- mice-discuss - lists.micemn.net

Traffic Drop

by Dean Bahls

Wondering if anyone knows the specifics behind the dramatic drop in MICE traffic that started about a week ago. Thanks! Dean Dean Bahls Network Services Manager Cooperative Network Services, LLC (218) 346-3635 (office) dean.bahls(a)cooperative-networks.com ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Jan. 22, 2014

Meeting Reminder / Agenda Request

by Shaun Carlson

All, Just a quick meeting reminder for our upcoming UG meeting on Thursday, January 30th at 4:00 PM in the 511 cafeteria. Please send me any agenda items you may have or any topics you want to be sure are covered. Thanks! s *Shaun Carlson*Network Engineering Manager | Arvig ph: (218) 346-8673 | em: shaun.carlson(a)arvig.com ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Jan. 20, 2014

Re: Please welcome Supranet to MICE!

by Richard Laager

On Sun, 2014-01-12 at 12:53 -0600, Chris Wopat wrote: > To whomever updates the participants list: some digits are transposed on > AS5683 on: http://micemn.net/participants.html Sorry about that. I also forgot to link your AS numbers like we do with the rest. I've fixed both, hopefully without creating any new mistakes. -- Richard ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Jan. 13, 2014

Re: Please welcome Supranet to MICE!

by Doug McIntyre

On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 12:53:16PM -0600, Chris Wopat wrote: > On 2013-12-23 08:46, Jay Hanke wrote: > >Supranet is connecting both of their ASNs to MICE via one port. Welcome aboard! The prefixes are coming in fine through the route servers. I'm routing through MICE to get to you now. -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> ~.~ ipHouse ~.~ Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Jan. 13, 2014

Re: Please welcome Supranet to MICE!

by Chris Wopat

On 2013-12-23 08:46, Jay Hanke wrote: > Supranet is connecting both of their ASNs to MICE via one port. > > AS: 4150 > IPv4: 206.108.255.27 > IPv6: 2001:504:27:0:0:1036::1/64 > Port: ge-1/0/7 Main Switch (shared) > Peering Contact: peering(a)supranet.net > Route Servers: yes > Max IPv4 Prefix: 250 > > AS: 5683 > IPv4: 206.108.255.28 > IPv6: 2001:504:27:0:0:1633::1/64 > Port: ge-1/0/7 Main Switch (shared) > Peering Contact: peering(a)supranet.net > Route Servers: yes > Max IPv4 Prefix: 250 > > Please email me back when the route server configuration is complete. Hello MICE folks, We went live on MICE over the weekend on AS4150, those who aren't on the route servers should have received a peering request from me. We will be turning up peering for AS5683 later this month. To whomever updates the participants list: some digits are transposed on AS5683 on: http://micemn.net/participants.html 5638 2001:504:27:0:0:1633::1 should be 5683 2001:504:27:0:0:1633::1 Thanks, -- Chris Wopat SupraNet Communications, Inc. chrisw(a)supranet.net (608) 836-0282 x302 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Jan. 12, 2014

Cologix Maintenance..

by Doug McIntyre

FYI: Since I remember some MICE members didn't receive Cologix's maintenace notices. Cologix has UPS/power maintenance right now (1/9/14), and MICE route reflector 1 (206.108.255.1) is down due to it. The route reflector #2 is up and still doing BGP. -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> ~.~ ipHouse ~.~ Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Jan. 9, 2014

Re: Enventis Maintenance

by Jake Lubitz

Update: We ran into a snag the other night (12/18) with this maintenance and had to move this event until after the holidays. As of 11:30AM today (1/3) we have our 10Gbps connection up, as well as BGP, to the MICE Juniper router. I apologize for the lack of updates on this. At any rate, the 10Gbps connection to MICE is up and happy at the moment. Please let us know if we missed anything. Thanks in advance. Jake ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Jan. 3, 2014

