- mice-discuss - lists.micemn.net

Re: MICE Meeting Dates

by Mike Horwath

On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 04:32:39PM -0500, Jay Hanke wrote: > > I won't be there?? > > If there is ever a MICE meeting in Fargo, I'll offer buy gas for your > Prius provided I can ride along... Deal. Guess I can be there after all! -- Mike Horwath ipHouse - Welcome home! drechsau(a)iphouse.net The universe is an island, surrounded by whatever it is that surrounds universes. - Berkeley Fortune ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 6, 2011

Re: MICE Meeting Dates

by Jay Hanke

> I won't be thereŠ If there is ever a MICE meeting in Fargo, I'll offer buy gas for your Prius provided I can ride along... Jay ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 6, 2011

Re: MICE Meeting Dates

by Jay Hanke

> The May 9th, 2012 might not be ideal -- that is during the Tristate > Conference in Fargo. I bet that a number of our members will be at > Tristate. You might want to consider a different date. The goal is to get the meetings on a set schedule. If there was interest and we can find a host, I'd be open to having a meeting in Fargo... Jay ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 6, 2011

Re: MICE Meeting Dates

by Mike Horwath

On 9/6/11 4:03 PM, "Steve Howard" <showard(a)PAULBUNYAN.NET> wrote: >Jay, > >The May 9th, 2012 might not be ideal -- that is during the Tristate >Conference in Fargo. I bet that a number of our members will be at >Tristate. You might want to consider a different date. I won't be thereŠ :) -- Mike Horwath ipHouse - Welcome home! drechsau(a)iphouse.net The universe is an island, surrounded by whatever it is that surrounds universes. - Berkeley Fortune ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 6, 2011

Re: MICE Meeting Dates

by Steve Howard

Jay, The May 9th, 2012 might not be ideal -- that is during the Tristate Conference in Fargo. I bet that a number of our members will be at Tristate. You might want to consider a different date. Thanks, Steve On 09/06/2011 03:53 PM, Jay Hanke wrote: > The next MICE meeting dates will be: > > November 9th, 2011 > May 9th, 2012 > November 14th, 2012 > > Thanks, > ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 6, 2011

MICE Meeting Dates

by Jay Hanke

The next MICE meeting dates will be: November 9th, 2011 May 9th, 2012 November 14th, 2012 Thanks, -- Jay Hanke CTO, CCIE #19093 Mankato Networks LLC 320 East Liberty Street Mankato, MN 56001-3838 Google 530-618-2398 jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net http://www.mankatonetworks.com ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 6, 2011

Re: Mice routes via Northern Lights GigaPoP

by Hannigan, Martin

On 9/3/11 11:26 PM, "Jay Hanke" <jayhanke(a)MANKATONETWORKS.NET> wrote: >> I'm back in the office next week and I'll try to get around to contacting >> Zayo. Probably later in the week, as I know I'm going to have a bunch of >> stuff waiting for me when I get into the office. :) > > Zayo has been to a MICE meeting and has been approached multiple times > they should be aware. You can lead a horse to water... [ .. ] > There are a number of carriers who have equipment within 150' of the > MICE rack but haven't connected. > Hopefully our presence can influence some of that for you. Akamai has an open peering policy. If you are connected to the IX and can send us an email (even a garbled one) asking us to peer, we'll say YES 100% of the time. Best, -M< ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 6, 2011

Re: Akamai Peering

by Hannigan, Martin

On 9/6/11 10:35 AM, "Jeremy Lumby" <jlumby(a)MNVOIP.COM> wrote: > Will Akamai be peered multi-laterally through the MICE route servers, or will > we need to email to setup individual bi-lateral BGP sessions with Akamai? Is > there an updated timeframe on when Akamai will be live on the exchange? > We prefer both. Time frame is soon. Best, -M< ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 6, 2011

