing about this change would limit the ability of any member to participate. Thanks to Richard for the proposal. Jonathan Jonathan Stewart Network Engineer LES.NET<http://les.net/> - AS18451 Desk: 1-204-666-6191 Mobile: 1-204-990-2120 130 Portage Avenue E Winnipeg, MB R3C 0A1 CANADA ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 -- Reid Fishler Senior Director Hurricane Electric +1-510-580-4178 ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 21, 2021

Re: Quorum

by Jeffrey Anderson

I fully support this proposal. It is necessary to keep the wheels turning efficiently. Jeffrey (Sparky) Anderson Implex.net Senior Network Engineer USCG Masters Licensed Captain USCG AUX ADSO-DV / VFC Point of Contact: Mobile: 612-799-7277 From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> On Behalf Of Reid Fishler Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 9:55 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Quorum I support this proposal as well. If we get to the point where we are in another lockdown, or where people don't want to travel, we will need this in force as well. All meetings will continue to be announced, but the board should not have to try to call people as the meeting starts to try to make sure the meeting will count (this has happened before). Reid On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 10:48 AM Jonathan Stewart <jonathan(a)les.net<mailto:jonathan@les.net>> wrote: On Mon., 2021-09-20 12:13 a.m., Richard Laager wrote: I propose that section 1.11 of the bylaws be amended to read as follows: Members representing ten percent (10%) of the voting power of the membership interests entitled to vote at a meeting of the members, or at least ten (10) members, whichever is less, are a quorum for the transaction of business. I support Richard's proposal. Not having quorum is a real governance problem, and if faced, it's a problem that the board and assembled members at the AGM would not be able to resolve. The only option would be to call a new meeting and hope for more attendees. 10 members seems sufficient to ensure there's reasonable oversight of business. And as Dean Bahls pointed out, nothing about this change would limit the ability of any member to participate. Thanks to Richard for the proposal. Jonathan Jonathan Stewart Network Engineer LES.NET<http://LES.NET> - AS18451 Desk: 1-204-666-6191 Mobile: 1-204-990-2120 130 Portage Avenue E Winnipeg, MB R3C 0A1 CANADA ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 -- Reid Fishler Senior Director Hurricane Electric +1-510-580-4178 ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 21, 2021

Corrected GPC Port Assignments

by Jay Hanke

Great Plains is moving off the MAIN MICE switch and onto the MN VoIP 10G switch. The new ports will be: MN VoIP 10g :: Ethernet31 MN VoIP 10g :: Ethernet32 MN VoIP 10g :: Ethernet33 -- Jay Hanke, President South Front Networks jayhanke(a)southfront.io Phone 612-204-0000

Sept. 21, 2021

Great Plains Additional Port

by Jay Hanke

Please add port: MICE MAIN :: Ethernet4/23 To the existing Great Plains LAG group (Port Channel 13) -- Jay Hanke, President South Front Networks jayhanke(a)southfront.io Phone 612-204-0000

Sept. 21, 2021

Re: Quorum

by Frank Bulk

I support as well, for all the reasons others have mentioned. Frank From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> On Behalf Of Reid Fishler Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 9:55 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Quorum I support this proposal as well. If we get to the point where we are in another lockdown, or where people don't want to travel, we will need this in force as well. All meetings will continue to be announced, but the board should not have to try to call people as the meeting starts to try to make sure the meeting will count (this has happened before). Reid On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 10:48 AM Jonathan Stewart <jonathan(a)les.net<mailto:jonathan@les.net>> wrote: On Mon., 2021-09-20 12:13 a.m., Richard Laager wrote: I propose that section 1.11 of the bylaws be amended to read as follows: Members representing ten percent (10%) of the voting power of the membership interests entitled to vote at a meeting of the members, or at least ten (10) members, whichever is less, are a quorum for the transaction of business. I support Richard's proposal. Not having quorum is a real governance problem, and if faced, it's a problem that the board and assembled members at the AGM would not be able to resolve. The only option would be to call a new meeting and hope for more attendees. 10 members seems sufficient to ensure there's reasonable oversight of business. And as Dean Bahls pointed out, nothing about this change would limit the ability of any member to participate. Thanks to Richard for the proposal. Jonathan Jonathan Stewart Network Engineer LES.NET<http://LES.NET> - AS18451 Desk: 1-204-666-6191 Mobile: 1-204-990-2120 130 Portage Avenue E Winnipeg, MB R3C 0A1 CANADA ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 -- Reid Fishler Senior Director Hurricane Electric +1-510-580-4178 ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 21, 2021

