- mice-discuss - lists.micemn.net

At 511 Anytime soon?

by James Montz

If anyone will be at 511 in the near future, and can spare an ear, a console port, and 15 minutes, please let me know. I would like to complete the Juniper Switch configuration, however, I will not be able to make it to 511 personally for the foreseeable near future. Thank you, --------------------------------------------------- *James C. Montz* Senior Consultant *Mankato Networks LLC* <http://www.mankatonetworks.net/>320 East Liberty Street <http://maps.google.com/maps?q=320+East+Liberty+Street%2CMankato%2CMN+56001&…>Mankato, MN 56001 *Phone:* *(320)-496-6689* *Email: jamesmontz(a)mankatonetworks.net* *Web: http://www.mankatonetworks.net Skype: james.montz* * http://www.linkedin.com/in/jmontz* ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

July 8, 2011

Re: Juniper Switch move

by Mike Horwath

On 7/7/11 10:00 AM, "Jay Hanke" <jayhanke(a)MANKATONETWORKS.NET> wrote: >Graphing- any progress? Really? IP address? SNMP community? -- Mike Horwath ipHouse - Welcome home! drechsau(a)iphouse.net The universe is an island, surrounded by whatever it is that surrounds universes. - Berkeley Fortune ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

July 7, 2011

Juniper Switch move

by Jay Hanke

I think we're about ready to move onto the new switching platform. We currently have a 1G link between the 4500 and the EX virtual chassis. I believe that we're ready to start moving copper ports on to the new switch. The link between the switches is on port 0 so we can move the copper ports preserving the existing port numbers. ie port 1 old = port 1 new. SDN is planning to move to a 10G port sometime in August. We can leave them in place on the main switch until they are ready for the 10G port. FWR, the connection type on the MICE end will change from SC to LC when this change occurs. I think that CNS was planning to upgrade the link to the main switch to 10G. Steve is that still the case? There are two copper Ethernet links coming out of the back of each of the route servers. I propose we move one of the route servers to the new switch and then move the second route server after all the participants have moved off. Which port is the mgmt port? Objections/ideas? Cut scheduling, I think early morning in the middle of the week would be the best. Graphing- any progress? -- Jay Hanke CTO, CCIE #19093 Mankato Networks LLC 320 East Liberty Street Mankato, MN 56001-3838 Google 530-618-2398 jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net http://www.mankatonetworks.com ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

July 7, 2011

DCN Assignment

by Jay Hanke

Dakota Carrier Network will be on port 0 of the new fiber switch. Mike, it is the first port on the left on the top switch in the rack. Steve -- Jay Hanke CTO, CCIE #19093 Mankato Networks LLC 320 East Liberty Street Mankato, MN 56001-3838 Google 530-618-2398 jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net http://www.mankatonetworks.com ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

July 6, 2011

Re: Status of Enventis

by David Farmer

Great, bilateral is fine! But as the great sage Larry the Cable Guy would say "GiT 'R DONE" I believe several of us have made requests to peering(a)enventis.com and are waiting for a response. I for one would like to get peering setup before school starts to between Aug 15th and Sept 6th depending on the school. On 7/5/11 13:02 CDT, Ryan Goldberg wrote: > Ran into him in the hall. He said bilateral only… > > Ryan > > *From:*MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] *On Behalf > Of *Jay Hanke > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 05, 2011 12:56 PM > *To:* MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET > *Subject:* Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Status of Enventis > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Jerry Bonner <JBonner(a)enventis.com > <mailto:JBonner@enventis.com>> wrote: > > We’re still here! Well kind of. I’ve taken on some different roles at > Enventis and will be focusing more on voice services going forward. I’ve > brought my colleague Kenji Ogura up to date and I hope to see him on > here shortly. We’ve received several requests and will be getting back > to everyone. > > I haven't seen anything from Kenji. If anyone has Kenji's contact info > please reach out. We need the routes! > > Jay > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > <http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > <http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1> > -- =============================================== David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 =============================================== ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

July 5, 2011

Re: Status of Enventis

by Ryan Goldberg

Ran into him in the hall. He said bilateral only... Ryan From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Jay Hanke Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 12:56 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Status of Enventis On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Jerry Bonner <JBonner(a)enventis.com<mailto:JBonner@enventis.com>> wrote: We're still here! Well kind of. I've taken on some different roles at Enventis and will be focusing more on voice services going forward. I've brought my colleague Kenji Ogura up to date and I hope to see him on here shortly. We've received several requests and will be getting back to everyone. I haven't seen anything from Kenji. If anyone has Kenji's contact info please reach out. We need the routes! Jay ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