Akamai Peering

by Jeremy Lumby

Will Akamai be peered multi-laterally through the MICE route servers, or will we need to email to setup individual bi-lateral BGP sessions with Akamai? Is there an updated timeframe on when Akamai will be live on the exchange? Thanks, Jeremy Lumby Minnesota VoIP 9217 17th Ave S Suite 216 Bloomington, MN 55425 Main: 612-355-7740 Direct: 612-392-6814 E-Fax: 952-873-7425 jlumby(a)mnvoip.com -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Hannigan, Martin Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 11:15 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Mice routes via Northern Lights GigaPoP On 9/3/11 11:26 PM, "Jay Hanke" <jayhanke(a)MANKATONETWORKS.NET> wrote: >> I'm back in the office next week and I'll try to get around to >> contacting Zayo. Probably later in the week, as I know I'm going to >> have a bunch of stuff waiting for me when I get into the office. :) > > Zayo has been to a MICE meeting and has been approached multiple times > they should be aware. You can lead a horse to water... [ .. ] > There are a number of carriers who have equipment within 150' of the > MICE rack but haven't connected. > Hopefully our presence can influence some of that for you. Akamai has an open peering policy. If you are connected to the IX and can send us an email (even a garbled one) asking us to peer, we'll say YES 100% of the time. Best, -M< ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 6, 2011

Re: Mice routes via Northern Lights GigaPoP

by David Farmer

On 9/3/11 22:26 CDT, Jay Hanke wrote: >> I'm back in the office next week and I'll try to get around to contacting >> Zayo. Probably later in the week, as I know I'm going to have a bunch of >> stuff waiting for me when I get into the office. :) > > Zayo has been to a MICE meeting and has been approached multiple times > they should be aware. You can lead a horse to water... > > There are a number of carriers who have equipment within 150' of the > MICE rack but haven't connected. Just like I can announce them the routes, but can't make the take them, that is the basics of Internet routing policy. :) If people would like, I can stop announce Zayo's routes to MICE or you can filter them if you want to maintain routing symmetry. I still plan to poke them again. :) I never said I would be successful. :) -- =============================================== David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 =============================================== ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 4, 2011

Re: Mice routes via Northern Lights GigaPoP

by Jay Hanke

> I'm back in the office next week and I'll try to get around to contacting > Zayo. Probably later in the week, as I know I'm going to have a bunch of > stuff waiting for me when I get into the office. :) Zayo has been to a MICE meeting and has been approached multiple times they should be aware. You can lead a horse to water... There are a number of carriers who have equipment within 150' of the MICE rack but haven't connected. ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 4, 2011

Re: Mice routes via Northern Lights GigaPoP

by David Farmer

On 8/31/11 19:31 CDT, Richard Laager wrote: > On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 19:26 -0500, Mike Horwath wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 03:28:00PM -0500, Jeremy Lumby wrote: >>> I have a case where I am seeing 199.199.0.0/16 in BGP via >>> MICE/Northern Lights GigaPoP. I have noticed that traffic to this >>> network takes MICE, however the return traffic is coming in across >>> one of my public Internet connections. I am assuming that either by >>> choice, or by accident that they are not accepting my route via >>> MICE/Northern Lights GigaPoP. I am wondering who would be the best >>> person to chat with about this since MICE does not list a peering >>> contact for Northern Lights GigaPoP in the participants page, and I >>> realize that the correct peering contact might be another level or >>> two deeper. >> >> Zayo (old Onvoy) network. >> >> Didn't we see something like this before when UMN connected things up >> with Zayo not accepting the route updates/insertions? > > FWIW: I'm seeing another possible problem the opposite way. I'm a > customer of Zayo and my routes to minnesota.edu go through the UMN, but > the return traffic goes to Zayo via Level3. Can you give me a prefix? The only routes I'm seeing from Zayo that I'm not accepting are ones that I have a better route to through MICE or a GigaPOP participant. Also, I'm not seeing any routes from AS33362 that are going via Level3, Cogent, TWTC, TransitRail or Internet2 CPS, our upstream Transit providers. Thanks -- =============================================== David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 =============================================== ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 4, 2011