Re: Quorum

by Reid Fishler

I support this proposal as well. If we get to the point where we are in another lockdown, or where people don't want to travel, we will need this in force as well. All meetings will continue to be announced, but the board should not have to try to call people as the meeting starts to try to make sure the meeting will count (this has happened before). Reid On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 10:48 AM Jonathan Stewart <jonathan(a)les.net> wrote: > > On Mon., 2021-09-20 12:13 a.m., Richard Laager wrote: > > I propose that section 1.11 of the bylaws be amended to read as follows: > > Members representing ten percent (10%) of the voting power of the > membership interests entitled to vote at a meeting of the members*, or at > least ten (10) members, whichever is less,* are a quorum for the > transaction of business. > > I support Richard's proposal. > > Not having quorum is a real governance problem, and if faced, it's a > problem that the board and assembled members at the AGM would not be able > to resolve. The only option would be to call a new meeting and hope for > more attendees. > > 10 members seems sufficient to ensure there's reasonable oversight of > business. And as Dean Bahls pointed out, nothing about this change would > limit the ability of any member to participate. > > Thanks to Richard for the proposal. > > > Jonathan > > > > Jonathan Stewart > Network EngineerLES.NET - AS18451 > Desk: 1-204-666-6191 > Mobile: 1-204-990-2120 > 130 Portage Avenue E > Winnipeg, MB R3C 0A1 > CANADA > > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > -- Reid Fishler Senior Director Hurricane Electric +1-510-580-4178

Sept. 20, 2021

Re: Quorum

by Jonathan Stewart

On Mon., 2021-09-20 12:13 a.m., Richard Laager wrote: > I propose that section 1.11 of the bylaws be amended to read as follows: > > Members representing ten percent (10%) of the voting power of the > membership interests entitled to vote at a meeting of the members_, or > at least ten (10) members, whichever is less,_ are a quorum for the > transaction of business. > I support Richard's proposal. Not having quorum is a real governance problem, and if faced, it's a problem that the board and assembled members at the AGM would not be able to resolve. The only option would be to call a new meeting and hope for more attendees. 10 members seems sufficient to ensure there's reasonable oversight of business. And as Dean Bahls pointed out, nothing about this change would limit the ability of any member to participate. Thanks to Richard for the proposal. Jonathan Jonathan Stewart Network Engineer LES.NET - AS18451 Desk: 1-204-666-6191 Mobile: 1-204-990-2120 130 Portage Avenue E Winnipeg, MB R3C 0A1 CANADA

Sept. 20, 2021

Re: Quorum

by Dean Bahls

Since this was mentioned on a call I had with Richard on Friday, I’m guessing the merger that he mentioned below may have been related to the networks of BBV, SMB and CNS (Fiber Minnesota) coming together on 9/1. However, the services provided by those companies will still remain with their respective companies. (i.e.: BBV will still provide Internet services for their customers. FM will just provide transport to BBV for their services.) Thus, there should be no change in membership as a result of this merger. If interested, here is a link to the press release: https://blandinonbroadband.org/2021/09/13/fiber-minnesota-creates-statewide… Thanks, Dean From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> On Behalf Of Richard Laager Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 12:13 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Quorum We've had the topic of quorum on the agenda a few times. At the last meeting, I said I thought our annual meeting would be a good time to take that up officially. I said I'd send a proposal to the list. To recap the concern: Our bylaws currently set the quorum at 10%. As we add members (which is great!), the required quorum increases proportionally. However, it seems we have approximately the same core group interested in governance. If we grow much more, we may be unable to meet the quorum requirement. We have already had a couple meetings where we had to wait for people to show up, or contact people to encourage them to join the call. The attendance numbers going back to the end of 2017 are: 11, 11, 10, 9*, 12, 12, 11, 16*, 11, 16, 15*, 15, 15 * Regular annual meeting with election. The current Bylaws and the Attendance information can be found at: http://micemn.net/resources.html As of the last meeting, our voting membership was 118, which puts quorum at 12 members. (Also, I understand that a merger has happened which would reduce most, if not all, of the previous attendance numbers by 1.) Counterargument: We haven't actually completely failed quorum yet. Counter-counter-argument: It's been close, and if it happens, then without a quorum, we can't fix the issue. We previously discussed the idea of setting a cap on the quorum. That is, it would be 10% or X, whichever is lower. This is consistent with other provisions in the bylaws (e.g. 3% or 50 members, whichever is less, can call a meeting if no meeting has occurred in 15 months). This seems like a great solution to me. I think 10 would be a good number. I propose that section 1.11 of the bylaws be amended to read as follows: Members representing ten percent (10%) of the voting power of the membership interests entitled to vote at a meeting of the members, or at least ten (10) members, whichever is less, are a quorum for the transaction of business. Thoughts? -- Richard _____ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS <http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1> &A=1

