- mice-discuss - lists.micemn.net

Re: MICE Traffic increase

by Justin Krejci

Thought I read somewhere that apple ios update was recently released. If true, that is likely the source of the traffic increase and would therefore not likely last too long. Either way it's nice to see Mice doing what it was intended for. -----Original Message----- From: Mike Bushard, Jr [mike.bushard(a)ARVIG.COM] Received: Thursday, 21 Mar 2013, 12:19pm To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET [MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE Traffic increase Looks like a fair amount is going to the GigaPop. Nice to see the extra traffic. I think you're right Steve, if it keeps up we'll want to look at some options. On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Steve Howard <showard(a)paulbunyan.net<mailto:showard@paulbunyan.net>> wrote: It looks like Akamai had a nice increase in traffic today starting around ~11AM. They are sending 6+ Gbps right now. :-) If it stays like this long-term, we might want to look into adding a second 10Gig link for Akamai and/or a 10Gig connection to the CNS switch. Steve ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 -- Mike Bushard Jr | Network Engineer IV | Arvig | 320.256.7471 Office | 320.256.0178 Direct | 320.429.0837 Mobile | 320.256.7555 Fax [http://ipstats.arvig.net/arviglogo.jpeg] ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 21, 2013

Re: MICE Traffic increase

by Mike Bushard, Jr

Looks like a fair amount is going to the GigaPop. Nice to see the extra traffic. I think you're right Steve, if it keeps up we'll want to look at some options. On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Steve Howard <showard(a)paulbunyan.net>wrote: > It looks like Akamai had a nice increase in traffic today starting > around ~11AM. They are sending 6+ Gbps right now. :-) > > If it stays like this long-term, we might want to look into adding a > second 10Gig link for Akamai and/or a 10Gig connection to the CNS switch. > > Steve > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > -- Mike Bushard Jr | Network Engineer IV *| *Arvig | 320.256.7471 Office | 320.256.0178 Direct | 320.429.0837 Mobile | 320.256.7555 Fax ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 21, 2013

MICE Traffic increase

by Steve Howard

It looks like Akamai had a nice increase in traffic today starting around ~11AM. They are sending 6+ Gbps right now. :-) If it stays like this long-term, we might want to look into adding a second 10Gig link for Akamai and/or a 10Gig connection to the CNS switch. Steve ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 21, 2013

Peering DB

by David Farmer

I was just looking in the Peering DB and notices and several people are still listing their old IP address in the Peering DB. You may want to update your info. -- ================================================ David Farmer Email: farmer(a)umn.edu Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 1-612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 1-612-812-9952 ================================================ ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 20, 2013

Re: Fwd: Urgent - seeing routing issues with subnet 64.122.xx.xx through peering point 206.108.255.62/24

