- mice-discuss - lists.micemn.net

MICE UG 9 Agenda

by Shaun Carlson

All, Please see the attached agenda for tonight's meeting. Email me if you have any additions. Thanks! s *Shaun Carlson *Network Engineering Manager | Arvig ph: (218) 346-8673 | em: shaun.carlson(a)arvig.com ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Oct. 2, 2013

i'm giving a talk at the HH Humphrey Institute TISP Forum you might be interested in

by Mike O'Connor

hi all just a quick note to invite you to a talk that i'll be giving in a couple weeks over at the UofM. my first-ever public talk about ICANN stuff. here's the link to the Eventbright signup/description thingy https://www.eventbrite.com/event/8475601753/?ref=enivtefor001&invite=NDI3MD… details: 10-October 4-5:30pm The Wilkins Room, Humphrey School of Public Affairs 301 19th Ave. South, Minneapolis, MN 55455 all the "usual suspect" telecomm policy type people show up for these, so you might find it an interesting gang even if my talk is terrible. and the fresh-baked UofM cookies are always good. here's the blurb. t'would be great to see you there. mikey Event Details Registration is $10 at the door Checks payable to University of Minnesota Telecommunications and Information Society Policy Forum Internet Management and the Future of the Internet: New Top Level Domains Speaker: Mike O’Connor gofast.net Co-Founder and Newly Elected Member of the ICANN Generic Names Council No one argues with the idea that the Internet is at the center of broadband life. ICANN (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers) is the international multi-stakeholder organization charged with the technical management of the names and numbers that tag our Internet traffic for safe delivery on the Net. The BIG NEWS from ICANN is that BIG CHANGE is on the way. The familiar small familyof top level domain names such as .COM, .NET, .GOV, .EDU, will grow to 1200 top level domain names in the next few years. Over the past 20 years, very few names were added but in the next year alone about 500 additions are planned. Is this good news? Is this bad news? Is the glass half full or half empty? Who will benefit? Who might lose? How might this affect your ISP? How might this affect telecommunications providers? Will trust be affected? As an ICANN “insider” Mike will share his views and moderate discussion to help us understand the big changes ahead in this part of the Internet. Please join us for this important discussion. Registration is $10 at the door Checks payable to University of Minnesota The idea behind this forum is simple and essential: purposeful exchange on key issues with engaged stakeholders to create a better information future. PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 24, 2013

Re: GigaPop Port move

by Doug McIntyre

On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 02:22:15PM -0500, Jay Hanke wrote: > The Gigapop interconnect will be moving from the CNS to the Main > Switch port xe-0/0/11. > > The Gigapop has requested the port be set up as a single channel port > channel in preparation for adding an additional 10 G link later this > year. > > Can we get a volunteer for the config? Sure all set and done. Setup for a port-channel/LAG. No LACP enabled. First time for an Aggregate interface setup on this switch stack, so some new ae interfaces will probably need to be probed on the cacti graphs after I just enabled them. (GigaPOP will be ae0) -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> -- ipHouse/Goldengate/Bitstream/ProNS -- Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 20, 2013

GigaPop Port move

by Jay Hanke

The Gigapop interconnect will be moving from the CNS to the Main Switch port xe-0/0/11. The Gigapop has requested the port be set up as a single channel port channel in preparation for adding an additional 10 G link later this year. Can we get a volunteer for the config? -- Jay Hanke CTO, CCIE #19093 Mankato Networks LLC PO Box 54 619 S Front St Mankato, MN 56001-3838 Google 530-618-2398 jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net http://www.mankatonetworks.com http://www.neutralpath.net ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 20, 2013