Sept. 20, 2021

Re: Quorum

by Dean Bahls

I support what Richard proposes. When things go well, interest is low. So it surely makes sense to let the core group (who mostly got MICE going in the first place), keep us moving forward. If there is something controversial going on, folks have every right to show up and make their voices heard. Dean From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> On Behalf Of Richard Laager Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 12:13 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Quorum We've had the topic of quorum on the agenda a few times. At the last meeting, I said I thought our annual meeting would be a good time to take that up officially. I said I'd send a proposal to the list. To recap the concern: Our bylaws currently set the quorum at 10%. As we add members (which is great!), the required quorum increases proportionally. However, it seems we have approximately the same core group interested in governance. If we grow much more, we may be unable to meet the quorum requirement. We have already had a couple meetings where we had to wait for people to show up, or contact people to encourage them to join the call. The attendance numbers going back to the end of 2017 are: 11, 11, 10, 9*, 12, 12, 11, 16*, 11, 16, 15*, 15, 15 * Regular annual meeting with election. The current Bylaws and the Attendance information can be found at: http://micemn.net/resources.html As of the last meeting, our voting membership was 118, which puts quorum at 12 members. (Also, I understand that a merger has happened which would reduce most, if not all, of the previous attendance numbers by 1.) Counterargument: We haven't actually completely failed quorum yet. Counter-counter-argument: It's been close, and if it happens, then without a quorum, we can't fix the issue. We previously discussed the idea of setting a cap on the quorum. That is, it would be 10% or X, whichever is lower. This is consistent with other provisions in the bylaws (e.g. 3% or 50 members, whichever is less, can call a meeting if no meeting has occurred in 15 months). This seems like a great solution to me. I think 10 would be a good number. I propose that section 1.11 of the bylaws be amended to read as follows: Members representing ten percent (10%) of the voting power of the membership interests entitled to vote at a meeting of the members, or at least ten (10) members, whichever is less, are a quorum for the transaction of business. Thoughts? -- Richard _____ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS <http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1> &A=1

Sept. 20, 2021

MICE UG 39

by Richard Laager

[Resending with correct Subject and Agenda attachment.] MICE UG 39 is this week (Wednesday, September 22). It will be in person and Zoom; details for both below. I've attached an agenda, which is just our stock agenda, plus the quorum topic and the election. UG 38 minutes are attached. As promised, I made a specific quorum proposal for discussion on the list: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind2109&L=MICE-DISCUSS&T=0&F=&S=&P=9… <http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind2109&L=MICE-DISCUSS&T=0&F=&S=&P=9…> For the election, the only nomination was Reid FIshler, so he is running unopposed. As has been our practice, we will still hold the vote for procedural reasons, even though the result is known. Updated meeting information: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind2108&L=MICE-DISCUSS&D=0&T=0&P=5908 <http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind2108&L=MICE-DISCUSS&D=0&T=0&P=5908> Notable points: * Masks required for all in-person attendees. * Zoom Details: https://umn.zoom.us/j/95578944919?pwd=Nk1pQXkyZ3dvNkdHTEFoeVNrblFLUT09 Meeting ID: 955 7894 4919 Passcode: 0dKX6f Venue information from last time: -------- Forwarded Message -------- MICE UG 38 will be held at the University’s Information Technology Building, 2218 University Ave SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414, Room 185. It is across University Ave SE from Huntington Bank Stadium (Formerly TCF Bank Stadium), see the link to the Campus Map below. This room has a video room system and remote access will be made available via Zoom video or phone audio, see Zoom details below. [snip superceded mask policy] Bring your own refreshments, the building's vending machines are still empty due to COVID precautions. There is a Caribou Coffee, just to the southeast of the building, and a CVS on the southwest corner of Ontario St SE and Washington Ave SE, less than a half a block away, and many other options are within easy walking distance. Please enter the building through the middle of three doors on the Ontario St SE side of the building, it will be open after 2:30 and will have a sign on it, if not please knock hard, or call my cell phone(612-812-9952). This door is right outside the meeting room, this avoids everyone traipsing through the building. The Stadium Village Green Line Light Rail Station is less than a block east of the building, kitty-corner at the intersection of University Ave SE and Huron Blvd SE, see the link below for the station's info page. Limited Street Parking is available on Ontario St SE and Beacon St SE. Otherwise, public parking is available in the Oak St and University Ave Ramps, each a little over two blocks away. Also, there is the Maroon and Gold Lots, which are a little further, on the north side of the Stadium, see the links below for more details on these ramps and lots. DO NOT park in University Parking Lot 70 on the north of the building, by the front door, between University Ave SE and the building, or Parking Lot 71 near the loading dock to the east of the building, they are contract parking only and you be ticketed. Also, DO NOT park in the private parking lot to the south of the building, you will likely be tagged, booted, and towed from that parking lot. https://campusmaps.umn.edu/information-technology <https://campusmaps.umn.edu/information-technology> https://safe-campus.umn.edu/return-campus/covid-19-updates <https://safe-campus.umn.edu/return-campus/covid-19-updates> https://www.metrotransit.org/stadium-village-station <https://www.metrotransit.org/stadium-village-station> https://www.pts.umn.edu/park/facilities/oakstreet <https://www.pts.umn.edu/park/facilities/oakstreet> https://www.pts.umn.edu/park/facilities/univave <https://www.pts.umn.edu/park/facilities/univave> https://www.pts.umn.edu/park/facilities/maroon <https://www.pts.umn.edu/park/facilities/maroon> https://www.pts.umn.edu/park/facilities/gold <https://www.pts.umn.edu/park/facilities/gold>