by David Farmer

Or Contact individual peering contacts of particular peers you want to test with. On 3/18/13 11:20 , Radzwon, Tony wrote: > Sorry everyone I have been out for the past week. > I have our NOC working on this issue, they want to do some testing would > the peering(a)micemn.net <mailto:peering@micemn.net>be their best route of > communication as they are not likely on the Mailing Lists. > > Thanks > > Tony > > *Tony Radzwon |**Network Engineer * > > direct 612.436.8009 | mobile 612.986.5715 > > Integra | 511 11^th ave. s. | Suite 340 | Minneapolis, MN 55415 > www.integratelecom.com <http://www.integratelecom.com> > > > <http://www.integratelecom.com/>cid:image007.gif@01CE1E4B.D4F37AB0 > <http://www.facebook.com/IntegraTelecom>cid:image008.gif@01CE1E4B.D4F37AB0 > <http://twitter.com/Integra_Telecom>cid:image017.gif@01CE1E4B.D4F37AB0 > <http://www.linkedin.com/company/integra> > > > > > > > From: Jay Hanke <jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net > <mailto:jayhanke@mankatonetworks.net>> > Reply-To: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET > <mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET>> > Date: Friday, March 15, 2013 5:19 PM > To: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET > <mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET>> > Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Fwd: Urgent - seeing routing issues with subnet > 64.122.xx.xx through peering point 206.108.255.62/24 > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: *Bauman, Mark* <Mark.Bauman(a)integratelecom.com > <mailto:Mark.Bauman@integratelecom.com>> > Date: Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:20 PM > Subject: Urgent - seeing routing issues with subnet 64.122.xx.xx through > peering point 206.108.255.62/24 <http://206.108.255.62/24> > To: "peering(a)micemn.net <mailto:peering@micemn.net>" <peering(a)micemn.net > <mailto:peering@micemn.net>> > Cc: NOC Network Repair <NOCNetworkRepair(a)integratelecom.com > <mailto:NOCNetworkRepair@integratelecom.com>>, "[DL] NOC Tier 3 Data" > <NOCTier3Data(a)integratelecom.com <mailto:NOCTier3Data@integratelecom.com>> > > > Hello MICE,____ > > __ __ > > Packets sourced from Integra’s 64.122.xx.xx subnet are experiencing 50+% > loss when going through our peering point with MICE at MPLSMNCD.____ > > __ __ > > Can you investigate from your end?____ > > __ __ > > Thanks,____ > > __ __ > > *Mark J. Bauman *| NRT____ > > 888-611-6621 <tel:888-611-6621>____ > > 4400 NE 77th Ave | Vancouver, WA 98662____ > > cid:image001.jpg@01CE1513.E60062F0 <http://www.integratelecom.com/>*____* > > __ __ > > > > > -- > Jay Hanke > CTO, CCIE #19093 > Mankato Networks LLC > PO Box 54 > 619 S Front St > Mankato, MN 56001-3838 > Google 530-618-2398 > jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net <mailto:jayhanke@mankatonetworks.net> > http://www.mankatonetworks.com > http://www.neutralpath.net > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > -- ================================================ David Farmer Email: farmer(a)umn.edu Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 1-612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 1-612-812-9952 ================================================ ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 18, 2013

Re: Fwd: Urgent - seeing routing issues with subnet 64.122.xx.xx through peering point 206.108.255.62/24

by Jay Hanke

Integra doesn't peer multilaterally, I would recommend they turn up one of the smaller bilateral sessions and test directly with a peer. On Mar 18, 2013 11:20 AM, "Radzwon, Tony" <Tony.Radzwon(a)integratelecom.com> wrote: > Sorry everyone I have been out for the past week. > I have our NOC working on this issue, they want to do some testing would > the peering(a)micemn.net be their best route of communication as they are > not likely on the Mailing Lists. > > Thanks > > Tony > > *Tony Radzwon |* *Network Engineer ***** > > direct 612.436.8009 | mobile 612.986.5715**** > > Integra | 511 11th ave. s. | Suite 340 | Minneapolis, MN 55415 > www.integratelecom.com > > > <http://www.integratelecom.com/>[image: > cid:image007.gif@01CE1E4B.D4F37AB0]<http://www.facebook.com/IntegraTelecom>[image: > cid:image008.gif@01CE1E4B.D4F37AB0] <http://twitter.com/Integra_Telecom>[image: > cid:image017.gif@01CE1E4B.D4F37AB0]<http://www.linkedin.com/company/integra> > > > > > > > From: Jay Hanke <jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net> > Reply-To: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> > Date: Friday, March 15, 2013 5:19 PM > To: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> > Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Fwd: Urgent - seeing routing issues with subnet > 64.122.xx.xx through peering point 206.108.255.62/24 > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Bauman, Mark <Mark.Bauman(a)integratelecom.com> > Date: Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:20 PM > Subject: Urgent - seeing routing issues with subnet 64.122.xx.xx through > peering point 206.108.255.62/24 > To: "peering(a)micemn.net" <peering(a)micemn.net> > Cc: NOC Network Repair <NOCNetworkRepair(a)integratelecom.com>, "[DL] NOC > Tier 3 Data" <NOCTier3Data(a)integratelecom.com> > > > Hello MICE,**** > > ** ** > > Packets sourced from Integra’s 64.122.xx.xx subnet are experiencing 50+% > loss when going through our peering point with MICE at MPLSMNCD.**** > > ** ** > > Can you investigate from your end?**** > > ** ** > > Thanks,**** > > ** ** > > *Mark J. Bauman *| NRT**** > > 888-611-6621**** > > 4400 NE 77th Ave | Vancouver, WA 98662**** > > [image: cid:image001.jpg@01CE1513.E60062F0]<http://www.integratelecom.com/> > ** > > ** ** > > > > -- > Jay Hanke > CTO, CCIE #19093 > Mankato Networks LLC > PO Box 54 > 619 S Front St > Mankato, MN 56001-3838 > Google 530-618-2398 > jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net > http://www.mankatonetworks.com > http://www.neutralpath.net > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 18, 2013

