- mice-discuss - lists.micemn.net

Re: Survey of Connected Devices

by Justin Krejci

On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 14:21 -0600, Jay Hanke wrote: > Could everyone share what type of device is connected directly to the > MICE switches? > > -Layer 2 (ethernet switch) > -Layer 2/3 (Ethernet Switch with L3 address on VLAN) > -Layer 3 (router) > USI Logically it's an L3 router port (not on a VLAN) ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Dec. 1, 2011

Re: Survey of Connected Devices

by Matthew Beckwell

AITech = Direct, untagged copper connection to our Layer 3 router. ~Matthew -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Jay Hanke Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 2:21 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Survey of Connected Devices Could everyone share what type of device is connected directly to the MICE switches? -Layer 2 (ethernet switch) -Layer 2/3 (Ethernet Switch with L3 address on VLAN) -Layer 3 (router) Jay ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Dec. 1, 2011

Re: Survey of Connected Devices

by Jeremy Lumby

I am going through a gigabit LEM of a Packeteer Packetshaper, and then into a Cisco 7204 VXR Router Jeremy Lumby Minnesota VoIP 9217 17th Ave S Suite 216 Bloomington, MN 55425 Main: 612-355-7740 Direct: 612-392-6814 E-Fax: 952-873-7425 jlumby(a)mnvoip.com -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Jay Hanke Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 2:21 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Survey of Connected Devices Could everyone share what type of device is connected directly to the MICE switches? -Layer 2 (ethernet switch) -Layer 2/3 (Ethernet Switch with L3 address on VLAN) -Layer 3 (router) Jay ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Dec. 1, 2011

Re: Survey of Connected Devices

by Doug McIntyre

On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 02:21:08PM -0600, Jay Hanke wrote: > Could everyone share what type of device is connected directly to the > MICE switches? > > -Layer 2 (ethernet switch) > -Layer 2/3 (Ethernet Switch with L3 address on VLAN) > -Layer 3 (router) Direct connection is a L2 switch used only as a media converter, and direct into a router back at my main POP. -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> -- ipHouse/Goldengate/Bitstream/ProNS -- Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Dec. 1, 2011

Survey of Connected Devices

by Jay Hanke

Could everyone share what type of device is connected directly to the MICE switches? -Layer 2 (ethernet switch) -Layer 2/3 (Ethernet Switch with L3 address on VLAN) -Layer 3 (router) Jay ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Dec. 1, 2011

Re: Nextera MICE port Assignment Request

by Anthony Anderberg

They should be ready to go. Anthony Anderberg Sr. Systems Analyst 320-234-5239 anthonyanderberg(a)nu-telecom.net -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Jay Hanke Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 11:25 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Nextera MICE port Assignment Request Nextera Main Switch ge-0/0/8 ASN 22402 69.147.218.8/24 2607:fe10:ffff::8/64 peering(a)nextera.net Please build them in the route servers and update the website and cacti server. Thanks! -- Jay Hanke CTO, CCIE #19093 Mankato Networks LLC 619 S Front St Mankato, MN 56001-3838 Google 530-618-2398 jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net http://www.mankatonetworks.com ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Nov. 30, 2011

Nextera MICE port Assignment Request

by Jay Hanke

Nextera Main Switch ge-0/0/8 ASN 22402 69.147.218.8/242607:fe10:ffff::8/64peering@nextera.net Please build them in the route servers and update the website and cacti server. Thanks! -- Jay Hanke CTO, CCIE #19093 Mankato Networks LLC 619 S Front St Mankato, MN 56001-3838 Google 530-618-2398 jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net http://www.mankatonetworks.com ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Nov. 30, 2011

New Data center in Eagan

by Frank Bulk

http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2011/11/22/five-9s-digital-expa… Thought this might interest some of the Minnesota folks. Frank ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Nov. 23, 2011

Re: New Arvig Port Assignment

by Mike Bushard Jr

Sounds great Jay. We'll work on getting you the info. We're excited to become part of the group! Mike Bushard, Jr Network Engineer IV *Arvig Communication Systems* diversicom-Melrose Telephone-Mainstreet Communications 320.256.7471 Office 320.256.0178 Direct mike.bushard(a)arvig.com On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Jay Hanke <jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net>wrote: > Arvig > Port Main switch 7 (copper) > 69.147.218.7/24 > 2607:fe10:ffff::7/64 > We need your contact info and ASN. Also please update your peeringDB > information. > > Thanks and welcome aboard! > > -- > Jay Hanke > CTO, CCIE #19093 > Mankato Networks LLC > 619 S Front St > Mankato, MN 56001-3838 > Google 530-618-2398 > jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net > http://www.mankatonetworks.com > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > -- *Mike Bushard, Jr* Network Engineer Arvig Communications Systems diversicom-Melrose Telephone-Wisper Wireless 320.256.7471 320.256.0178 Direct 320.333.9448 Mobile 320.256.7555 Fax ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Nov. 23, 2011