Re: MICE Congestion Issues

by Mike Hemphill

Let us know and we will get it done. Mike Mike Hemphill General Manager | Cologix, Inc. 511 11th Ave S, Suite 450 | Minneapolis, MN 55415 P: 612.333.1922 | M: 612.812.5242 mike.hemphill(a)cologix.com cologix.com -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of David Farmer Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 5:17 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE Congestion Issues I need to talk with Mike about moving the cross connect. If necessary I think I could do it yet today. But probably later this week or next week if that is ok. On 9/18/13 17:02 , Jay Hanke wrote: > Yes, the traffic levels have come down between the switches. > > Farmer, what's your timeline on moving the Gigapop? It may be time to > start thinking about n x 10G for several of these links. > > jay > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Hannigan, Martin <marty(a)akamai.com> wrote: >> I'm not able to move at the near moment. I've pulled back some traffic. Are we still seeing drops? >> >> Best, >> >> Martin >> >> On Sep 18, 2013, at 17:40, "Mike Horwath" <drechsau(a)GEEKS.ORG> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 04:14:00PM -0500, Jeremy Lumby wrote: >>>> The problem is X2 versus SFP+ optics. I would be happy to donate, >>>> the problem is I only have X2 optics, and no SFP+ laying around. >>>> If we moved the GigaPoP, that would solve the immediate problem, so >>>> the trick would be if someone had one SFP+ module to facilitate the >>>> move. >>> >>> Hmm.. >>> >>> Seems surmountable! >>> >>> -- >>> Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau(a)Geeks.ORG >>> >>> #################################################################### >>> #### >>> >>> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: >>> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 >> >> ##################################################################### >> ### >> >> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: >> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > > -- ================================================ David Farmer Email: farmer(a)umn.edu Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 1-612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 1-612-812-9952 ================================================ ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 19, 2013

Re: MICE Congestion Issues

by David Farmer

On 9/18/13 17:58 , Anthony Anderberg wrote: > It looks like the Gigapop traffic has dropped in the past hour or two, I'm not sure if it's because their cluster is picking up more load like David mentioned or because of some time-of-day shift in user's connections. Probably both. I was just looking around and noticed like we pegged some links around our network this afternoon and had some other issues elsewhere. Nothing like the stress of an iOS update to find your week spots. :-[ > It looks like Hurricane traffic has picked up some, currently at about 5G egress. > The Akamai cluster and Core-to-CNS links are running at about 7G right now and I'm not seeing any queue drops. > > > Anthony Anderberg > Sr. Systems Analyst > 320-234-5239 > anthonyanderberg(a)nu-telecom.net -- ================================================ David Farmer Email: farmer(a)umn.edu Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 1-612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 1-612-812-9952 ================================================ ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 19, 2013

Re: MICE Congestion Issues

by Radzwon, Tony

David, I may have an SFP you can use. If you stop by 511 this week let me know. Tony Radzwon Integra Telecom On Sep 18, 2013, at 5:17 PM, "David Farmer" <farmer(a)UMN.EDU> wrote: > I need to talk with Mike about moving the cross connect. If necessary I think I could do it yet today. But probably later this week or next week if that is ok. > > On 9/18/13 17:02 , Jay Hanke wrote: >> Yes, the traffic levels have come down between the switches. >> >> Farmer, what's your timeline on moving the Gigapop? It may be time to >> start thinking about n x 10G for several of these links. >> >> jay >> >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Hannigan, Martin <marty(a)akamai.com> wrote: >>> I'm not able to move at the near moment. I've pulled back some traffic. Are we still seeing drops? >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Martin >>> >>> On Sep 18, 2013, at 17:40, "Mike Horwath" <drechsau(a)GEEKS.ORG> wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 04:14:00PM -0500, Jeremy Lumby wrote: >>>>> The problem is X2 versus SFP+ optics. I would be happy to donate, >>>>> the problem is I only have X2 optics, and no SFP+ laying around. If >>>>> we moved the GigaPoP, that would solve the immediate problem, so the >>>>> trick would be if someone had one SFP+ module to facilitate the >>>>> move. >>>> >>>> Hmm.. >>>> >>>> Seems surmountable! >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau(a)Geeks.ORG >>>> >>>> ######################################################################## >>>> >>>> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: >>>> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 >>> >>> ######################################################################## >>> >>> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: >>> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > > -- > ================================================ > David Farmer Email: farmer(a)umn.edu > Office of Information Technology > University of Minnesota > 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 1-612-626-0815 > Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 1-612-812-9952 > ================================================ > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 18, 2013