July 5, 2011

Re: Status of Enventis

by Mike Hemphill

Kenji Ogura (218) 740-6100 kogura(a)enventis.com Mike Hemphill FWR Communication Networks VP Sales 612-333-1922 voice 612-812-5242 cell 612-333-1945 fax mhemphill(a)mngateway.com Visit us at: www.mngateway.com _____ From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Jay Hanke Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 12:56 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Status of Enventis On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Jerry Bonner <JBonner(a)enventis.com> wrote: We're still here! Well kind of. I've taken on some different roles at Enventis and will be focusing more on voice services going forward. I've brought my colleague Kenji Ogura up to date and I hope to see him on here shortly. We've received several requests and will be getting back to everyone. I haven't seen anything from Kenji. If anyone has Kenji's contact info please reach out. We need the routes! Jay _____ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS <http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1> &A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

July 5, 2011

Re: Status of Enventis

by Jay Hanke

On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Jerry Bonner <JBonner(a)enventis.com> wrote: > We’re still here! Well kind of. I’ve taken on some different roles at > Enventis and will be focusing more on voice services going forward. I’ve > brought my colleague Kenji Ogura up to date and I hope to see him on here > shortly. We’ve received several requests and will be getting back to > everyone. > I haven't seen anything from Kenji. If anyone has Kenji's contact info please reach out. We need the routes! Jay ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

July 5, 2011

Fwd: [arin-announce] 2011 Global IPv6 Survey Now Open

by David Farmer

I would like to encourage everyone to full out this survey. Thanks -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [arin-announce] 2011 Global IPv6 Survey Now Open Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 09:59:54 -0400 From: ARIN <info(a)arin.net> To: arin-announce(a)arin.net As announced last year, after the 2010 survey results were presented, GNKS Consult is working with the RIPE NCC and NRO to repeat the global 2010 survey on the current and future use of IPv6. The IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey is now online, and we encourage all members of the ARIN community to participate. The survey is available at http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/GlobalIPv6survey2011. The purpose of the survey is to develop a better understanding of where the community is moving, and what can be done to ensure the Internet community is ready for the widespread adoption of IPv6. There has been little change to the survey since it was carried out in 2009 (only RIPE and APNIC) and 2010 (global), which will make comparison of progress possible. The results of previous surveys showed that community participation does contribute to a better understanding: more than 90% of last year's over 1600 respondents indicated that they were interested in participating again in 2011. We encourage all organizations to participate in this survey, which we hope will establish a comprehensive view of present IPv6 penetration and future plans for IPv6 deployment. The survey is composed of 23 questions and can be completed in about 15 minutes. For those without IPv6 allocations or assignments, or who have not yet deployed IPv6, the questions will be fewer in number. Results of the IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey will be presented and discussed widely, with the support of your RIR. Results for the 2010 Global IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2010 can be found at http://www.ipv6monitoring.eu/reports/Global%20IPv6%20Survey%20Summary%20v2.… There is also a comparison report prepared for RIPE NCC that looks at changes between the 2010 global survey and the 2009 IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey that only took place in the RIPE NCC and APNIC regions. This can be found at: http://ripe61.ripe.net/presentations/117-2010_IPv6_Survey_Results_RIPE_NCC_… Results of the 2009 survey, including a comparison of RIPE and APNIC regional results, can be found at http://ripe59.ripe.net/presentations/botterman-v6-survey.pdf. Please provide your name and contact information on the survey form if you wish to receive the draft survey analysis when it is completed. Please also indicate whether you are willing to share additional data with the TNO and GNKS Consult IPv6 Deployment Monitoring team. The survey will close on 31 July 2011. On behalf of ARIN and GNKS Consulting, we thank you for your time and interest in completing this survey. If you have any questions concerning the survey, please send an email to info(a)gnksconsult.com. Regards, Communications and Member Services American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

July 1, 2011

Re: TechdotMN article on MICE

by David Farmer

On 6/17/11 13:16 CDT, Mike Horwath wrote: > On 6/16/11 9:42 AM, "James Montz"<jamesmontz(a)MANKATONETWORKS.NET> wrote: > >> Mike Bollinger of TechdotMN was kind enough to write an article about >> MICE. >> http://tech.mn/news/2011/06/15/midwest-internet-cooperative-exchange-mice/ >> >> >> I feel bad about me being presented as one of the founding leaders. I in >> no way made myself out to be such. > > Integrity and truth in journalism today has been missing for years. I worked at the Minnesota Daily for a long time with Journalists and learned; Journalists aren't evil, they usually just don't understand what they are writing or talking about and are on deadline. Those two facts make for an interesting combination. :) -- =============================================== David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 =============================================== ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