Re: Fwd: Urgent - seeing routing issues with subnet 64.122.xx.xx through peering point 206.108.255.62/24

by Radzwon, Tony

Sorry everyone I have been out for the past week. I have our NOC working on this issue, they want to do some testing would the peering(a)micemn.net<mailto:peering@micemn.net> be their best route of communication as they are not likely on the Mailing Lists. Thanks Tony Tony Radzwon | Network Engineer direct 612.436.8009 | mobile 612.986.5715 Integra | 511 11th ave. s. | Suite 340 | Minneapolis, MN 55415 www.integratelecom.com<http://www.integratelecom.com> [cid:F1A492D2-8984-4539-94B2-DACBE52359B8]<http://www.integratelecom.com/>[cid:image007.gif@01CE1E4B.D4F37AB0]<http://www.facebook.com/IntegraTelecom>[cid:image008.gif@01CE1E4B.D4F37AB0]<http://twitter.com/Integra_Telecom>[cid:image017.gif@01CE1E4B.D4F37AB0]<http://www.linkedin.com/company/integra> From: Jay Hanke <jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net<mailto:jayhanke@mankatonetworks.net>> Reply-To: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET<mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET>> Date: Friday, March 15, 2013 5:19 PM To: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET<mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET>> Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Fwd: Urgent - seeing routing issues with subnet 64.122.xx.xx through peering point 206.108.255.62/24 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Bauman, Mark <Mark.Bauman(a)integratelecom.com<mailto:Mark.Bauman@integratelecom.com>> Date: Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:20 PM Subject: Urgent - seeing routing issues with subnet 64.122.xx.xx through peering point 206.108.255.62/24<http://206.108.255.62/24> To: "peering(a)micemn.net<mailto:peering@micemn.net>" <peering(a)micemn.net<mailto:peering@micemn.net>> Cc: NOC Network Repair <NOCNetworkRepair(a)integratelecom.com<mailto:NOCNetworkRepair@integratelecom.com>>, "[DL] NOC Tier 3 Data" <NOCTier3Data(a)integratelecom.com<mailto:NOCTier3Data@integratelecom.com>> Hello MICE, Packets sourced from Integra’s 64.122.xx.xx subnet are experiencing 50+% loss when going through our peering point with MICE at MPLSMNCD. Can you investigate from your end? Thanks, Mark J. Bauman | NRT 888-611-6621<tel:888-611-6621> 4400 NE 77th Ave | Vancouver, WA 98662 [cid:image001.jpg@01CE1513.E60062F0]<http://www.integratelecom.com/> -- Jay Hanke CTO, CCIE #19093 Mankato Networks LLC PO Box 54 619 S Front St Mankato, MN 56001-3838 Google 530-618-2398 jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net<mailto:jayhanke@mankatonetworks.net> http://www.mankatonetworks.com http://www.neutralpath.net ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 18, 2013

Re: Fwd: Urgent - seeing routing issues with subnet 64.122.xx.xx through peering point 206.108.255.62/24

by Richard Laager

I'm not sure that Mark is on this mailing list. Mark, if you're not, see the archives: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind1303&L=MICE-DISCUSS&F=&S=&P=13857 On Fri, 2013-03-15 at 18:12 -0500, David Farmer wrote: > Going to where or coming from where? Which Peer? I believe Integra is > only bilaterally peering at MICE? With us (Wiktel, AS33362), at least. When I was testing earlier today, it appeared that the packet loss was happening inside Integra's network. I just spoke to Mark on the phone and he's characterizing it as packet loss that only happens with a particular source IP range. They're doing more investigation right now. -- Richard ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 15, 2013