Re: MICE Congestion Issues

by Anthony Anderberg

It looks like the Gigapop traffic has dropped in the past hour or two, I'm not sure if it's because their cluster is picking up more load like David mentioned or because of some time-of-day shift in user's connections. It looks like Hurricane traffic has picked up some, currently at about 5G egress. The Akamai cluster and Core-to-CNS links are running at about 7G right now and I'm not seeing any queue drops. Anthony Anderberg Sr. Systems Analyst 320-234-5239 anthonyanderberg(a)nu-telecom.net -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of David Farmer Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 5:17 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE Congestion Issues I need to talk with Mike about moving the cross connect. If necessary I think I could do it yet today. But probably later this week or next week if that is ok. On 9/18/13 17:02 , Jay Hanke wrote: > Yes, the traffic levels have come down between the switches. > > Farmer, what's your timeline on moving the Gigapop? It may be time to > start thinking about n x 10G for several of these links. > > jay > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Hannigan, Martin <marty(a)akamai.com> wrote: >> I'm not able to move at the near moment. I've pulled back some traffic. Are we still seeing drops? >> >> Best, >> >> Martin >> >> On Sep 18, 2013, at 17:40, "Mike Horwath" <drechsau(a)GEEKS.ORG> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 04:14:00PM -0500, Jeremy Lumby wrote: >>>> The problem is X2 versus SFP+ optics. I would be happy to donate, >>>> the problem is I only have X2 optics, and no SFP+ laying around. >>>> If we moved the GigaPoP, that would solve the immediate problem, so >>>> the trick would be if someone had one SFP+ module to facilitate the >>>> move. >>> >>> Hmm.. >>> >>> Seems surmountable! >>> >>> -- >>> Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau(a)Geeks.ORG >>> >>> #################################################################### >>> #### >>> >>> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: >>> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 >> >> ##################################################################### >> ### >> >> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: >> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > > -- ================================================ David Farmer Email: farmer(a)umn.edu Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 1-612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 1-612-812-9952 ================================================ ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 18, 2013

Re: MICE Congestion Issues

by David Farmer

I need to talk with Mike about moving the cross connect. If necessary I think I could do it yet today. But probably later this week or next week if that is ok. On 9/18/13 17:02 , Jay Hanke wrote: > Yes, the traffic levels have come down between the switches. > > Farmer, what's your timeline on moving the Gigapop? It may be time to > start thinking about n x 10G for several of these links. > > jay > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Hannigan, Martin <marty(a)akamai.com> wrote: >> I'm not able to move at the near moment. I've pulled back some traffic. Are we still seeing drops? >> >> Best, >> >> Martin >> >> On Sep 18, 2013, at 17:40, "Mike Horwath" <drechsau(a)GEEKS.ORG> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 04:14:00PM -0500, Jeremy Lumby wrote: >>>> The problem is X2 versus SFP+ optics. I would be happy to donate, >>>> the problem is I only have X2 optics, and no SFP+ laying around. If >>>> we moved the GigaPoP, that would solve the immediate problem, so the >>>> trick would be if someone had one SFP+ module to facilitate the >>>> move. >>> >>> Hmm.. >>> >>> Seems surmountable! >>> >>> -- >>> Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau(a)Geeks.ORG >>> >>> ######################################################################## >>> >>> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: >>> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 >> >> ######################################################################## >> >> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: >> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > > -- ================================================ David Farmer Email: farmer(a)umn.edu Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 1-612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 1-612-812-9952 ================================================ ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 18, 2013

Re: MICE Congestion Issues

by Jay Hanke

Yes, the traffic levels have come down between the switches. Farmer, what's your timeline on moving the Gigapop? It may be time to start thinking about n x 10G for several of these links. jay On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Hannigan, Martin <marty(a)akamai.com> wrote: > I'm not able to move at the near moment. I've pulled back some traffic. Are we still seeing drops? > > Best, > > Martin > > On Sep 18, 2013, at 17:40, "Mike Horwath" <drechsau(a)GEEKS.ORG> wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 04:14:00PM -0500, Jeremy Lumby wrote: >>> The problem is X2 versus SFP+ optics. I would be happy to donate, >>> the problem is I only have X2 optics, and no SFP+ laying around. If >>> we moved the GigaPoP, that would solve the immediate problem, so the >>> trick would be if someone had one SFP+ module to facilitate the >>> move. >> >> Hmm.. >> >> Seems surmountable! >> >> -- >> Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau(a)Geeks.ORG >> >> ######################################################################## >> >> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: >> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 -- Jay Hanke CTO, CCIE #19093 Mankato Networks LLC PO Box 54 619 S Front St Mankato, MN 56001-3838 Google 530-618-2398 jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net http://www.mankatonetworks.com http://www.neutralpath.net ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 18, 2013