June 17, 2011

Re: TechdotMN article on MICE

by Mike Horwath

On 6/16/11 9:42 AM, "James Montz" <jamesmontz(a)MANKATONETWORKS.NET> wrote: >Mike Bollinger of TechdotMN was kind enough to write an article about >MICE. >http://tech.mn/news/2011/06/15/midwest-internet-cooperative-exchange-mice/ > > >I feel bad about me being presented as one of the founding leaders. I in >no way made myself out to be such. Integrity and truth in journalism today has been missing for years. :) -- Mike Horwath ipHouse - Welcome home! drechsau(a)iphouse.net The universe is an island, surrounded by whatever it is that surrounds universes. - Berkeley Fortune ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

June 17, 2011

TechdotMN article on MICE

by James Montz

Mike Bollinger of TechdotMN was kind enough to write an article about MICE. http://tech.mn/news/2011/06/15/midwest-internet-cooperative-exchange-mice/ I feel bad about me being presented as one of the founding leaders. I in no way made myself out to be such. --------------------------------------------------- *James C. Montz* Senior Consultant *Mankato Networks LLC* <http://www.mankatonetworks.net/>320 East Liberty Street <http://maps.google.com/maps?q=320+East+Liberty+Street%2CMankato%2CMN+56001&…>Mankato, MN 56001 *Phone:* *(320)-496-6689* *Email: jamesmontz(a)mankatonetworks.net* *Web: http://www.mankatonetworks.net Skype: james.montz* * http://www.linkedin.com/in/jmontz* ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

June 16, 2011

Re: Akamai Traffic on MICE

by Jay Hanke

> Yes, the optics are ready to go in port Ten 0/10. (Note that this port > was previously as Hurricane Electric). Mike at FWR is running an interconnect to the old switch to the new Junipers. I would like to at least move SDN if possible at the same time. Maybe it would be best to move everything at once. We don't have any 1G SFP modules. The only two links on fiber are SDN and CNS. Are we making progress on graphing? Jay ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

June 7, 2011

Re: Akamai Traffic on MICE

by Steve Howard

Jay, On 06/06/2011 05:19 PM, Jay Hanke wrote: > CNS, Are you planning on moving to 10G for your switch as well? > Yes, the optics are ready to go in port Ten 0/10. (Note that this port was previously as Hurricane Electric). Thanks, Steve ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

June 7, 2011

Re: Akamai Traffic on MICE

by Jay Hanke

On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Mitch Elfstrand <Mitch.Elfstrand(a)sdncommunications.com> wrote: > SDN is willing to move the connection to alleviate the issue. Please let us know if we need to send someone to 511 to help with anything. > Has SDN considered moving to a 10 G connection? You're running 800 Mb/s of traffic consistently. When the Akamai cluster gets upgraded at the U you'll likely be blocking pretty bad. We've got the new Junipers about ready to go so you would have your choice of connection points. CNS, Are you planning on moving to 10G for your switch as well? Jay ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

June 6, 2011

Re: Jumper between Junipers and Cisco 4500

by Mike Hemphill

I just did a visual. No, there is not. Can we put one in? Mike Hemphill FWR Communication Networks VP Sales 612-333-1922 voice 612-812-5242 cell 612-333-1945 fax mhemphill(a)mngateway.com Visit us at: www.mngateway.com -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Jay Hanke Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 10:16 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Jumper between Junipers and Cisco 4500 Is there a jumper in place between the new Junipers and the 4500? Jay ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

June 6, 2011

Jumper between Junipers and Cisco 4500

by Jay Hanke

Is there a jumper in place between the new Junipers and the 4500? Jay ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

June 6, 2011

Re: IPv6 from CDW/Berbee AS 3599

by Ryan Goldberg

Farmer said: "Compudyne AS 47096 should both peer with both route servers." Ryan (Compudyne/AS47096) says: Done. I also cleaned up our v6 stuff. ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

June 4, 2011

Re: IPv6 from CDW/Berbee AS 3599

by Mike Horwath

I'll look at hooking the two route servers up this weekend. I, actually, thought that was done already. -- Mike Horwath via iPad 2, electric boogaloo! ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