Re: Fwd: Urgent - seeing routing issues with subnet 64.122.xx.xx through peering point 206.108.255.62/24

by David Farmer

Going to where or coming from where? Which Peer? I believe Integra is only bilaterally peering at MICE? On 3/15/13 17:19 , Jay Hanke wrote: > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: *Bauman, Mark* <Mark.Bauman(a)integratelecom.com > <mailto:Mark.Bauman@integratelecom.com>> > Date: Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:20 PM > Subject: Urgent - seeing routing issues with subnet 64.122.xx.xx through > peering point 206.108.255.62/24 <http://206.108.255.62/24> > To: "peering(a)micemn.net <mailto:peering@micemn.net>" <peering(a)micemn.net > <mailto:peering@micemn.net>> > Cc: NOC Network Repair <NOCNetworkRepair(a)integratelecom.com > <mailto:NOCNetworkRepair@integratelecom.com>>, "[DL] NOC Tier 3 Data" > <NOCTier3Data(a)integratelecom.com <mailto:NOCTier3Data@integratelecom.com>> > > > Hello MICE,____ > > __ __ > > Packets sourced from Integra’s 64.122.xx.xx subnet are experiencing 50+% > loss when going through our peering point with MICE at MPLSMNCD.____ > > __ __ > > Can you investigate from your end?____ > > __ __ > > Thanks,____ > > __ __ > > *Mark J. Bauman *| NRT____ > > 888-611-6621 <tel:888-611-6621>____ > > 4400 NE 77th Ave | Vancouver, WA 98662____ > > cid:image001.jpg@01CE1513.E60062F0 <http://www.integratelecom.com/>*____* > > __ __ > > > > > -- > Jay Hanke > CTO, CCIE #19093 > Mankato Networks LLC > PO Box 54 > 619 S Front St > Mankato, MN 56001-3838 > Google 530-618-2398 > jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net <mailto:jayhanke@mankatonetworks.net> > http://www.mankatonetworks.com > http://www.neutralpath.net > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > -- ================================================ David Farmer Email: farmer(a)umn.edu Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 1-612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 1-612-812-9952 ================================================ ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 15, 2013

Re: Fwd: Urgent - seeing routing issues with subnet 64.122.xx.xx through peering point 206.108.255.62/24

by Doug McIntyre

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 05:19:36PM -0500, Mark Bauman <Mark.Bauman(a)integratelecom.com> wrote: > Hello MICE, > Packets sourced from Integra?s 64.122.xx.xx subnet are experiencing 50+% > loss when going through our peering point with MICE at MPLSMNCD. It looks like you pulled the plug, so it is a bit difficult to diagnose right now. The error counters on the port are pretty clean over all though. Interface: xe-0/0/2, Enabled, Link is Down Encapsulation: Ethernet, Speed: 10000mbps Traffic statistics: Current delta Input bytes: 29263828475919 (0 bps) [0] Output bytes: 20763155160434 (0 bps) [0] Input packets: 36106842252 (0 pps) [0] Output packets: 29187411842 (0 pps) [0] Error statistics: Input errors: 0 [0] Input drops: 0 [0] Input framing errors: 0 [0] Policed discards: 0 [0] L3 incompletes: 0 [0] L2 channel errors: 0 [0] L2 mismatch timeouts: 0 [0] Carrier transitions: 18 [0] Output errors: 0 [0] Output drops: 0 [0] Aged packets: 0 [0] Active alarms : LINK Active defects: LINK It would probably be helpful if the link could come up with BGP down if you don't want traffic to flow, we could do some ping tests to you. -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> -- ipHouse/Goldengate/Bitstream/ProNS -- Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 15, 2013