Sept. 20, 2021

MICE UG 38 Tomorrow!

by Richard Laager

MICE UG 39 is this week (Wednesday, September 22). It will be in person and Zoom; details for both below. I've attached an agenda, which is just our stock agenda, plus the quorum topic and the election. UG 38 minutes are attached. As promised, I made a specific quorum proposal for discussion on the list: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind2109&L=MICE-DISCUSS&T=0&F=&S=&P=9… <http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind2109&L=MICE-DISCUSS&T=0&F=&S=&P=9…> For the election, the only nomination was Reid FIshler, so he is running unopposed. As has been our practice, we will still hold the vote for procedural reasons, even though the result is known. Updated meeting information: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind2108&L=MICE-DISCUSS&D=0&T=0&P=5908 <http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind2108&L=MICE-DISCUSS&D=0&T=0&P=5908> Notable points: * Masks required for all in-person attendees. * Zoom Details: https://umn.zoom.us/j/95578944919?pwd=Nk1pQXkyZ3dvNkdHTEFoeVNrblFLUT09 Meeting ID: 955 7894 4919 Passcode: 0dKX6f Venue information from last time: -------- Forwarded Message -------- MICE UG 38 will be held at the University’s Information Technology Building, 2218 University Ave SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414, Room 185. It is across University Ave SE from Huntington Bank Stadium (Formerly TCF Bank Stadium), see the link to the Campus Map below. This room has a video room system and remote access will be made available via Zoom video or phone audio, see Zoom details below. [snip superceded mask policy] Bring your own refreshments, the building's vending machines are still empty due to COVID precautions. There is a Caribou Coffee, just to the southeast of the building, and a CVS on the southwest corner of Ontario St SE and Washington Ave SE, less than a half a block away, and many other options are within easy walking distance. Please enter the building through the middle of three doors on the Ontario St SE side of the building, it will be open after 2:30 and will have a sign on it, if not please knock hard, or call my cell phone(612-812-9952). This door is right outside the meeting room, this avoids everyone traipsing through the building. The Stadium Village Green Line Light Rail Station is less than a block east of the building, kitty-corner at the intersection of University Ave SE and Huron Blvd SE, see the link below for the station's info page. Limited Street Parking is available on Ontario St SE and Beacon St SE. Otherwise, public parking is available in the Oak St and University Ave Ramps, each a little over two blocks away. Also, there is the Maroon and Gold Lots, which are a little further, on the north side of the Stadium, see the links below for more details on these ramps and lots. DO NOT park in University Parking Lot 70 on the north of the building, by the front door, between University Ave SE and the building, or Parking Lot 71 near the loading dock to the east of the building, they are contract parking only and you be ticketed. Also, DO NOT park in the private parking lot to the south of the building, you will likely be tagged, booted, and towed from that parking lot. https://campusmaps.umn.edu/information-technology <https://campusmaps.umn.edu/information-technology> https://safe-campus.umn.edu/return-campus/covid-19-updates <https://safe-campus.umn.edu/return-campus/covid-19-updates> https://www.metrotransit.org/stadium-village-station <https://www.metrotransit.org/stadium-village-station> https://www.pts.umn.edu/park/facilities/oakstreet <https://www.pts.umn.edu/park/facilities/oakstreet> https://www.pts.umn.edu/park/facilities/univave <https://www.pts.umn.edu/park/facilities/univave> https://www.pts.umn.edu/park/facilities/maroon <https://www.pts.umn.edu/park/facilities/maroon> https://www.pts.umn.edu/park/facilities/gold <https://www.pts.umn.edu/park/facilities/gold>