Re: MICE Congestion Issues

by Hannigan, Martin

I'm not able to move at the near moment. I've pulled back some traffic. Are we still seeing drops? Best, Martin On Sep 18, 2013, at 17:40, "Mike Horwath" <drechsau(a)GEEKS.ORG> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 04:14:00PM -0500, Jeremy Lumby wrote: >> The problem is X2 versus SFP+ optics. I would be happy to donate, >> the problem is I only have X2 optics, and no SFP+ laying around. If >> we moved the GigaPoP, that would solve the immediate problem, so the >> trick would be if someone had one SFP+ module to facilitate the >> move. > > Hmm.. > > Seems surmountable! > > -- > Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau(a)Geeks.ORG > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 18, 2013

Re: MICE Congestion Issues

by David Farmer

I'd be happy to move the GigaPOP to the main switch, I'll look at getting a SFP+. I think I have one I can borrow from our Infinera equipment as well. However, this is just iOS7, this happened with iOS6 last year too, at first we pulled it from the MICE Akamai nodes and then it shifted to our local nodes. I'm not sure why, but that's the way it seems to work. Thanks On 9/18/13 16:14 , Jeremy Lumby wrote: > The problem is X2 versus SFP+ optics. I would be happy to donate, the problem is I only have X2 optics, and no SFP+ laying around. If we moved the GigaPoP, that would solve the immediate problem, so the trick would be if someone had one SFP+ module to facilitate the move. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Mike Horwath > Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 3:59 PM > To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET > Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE Congestion Issues > > On Sep 18, 2013, at 2:51 PM, Richard Laager <rlaager(a)WIKTEL.COM> wrote: > >> On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 14:47 -0500, Steve Howard wrote: >>> Wouldn't it make more sense to move Akamai to the CNS switch? i.e. >>> Move one instead of two? The GigaPOP and HE both purchased their >>> optics, so that could also become a factor in any changes. >> >> It seems to me like it'd make more sense to have the big networks at >> the main switch, since then the connection to CNS only needs to >> support the bandwidth needs of CNS and others on that switch. Thus, >> for now, the single 10Gig between the CNS switch and main switch should be fine. > > I agree. > > Move them to the main switch as it gets it closer to more participants. > > Optics may just move and be compatible. > > Agree on the LAG/LACP config for Akamai as well *on the main switch*. > > -- > Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau(a)Geeks.ORG > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > -- ================================================ David Farmer Email: farmer(a)umn.edu Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 1-612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 1-612-812-9952 ================================================ ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 18, 2013

Re: MICE Congestion Issues

by Mike Horwath

On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 04:14:00PM -0500, Jeremy Lumby wrote: > The problem is X2 versus SFP+ optics. I would be happy to donate, > the problem is I only have X2 optics, and no SFP+ laying around. If > we moved the GigaPoP, that would solve the immediate problem, so the > trick would be if someone had one SFP+ module to facilitate the > move. Hmm.. Seems surmountable! -- Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau(a)Geeks.ORG ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 18, 2013

Re: MICE Congestion Issues

by Jeremy Lumby

The problem is X2 versus SFP+ optics. I would be happy to donate, the problem is I only have X2 optics, and no SFP+ laying around. If we moved the GigaPoP, that would solve the immediate problem, so the trick would be if someone had one SFP+ module to facilitate the move. -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Mike Horwath Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 3:59 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE Congestion Issues On Sep 18, 2013, at 2:51 PM, Richard Laager <rlaager(a)WIKTEL.COM> wrote: > On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 14:47 -0500, Steve Howard wrote: >> Wouldn't it make more sense to move Akamai to the CNS switch? i.e. >> Move one instead of two? The GigaPOP and HE both purchased their >> optics, so that could also become a factor in any changes. > > It seems to me like it'd make more sense to have the big networks at > the main switch, since then the connection to CNS only needs to > support the bandwidth needs of CNS and others on that switch. Thus, > for now, the single 10Gig between the CNS switch and main switch should be fine. I agree. Move them to the main switch as it gets it closer to more participants. Optics may just move and be compatible. Agree on the LAG/LACP config for Akamai as well *on the main switch*. -- Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau(a)Geeks.ORG ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 18, 2013

Re: MICE Congestion Issues

by Mike Horwath

On Sep 18, 2013, at 2:51 PM, Richard Laager <rlaager(a)WIKTEL.COM> wrote: > On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 14:47 -0500, Steve Howard wrote: >> Wouldn't it make more sense to move Akamai to the CNS switch? i.e. >> Move one instead of two? The GigaPOP and HE both purchased their >> optics, so that could also become a factor in any changes. > > It seems to me like it'd make more sense to have the big networks at the > main switch, since then the connection to CNS only needs to support the > bandwidth needs of CNS and others on that switch. Thus, for now, the > single 10Gig between the CNS switch and main switch should be fine. I agree. Move them to the main switch as it gets it closer to more participants. Optics may just move and be compatible. Agree on the LAG/LACP config for Akamai as well *on the main switch*. -- Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau(a)Geeks.ORG ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 18, 2013