Re: Fwd: Urgent - seeing routing issues with subnet 64.122.xx.xx through peering point 206.108.255.62/24

by Mike Bushard, Jr

We saw some loss to integra today also. Mike Bushard Jr | Network Engineer IV | Arvig | 320.256.0178 direct | 320.429.0837 Mobile Sent from my Verizon Wireless DROID RAZR by Motorola Please excuse short responses and spelling errors. On Mar 15, 2013 5:19 PM, "Jay Hanke" <jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net> wrote: > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Bauman, Mark <Mark.Bauman(a)integratelecom.com> > Date: Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:20 PM > Subject: Urgent - seeing routing issues with subnet 64.122.xx.xx through > peering point 206.108.255.62/24 > To: "peering(a)micemn.net" <peering(a)micemn.net> > Cc: NOC Network Repair <NOCNetworkRepair(a)integratelecom.com>, "[DL] NOC > Tier 3 Data" <NOCTier3Data(a)integratelecom.com> > > > Hello MICE,**** > > ** ** > > Packets sourced from Integra’s 64.122.xx.xx subnet are experiencing 50+% > loss when going through our peering point with MICE at MPLSMNCD.**** > > ** ** > > Can you investigate from your end?**** > > ** ** > > Thanks,**** > > ** ** > > *Mark J. Bauman *| NRT**** > > 888-611-6621**** > > 4400 NE 77th Ave | Vancouver, WA 98662**** > > [image: cid:image001.jpg@01CE1513.E60062F0]<http://www.integratelecom.com/> > ** > > ** ** > > > > -- > Jay Hanke > CTO, CCIE #19093 > Mankato Networks LLC > PO Box 54 > 619 S Front St > Mankato, MN 56001-3838 > Google 530-618-2398 > jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net > http://www.mankatonetworks.com > http://www.neutralpath.net > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 15, 2013

Fwd: Urgent - seeing routing issues with subnet 64.122.xx.xx through peering point 206.108.255.62/24

by Jay Hanke

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Bauman, Mark <Mark.Bauman(a)integratelecom.com> Date: Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:20 PM Subject: Urgent - seeing routing issues with subnet 64.122.xx.xx through peering point 206.108.255.62/24 To: "peering(a)micemn.net" <peering(a)micemn.net> Cc: NOC Network Repair <NOCNetworkRepair(a)integratelecom.com>, "[DL] NOC Tier 3 Data" <NOCTier3Data(a)integratelecom.com> Hello MICE,**** ** ** Packets sourced from Integra’s 64.122.xx.xx subnet are experiencing 50+% loss when going through our peering point with MICE at MPLSMNCD.**** ** ** Can you investigate from your end?**** ** ** Thanks,**** ** ** *Mark J. Bauman *| NRT**** 888-611-6621**** 4400 NE 77th Ave | Vancouver, WA 98662**** [image: cid:image001.jpg@01CE1513.E60062F0] <http://www.integratelecom.com/> ** ** ** -- Jay Hanke CTO, CCIE #19093 Mankato Networks LLC PO Box 54 619 S Front St Mankato, MN 56001-3838 Google 530-618-2398 jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net http://www.mankatonetworks.com http://www.neutralpath.net ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 15, 2013

Re: MICE Route Server #1 offline?

by Mike Horwath

On Mar 10, 2013, at 12:41 AM, Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> wrote: > Guess I should head out when I can in order to configure and plug > them into something so they can be utilized since this lockup has > now happened twice in their 2.5 year run. The sky is falling! :) -- Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau(a)Geeks.ORG ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 10, 2013

Re: MICE Route Server #1 offline?

by Doug McIntyre

On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 12:27:57AM -0600, Nevin Lyne wrote: > For some reason I thought they already had DRAC cards, but if not I > have a drawer full of them for those model systems. That does appear to be the case (at least on the active -02 unit) micemn-02# ipmitool fru print ... FRU Device Description : DRAC 5 (ID 0) Chassis Type : Unknown Board Mfg Date : Sun Dec 31 17:00:00 1995 Board Mfg : DELL Board Product : FRU16K,DELL P/N Board Serial : CN6970267G0720 Board Part Number : 0D8635A04 Product Manufacturer : DELL Guess I should head out when I can in order to configure and plug them into something so they can be utilized since this lockup has now happened twice in their 2.5 year run. -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> -- ipHouse/Goldengate/Bitstream/ProNS -- Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 10, 2013