Re: Mice routes via Northern Lights GigaPoP

by David Farmer

Sorry, I'm out of the country and a bit behind on email. We are announcing the routes we learn from MICE to Zayo and VISI, two commercial peers we had prior to the creation of MICE. I've been meaning to contact them and suggest that they peer directly at MiCE. We also announce all of the GigaPOP R&E participants, the state, MnSCU, many of the private colleges, much of K12 in the state, North Dakota Higher Ed and K12, Iowa State and much of ICN, etc... I believe VISI is actually accepting the routes and that Zayo is not accepting the routes. As was discussed on the list I believe they have old static prefix filters in place and are not accepting the routes. I've also been meaning to contact them about that too. But it has been a busy summer, and I haven't had a chance to get to it. I'm back in the office next week and I'll try to get around to contacting Zayo. Probably later in the week, as I know I'm going to have a bunch of stuff waiting for me when I get into the office. :) On 8/31/11 15:28 CDT, Jeremy Lumby wrote: > I have a case where I am seeing 199.199.0.0/16 in BGP via MICE/Northern Lights GigaPoP. I have noticed that traffic to this network takes MICE, however the return traffic is coming in across one of my public Internet connections. I am assuming that either by choice, or by accident that they are not accepting my route via MICE/Northern Lights GigaPoP. I am wondering who would be the best person to chat with about this since MICE does not list a peering contact for Northern Lights GigaPoP in the participants page, and I realize that the correct peering contact might be another level or two deeper. > > Thanks, > Jeremy > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 -- =============================================== David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 =============================================== ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 4, 2011

Re: Bird Help

by James Montz

I am On Sep 2, 2011 4:10 PM, "Jay Hanke" <jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net> wrote: > Is someone around build a couple of new bgp sessions for a new carrier > on the route servers? > > -- > Jay Hanke > CTO, CCIE #19093 > Mankato Networks LLC > 320 East Liberty Street > Mankato, MN 56001-3838 > Google 530-618-2398 > jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net > http://www.mankatonetworks.com > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 3, 2011

Bird Help

by Jay Hanke

Is someone around build a couple of new bgp sessions for a new carrier on the route servers? -- Jay Hanke CTO, CCIE #19093 Mankato Networks LLC 320 East Liberty Street Mankato, MN 56001-3838 Google 530-618-2398 jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net http://www.mankatonetworks.com ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 2, 2011

Re: Mice routes via Northern Lights GigaPoP

by Matthew Beckwell

Yeahhh... It's by choice-- there are (old/outdated) static prefix filters on Zayo's peering session to the Gigapop. With the addition of MICE to AS57-- there's a lot more diverse traffic headed that direction than there used to be. I'll start a dialog with my contacts over there and see if we can get them to take more of a standard "transit" approach to that session. We have the same problem with our (relatively new) IPv4 prefix...MICE out...Level3/XO return... ~Matthew On Aug 31, 2011, at 3:28 PM, Jeremy Lumby wrote: > I have a case where I am seeing 199.199.0.0/16 in BGP via MICE/Northern Lights GigaPoP. I have noticed that traffic to this network takes MICE, however the return traffic is coming in across one of my public Internet connections. I am assuming that either by choice, or by accident that they are not accepting my route via MICE/Northern Lights GigaPoP. I am wondering who would be the best person to chat with about this since MICE does not list a peering contact for Northern Lights GigaPoP in the participants page, and I realize that the correct peering contact might be another level or two deeper. > > Thanks, > Jeremy > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 1, 2011