Re: MICE Congestion Issues

by Doug McIntyre

On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 07:39:52PM +0000, Anthony Anderberg wrote: > I see the link from the Akamai cluster was above 9.5G too. It's possible that could be the next bottleneck for full utilization of the exchange (and of Akamai's cluster). > We certainly know that there will be more iOS upgrades in the future. It looks like Akamai is climbing up to just about 7Gbps peaks during normal times, which should probably be a trigger to get dual 10G to them.. Besides the large flow of Akamai->Gigapop/State of MN, it looks just like going from Akamai's spikes, that the next biggest consumers all around of Akamai output is about 600-700Mbps all on the main switch, unless that ~2Gbps spike out to HE was related to Akamai traffic. I don't think HE is too big a factor, but Gigapop & Akamai should probably live on one switch, and we should talk to Akamai to double up the connection. -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> -- ipHouse/Goldengate/Bitstream/ProNS -- Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 18, 2013

Re: MICE Congestion Issues

by Jeremy Lumby

Everything is single mode. From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Brady Kittel Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 3:22 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE Congestion Issues Guessing Akamai/Hurricane are using LR X2 optics over single mode? If they're running SR over multi I might have some extra 10Gb SFP+ Cisco brand optics. On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Steve Howard <showard(a)paulbunyan.net> wrote: It is a Cisco WS-C3560E-12D. It has qty 12 X2 10Gig ports. (Or 2x1Gig ports when using the TwinGig adapter). On 09/18/2013 03:07 PM, Anthony Anderberg wrote: I don't recall what model switch the CNS unit is – are they X2 based ports or SFP+ ? If SFP+ I bet the Juniper switch would be OK with Cisco modules. Anthony Anderberg Sr. Systems Analyst 320-234-5239 anthonyanderberg(a)nu-telecom.net www.nutelecom.net From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Steve Howard Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 2:47 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE Congestion Issues Wouldn't it make more sense to move Akamai to the CNS switch? i.e. Move one instead of two? The GigaPOP and HE both purchased their optics, so that could also become a factor in any changes. Can Akamai connect to both switches at a 10Gig level? Perhaps that would be easier than moving anybody? On 09/18/2013 02:10 PM, Mike Bushard, Jr wrote: Should we just move the GigaPOP and HE to the main switch? On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Jay Hanke <jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net> wrote: There appears to be some intermittent congestion issues on MICE right now between the Main switch and the CNS remote switch. We may need to move a link (or two) to the main switch. -- Jay Hanke CTO, CCIE #19093 Mankato Networks LLC PO Box 54 619 S Front St Mankato, MN 56001-3838 Google 530-618-2398 jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net http://www.mankatonetworks.com http://www.neutralpath.net ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 -- Mike Bushard Jr | Network Engineer IV | Arvig | 320.256.7471 Office | 320.256.0178 Direct | 320.429.0837 Mobile | 320.256.7555 Fax To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 18, 2013