Re: MICE incident @11:47 CST

by Anthony Anderberg

Looks like the routes came back up for everyone but DCN. If anyone needs a hand just let us know. Anthony Anderberg Sr. Systems Analyst - NU-Telecom O: 320-234-5239 C: 320-234-5539 anthonyanderberg(a)nu-telecom.net -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Jay Hanke Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 2:10 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE incident @11:47 CST On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 1:54 PM, James Stahr <stahr(a)mailbag.com> wrote: > Anyone else have an issue? stats.micemn.net show spikes which would > likely indicate a spanning tree loop or a broadcast storm. Whatever > the traffic was, it caused a CPU spike and upset all of our other BGP > sessions on our ASR as well. I apologize, that was my mess up. I was working on a customer transport link and didn't realize I had a bridge-domain built on the port. It created a loop when the port came up within the customer network and it looks like it spewed garbage on to the MICE vlan. Jay ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Nov. 22, 2011

Re: MICE incident @11:47 CST

by Justin Krejci

My favorite quote from their config guide: 4.2.6. Non-unicast IPv4: IGMP, DHCP, TFTP On the ISP peering LAN, the only non-unicast traffic that is allowed is the ARP query. Sometimes we see equipment trying to get a configuration through broadcast TFTP, or configure themselves through DHCP. We will leave it to the reader to consider why this is a bad idea. On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 14:14 -0600, Andrew Hoyos wrote: > Can we revisit the whole spanning tree on the IX thing again? > > My two cents last time was for 1 mac address per participant facing port, proper storm control limts, bpdufilter, etc. > > Also, I'd encourage all participants to review their config's, *especially* if they have layer2 devices in the mix somewhere. > AMS-IX has put together very nice and self-explainatory guides about how to keep your layer2 devices acting nice and not have a negative effect on the entire MICE IX. > > That configuration guide is located here: http://www.ams-ix.net/config-guide > > -- > Andrew Hoyos > hoyosa(a)gmail.com > > On Nov 22, 2011, at 2:06 PM, Eric Crist wrote: > > > Judging by the graphs, it was something between Cooperative Net and HE… > > > > --- > > Eric F Crist > > System Administrator > > ClaimLynx, Inc > > (952) 593-5969 x2301 > > > > > > > > On Nov 22, 2011, at 13:54:12, James Stahr wrote: > > > >> Anyone else have an issue? stats.micemn.net show spikes which would likely indicate a spanning tree loop or a broadcast storm. Whatever the traffic was, it caused a CPU spike and upset all of our other BGP sessions on our ASR as well. > >> > >> -James > >> Berbee/CDW > >> > >> ######################################################################## > >> > >> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > >> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > > > ######################################################################## > > > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Nov. 22, 2011

Re: MICE incident @11:47 CST

by Andrew Hoyos

Can we revisit the whole spanning tree on the IX thing again? My two cents last time was for 1 mac address per participant facing port, proper storm control limts, bpdufilter, etc. Also, I'd encourage all participants to review their config's, *especially* if they have layer2 devices in the mix somewhere. AMS-IX has put together very nice and self-explainatory guides about how to keep your layer2 devices acting nice and not have a negative effect on the entire MICE IX. That configuration guide is located here: http://www.ams-ix.net/config-guide -- Andrew Hoyos hoyosa(a)gmail.com On Nov 22, 2011, at 2:06 PM, Eric Crist wrote: > Judging by the graphs, it was something between Cooperative Net and HE… > > --- > Eric F Crist > System Administrator > ClaimLynx, Inc > (952) 593-5969 x2301 > > > > On Nov 22, 2011, at 13:54:12, James Stahr wrote: > >> Anyone else have an issue? stats.micemn.net show spikes which would likely indicate a spanning tree loop or a broadcast storm. Whatever the traffic was, it caused a CPU spike and upset all of our other BGP sessions on our ASR as well. >> >> -James >> Berbee/CDW >> >> ######################################################################## >> >> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: >> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Nov. 22, 2011