Re: Mice routes via Northern Lights GigaPoP

by Richard Laager

On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 19:26 -0500, Mike Horwath wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 03:28:00PM -0500, Jeremy Lumby wrote: > > I have a case where I am seeing 199.199.0.0/16 in BGP via > > MICE/Northern Lights GigaPoP. I have noticed that traffic to this > > network takes MICE, however the return traffic is coming in across > > one of my public Internet connections. I am assuming that either by > > choice, or by accident that they are not accepting my route via > > MICE/Northern Lights GigaPoP. I am wondering who would be the best > > person to chat with about this since MICE does not list a peering > > contact for Northern Lights GigaPoP in the participants page, and I > > realize that the correct peering contact might be another level or > > two deeper. > > Zayo (old Onvoy) network. > > Didn't we see something like this before when UMN connected things up > with Zayo not accepting the route updates/insertions? FWIW: I'm seeing another possible problem the opposite way. I'm a customer of Zayo and my routes to minnesota.edu go through the UMN, but the return traffic goes to Zayo via Level3. Richard ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 1, 2011

Re: Mice routes via Northern Lights GigaPoP

by Mike Horwath

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 03:28:00PM -0500, Jeremy Lumby wrote: > I have a case where I am seeing 199.199.0.0/16 in BGP via > MICE/Northern Lights GigaPoP. I have noticed that traffic to this > network takes MICE, however the return traffic is coming in across > one of my public Internet connections. I am assuming that either by > choice, or by accident that they are not accepting my route via > MICE/Northern Lights GigaPoP. I am wondering who would be the best > person to chat with about this since MICE does not list a peering > contact for Northern Lights GigaPoP in the participants page, and I > realize that the correct peering contact might be another level or > two deeper. Zayo (old Onvoy) network. Didn't we see something like this before when UMN connected things up with Zayo not accepting the route updates/insertions? -- Mike Horwath ipHouse - Welcome home! drechsau(a)iphouse.net The universe is an island, surrounded by whatever it is that surrounds universes. - Berkeley Fortune ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 1, 2011

Mice routes via Northern Lights GigaPoP

by Jeremy Lumby

I have a case where I am seeing 199.199.0.0/16 in BGP via MICE/Northern Lights GigaPoP. I have noticed that traffic to this network takes MICE, however the return traffic is coming in across one of my public Internet connections. I am assuming that either by choice, or by accident that they are not accepting my route via MICE/Northern Lights GigaPoP. I am wondering who would be the best person to chat with about this since MICE does not list a peering contact for Northern Lights GigaPoP in the participants page, and I realize that the correct peering contact might be another level or two deeper. Thanks, Jeremy ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Aug. 31, 2011

Re: IPv6 Route Server Check-in

by Owen DeLong

Check your IPv6 MaxPrefixes limit. Owen On Aug 30, 2011, at 1:41 PM, Doug McIntyre wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 03:23:46PM -0500, Matthew Beckwell wrote: >> I just noticed both of our IPv6 sessions to the route servers are down. (2607:fe10:ffff::1, 2607:fe10:ffff::2). IPv4 is fine....other IPv6 sessions seem ok. >> (Although I'm not sure for how long-- my logging wasn't setup yet). >> >> Just doing a "DownForEveryoneOrJustMe" check... > > Hmm, up for us. > ... > 2607:fe10:ffff::1 > 4 53679 144213 126038 0 0 0 02w5d00h 19 > 2607:fe10:ffff::2 > 4 53679 144120 126038 0 0 0 02w5d00h 19 > > > And.. > > [merlyn@micemn-01 /]$ ping6 2607:fe10:ffff::25 > PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2607:fe10:ffff::1 --> 2607:fe10:ffff::25 > > ^C > > [merlyn@micemn-01 /]$ telnet 2607:fe10:ffff::25 bgp > Trying 2607:fe10:ffff::25... > telnet: connect to address 2607:fe10:ffff::25: Host is down > telnet: Unable to connect to remote host > > > Check your IPv6 stack? > > > > -- > Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> > -- ipHouse/Goldengate/Bitstream/ProNS -- > Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Aug. 30, 2011