Sept. 20, 2021

Quorum

by Richard Laager

We've had the topic of quorum on the agenda a few times. At the last meeting, I said I thought our annual meeting would be a good time to take that up officially. I said I'd send a proposal to the list. To recap the concern: Our bylaws currently set the quorum at 10%. As we add members (which is great!), the required quorum increases proportionally. However, it seems we have approximately the same core group interested in governance. If we grow much more, we may be unable to meet the quorum requirement. We have already had a couple meetings where we had to wait for people to show up, or contact people to encourage them to join the call. The attendance numbers going back to the end of 2017 are: 11, 11, 10, 9*, 12, 12, 11, 16*, 11, 16, 15*, 15, 15 * Regular annual meeting with election. The current Bylaws and the Attendance information can be found at: http://micemn.net/resources.html <http://micemn.net/resources.html> As of the last meeting, our voting membership was 118, which puts quorum at 12 members. (Also, I understand that a merger has happened which would reduce most, if not all, of the previous attendance numbers by 1.) Counterargument: We haven't actually completely failed quorum yet. Counter-counter-argument: It's been close, and if it happens, then without a quorum, we can't fix the issue. We previously discussed the idea of setting a cap on the quorum. That is, it would be 10% or X, whichever is lower. This is consistent with other provisions in the bylaws (e.g. 3% or 50 members, whichever is less, can call a meeting if no meeting has occurred in 15 months). This seems like a great solution to me. I think 10 would be a good number. I propose that section 1.11 of the bylaws be amended to read as follows: Members representing ten percent (10%) of the voting power of the membership interests entitled to vote at a meeting of the members_, or at least ten (10) members, whichever is less,_ are a quorum for the transaction of business. Thoughts? -- Richard

Sept. 20, 2021

MN VoIP extension switch uplink upgrade

by Jeremy Lumby

Minnesota VoIP has completed upgrading the link between their extension switches and the MICE core to 3x100G. The new link runs from 6/13/1 on the main switch to 27/1 on the MN VoIP extension. Jeremy Lumby Minnesota VoIP 9217 17th Ave S #216 Bloomington, MN 55425 M: 612-355-7740 D: 612-392-6814 F: 952-873-7425 jlumby(a)mnvoip.com

Sept. 19, 2021

ImOn Upgrade

by Jeremy Lumby

ImOn has upgraded to 20G on the MN VoIP extension switch. Ports 29 & 30 in Portchannel 5 Jeremy Lumby Minnesota VoIP 9217 17th Ave S #216 Bloomington, MN 55425 M: 612-355-7740 D: 612-392-6814 F: 952-873-7425 jlumby(a)mnvoip.com

Sept. 15, 2021

Re: Limelight redundant connection

by Frank Bulk

Ok, will do. Frank -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> On Behalf Of Jay Hanke Sent: Friday, September 10, 2021 9:34 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Limelight redundant connection You'll want to reach out directly to Limelight for that question. I'm not sure that they monitor the list anymore after Jonny left. On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 9:31 AM Frank Bulk <fbulk(a)mypremieronline.com> wrote: > > Since Limelight is peering on the two route reflectors, is there anything additional we get if we peer with them directly at MICE? > > > > Frank > > > > From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> On Behalf Of Jeremy Lumby > Sent: Thursday, September 9, 2021 2:38 PM > To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET > Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Limelight redundant connection > > > > > > I just wanted to let everyone know that Limelight has completed their second connection to MICE that goes through the MN VoIP extension switch. They are fully operational now and ready for any bilateral peering requests on the additional ip addresses. > > > > > > Jeremy Lumby > > Minnesota VoIP > > 9217 17th Ave S > > Suite 216 > > Bloomington MN 55425 > > Main 612-355-7740 > > Direct 612-392-6814 > > EFax 952-873-7425 > > jlumby(a)mnvoip.com > > > > > > ________________________________ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > > ________________________________ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 -- Jay Hanke, President South Front Networks jayhanke(a)southfront.io Phone 612-204-0000

