- mice-discuss - lists.micemn.net

Re: Zayo Test Request

by Matthew Beckwell

root@plmomn1:~# traceroute 184.94.224.1 traceroute to 184.94.224.1 (184.94.224.1), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 router-vrrp.plmo.mn.beckwell.net (206.146.60.1) 1.397 ms 1.396 ms 1.386 ms 2 vlan118-ply-border6.colo.zayoenterprise.net (206.144.55.166) 1.929 ms 2.043 ms 2.035 ms 3 172.31.12.69 (172.31.12.69) 2.490 ms 2.630 ms 2.677 ms 4 172.31.12.69 (172.31.12.69) 2.616 ms !H * * root@plmomn1:~# ping 184.94.224.1 PING 184.94.224.1 (184.94.224.1) 56(84) bytes of data. From 172.31.12.69 icmp_seq=1 Destination Host Unreachable From 172.31.12.69 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable From 172.31.12.69 icmp_seq=4 Destination Host Unreachable From 172.31.12.69 icmp_seq=5 Destination Host Unreachable From 172.31.12.69 icmp_seq=6 Destination Host Unreachable ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

May 26, 2011

Re: Zayo Test Request

by Mike Ockenga

Don't know if it's still up, but previously there's been a nice LG for AS5006 at http://lg.onvoy.net, if that would help. Mike Ockenga Sent from my iPhone On May 26, 2011, at 8:25 AM, "Jay Hanke" <jayhanke(a)MANKATONETWORKS.NET> wrote: > Can someone who has Zayo connectivity ping/traceroute 184.94.224.1? > > Thanks! > > Jay > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

May 26, 2011

Zayo Test Request

by Jay Hanke

Can someone who has Zayo connectivity ping/traceroute 184.94.224.1? Thanks! Jay ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

May 26, 2011

Juniper Training Location Info

by Jay Hanke

We are going to be in the FWR conference room at the 511 building for the Juniper switch training on Thursday June 2nd at 2 PM. We're expecting the training to go about 2 hours. Thanks! Jay ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

May 26, 2011

Re: New Member's Configured on BIRD

by David Farmer III

In a way both are correct. The Northern Lights Gigapop (AS57) is the ISP transit provider AS operated by the University and is the AS peering at MICE. Northern Lights Gigapop is simply a DBA of the University. AS217 is the source AS for traffic from the University's campuses. AS1998 is the source AS for the State of MN and MNSCU's campuses. There are a number of other ASes that AS57 is transiting to MICE as well. I can create a new AS-set in the RADb containing the ASes that AS57 is transiting to MICE, if folks are interested let me know. Is anyone connected to MICE generating BGP or traffic filters from the RADb? Sent from my Windows Phone From: Jay Hanke Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 14:40 To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)lists.iphouse.net Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] New Member's Configured on BIRD > Then fix0r! > > You has the power! Farmer, which one is correct? Northern Lights Gigapop or UMN? jay ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

May 25, 2011

Re: New Member's Configured on BIRD

by Andrew Hoyos

On May 25, 2011, at 3:13 PM, Koch, Andrew wrote: >>> Farmer, which one is correct? Northern Lights Gigapop or UMN? >> >> I bet former. >> >> Later is AS217 if memory serves... >> > > > The names in whois make it, oh, so clear :-) :) If RADB objects are right: aut-num: AS57 as-name: NL-GIGAPOP descr: Northern Lights GigaPOP aut-num: AS217 as-name: ASN-UMN descr: University of Minnesota ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