Re: MICE incident @11:47 CST

by Jay Hanke

On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 1:54 PM, James Stahr <stahr(a)mailbag.com> wrote: > Anyone else have an issue? stats.micemn.net show spikes which would likely > indicate a spanning tree loop or a broadcast storm. Whatever the traffic > was, it caused a CPU spike and upset all of our other BGP sessions on our > ASR as well. I apologize, that was my mess up. I was working on a customer transport link and didn't realize I had a bridge-domain built on the port. It created a loop when the port came up within the customer network and it looks like it spewed garbage on to the MICE vlan. Jay ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Nov. 22, 2011

Re: MICE incident @11:47 CST

by Eric Crist

Judging by the graphs, it was something between Cooperative Net and HE… --- Eric F Crist System Administrator ClaimLynx, Inc (952) 593-5969 x2301 On Nov 22, 2011, at 13:54:12, James Stahr wrote: > Anyone else have an issue? stats.micemn.net show spikes which would likely indicate a spanning tree loop or a broadcast storm. Whatever the traffic was, it caused a CPU spike and upset all of our other BGP sessions on our ASR as well. > > -James > Berbee/CDW > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Nov. 22, 2011

Re: MICE incident @11:47 CST

by Ryan Goldberg

Saw same, bgp poof, and mac-flap ick... Ryan ----- Reply message ----- From: "James Stahr" <stahr(a)MAILBAG.COM> To: "MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET" <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE incident @11:47 CST Date: Tue, Nov 22, 2011 1:54 pm Anyone else have an issue? stats.micemn.net show spikes which would likely indicate a spanning tree loop or a broadcast storm. Whatever the traffic was, it caused a CPU spike and upset all of our other BGP sessions on our ASR as well. -James Berbee/CDW ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Nov. 22, 2011

MICE incident @11:47 CST

by James Stahr

Anyone else have an issue? stats.micemn.net show spikes which would likely indicate a spanning tree loop or a broadcast storm. Whatever the traffic was, it caused a CPU spike and upset all of our other BGP sessions on our ASR as well. -James Berbee/CDW ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Nov. 22, 2011

New Arvig Port Assignment

by Jay Hanke

Arvig Port Main switch 7 (copper) 69.147.218.7/24 2607:fe10:ffff::7/64 We need your contact info and ASN. Also please update your peeringDB information. Thanks and welcome aboard! -- Jay Hanke CTO, CCIE #19093 Mankato Networks LLC 619 S Front St Mankato, MN 56001-3838 Google 530-618-2398 jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net http://www.mankatonetworks.com ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Nov. 21, 2011

Re: route-server IPv6 BGP

by Doug McIntyre

On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 06:11:29PM -0600, Bradley Urberg-Carlson wrote: > Thanks, Doug. Found the issue. You should see local ping6 times to VISI now. Yep, all looking good there ASN_8015 BGP master up 17:56 Established Description: 8015 - VISI Routes: 1 imported, 23 exported, 1 preferred Receiving one prefix, exporting the 23 IPv6 prefixes now in the exchange. -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> -- ipHouse/Goldengate/Bitstream/ProNS -- Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Nov. 14, 2011

Re: route-server IPv6 BGP

by Bradley Urberg-Carlson

Thanks, Doug. Found the issue. You should see local ping6 times to VISI now. -Bradley ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Nov. 14, 2011

Re: route-server IPv6 BGP

by Doug McIntyre

On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 04:52:29PM -0600, Bradley Urberg-Carlson wrote: > Thanks, Doug. All helpful. Neighbor ::1 and ::2 are shut-down for now to stop babbling errors. > The BGP connection was via native IPv6, but was being closed by ::1 and ::2: > > > Nov 13 15:10:56 CST: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 2607:FE10:FFFF::1 Up > > Nov 13 15:10:57 CST: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: received from neighbor 2607:FE10:FFFF::1 6/1 (cease) 0 bytes Case notification subcode 1 is Maximum Number of Prefixes Reached. Check your route-map to make sure you are filtering on the proper criteria, and doing so in the proper address-family. -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> -- ipHouse/Goldengate/Bitstream/ProNS -- Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Nov. 13, 2011

Re: route-server IPv6 BGP

by Bradley Urberg-Carlson

Thanks, Doug. All helpful. Neighbor ::1 and ::2 are shut-down for now to stop babbling errors. The BGP connection was via native IPv6, but was being closed by ::1 and ::2: > Nov 13 15:10:56 CST: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 2607:FE10:FFFF::1 Up > Nov 13 15:10:57 CST: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: received from neighbor 2607:FE10:FFFF::1 6/1 (cease) 0 bytes > Nov 13 15:10:57 CST: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 2607:FE10:FFFF::1 Down BGP Notification received I have an "address-family ipv4... no neighbor ... activate": there should be no IPv4 prefixes advertised on those sessions. -Bradley ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Nov. 13, 2011