Re: MICE Route Server #1 offline?

by Nevin Lyne

On Sunday, March 10, 2013 12:20am, "Doug McIntyre" <merlyn(a)IPHOUSE.NET> said: > On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 09:42:56PM -0600, Brady Kittel wrote: >> Otherwise I think we could probably just provide a pair of new servers if >> someone can recommend minimum specs and it can wait for another month or >> two. I'm assuming 1u, maybe a single quad core low power processor, 12GB >> mem, mirrored 100GB drives, dial ps, and ilo would work? > > The requirements are minimalist. Current running system uses 52MB and is > 99.99% idle. It could just need a DIMM reseat or something. Or apparently > a DRAC card implant or switched PDU. For some reason I thought they already had DRAC cards, but if not I have a drawer full of them for those model systems. -- Nevin Lyne -- Founder / Director of Technology -- Gippy's Internet Solutions, LLC. / EngineHosting.com ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 10, 2013

Re: MICE Route Server #1 offline?

by Doug McIntyre

On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 09:42:56PM -0600, Brady Kittel wrote: > Otherwise I think we could probably just provide a pair of new servers if > someone can recommend minimum specs and it can wait for another month or > two. I'm assuming 1u, maybe a single quad core low power processor, 12GB > mem, mirrored 100GB drives, dial ps, and ilo would work? The requirements are minimalist. Current running system uses 52MB and is 99.99% idle. It could just need a DIMM reseat or something. Or apparently a DRAC card implant or switched PDU. -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> -- ipHouse/Goldengate/Bitstream/ProNS -- Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 10, 2013

Re: MICE Route Server #1 offline?

by Brady Kittel

I have quite a few HP dl360s g5s with lights out remote management remote management licensed. I could provide a pair along with hot spare drives, mirrored memory, and redundant ps. Otherwise I think we could probably just provide a pair of new servers if someone can recommend minimum specs and it can wait for another month or two. I'm assuming 1u, maybe a single quad core low power processor, 12GB mem, mirrored 100GB drives, dial ps, and ilo would work? On Mar 9, 2013 9:17 PM, "Nevin Lyne" <nevin(a)enginehosting.com> wrote: > > > On Saturday, March 9, 2013 9:12pm, "Mike Horwath" <drechsau(a)GEEKS.ORG> > said: > > > Free doesn't always include the crutches. > > > > Might be time for hardware less than 7-8 years old. > > > > -- > > Mike, via phone > > Not sure those 1950s were quite 7 or 8 years old, but I would be happy to > donate some newer boxes to the MICE cause if needed. > > -- Nevin Lyne > -- Founder / Director of Technology > -- Gippy's Internet Solutions, LLC. / EngineHosting.com > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 10, 2013

Re: MICE Route Server #1 offline?

by Ryan Goldberg

I can likely produce recent hardware and/or a managed PDU and/or misc hardware/services. Throw reqs out and I'll dig in. Ryan On Mar 9, 2013, at 9:14 PM, "Mike Horwath" <drechsau(a)GEEKS.ORG> wrote: > Free doesn't always include the crutches. > > Might be time for hardware less than 7-8 years old. > > -- > Mike, via phone > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 10, 2013

Re: MICE Route Server #1 offline?

by Nevin Lyne

On Saturday, March 9, 2013 9:12pm, "Mike Horwath" <drechsau(a)GEEKS.ORG> said: > Free doesn't always include the crutches. > > Might be time for hardware less than 7-8 years old. > > -- > Mike, via phone Not sure those 1950s were quite 7 or 8 years old, but I would be happy to donate some newer boxes to the MICE cause if needed. -- Nevin Lyne -- Founder / Director of Technology -- Gippy's Internet Solutions, LLC. / EngineHosting.com ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 10, 2013

Re: MICE Route Server #1 offline?

by Mike Horwath

Free doesn't always include the crutches. Might be time for hardware less than 7-8 years old. -- Mike, via phone ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 10, 2013