May 25, 2011

Re: New Member's Configured on BIRD

by Koch, Andrew

> -----Original Message----- > From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of > Mike Horwath > Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 2:52 PM > To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET > Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] New Member's Configured on BIRD > > On 5/25/11 2:40 PM, "Jay Hanke" <jayhanke(a)MANKATONETWORKS.NET> wrote: > > >> Then fix0r! > >> > >> You has the power! > > > >Farmer, which one is correct? Northern Lights Gigapop or UMN? > > I bet former. > > Later is AS217 if memory serves... > The names in whois make it, oh, so clear :-) [elm:usrako]: whois -h whois.arin.net " a 57 " # # The following results may also be obtained via: # http://whois.arin.net/rest/asns;q=57?showDetails=true # ASNumber: 57 ASName: UMN-REI-UC ASHandle: AS57 RegDate: 1985-12-18 Updated: 2010-07-14 Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/asn/AS57 OrgName: University of Minnesota OrgId: UNIVER-233-Z Address: 2218 Univ Ave SE City: Minneapolis StateProv: MN PostalCode: 55455 Country: US RegDate: 2009-10-13 Updated: 2010-02-02 Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/org/UNIVER-233-Z ... [elm:usrako]: whois -h whois.arin.net " a 217 " # # The following results may also be obtained via: # http://whois.arin.net/rest/asns;q=217?showDetails=true # ASNumber: 217 ASName: UMN-AGS-NET-AS ASHandle: AS217 RegDate: 1988-07-25 Updated: 2010-02-02 Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/asn/AS217 OrgName: University of Minnesota OrgId: UNIVER-233-Z Address: 2218 Univ Ave SE City: Minneapolis StateProv: MN PostalCode: 55455 Country: US RegDate: 2009-10-13 Updated: 2010-02-02 Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/org/UNIVER-233-Z ... [elm:usrako]: whois -h whois.arin.net " a 1703 " # # The following results may also be obtained via: # http://whois.arin.net/rest/asns;q=1703?showDetails=true # ASNumber: 1703 ASName: MIX ASHandle: AS1703 RegDate: 1992-02-13 Updated: 2010-02-02 Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/asn/AS1703 OrgName: University of Minnesota OrgId: UNIVER-233-Z Address: 2218 Univ Ave SE City: Minneapolis StateProv: MN PostalCode: 55455 Country: US RegDate: 2009-10-13 Updated: 2010-02-02 Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/org/UNIVER-233-Z ... ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

May 25, 2011

Re: New Member's Configured on BIRD

by Mike Horwath

On 5/25/11 2:40 PM, "Jay Hanke" <jayhanke(a)MANKATONETWORKS.NET> wrote: >> Then fix0r! >> >> You has the power! > >Farmer, which one is correct? Northern Lights Gigapop or UMN? I bet former. Later is AS217 if memory serves... -- Mike Horwath ipHouse - Welcome home! drechsau(a)iphouse.net The universe is an island, surrounded by whatever it is that surrounds universes. - Berkeley Fortune ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

May 25, 2011

Re: New Member's Configured on BIRD

by Jay Hanke

> Then fix0r! > > You has the power! Farmer, which one is correct? Northern Lights Gigapop or UMN? jay ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

May 25, 2011

Re: Cacti Graph using SNMPv1?

by Mike Horwath

On 5/25/11 2:24 PM, "Steve Howard" <showard(a)PAULBUNYAN.NET> wrote: >On 05/25/2011 02:15 PM, Mike Horwath wrote: >> On 5/25/11 11:39 AM, "Andrew Hoyos" <hoyosa(a)GMAIL.COM> wrote: >> >>> On May 25, 2011, at 11:33 AM, David Farmer wrote: >>> >>>> On 5/25/11 11:07 CDT, Jay Hanke wrote: >>>>>> Did you check that the Data Source for the graph is also using the >>>>>> 64-bit counters? >>>>>> >>>>>>> Nothing special in logs either showing a problem. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Steve - your own monitoring showing problems at all with data >>>>> Are you looking at Gi-0/2? >>>> it is possible this is a problem on the Cisco side too, that port >>>> Gi-0/2 on the 3560E got changed to being in a port channel sometime >>>>this >>>> creates weird issues. They usually go away after a reboot. >>> Yeah, I've seen this same thing on a few occasions when adding/removing >>> interfaces from port channels. >>> >>> Also, double check you've got "snmp-server ifindex persist" set in the >>> config, as you might be polling something else too. >> Shit, that's a great point! >> >> We aways have that set. >> >> Steve, can you check that? >> >> Could very well be a different port now :( >> >> But once you set it to persist (if it wasn't set), I can look into >>things >> further. >> > >It was not there. It is now. Super duper, I'll have it 'rescan' things. Hope it donut scrwed up things! -- Mike Horwath ipHouse - Welcome home! drechsau(a)iphouse.net The universe is an island, surrounded by whatever it is that surrounds universes. - Berkeley Fortune ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