Re: IPv6 Route Server Check-in

by Matthew Beckwell

Found a typo on the ACL. Thanks for the extra eyes. ~Matthew -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Doug McIntyre Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 3:41 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] IPv6 Route Server Check-in On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 03:23:46PM -0500, Matthew Beckwell wrote: > I just noticed both of our IPv6 sessions to the route servers are down. (2607:fe10:ffff::1, 2607:fe10:ffff::2). IPv4 is fine....other IPv6 sessions seem ok. > (Although I'm not sure for how long-- my logging wasn't setup yet). > > Just doing a "DownForEveryoneOrJustMe" check... Hmm, up for us. ... 2607:fe10:ffff::1 4 53679 144213 126038 0 0 0 02w5d00h 19 2607:fe10:ffff::2 4 53679 144120 126038 0 0 0 02w5d00h 19 And.. [merlyn@micemn-01 /]$ ping6 2607:fe10:ffff::25 PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2607:fe10:ffff::1 --> 2607:fe10:ffff::25 ^C [merlyn@micemn-01 /]$ telnet 2607:fe10:ffff::25 bgp Trying 2607:fe10:ffff::25... telnet: connect to address 2607:fe10:ffff::25: Host is down telnet: Unable to connect to remote host Check your IPv6 stack? -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> -- ipHouse/Goldengate/Bitstream/ProNS -- Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Aug. 30, 2011

Re: IPv6 Route Server Check-in

by Doug McIntyre

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 03:23:46PM -0500, Matthew Beckwell wrote: > I just noticed both of our IPv6 sessions to the route servers are down. (2607:fe10:ffff::1, 2607:fe10:ffff::2). IPv4 is fine....other IPv6 sessions seem ok. > (Although I'm not sure for how long-- my logging wasn't setup yet). > > Just doing a "DownForEveryoneOrJustMe" check... Hmm, up for us. ... 2607:fe10:ffff::1 4 53679 144213 126038 0 0 0 02w5d00h 19 2607:fe10:ffff::2 4 53679 144120 126038 0 0 0 02w5d00h 19 And.. [merlyn@micemn-01 /]$ ping6 2607:fe10:ffff::25 PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2607:fe10:ffff::1 --> 2607:fe10:ffff::25 ^C [merlyn@micemn-01 /]$ telnet 2607:fe10:ffff::25 bgp Trying 2607:fe10:ffff::25... telnet: connect to address 2607:fe10:ffff::25: Host is down telnet: Unable to connect to remote host Check your IPv6 stack? -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> -- ipHouse/Goldengate/Bitstream/ProNS -- Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Aug. 30, 2011

Re: IPv6 Route Server Check-in

by Steve Howard

Our IPv6 sessions to MICE are both up and stable. On 08/30/2011 03:23 PM, Matthew Beckwell wrote: > I just noticed both of our IPv6 sessions to the route servers are down. (2607:fe10:ffff::1, 2607:fe10:ffff::2). IPv4 is fine....other IPv6 sessions seem ok. > (Although I'm not sure for how long-- my logging wasn't setup yet). > > Just doing a "DownForEveryoneOrJustMe" check... > ~Matthew > ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Aug. 30, 2011

IPv6 Route Server Check-in

by Matthew Beckwell

I just noticed both of our IPv6 sessions to the route servers are down. (2607:fe10:ffff::1, 2607:fe10:ffff::2). IPv4 is fine....other IPv6 sessions seem ok. (Although I'm not sure for how long-- my logging wasn't setup yet). Just doing a "DownForEveryoneOrJustMe" check... ~Matthew -- Matthew Beckwell - Senior Network and Application Engineer Advanced Integrated Technologies Office: 952-829-5511 x204 matthewb(a)aitech.net ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Aug. 30, 2011

"carrier choice" verbiage

by Ryan Goldberg

I've got a customer moving into a building where the building owners/management is attempting to enforce carrier exclusivity; they are in bed with another carrier. I already have the customer's other two sites on-net. This would be a third, new site. My fiber is just outside of the building, and I want to be in it. The owners of the company (my customer) have a pretty strong hand, and are looking for verbiage to add to the lease basically stating they can use whatever carrier they want. Does anyone have something like this handy? Thanks! Ryan ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Aug. 25, 2011