Re: Cogent Transport

by Justin Krejci

We've several customers who do. Let me know if nobody gets back to you on this and I can ask around. I presume you're looking for feedback or something? -----Original Message----- From: Jay Hanke [jayhanke(a)MANKATONETWORKS.NET] Received: Monday, 23 Dec 2013, 7:15AM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET [MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Cogent Transport Does anyone on MICE have a Cogent L2 Transport Circuit? Could you contact me off-list? -- Jay Hanke CTO, CCIE #19093 Mankato Networks LLC PO Box 54 619 S Front St Mankato, MN 56001-3838 Google 530-618-2398 jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net http://www.mankatonetworks.com http://www.neutralpath.net ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Dec. 25, 2013

Re: Please welcome Supranet to MICE!

by Doug McIntyre

On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 08:46:37AM -0600, Jay Hanke wrote: > Supranet is connecting both of their ASNs to MICE via one port. > > AS: 4150 > IPv4: 206.108.255.27 > IPv6: 2001:504:27:0:0:1036::1/64 > Port: ge-1/0/7 Main Switch (shared) > Peering Contact: peering(a)supranet.net > Route Servers: yes > Max IPv4 Prefix: 250 > > AS: 5683 > IPv4: 206.108.255.28 > IPv6: 2001:504:27:0:0:1633::1/64 > Port: ge-1/0/7 Main Switch (shared) > Peering Contact: peering(a)supranet.net > Route Servers: yes > Max IPv4 Prefix: 250 > > Please email me back when the route server configuration is complete. Sure, all four entries are added to each route-server. They are all set to go once they get hooked up. -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> ~.~ ipHouse ~.~ Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Dec. 23, 2013

Cogent Transport

by Jay Hanke

Does anyone on MICE have a Cogent L2 Transport Circuit? Could you contact me off-list? -- Jay Hanke CTO, CCIE #19093 Mankato Networks LLC PO Box 54 619 S Front St Mankato, MN 56001-3838 Google 530-618-2398 jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net http://www.mankatonetworks.com http://www.neutralpath.net ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Dec. 23, 2013

Re: Please welcome Supranet to MICE!

by Chris Wopat

On 12/23/2013 08:46 AM, Jay Hanke wrote: > Supranet is connecting both of their ASNs to MICE via one port. > > AS: 4150 > IPv4: 206.108.255.27 > IPv6: 2001:504:27:0:0:1036::1/64 > Port: ge-1/0/7 Main Switch (shared) > Peering Contact: peering(a)supranet.net > Route Servers: yes > Max IPv4 Prefix: 250 > > AS: 5683 > IPv4: 206.108.255.28 > IPv6: 2001:504:27:0:0:1633::1/64 > Port: ge-1/0/7 Main Switch (shared) > Peering Contact: peering(a)supranet.net > Route Servers: yes > Max IPv4 Prefix: 250 Thanks Jay. MICE participants- we'll be ready to peer in early January. I'll shoot out another message then to muster up peers that don't use the route-server. -- Chris Wopat SupraNet Communications, Inc. chrisw(a)supranet.net (608) 836-0282 x302 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Dec. 23, 2013

Please welcome Supranet to MICE!

by Jay Hanke

Supranet is connecting both of their ASNs to MICE via one port. AS: 4150 IPv4: 206.108.255.27 IPv6: 2001:504:27:0:0:1036::1/64 Port: ge-1/0/7 Main Switch (shared) Peering Contact: peering(a)supranet.net Route Servers: yes Max IPv4 Prefix: 250 AS: 5683 IPv4: 206.108.255.28 IPv6: 2001:504:27:0:0:1633::1/64 Port: ge-1/0/7 Main Switch (shared) Peering Contact: peering(a)supranet.net Route Servers: yes Max IPv4 Prefix: 250 Please email me back when the route server configuration is complete. Thanks! -- Jay Hanke CTO, CCIE #19093 Mankato Networks LLC PO Box 54 619 S Front St Mankato, MN 56001-3838 Google 530-618-2398 jayhanke(a)mankatonetworks.net http://www.mankatonetworks.com http://www.neutralpath.net ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Dec. 23, 2013

Re: cogent or HE?

by Matthew Beckwell

Per Hurricane Electric: We had an issue with our router in Chicago. This affected routing in the region. At this time the issue is resolved. -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Andrew Hoyos Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 4:25 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] cogent or HE? We just lost our "full view" from HE... Seems to have stabilized though. On Dec 18, 2013, at 4:23 PM, Ryan Goldberg wrote: > Anybody else notice anything out of the ordinary with cogent or HE transit? > > Sorry for the spam... > > Ryan > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > -- Andrew Hoyos hoyosa(a)gmail.com ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Dec. 18, 2013