May 25, 2011

Re: Cacti Graph using SNMPv1?

by Steve Howard

On 05/25/2011 02:15 PM, Mike Horwath wrote: > On 5/25/11 11:39 AM, "Andrew Hoyos" <hoyosa(a)GMAIL.COM> wrote: > >> On May 25, 2011, at 11:33 AM, David Farmer wrote: >> >>> On 5/25/11 11:07 CDT, Jay Hanke wrote: >>>>> Did you check that the Data Source for the graph is also using the >>>>> 64-bit counters? >>>>> >>>>>> Nothing special in logs either showing a problem. >>>>>> >>>>>> Steve - your own monitoring showing problems at all with data >>>> Are you looking at Gi-0/2? >>> it is possible this is a problem on the Cisco side too, that port >>> Gi-0/2 on the 3560E got changed to being in a port channel sometime this >>> creates weird issues. They usually go away after a reboot. >> Yeah, I've seen this same thing on a few occasions when adding/removing >> interfaces from port channels. >> >> Also, double check you've got "snmp-server ifindex persist" set in the >> config, as you might be polling something else too. > Shit, that's a great point! > > We aways have that set. > > Steve, can you check that? > > Could very well be a different port now :( > > But once you set it to persist (if it wasn't set), I can look into things > further. > It was not there. It is now. ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

May 25, 2011

Re: Cacti Graph using SNMPv1?

by Mike Horwath

On 5/25/11 11:39 AM, "Andrew Hoyos" <hoyosa(a)GMAIL.COM> wrote: >On May 25, 2011, at 11:33 AM, David Farmer wrote: > >> On 5/25/11 11:07 CDT, Jay Hanke wrote: >>>> Did you check that the Data Source for the graph is also using the >>>> 64-bit counters? >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Nothing special in logs either showing a problem. >>>>> >>>>> Steve - your own monitoring showing problems at all with data >>> >>> Are you looking at Gi-0/2? >> >> it is possible this is a problem on the Cisco side too, that port >>Gi-0/2 on the 3560E got changed to being in a port channel sometime this >>creates weird issues. They usually go away after a reboot. > >Yeah, I've seen this same thing on a few occasions when adding/removing >interfaces from port channels. > >Also, double check you've got "snmp-server ifindex persist" set in the >config, as you might be polling something else too. Shit, that's a great point! We aways have that set. Steve, can you check that? Could very well be a different port now :( But once you set it to persist (if it wasn't set), I can look into things further. -- Mike Horwath ipHouse - Welcome home! drechsau(a)iphouse.net The universe is an island, surrounded by whatever it is that surrounds universes. - Berkeley Fortune ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

May 25, 2011

Re: Cacti Graph using SNMPv1?

by Mike Horwath

On 5/25/11 11:01 AM, "Justin Krejci" <jkrejci(a)USINTERNET.COM> wrote: >On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 15:53 +0000, Mike Horwath wrote: >> On 5/24/11 6:28 PM, "Justin Krejci" <jkrejci(a)USINTERNET.COM> wrote: >> >> > >> >'micemn-gateway-2.micemn.net - Traffic - Gi0/2' in Cacti is exhibiting >> >signs of using SNMPv1 counters (frequent gaps at higher bandwidth >>usage) >> > >> >Is this a known issue? If not I presume someone at iphouse can fix this >> >easily. >> > >> >The "Fix64bit" plugin for Cacti is great for correcting this condition >>on >> >the fly if my assumption on the problem is correct. >> >> Your assumption is wrong unfortunately. >> >> I wish I had made a mistake, but stats.micemn.net's Cacti config is >>64bit >> for gathering of stuff. >> >> And using SNMPv2 according to the configuration. > >Did you check that the Data Source for the graph is also using the >64-bit counters? Verified! -- Mike Horwath ipHouse - Welcome home! drechsau(a)iphouse.net The universe is an island, surrounded by whatever it is that surrounds universes. - Berkeley Fortune ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