Re: MICE Congestion Issues

by Brady Kittel

Guessing Akamai/Hurricane are using LR X2 optics over single mode? If they're running SR over multi I might have some extra 10Gb SFP+ Cisco brand optics. On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Steve Howard <showard(a)paulbunyan.net>wrote: > It is a Cisco WS-C3560E-12D. It has qty 12 X2 10Gig ports. (Or 2x1Gig > ports when using the TwinGig adapter). > > > > On 09/18/2013 03:07 PM, Anthony Anderberg wrote: > > I don't recall what model switch the CNS unit is – are they X2 based > ports or SFP+ ?**** > > If SFP+ I bet the Juniper switch would be OK with Cisco modules.**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *Anthony Anderberg* > > Sr. Systems Analyst**** > > [image: NUtel_email_logo_1]**** > > 320-234-5239**** > > anthonyanderberg(a)nu-telecom.net**** > > *www.nutelecom.net* > > * * > > ** ** > > *From:* MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET<MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET>] > *On Behalf Of *Steve Howard > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 18, 2013 2:47 PM > *To:* MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET > *Subject:* Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE Congestion Issues**** > > ** ** > > > Wouldn't it make more sense to move Akamai to the CNS switch? i.e. Move > one instead of two? The GigaPOP and HE both purchased their optics, so that > could also become a factor in any changes. > > Can Akamai connect to both switches at a 10Gig level? Perhaps that would > be easier than moving anybody? > > **** > > On 09/18/2013 02:10 PM, Mike Bushard, Jr wrote:**** > > Should we just move the GigaPOP and HE to the main switch?**** > > ** ** > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Jay Hanke <jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net> > wrote:**** > > There appears to be some intermittent congestion issues on MICE right > now between the Main switch and the CNS remote switch. > > We may need to move a link (or two) to the main switch. > > -- > Jay Hanke > CTO, CCIE #19093 > Mankato Networks LLC > PO Box 54 > 619 S Front St > Mankato, MN 56001-3838 > Google 530-618-2398 > jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net > http://www.mankatonetworks.com > http://www.neutralpath.net > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1**** > > > > **** > > ** ** > > -- > Mike Bushard Jr > | Network Engineer IV > *| *Arvig > | 320.256.7471 Office > | 320.256.0178 Direct > | 320.429.0837 Mobile > | 320.256.7555 Fax > **** > > ** ** > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 **** > > ** ** > > ** ** > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 **** > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 18, 2013

Re: MICE Congestion Issues

by Steve Howard

Sept. 18, 2013

Re: MICE Congestion Issues

by Mike Bushard, Jr

X2 On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Anthony Anderberg < anthonyanderberg(a)nu-telecom.net> wrote: > I don't recall what model switch the CNS unit is – are they X2 based > ports or SFP+ ?**** > > If SFP+ I bet the Juniper switch would be OK with Cisco modules.**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *Anthony Anderberg* > > Sr. Systems Analyst**** > > [image: NUtel_email_logo_1]**** > > 320-234-5239**** > > anthonyanderberg(a)nu-telecom.net**** > > *www.nutelecom.net* > > * * > > ** ** > > *From:* MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] *On Behalf > Of *Steve Howard > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 18, 2013 2:47 PM > > *To:* MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET > *Subject:* Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE Congestion Issues**** > > ** ** > > > Wouldn't it make more sense to move Akamai to the CNS switch? i.e. Move > one instead of two? The GigaPOP and HE both purchased their optics, so that > could also become a factor in any changes. > > Can Akamai connect to both switches at a 10Gig level? Perhaps that would > be easier than moving anybody? > > **** > > On 09/18/2013 02:10 PM, Mike Bushard, Jr wrote:**** > > Should we just move the GigaPOP and HE to the main switch?**** > > ** ** > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Jay Hanke <jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net> > wrote:**** > > There appears to be some intermittent congestion issues on MICE right > now between the Main switch and the CNS remote switch. > > We may need to move a link (or two) to the main switch. > > -- > Jay Hanke > CTO, CCIE #19093 > Mankato Networks LLC > PO Box 54 > 619 S Front St > Mankato, MN 56001-3838 > Google 530-618-2398 > jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net > http://www.mankatonetworks.com > http://www.neutralpath.net > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1**** > > > > **** > > ** ** > > -- > Mike Bushard Jr > | Network Engineer IV > *| *Arvig > | 320.256.7471 Office > | 320.256.0178 Direct > | 320.429.0837 Mobile > | 320.256.7555 Fax > **** > > ** ** > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 **** > > ** ** > > ** ** > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 **** > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > -- Mike Bushard Jr | Network Engineer IV *| *Arvig | 320.256.7471 Office | 320.256.0178 Direct | 320.429.0837 Mobile | 320.256.7555 Fax ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 18, 2013