June 4, 2011

Re: IPv6 from CDW/Berbee AS 3599

by David Farmer

On 6/3/11 22:43 CDT, Justin Krejci wrote: > Getting 2 less prefixes from 2607:FE10:FFFF::2 than from > 2607:FE10:FFFF::1 for CDW/Brebee. > > *> 2607:FEE0::/32 2607:FE10:FFFF::26 > 0 3599 i > *> 2607:FEE0:8000::/40 > 2607:FE10:FFFF::26 > 0 3599 ? > > Looks like the /40 is just a subset of the /32 prefix > > IPv4 prefix counts are identical on the route servers. > > There is no contact on the MICE Participants page for them. > Anyone have an idea or a good contact for them? Actually CDW/Berbee AS 3599 is only peering with the one of route servers, for IPv4 and IPv6. The reason that you see the same number of routes in IPv4 is that Genesis Wireless/RevNetData AS 30032 isn't properly filtering their BGP announcements and reflecting them back to the Route Server. Since the route servers AS isn't in the announcement, normal BGP loop detection doesn't block it. This is one of the dangers of running route server mode. So, 1. CDW/Berbee AS 3599 and Compudyne AS 47096 should both peer with both route servers. 2. Genesis Wireless/RevNetData AS 30032 should filter their route announcements with a prefix-list. Or, should set a BGP community on the routes they learn from the MICE route servers or any direct peers and not announce any routes with that BGP Community back to MICE. Since they don't have to many prefixes and are not serving other ASes, I would suggest the prefix-list option would be the easiest. 3. The route servers should iBGP peer with each other. This would prevent future similar problems. And, would be handy if Peer A looses connectivity to Route Server 1 and Peer B looses connectivity to Route Server 2, then the two peers can still talk to each other. Yes, that would be a bizarre failure mode, but weird sh!% happens. :) -------- An edited "show bgp ipv4 unicast regexp _3599_" Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path * 64.73.0.0/17 69.147.218.26 180 0 30032 3599 i *> 69.147.218.26 180 0 3599 i * 64.73.112.0/20 69.147.218.26 180 0 30032 3599 i *> 69.147.218.26 180 0 3599 i * 64.73.128.0/18 69.147.218.26 180 0 30032 3599 i *> 69.147.218.26 180 0 3599 i * 91.220.15.0/24 69.147.218.26 180 0 30032 3599 51818 i *> 69.147.218.26 180 0 3599 51818 i * 173.240.64.0/20 69.147.218.26 180 0 30032 3599 i *> 69.147.218.26 180 0 3599 i * 192.135.80.0 69.147.218.26 180 0 30032 3599 ? *> 69.147.218.26 180 0 3599 ? * 199.36.37.0 69.147.218.26 180 0 30032 3599 i *> 69.147.218.26 180 0 3599 i * 199.36.47.0 69.147.218.26 180 0 30032 3599 i *> 69.147.218.26 180 0 3599 i * 204.17.145.0 69.147.218.26 180 0 30032 3599 i *> 69.147.218.26 180 0 3599 i * 204.86.231.0 69.147.218.26 180 0 30032 3599 i *> 69.147.218.26 180 0 3599 i * 205.173.176.0/21 69.147.218.26 180 0 30032 3599 i *> 69.147.218.26 180 0 3599 i * 205.173.180.0 69.147.218.26 180 0 30032 3599 i *> 69.147.218.26 180 0 3599 i * 205.173.181.0 69.147.218.26 180 0 30032 3599 i *> 69.147.218.26 180 0 3599 i * 207.126.176.0/20 69.147.218.26 180 0 30032 3599 46814 46814 i *> 69.147.218.26 180 0 3599 46814 46814 i ------- An edited "show bgp ipv4 unicast regexp _30032_" Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path * 63.171.43.0/24 69.147.218.103 180 0 30032 i *> 69.147.218.103 180 0 30032 i * 64.73.0.0/17 69.147.218.26 180 0 30032 3599 i * 64.73.112.0/20 69.147.218.26 180 0 30032 3599 i * 64.73.128.0/18 69.147.218.26 180 0 30032 3599 i * 65.165.20.0/23 69.147.218.103 180 0 30032 i *> 69.147.218.103 180 0 30032 i r 69.147.218.0/24 69.147.218.103 180 0 30032 ? r> 69.147.218.103 180 0 30032 ? * 74.117.240.0/21 69.147.218.103 180 0 30032 i *> 69.147.218.103 180 0 30032 i * 91.220.15.0/24 69.147.218.26 180 0 30032 3599 51818 i * 173.240.64.0/20 69.147.218.26 180 0 30032 3599 i * 192.135.80.0 69.147.218.26 180 0 30032 3599 ? * 199.21.240.0/21 69.147.218.101 180 0 30032 47096 i * 199.36.37.0 69.147.218.26 180 0 30032 3599 i * 199.36.47.0 69.147.218.26 180 0 30032 3599 i * 204.17.145.0 69.147.218.26 180 0 30032 3599 i * 204.86.231.0 69.147.218.26 180 0 30032 3599 i * 204.120.16.0/20 69.147.218.103 180 0 30032 i *> 69.147.218.103 180 0 30032 i * 205.173.176.0/21 69.147.218.26 180 0 30032 3599 i * 205.173.180.0 69.147.218.26 180 0 30032 3599 i * 205.173.181.0 69.147.218.26 180 0 30032 3599 i * 206.51.193.0 69.147.218.101 180 0 30032 47096 i * 207.126.176.0/20 69.147.218.26 180 0 30032 3599 46814 46814 i * 216.70.9.0 69.147.218.101 180 0 30032 47096 i * 216.70.13.0 69.147.218.101 180 0 30032 47096 i * 216.70.17.0 69.147.218.101 180 0 30032 47096 i * 216.70.22.0 69.147.218.101 180 0 30032 47096 i * 216.70.26.0 69.147.218.101 180 0 30032 47096 i * 216.70.27.0 69.147.218.101 180 0 30032 47096 i * 216.70.28.0 69.147.218.101 180 0 30032 47096 i * 216.70.29.0 69.147.218.101 180 0 30032 47096 i -- =============================================== David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 =============================================== ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