May 25, 2011

Re: New Member's Configured on BIRD

by Mike Horwath

On 5/25/11 11:46 AM, "James Montz" <jamesmontz(a)MANKATONETWORKS.NET> wrote: >Added IPv4 and IPv6 Configuration for City of Windomw (ASN: 46692). >Welcome! >Also noticed that IPv6 config for UMN (ASN: 57) was not in, so added that >as well. > >Maybe its a matter of semantics, but the website lists Northern Lights >GigaPoP as ASN: 57, NOT UMN. Then fix0r! You has the power! -- Mike Horwath ipHouse - Welcome home! drechsau(a)iphouse.net The universe is an island, surrounded by whatever it is that surrounds universes. - Berkeley Fortune ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

May 25, 2011

New Member's Configured on BIRD

by James Montz

Added IPv4 and IPv6 Configuration for City of Windomw (ASN: 46692). Welcome! Also noticed that IPv6 config for UMN (ASN: 57) was not in, so added that as well. Maybe its a matter of semantics, but the website lists Northern Lights GigaPoP as ASN: 57, NOT UMN. --------------------------------------------------- *James C. Montz* Senior Consultant *Mankato Networks LLC* <http://www.mankatonetworks.net/>320 East Liberty Street <http://maps.google.com/maps?q=320+East+Liberty+Street%2CMankato%2CMN+56001&…>Mankato, MN 56001 *Phone:* *(320)-496-6689* *Email: jamesmontz(a)mankatonetworks.net* *Web: http://www.mankatonetworks.net Skype: james.montz* * http://www.linkedin.com/in/jmontz* ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

May 25, 2011

Re: Cacti Graph using SNMPv1?

by Andrew Hoyos

On May 25, 2011, at 11:33 AM, David Farmer wrote: > On 5/25/11 11:07 CDT, Jay Hanke wrote: >>> Did you check that the Data Source for the graph is also using the >>> 64-bit counters? >>> >>>> >>>> Nothing special in logs either showing a problem. >>>> >>>> Steve - your own monitoring showing problems at all with data >> >> Are you looking at Gi-0/2? > > it is possible this is a problem on the Cisco side too, that port Gi-0/2 on the 3560E got changed to being in a port channel sometime this creates weird issues. They usually go away after a reboot. Yeah, I've seen this same thing on a few occasions when adding/removing interfaces from port channels. Also, double check you've got "snmp-server ifindex persist" set in the config, as you might be polling something else too. ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

May 25, 2011

Re: Cacti Graph using SNMPv1?

by David Farmer

On 5/25/11 11:07 CDT, Jay Hanke wrote: >> Did you check that the Data Source for the graph is also using the >> 64-bit counters? >> >>> >>> Nothing special in logs either showing a problem. >>> >>> Steve - your own monitoring showing problems at all with data > > Are you looking at Gi-0/2? it is possible this is a problem on the Cisco side too, that port Gi-0/2 on the 3560E got changed to being in a port channel sometime this creates weird issues. They usually go away after a reboot. > Usually SNMPv1 issues will appear at right about 100 Mb/s on a five > minute average. We're pulling the po1 interface well over a Gig > without an issue. Also, the traffic will show up with spike and then > nothing (when the counter rolls over). > > Jay > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 -- =============================================== David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 =============================================== ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

May 25, 2011

Re: Cacti Graph using SNMPv1?

by Steve Howard

On 05/25/2011 10:53 AM, Mike Horwath wrote: > Steve - your own monitoring showing problems at all with data I haven't got around to setting up the monitoring. Yours has worked great so I didn't bother (yet). Steve ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

May 25, 2011

Re: Cacti Graph using SNMPv1?

by Owen DeLong

On May 25, 2011, at 9:01 AM, Justin Krejci wrote: > On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 15:53 +0000, Mike Horwath wrote: >> On 5/24/11 6:28 PM, "Justin Krejci" <jkrejci(a)USINTERNET.COM> wrote: >> >>> >>> 'micemn-gateway-2.micemn.net - Traffic - Gi0/2' in Cacti is exhibiting >>> signs of using SNMPv1 counters (frequent gaps at higher bandwidth usage) >>> >>> Is this a known issue? If not I presume someone at iphouse can fix this >>> easily. >>> >>> The "Fix64bit" plugin for Cacti is great for correcting this condition on >>> the fly if my assumption on the problem is correct. >> >> Your assumption is wrong unfortunately. >> >> I wish I had made a mistake, but stats.micemn.net's Cacti config is 64bit >> for gathering of stuff. >> >> And using SNMPv2 according to the configuration. > > Did you check that the Data Source for the graph is also using the > 64-bit counters? > This would be the question of ifInOctets (32 bit) vs. ifInHCOctets (64 bit) IIRC. In case the reference is helpful. Owen >> >> Nothing special in logs either showing a problem. >> >> Steve - your own monitoring showing problems at all with data? >> > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