Re: route-server IPv6 BGP

by Doug McIntyre

On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 03:57:10PM -0600, Bradley Urberg-Carlson wrote: > Are there any tricks to getting Cisco BGP up to 2607:FE10:FFFF::1 and ::2 ? The route-servers are closing our BGP sessions as soon as we open them. Make sure you are talking IPv6 BGP over an IPv6 connection. (You can pass IPv6 routes over an IPv4 BGP session, which everybody supposedly supports, but mostly doesn't work).. Also make sure to pass IPv6 routes inside the correct address family as well. Also, make sure you don't over filter on IPv6, ie. allow BGP protocol back into your router. Your router isn't listening to BGP connections trying to connect from 2607:fe10:ffff::1... $ telnet 2607:fe10:ffff::6 bgp Trying 2607:fe10:ffff::6... telnet: connect to address 2607:fe10:ffff::6: Connection refused telnet: Unable to connect to remote host It is pingable from there though. I should be able to connect on the BGP port.. -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> -- ipHouse/Goldengate/Bitstream/ProNS -- Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Nov. 13, 2011

route-server IPv6 BGP

by Bradley Urberg-Carlson

Are there any tricks to getting Cisco BGP up to 2607:FE10:FFFF::1 and ::2 ? The route-servers are closing our BGP sessions as soon as we open them. -Bradley VISI ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Nov. 13, 2011

Re: MICE UG Reminder

by Mike O'Connor

no worries -- it's just that there was a strong "Roseville" thread to MICE meetings in the past -- wanted to make sure that he hadn't gotten the wrong Grumpy's in the announcement. also wanted to send a heads up to those (like me) who'd put the Roseville locale in their calendar. m On Nov 9, 2011, at 2:07 PM, Justin Krejci wrote: > Not to sound rude but did you read Jay's email that you just replied to? > He did explicitly state "Grumpy's on Washington in Minneapolis" in the > body. :) > > > > On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 13:59 -0600, Mike O'Connor wrote: >> just checking -- Grumpy's on Washington (1111 Washington Ave S) or Grumpy's in Roseville (2801 Snelling Ave N.)? >> >> mikey >> >> >> On Nov 8, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Jay Hanke wrote: >> >>> Just a reminder, the MICE meeting is tomorrow at 3 at Grumpy's on >>> Washington in Minneapolis. If someone wants to see the the exchange >>> point before the meeting I'll be available from 11 AM until the start >>> of the meeting at 511. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> -- >>> Jay Hanke >>> CTO, CCIE #19093 >>> Mankato Networks LLC >>> 619 S Front St >>> Mankato, MN 56001-3838 >>> Google 530-618-2398 >>> jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net >>> http://www.mankatonetworks.com >>> >>> ######################################################################## >>> >>> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: >>> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 >> >> - - - - - - - - - >> phone 651-647-6109 >> fax 866-280-2356 >> web http://www.haven2.com >> handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.) >> >> ######################################################################## >> >> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: >> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 - - - - - - - - - phone 651-647-6109 fax 866-280-2356 web http://www.haven2.com handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.) ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Nov. 9, 2011

Re: MICE UG Reminder

by Justin Krejci

Not to sound rude but did you read Jay's email that you just replied to? He did explicitly state "Grumpy's on Washington in Minneapolis" in the body. :) On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 13:59 -0600, Mike O'Connor wrote: > just checking -- Grumpy's on Washington (1111 Washington Ave S) or Grumpy's in Roseville (2801 Snelling Ave N.)? > > mikey > > > On Nov 8, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Jay Hanke wrote: > > > Just a reminder, the MICE meeting is tomorrow at 3 at Grumpy's on > > Washington in Minneapolis. If someone wants to see the the exchange > > point before the meeting I'll be available from 11 AM until the start > > of the meeting at 511. > > > > Thanks, > > > > -- > > Jay Hanke > > CTO, CCIE #19093 > > Mankato Networks LLC > > 619 S Front St > > Mankato, MN 56001-3838 > > Google 530-618-2398 > > jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net > > http://www.mankatonetworks.com > > > > ######################################################################## > > > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > - - - - - - - - - > phone 651-647-6109 > fax 866-280-2356 > web http://www.haven2.com > handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.) > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Nov. 9, 2011