June 4, 2011

IPv6 from CDW/Berbee AS 3599

by Justin Krejci

Getting 2 less prefixes from 2607:FE10:FFFF::2 than from 2607:FE10:FFFF::1 for CDW/Brebee. *> 2607:FEE0::/32 2607:FE10:FFFF::26 0 3599 i *> 2607:FEE0:8000::/40 2607:FE10:FFFF::26 0 3599 ? Looks like the /40 is just a subset of the /32 prefix IPv4 prefix counts are identical on the route servers. There is no contact on the MICE Participants page for them. Anyone have an idea or a good contact for them? ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

June 4, 2011

Re: UMN IPv6 peering is up

by Mike Horwath

On 6/3/11 7:07 PM, "David Farmer" <farmer(a)UMN.EDU> wrote: >I just brought up our IPv6 peering with the MICE route server. That's awesome. Thanks! -- Mike Horwath ipHouse - Welcome home! drechsau(a)iphouse.net The universe is an island, surrounded by whatever it is that surrounds universes. - Berkeley Fortune ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

June 4, 2011

UMN IPv6 peering is up

by David Farmer

I just brought up our IPv6 peering with the MICE route server. I about tripled the number of IPv6 routes in the MICE route server. We are also announcing a local 6to4 relay server we run into the MICE route server. You might want to double check where you are sending 6to4 traffic, check these two routes. IPv6 2002::/16 IPv4 192.88.99.0 -- =============================================== David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 =============================================== ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

June 4, 2011

Re: MICE website...ipv6...READY!

by Owen DeLong

Confirmed: baikal:owen (15) /Volumes/iDisk/Documents/6166Q % host www.micemn.net 2011/06/03 12:22:59 www.micemn.net has address 209.240.81.170 www.micemn.net has IPv6 address 2001:4980:abba:abba::170 (The PDF shows the page loaded form http://[2001:4980:abba:abba::170] WOOT! On Jun 3, 2011, at 12:36 PM, Frank Bulk wrote: > Nice: > > <image001.png> > > Frank > > -----Original Message----- > From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Steve Howard > Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 1:49 PM > To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET > Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE website...ipv6...READY! > > Done. > > On 06/03/2011 12:52 PM, Mike Horwath wrote: > > On 6/2/11 3:10 PM, "Mike Horwath" <drechsau(a)IPHOUSE.NET> wrote: > > > >> Mr. Howard, please update the DNS records to add an AAAA record of: > >> > >> 2001:4980:ABBA:ABBA::170 > >> > >> Enginehosting is now IPv6 ready (eternally). Need to do some work > >> internally still native frontend/backend services. > > Calling Steve Howard to the white curtesy phone... > > > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

June 3, 2011

Re: MICE website...ipv6...READY!

by Frank Bulk

Nice: [cid:image001.png@01CC21FB.A329B830] Frank -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Steve Howard Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 1:49 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE website...ipv6...READY! Done. On 06/03/2011 12:52 PM, Mike Horwath wrote: > On 6/2/11 3:10 PM, "Mike Horwath" <drechsau(a)IPHOUSE.NET<mailto:drechsau@IPHOUSE.NET>> wrote: > >> Mr. Howard, please update the DNS records to add an AAAA record of: >> >> 2001:4980:ABBA:ABBA::170 >> >> Enginehosting is now IPv6 ready (eternally). Need to do some work >> internally still native frontend/backend services. > Calling Steve Howard to the white curtesy phone... > ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

June 3, 2011