Sept. 10, 2021

Re: Limelight redundant connection

by Jay Hanke

You'll want to reach out directly to Limelight for that question. I'm not sure that they monitor the list anymore after Jonny left. On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 9:31 AM Frank Bulk <fbulk(a)mypremieronline.com> wrote: > > Since Limelight is peering on the two route reflectors, is there anything additional we get if we peer with them directly at MICE? > > > > Frank > > > > From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> On Behalf Of Jeremy Lumby > Sent: Thursday, September 9, 2021 2:38 PM > To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET > Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Limelight redundant connection > > > > > > I just wanted to let everyone know that Limelight has completed their second connection to MICE that goes through the MN VoIP extension switch. They are fully operational now and ready for any bilateral peering requests on the additional ip addresses. > > > > > > Jeremy Lumby > > Minnesota VoIP > > 9217 17th Ave S > > Suite 216 > > Bloomington MN 55425 > > Main 612-355-7740 > > Direct 612-392-6814 > > EFax 952-873-7425 > > jlumby(a)mnvoip.com > > > > > > ________________________________ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > > ________________________________ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 -- Jay Hanke, President South Front Networks jayhanke(a)southfront.io Phone 612-204-0000

Sept. 10, 2021

Re: Limelight redundant connection

by Frank Bulk

Since Limelight is peering on the two route reflectors, is there anything additional we get if we peer with them directly at MICE? Frank From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> On Behalf Of Jeremy Lumby Sent: Thursday, September 9, 2021 2:38 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Limelight redundant connection I just wanted to let everyone know that Limelight has completed their second connection to MICE that goes through the MN VoIP extension switch. They are fully operational now and ready for any bilateral peering requests on the additional ip addresses. Jeremy Lumby Minnesota VoIP 9217 17th Ave S Suite 216 Bloomington MN 55425 Main 612-355-7740 Direct 612-392-6814 EFax 952-873-7425 jlumby(a)mnvoip.com<mailto:jlumby@mnvoip.com> ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 10, 2021

Limelight redundant connection

by Jeremy Lumby

I just wanted to let everyone know that Limelight has completed their second connection to MICE that goes through the MN VoIP extension switch. They are fully operational now and ready for any bilateral peering requests on the additional ip addresses.Jeremy LumbyMinnesota VoIP9217 17th Ave SSuite 216Bloomington MN 55425Main 612-355-7740Direct 612-392-6814EFax 952-873-7425jlumby(a)mnvoip.com

Sept. 9, 2021

Re: Akamai Port Addition

by Jeremy Lumby

The switch has been configured, and is ready for their connection. -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Jay Hanke Sent: Saturday, September 04, 2021 11:19 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Akamai Port Addition We've allocated the following port to be added to the existing Akamai Port Channel 19 MICE MAIN :: Ethernet6/12/1 This will bring Akamai to 500G total MICE bandwidth. 1x2x100G 1x3x100G This email will serve as your LOA/CFA. Cologix has been copied on this email. -- Jay Hanke, President South Front Networks jayhanke(a)southfront.io Phone 612-204-0000

Sept. 4, 2021

Akamai Port Addition

by Jay Hanke

We've allocated the following port to be added to the existing Akamai Port Channel 19 MICE MAIN :: Ethernet6/12/1 This will bring Akamai to 500G total MICE bandwidth. 1x2x100G 1x3x100G This email will serve as your LOA/CFA. Cologix has been copied on this email. -- Jay Hanke, President South Front Networks jayhanke(a)southfront.io Phone 612-204-0000

Sept. 4, 2021

Re: Hiawatha (AS14828) LAG Group Augment

by Jeremy Lumby

The switch has been configured, and is ready for them. -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Jay Hanke Sent: Friday, September 03, 2021 10:12 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Hiawatha (AS14828) LAG Group Augment Please add the following 10G port to the existing Hiawatha LAG group: Ethernet4/41 This will bring the LAG to 1x3x10G. -- Jay Hanke, President South Front Networks jayhanke(a)southfront.io Phone 612-204-0000

Sept. 3, 2021

Hiawatha (AS14828) LAG Group Augment

by Jay Hanke

Please add the following 10G port to the existing Hiawatha LAG group: Ethernet4/41 This will bring the LAG to 1x3x10G. -- Jay Hanke, President South Front Networks jayhanke(a)southfront.io Phone 612-204-0000

Sept. 3, 2021