May 25, 2011

Re: Cacti Graph using SNMPv1?

by Jay Hanke

> Did you check that the Data Source for the graph is also using the > 64-bit counters? > >> >> Nothing special in logs either showing a problem. >> >> Steve - your own monitoring showing problems at all with data Are you looking at Gi-0/2? Usually SNMPv1 issues will appear at right about 100 Mb/s on a five minute average. We're pulling the po1 interface well over a Gig without an issue. Also, the traffic will show up with spike and then nothing (when the counter rolls over). Jay ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

May 25, 2011

Re: Cacti Graph using SNMPv1?

by Justin Krejci

On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 15:53 +0000, Mike Horwath wrote: > On 5/24/11 6:28 PM, "Justin Krejci" <jkrejci(a)USINTERNET.COM> wrote: > > > > >'micemn-gateway-2.micemn.net - Traffic - Gi0/2' in Cacti is exhibiting > >signs of using SNMPv1 counters (frequent gaps at higher bandwidth usage) > > > >Is this a known issue? If not I presume someone at iphouse can fix this > >easily. > > > >The "Fix64bit" plugin for Cacti is great for correcting this condition on > >the fly if my assumption on the problem is correct. > > Your assumption is wrong unfortunately. > > I wish I had made a mistake, but stats.micemn.net's Cacti config is 64bit > for gathering of stuff. > > And using SNMPv2 according to the configuration. Did you check that the Data Source for the graph is also using the 64-bit counters? > > Nothing special in logs either showing a problem. > > Steve - your own monitoring showing problems at all with data? > ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

May 25, 2011

Re: Cacti Graph using SNMPv1?

by Mike Horwath

On 5/24/11 6:28 PM, "Justin Krejci" <jkrejci(a)USINTERNET.COM> wrote: > >'micemn-gateway-2.micemn.net - Traffic - Gi0/2' in Cacti is exhibiting >signs of using SNMPv1 counters (frequent gaps at higher bandwidth usage) > >Is this a known issue? If not I presume someone at iphouse can fix this >easily. > >The "Fix64bit" plugin for Cacti is great for correcting this condition on >the fly if my assumption on the problem is correct. Your assumption is wrong unfortunately. I wish I had made a mistake, but stats.micemn.net's Cacti config is 64bit for gathering of stuff. And using SNMPv2 according to the configuration. Nothing special in logs either showing a problem. Steve - your own monitoring showing problems at all with data? -- Mike Horwath ipHouse - Welcome home! drechsau(a)iphouse.net The universe is an island, surrounded by whatever it is that surrounds universes. - Berkeley Fortune ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

May 25, 2011

Re: NANOG

by Jay Hanke

>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Jay Hanke <jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net> wrote: >>> Is anyone going to NANOG in Denver? >> >> i will be. is there interest in a twin cities networking geeks dinner? > > I'm on the fence. Combo WI/MN networking geeks dinner, that might do the trick? :) I'm in. Let's make it happen! ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

May 25, 2011

Cacti Graph using SNMPv1?

by Justin Krejci

'micemn-gateway-2.micemn.net - Traffic - Gi0/2' in Cacti is exhibiting signs of using SNMPv1 counters (frequent gaps at higher bandwidth usage) Is this a known issue? If not I presume someone at iphouse can fix this easily. The "Fix64bit" plugin for Cacti is great for correcting this condition on the fly if my assumption on the problem is correct. ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

May 24, 2011

Re: NANOG

by Andrew Hoyos

On May 23, 2011, at 4:18 PM, steve ulrich wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Jay Hanke <jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net> wrote: >> Is anyone going to NANOG in Denver? > > i will be. is there interest in a twin cities networking geeks dinner? I'm on the fence. Combo WI/MN networking geeks dinner, that might do the trick? :) ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

May 24, 2011