Re: cogent or HE?

by Eric Crist

We have both and I can look when I get back to a terminal. None of our canaries have tipped over though. On Wednesday, December 18, 2013, Andrew Hoyos wrote: > We just lost our "full view" from HE... Seems to have stabilized though. > > On Dec 18, 2013, at 4:23 PM, Ryan Goldberg wrote: > > > Anybody else notice anything out of the ordinary with cogent or HE > transit? > > > > Sorry for the spam… > > > > Ryan > > > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > > > -- > Andrew Hoyos > hoyosa(a)gmail.com <javascript:;> > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > -- Eric F Crist System Administrator ClaimLynx, Inc (952) 593-5969 x2301 -- This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the individual responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, please be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please return it to the sender immediately and delete the original message and any copy of it from your computer system. If you have any questions concerning this message, please contact the sender or call ClaimLynx at (952) 593-5969. ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Dec. 18, 2013

Re: cogent or HE?

by Matthew Beckwell

+1 I sent it over to noc(a)he.net ~Matthew -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Andrew Hoyos Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 4:25 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] cogent or HE? We just lost our "full view" from HE... Seems to have stabilized though. On Dec 18, 2013, at 4:23 PM, Ryan Goldberg wrote: > Anybody else notice anything out of the ordinary with cogent or HE transit? > > Sorry for the spam... > > Ryan > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > -- Andrew Hoyos hoyosa(a)gmail.com ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Dec. 18, 2013

Re: cogent or HE?

by Andrew Hoyos

We just lost our "full view" from HE... Seems to have stabilized though. On Dec 18, 2013, at 4:23 PM, Ryan Goldberg wrote: > Anybody else notice anything out of the ordinary with cogent or HE transit? > > Sorry for the spam… > > Ryan > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > -- Andrew Hoyos hoyosa(a)gmail.com ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Dec. 18, 2013

cogent or HE?

by Ryan Goldberg

Anybody else notice anything out of the ordinary with cogent or HE transit? Sorry for the spam... Ryan ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Dec. 18, 2013

Enventis Maintenance

by Jake Lubitz

Greeting Tonight (12/17 into 12/18) we are planning on doing some maintenance work on our equipment that connects to the MICE Juniper router. This is in preparation to upgrade our link to the MICE router to 10Gbps. As a result, traffic (BGP) from us to the MICE router will drop out tonight. We hope to have everything back up by tomorrow (12/18) afternoon. Please let us know if there are any issues or objections to this maintenance work. Thanks in advance. Jake ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Dec. 17, 2013

Re: Port Anonymity

by Hannigan, Martin

Appreciate the community. Thanks. Onward! First 20g LAG! > On Dec 11, 2013, at 23:44, "Anthony Anderberg" <anthonyanderberg(a)NU-TELECOM.NET> wrote: > > Since I haven't seen anyone argue for maintaining the status quo and it seems like we're working toward a policy that includes optional opacity of some sort I've removed the member identification colors from the Ingress graph, guest access to Akamai's graph, and also the details from their Weathermap link. > > As always let me know if you see anything wrong or silly. > > Cheers, > anthony > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Dec. 12, 2013

Re: Port Anonymity

by Anthony Anderberg

Since I haven't seen anyone argue for maintaining the status quo and it seems like we're working toward a policy that includes optional opacity of some sort I've removed the member identification colors from the Ingress graph, guest access to Akamai's graph, and also the details from their Weathermap link. As always let me know if you see anything wrong or silly. Cheers, anthony ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Dec. 12, 2013

Re: Port Anonymity

by Hannigan, Martin

Thanks guys...! > On Dec 11, 2013, at 19:00, "Doug McIntyre" <merlyn(a)IPHOUSE.NET> wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 02:58:12PM -0600, Michael Horwath wrote: >>> On Dec 11, 2013, at 1:59 PM, Anthony Anderberg <anthonyanderberg(a)NU-TELECOM.NET> wrote: >>> One loose end: Doug - can you remove that posting (or perhaps just the graph image) from the mailing list archive? >> >> It may not be possible and I?d need to engage Doug at ipHouse to do something directly in the archives (which LISTSERV will probably bark about). > > > I've removed that posting (just the attachment was not possible) from > the list Archives. > > -- > Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> > ~.~ ipHouse ~.~ > Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Dec. 12, 2013

