- mice-discuss - lists.micemn.net

Re: MICE attached compliance speed test server

by Shaun Carlson

I was looking at a couple of options for Raspberry Pi, but haven't built anything yet. Have you? s *Shaun Carlson* Director of R&D and Continuous Innovation *ph*: (218) 346.8673 | *em*: shaun.carlson(a)arvig.com *schedule a meeting:* phone call <https://x.ai/calendar/shauncarlson/phone> | video call <https://x.ai/calendar/shauncarlson/video> | meeting <https://x.ai/calendar/shauncarlson/office> *Arvig* | 150 Second Street SW | Perham, MN 56573 | arvig.com On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 9:37 AM Jeff Wilde <jeff.wilde(a)parkregion.com> wrote: > Have you looked into using a raspberry PI device? > > > > > > *From:* MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> *On Behalf Of *Steve > Howard > *Sent:* Monday, February 25, 2019 9:20 AM > *To:* MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET > *Subject:* Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE attached compliance speed test server > > > > Our Calix sales guy has told us that they have changed their software to > support servers like ours. > > However, as I understand things, the Calix testing solution only works > with their Gigaspire product. This greatly limits the usefulness of their > product so we developed an in-house solution based on smokeping to do the > testing for us. Not ideal, but, it will get the job done. > > On 02/25/2019 08:11 AM, Frank Bulk wrote: > > I’m not sure how many companies are also interested in this, but if it > could be used by Calix or Vantage Point’s CAF II-based broadband testing > solutions, we would be interested in financially supporting this. > > > > Frank > > > > *From:* MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> > <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> *On Behalf Of *Jay Hanke > *Sent:* Sunday, February 24, 2019 11:13 AM > *To:* MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET > *Subject:* [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE attached compliance speed test server > > > > Was there any progress on this? > > > > -- > > Jay Hanke, President > > South Front Networks > > jayhanke(a)southfront.io > > Phone 612-204-0000 > > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > > > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 >

Feb. 25, 2019

Re: MICE attached compliance speed test server

by Jeff Wilde

Have you looked into using a raspberry PI device? From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> On Behalf Of Steve Howard Sent: Monday, February 25, 2019 9:20 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE attached compliance speed test server Our Calix sales guy has told us that they have changed their software to support servers like ours. However, as I understand things, the Calix testing solution only works with their Gigaspire product. This greatly limits the usefulness of their product so we developed an in-house solution based on smokeping to do the testing for us. Not ideal, but, it will get the job done. On 02/25/2019 08:11 AM, Frank Bulk wrote: I’m not sure how many companies are also interested in this, but if it could be used by Calix or Vantage Point’s CAF II-based broadband testing solutions, we would be interested in financially supporting this. Frank From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET><mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> On Behalf Of Jay Hanke Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2019 11:13 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET<mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE attached compliance speed test server Was there any progress on this? -- Jay Hanke, President South Front Networks jayhanke(a)southfront.io<mailto:jayhanke@southfront.io> Phone 612-204-0000 ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Feb. 25, 2019

Re: MICE attached compliance speed test server

by Steve Howard

Feb. 25, 2019

Re: MICE attached compliance speed test server

by Steve Howard

Feb. 25, 2019

Re: MICE attached compliance speed test server

by Steve Howard

Feb. 25, 2019

Re: MICE attached compliance speed test server

by Jay Hanke

What would the connection need to look like? Would the route to/from the test server show up in the route servers, require bilateral or new layer2? Jay On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 8:41 AM Steve Howard <showard(a)paulbunyan.net> wrote: > > Yep. We are working with our Washington attorneys to get them to get some > confirmation that MICE is an acceptable location. The rules state the St > Paul "metropolitan area". My belief is that MICE is in the St Paul > metropolitan area, but, we'd like to get some written confirmation to be > safe. > > > > On 02/25/2019 06:59 AM, Dean Bahls wrote: > > Politicians aren’t Internet savvy. So it ends up in the wrong place. * > *sigh** > > > > Dean > > > > > > *From:* MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> > <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> *On Behalf Of *Jay Hanke > *Sent:* Sunday, February 24, 2019 5:34 PM > *To:* MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET > *Subject:* Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE attached compliance speed test server > > > > Interesting, I wonder how they came up with St Paul (no public IXP). Also > Omaha is missing last I looked, Omaha was larger than KCIX. > > > > If someone implements something in St. Paul. I have some networks looking > for test locations. It might bring more eyeballs to mice. > > > > On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 5:00 PM Richard Laager <rlaager(a)wiktel.com> wrote: > > On 2/24/19 4:43 PM, Jay Hanke wrote: > > Is there a public FCC doc someplace? > > I think this is the one, but I'm really not positive on that. FCC stuff > isn't my area of expertise. > https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-18-710A1.pdf > > -- > Richard > > > > > -- > > Jay Hanke, President > > South Front Networks > > jayhanke(a)southfront.io > > Phone 612-204-0000 > > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > -- Jay Hanke, President South Front Networks jayhanke(a)southfront.io Phone 612-204-0000

Feb. 25, 2019

Re: MICE attached compliance speed test server

by Steve Howard

Feb. 25, 2019

Re: MICE attached compliance speed test server

by Jay Hanke

Steve- Are you open to allowing other cooperatives to use it (beyond CNS attached members)? On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 8:15 AM Steve Howard <showard(a)paulbunyan.net> wrote: > On 02/24/2019 04:36 PM, Richard Laager wrote: > > On 2/24/19 11:13 AM, Jay Hanke wrote: > > Was there any progress on this? > > I believe Steve decided to keep his iperf server private. > > > > We are in the process of replacing our compliance speed test server at > MICE. It is "semi-private". i.e. It is operating on a separate VLAN that > is on the CNS Remote switch. Anybody who is connected to the CNS remote > can request access and we'll set them up. This methodology was chosen due > to several items of concern that were brought up and the last MICE meeting. > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > -- Jay Hanke, President South Front Networks jayhanke(a)southfront.io Phone 612-204-0000

Feb. 25, 2019

Re: MICE attached compliance speed test server

by Steve Howard

Feb. 25, 2019

Re: MICE Google Traffic

by Jeremy Lumby

I agree it does not seem right, however I have talked to Google about it almost 10 times, and they find/fix other unrelated issues many of the times, however they still claim there is nothing limiting traffic below their 100G port speed. From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk Sent: Monday, February 25, 2019 8:11 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE Google Traffic It seems a bit odd that it floats so evenly at ~56 Gbps most of the day: http://micelg.usinternet.com/cacti/graph.php?action=view&local_graph_id=124… Does that seem right? Frank From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> On Behalf Of Mike Wilker Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 9:32 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE Google Traffic Thanks for the update Jeremy. Thank You, Mike Wilker CTO ( Office: (507) 214-0259 - Email: mwilker(a)jagcom.net www.JagCom.net 213 South Oak Avenue Owatonna, MN 55060 On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 7:31 AM Jeremy Lumby <jlumby(a)mnvoip.com> wrote: I just got the official word back from Google that everything should be stable. From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of AnthonyAnderberg(a)nuvera.net Sent: Friday, February 01, 2019 11:44 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE Google Traffic It looks like Google’s MICE traffic levels are significantly higher tonight - not as high as they’d been, but I suspect a lot of us are still suppressing our prefixes to them at MICE. Have they confirmed anything or does anyone who was having trouble and is using Google msp5 at MICE currently still have issues? Thanks, anthony To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Feb. 25, 2019