Re: MICE Congestion Issues

by Anthony Anderberg

I don't recall what model switch the CNS unit is – are they X2 based ports or SFP+ ? If SFP+ I bet the Juniper switch would be OK with Cisco modules. Anthony Anderberg Sr. Systems Analyst [NUtel_email_logo_1] 320-234-5239 anthonyanderberg(a)nu-telecom.net<mailto:anthonyanderberg@nu-telecom.net> www.nutelecom.net From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Steve Howard Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 2:47 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE Congestion Issues Wouldn't it make more sense to move Akamai to the CNS switch? i.e. Move one instead of two? The GigaPOP and HE both purchased their optics, so that could also become a factor in any changes. Can Akamai connect to both switches at a 10Gig level? Perhaps that would be easier than moving anybody? On 09/18/2013 02:10 PM, Mike Bushard, Jr wrote: Should we just move the GigaPOP and HE to the main switch? On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Jay Hanke <jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net<mailto:jayhanke@mankatonetworks.net>> wrote: There appears to be some intermittent congestion issues on MICE right now between the Main switch and the CNS remote switch. We may need to move a link (or two) to the main switch. -- Jay Hanke CTO, CCIE #19093 Mankato Networks LLC PO Box 54 619 S Front St Mankato, MN 56001-3838 Google 530-618-2398<tel:530-618-2398> jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net<mailto:jayhanke@mankatonetworks.net> http://www.mankatonetworks.com http://www.neutralpath.net ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 -- Mike Bushard Jr | Network Engineer IV | Arvig | 320.256.7471 Office | 320.256.0178 Direct | 320.429.0837 Mobile | 320.256.7555 Fax [http://ipstats.arvig.net/arviglogo.jpeg] ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 18, 2013

Re: MICE Congestion Issues

by Anthony Anderberg

I've had it the other way around - waiting patiently for a mouse-over to popup a traffic graph on a Visio diagram. Anthony Anderberg Sr. Systems Analyst [NUtel_email_logo_1] 320-234-5239 anthonyanderberg(a)nu-telecom.net<mailto:anthonyanderberg@nu-telecom.net> www.nutelecom.net From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Shaun Carlson Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 2:58 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE Congestion Issues Ever get into one of those mind-sets where you're thinking visio and nothing else seems like a network map? ;) Thanks guys s Shaun Carlson Network Engineering Manager | Arvig ph: (218) 346-8673 | em: shaun.carlson(a)arvig.com<mailto:shaun.carlson@arvig.com> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Jay Hanke <jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net<mailto:jayhanke@mankatonetworks.net>> wrote: The topology is laid out pretty well in Anthony's Weathermap on the MICE traffic server. On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Shaun Carlson <shaun.carlson(a)arvig.com<mailto:shaun.carlson@arvig.com>> wrote: > Does anyone have a good diagram to represent the current connections? > > s > > > Shaun Carlson > Network Engineering Manager | Arvig > ph: (218) 346-8673<tel:%28218%29%20346-8673> | em: shaun.carlson(a)arvig.com<mailto:shaun.carlson@arvig.com> > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Richard Laager <rlaager(a)wiktel.com<mailto:rlaager@wiktel.com>> wrote: >> >> On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 14:47 -0500, Steve Howard wrote: >> > Wouldn't it make more sense to move Akamai to the CNS switch? i.e. >> > Move one instead of two? The GigaPOP and HE both purchased their >> > optics, so that could also become a factor in any changes. >> >> It seems to me like it'd make more sense to have the big networks at the >> main switch, since then the connection to CNS only needs to support the >> bandwidth needs of CNS and others on that switch. Thus, for now, the >> single 10Gig between the CNS switch and main switch should be fine. >> >> > Can Akamai connect to both switches at a 10Gig level? Perhaps that >> > would be easier than moving anybody? >> >> If Akamai is pushing over 10 Gbps, then it seems like the answer is 2 >> connections (link agg or not, depending on their setup) to the main >> switch. >> >> -- >> Richard >> >> ######################################################################## >> >> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: >> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > > > ________________________________ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 -- Jay Hanke CTO, CCIE #19093 Mankato Networks LLC PO Box 54 619 S Front St Mankato, MN 56001-3838 Google 530-618-2398<tel:530-618-2398> jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net<mailto:jayhanke@mankatonetworks.net> http://www.mankatonetworks.com http://www.neutralpath.net ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 18, 2013