Re: MICE Route Server #1 offline?

by Eric Crist

No IPMI/DRAC? On Mar 9, 2013 5:16 PM, "Frank Bulk" <fbulk(a)mypremieronline.com> wrote: > Sounds like it's time to get a managed PDU in place. > > Frank > > -----Original Message----- > From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of > Doug McIntyre > Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2013 12:40 PM > To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET > Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE Route Server #1 offline? > > On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 06:22:13PM +0000, Chris Scheidecker wrote: > > Having trouble pinging 206.108.255.1 and BGP session dropped about 3 > hours ago. > > > Yes, the hardware does seem to be borked. > > If anybody is around 511 this weekend near the MICE cabinet, we > probably just need the 1st server power cycled and brought back online > when somebody can get to it. > > -- > Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> > -- ipHouse/Goldengate/Bitstream/ProNS -- > Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > -- This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the individual responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, please be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please return it to the sender immediately and delete the original message and any copy of it from your computer system. If you have any questions concerning this message, please contact the sender or call ClaimLynx at (952) 593-5969. ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 9, 2013

Re: MICE Route Server #1 offline?

by Reid Fishler

Or an intern! Reid On Mar 9, 2013 3:16 PM, "Frank Bulk" <fbulk(a)mypremieronline.com> wrote: > Sounds like it's time to get a managed PDU in place. > > Frank > > -----Original Message----- > From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of > Doug McIntyre > Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2013 12:40 PM > To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET > Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE Route Server #1 offline? > > On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 06:22:13PM +0000, Chris Scheidecker wrote: > > Having trouble pinging 206.108.255.1 and BGP session dropped about 3 > hours ago. > > > Yes, the hardware does seem to be borked. > > If anybody is around 511 this weekend near the MICE cabinet, we > probably just need the 1st server power cycled and brought back online > when somebody can get to it. > > -- > Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> > -- ipHouse/Goldengate/Bitstream/ProNS -- > Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 9, 2013

Re: MICE Route Server #1 offline?

by Frank Bulk

Sounds like it's time to get a managed PDU in place. Frank -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Doug McIntyre Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2013 12:40 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE Route Server #1 offline? On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 06:22:13PM +0000, Chris Scheidecker wrote: > Having trouble pinging 206.108.255.1 and BGP session dropped about 3 hours ago. Yes, the hardware does seem to be borked. If anybody is around 511 this weekend near the MICE cabinet, we probably just need the 1st server power cycled and brought back online when somebody can get to it. -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> -- ipHouse/Goldengate/Bitstream/ProNS -- Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 9, 2013

Re: Comptel Plus

by Mike Hemphill

See you there Mike Hemphill General Manager - Minneapolis 612-333-1922 office 612-812-5242 cell mike.hemphill(a)cologix.com Sent from my Samsung Epic 4G phone On Mar 9, 2013 11:15 AM, "Jay Hanke" <jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net> wrote: > I'll be wandering around at Comptel plus in Vegas Monday and Tuesday. If > there is anyone I should talk to while I'm there regarding MICE just let me > know. > > -- > Jay Hanke > CTO, CCIE #19093 > Mankato Networks LLC > PO Box 54 > 619 S Front St > Mankato, MN 56001-3838 > Google 530-618-2398 > jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net > Consulting http://www.mankatonetworks.com/ > Colo http://www.neutralpath.net/ > > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 9, 2013

Re: Comptel Plus

by Reid Fishler

I will be there as well. Reid On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Jay Hanke <jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net>wrote: > I'll be wandering around at Comptel plus in Vegas Monday and Tuesday. If > there is anyone I should talk to while I'm there regarding MICE just let me > know. > > -- > Jay Hanke > CTO, CCIE #19093 > Mankato Networks LLC > PO Box 54 > 619 S Front St > Mankato, MN 56001-3838 > Google 530-618-2398 > jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net > Consulting http://www.mankatonetworks.com/ > Colo http://www.neutralpath.net/ > > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > -- Reid Fishler Director Hurricane Electric +1-510-580-4178 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

March 9, 2013