Re: Port Anonymity

by Doug McIntyre

On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 02:58:12PM -0600, Michael Horwath wrote: > On Dec 11, 2013, at 1:59 PM, Anthony Anderberg <anthonyanderberg(a)NU-TELECOM.NET> wrote: > > One loose end: Doug - can you remove that posting (or perhaps just the graph image) from the mailing list archive? > > It may not be possible and I?d need to engage Doug at ipHouse to do something directly in the archives (which LISTSERV will probably bark about). I've removed that posting (just the attachment was not possible) from the list Archives. -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> ~.~ ipHouse ~.~ Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Dec. 11, 2013

Re: Port Anonymity

by Michael Horwath

On Dec 11, 2013, at 2:58 PM, Michael Horwath <drechsau(a)GEEKS.ORG> wrote: > On Dec 11, 2013, at 1:59 PM, Anthony Anderberg <anthonyanderberg(a)NU-TELECOM.NET> wrote: > >> One loose end: Doug - can you remove that posting (or perhaps just the graph image) from the mailing list archive? > > As the list master for this I’ll check into what can be done. > > It may not be possible and I’d need to engage Doug at ipHouse to do something directly in the archives (which LISTSERV will probably bark about). Looks like I’ll need to work with Doug. Fingers ><ed! -- Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau(a)Geeks.ORG ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Dec. 11, 2013

Re: Port Anonymity

by Michael Horwath

On Dec 11, 2013, at 1:59 PM, Anthony Anderberg <anthonyanderberg(a)NU-TELECOM.NET> wrote: > One loose end: Doug - can you remove that posting (or perhaps just the graph image) from the mailing list archive? As the list master for this I’ll check into what can be done. It may not be possible and I’d need to engage Doug at ipHouse to do something directly in the archives (which LISTSERV will probably bark about). -- Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau(a)Geeks.ORG ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Dec. 11, 2013

Re: Port Anonymity

by Hannigan, Martin

On Dec 10, 2013, at 10:49 PM, Jay Hanke <jayhanke(a)MANKATONETWORKS.NET<mailto:jayhanke@MANKATONETWORKS.NET>> wrote: > Right on with the agreement. It does say that we may ask for MRTG graph data related to ports statistics. It also says we expect confidentiality. Our port data is confidential. The MICE Board signed this agreement with us. If we take our port down to the wider audience like we have gracefully requested, we're happy to discuss what the objective is and how we may be helpful. I'll be honest, I doubt that the outcome is "sure, display our data to anyone with a login", but it is likely to be reasonable and inline with North American IXP norms. NETNOD is in Norway and Mice is in North America. NETNOD is also orders of magnitude larger than MICE. That's not the solution. > Can you narrow down the scope better? Keep in mind we have no formally defined admins, so if you say admin you'll need to lay that out as well. Sure. And thanks for the call this morning, I appreciated it. When we define admins they should be folks with enable on the gear who have it to fix problems. There should also be a basic expectation of privacy of that data. Admins emailing. me and saying "Hey! Where's your port upgrade!" is fine, but emailing the entire list with that is probably not ok. That should apply across the organization. This would be a fairly standard interpretation of how things are done at IXP's in North America and depending upon the final language I would be pleased to support. As far as my data being "public" I'm going to disagree with the board that any member with a login != public so I'm still asking that they remove my graph until we have a better solution. I'm a former MRTG user and maker of pages to monitor things with SNMP, I'm well aware of how to make this work and I'm happy to volunteer to help manage the cacti instance if it would be helpful. There are multiple good reasons for this approach. Unfortunately, the UG meeting conflicts with my Super Bowl vacation or I would come to do a presentation for you on this. Perhaps next one. I hope this helps to clarify and move us along. And as soon as we get this resolved I'll start working to add my second 10G. :-) Best, -M< ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Dec. 11, 2013