Re: MICE Congestion Issues

by Shaun Carlson

Ever get into one of those mind-sets where you're thinking visio and nothing else seems like a network map? ;) Thanks guys s *Shaun Carlson *Network Engineering Manager | Arvig ph: (218) 346-8673 | em: shaun.carlson(a)arvig.com On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Jay Hanke <jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net>wrote: > The topology is laid out pretty well in Anthony's Weathermap on the > MICE traffic server. > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Shaun Carlson <shaun.carlson(a)arvig.com> > wrote: > > Does anyone have a good diagram to represent the current connections? > > > > s > > > > > > Shaun Carlson > > Network Engineering Manager | Arvig > > ph: (218) 346-8673 | em: shaun.carlson(a)arvig.com > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Richard Laager <rlaager(a)wiktel.com> > wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 14:47 -0500, Steve Howard wrote: > >> > Wouldn't it make more sense to move Akamai to the CNS switch? i.e. > >> > Move one instead of two? The GigaPOP and HE both purchased their > >> > optics, so that could also become a factor in any changes. > >> > >> It seems to me like it'd make more sense to have the big networks at the > >> main switch, since then the connection to CNS only needs to support the > >> bandwidth needs of CNS and others on that switch. Thus, for now, the > >> single 10Gig between the CNS switch and main switch should be fine. > >> > >> > Can Akamai connect to both switches at a 10Gig level? Perhaps that > >> > would be easier than moving anybody? > >> > >> If Akamai is pushing over 10 Gbps, then it seems like the answer is 2 > >> connections (link agg or not, depending on their setup) to the main > >> switch. > >> > >> -- > >> Richard > >> > >> ######################################################################## > >> > >> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > >> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > > > -- > Jay Hanke > CTO, CCIE #19093 > Mankato Networks LLC > PO Box 54 > 619 S Front St > Mankato, MN 56001-3838 > Google 530-618-2398 > jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net > http://www.mankatonetworks.com > http://www.neutralpath.net > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 18, 2013

Re: MICE Congestion Issues

by Jay Hanke

The topology is laid out pretty well in Anthony's Weathermap on the MICE traffic server. On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Shaun Carlson <shaun.carlson(a)arvig.com> wrote: > Does anyone have a good diagram to represent the current connections? > > s > > > Shaun Carlson > Network Engineering Manager | Arvig > ph: (218) 346-8673 | em: shaun.carlson(a)arvig.com > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Richard Laager <rlaager(a)wiktel.com> wrote: >> >> On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 14:47 -0500, Steve Howard wrote: >> > Wouldn't it make more sense to move Akamai to the CNS switch? i.e. >> > Move one instead of two? The GigaPOP and HE both purchased their >> > optics, so that could also become a factor in any changes. >> >> It seems to me like it'd make more sense to have the big networks at the >> main switch, since then the connection to CNS only needs to support the >> bandwidth needs of CNS and others on that switch. Thus, for now, the >> single 10Gig between the CNS switch and main switch should be fine. >> >> > Can Akamai connect to both switches at a 10Gig level? Perhaps that >> > would be easier than moving anybody? >> >> If Akamai is pushing over 10 Gbps, then it seems like the answer is 2 >> connections (link agg or not, depending on their setup) to the main >> switch. >> >> -- >> Richard >> >> ######################################################################## >> >> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: >> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > > > ________________________________ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 -- Jay Hanke CTO, CCIE #19093 Mankato Networks LLC PO Box 54 619 S Front St Mankato, MN 56001-3838 Google 530-618-2398 jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net http://www.mankatonetworks.com http://www.neutralpath.net ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 18, 2013

Re: MICE Congestion Issues

by Justin Krejci

http://micelg.usinternet.com/cacti/plugins/weathermap/weathermap-cacti-plug… or just log into the cacti server (guest/guest) and click "Weathermap" tab at the top. ________________________________ From: MICE Discuss [MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] on behalf of Shaun Carlson [shaun.carlson(a)ARVIG.COM] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 2:53 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE Congestion Issues Does anyone have a good diagram to represent the current connections? s Shaun Carlson Network Engineering Manager | Arvig ph: (218) 346-8673 | em: shaun.carlson(a)arvig.com<mailto:shaun.carlson@arvig.com> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Richard Laager <rlaager(a)wiktel.com<mailto:rlaager@wiktel.com>> wrote: On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 14:47 -0500, Steve Howard wrote: > Wouldn't it make more sense to move Akamai to the CNS switch? i.e. > Move one instead of two? The GigaPOP and HE both purchased their > optics, so that could also become a factor in any changes. It seems to me like it'd make more sense to have the big networks at the main switch, since then the connection to CNS only needs to support the bandwidth needs of CNS and others on that switch. Thus, for now, the single 10Gig between the CNS switch and main switch should be fine. > Can Akamai connect to both switches at a 10Gig level? Perhaps that > would be easier than moving anybody? If Akamai is pushing over 10 Gbps, then it seems like the answer is 2 connections (link agg or not, depending on their setup) to the main switch. -- Richard ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 18, 2013