- mice-discuss - lists.micemn.net

Re: Hurricane and route servers

by Chris Wopat

On 09/28/2016 02:32 PM, Rob Mosher wrote: > As per Reid's email, we'll be sending around 40k, so I'd increase your > limits by at least that much. > > Currently, we're sending a small subset (about 4500) to rs2. Perhaps give it a few days before sending more at all for folks to get caught up on the list? This was first mentioned only an hour ago. I would suspect that many folks had a limit set around 4k or so, which is more than double what it has been recently. It also may be beneficial to post a recommended prefix limit for the route servers on the website, and/or add AS53679 to peeringdb with said info. -- Chris Wopat Network Engineer, WiscNet wopat(a)wiscnet.net 608-210-3965

Sept. 28, 2016

Re: Hurricane and route servers

by Andrew Hoyos

Was just looking at this as well. Appears there are a few folks leaking _6939_ prefixes/paths on to the IX: NebraskaLink and Vaultas - may want to double check these hoyosa(a)er1.511.msp> show route receive-protocol bgp 206.108.255.2 | match 6939 * 24.51.44.0/23 206.108.255.70 16851 6939 1299 174 30612 I * 24.72.210.0/23 206.108.255.70 16851 6939 1299 174 30612 I * 24.72.212.0/23 206.108.255.70 16851 6939 1299 174 30612 I * 24.223.120.0/23 206.108.255.70 16851 6939 30688 30164 I * 65.161.180.0/23 206.108.255.70 16851 6939 209 17046 I * 72.14.74.0/24 206.108.255.100 53480 6939 5009 I * 199.47.66.0/24 206.108.255.70 16851 6939 6461 32307 I -- Andrew Hoyos hoyosa(a)gmail.com > On Sep 28, 2016, at 2:29 PM, Frank Bulk <fbulk(a)MYPREMIERONLINE.COM> wrote: > > Just saw our BGP session go down …. I’m guessing someone added something already. > > Sep 28 14:02:56 192.168.0.85 BGP: No. of prefix received from BGP Peer 206.108.255.2: exceeds warning limit 1980 > Sep 28 14:02:57 192.168.0.85 BGP: No. of prefix received from BGP Peer 206.108.255.2 exceeds maximum prefix limit...shutdown > Sep 28 14:02:57 192.168.0.85 BGP: Peer 206.108.255.2 DOWN (Peer had exceeded the prefix limit) > > Removed limits for now. > > telnet@Premier's_MLXe-4_facing_Spencer#show ip bgp summary > <snip> > Neighbor Address AS# State Time Rt:Accepted Filtered Sent ToSend > 206.108.255.1 53679 ESTAB 38d 2h48m 1831 0 49 0 > 206.108.255.2 53679 ESTAB 0h 0m39s 5167 0 49 0 > telnet@Premier's_MLXe-4_facing_Spencer# > > Reid, can let us know how many IPv4 and IPv6 prefixes you’ll be sending, so we can adjust our limits? > > Frank > > From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Reid Fishler > Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 1:50 PM > To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET > Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Hurricane and route servers > > Hurricane will begin to send routes to the route servers within the next few days. Approximately 40k routes will be sent, so watch your filters! Happy peering! > > Reid > > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 >

Sept. 28, 2016

Re: Hurricane and route servers

by Rob Mosher

As per Reid's email, we'll be sending around 40k, so I'd increase your limits by at least that much. Currently, we're sending a small subset (about 4500) to rs2. -- Rob Mosher Senior Network and Software Engineer Hurricane Electric / AS6939 On 9/28/2016 3:29 PM, Frank Bulk wrote: > > Just saw our BGP session go down …. I’m guessing someone added > something already. > > Sep 28 14:02:56 192.168.0.85 BGP: No. of prefix received from BGP Peer > 206.108.255.2: exceeds warning limit 1980 > > Sep 28 14:02:57 192.168.0.85 BGP: No. of prefix received from BGP Peer > 206.108.255.2 exceeds maximum prefix limit...shutdown > > Sep 28 14:02:57 192.168.0.85 BGP: Peer 206.108.255.2 DOWN (Peer had > exceeded the prefix limit) > > Removed limits for now. > > telnet@Premier's_MLXe-4_facing_Spencer#show ip bgp summary > > <snip> > > Neighbor Address AS# State Time Rt:Accepted > Filtered Sent ToSend > > 206.108.255.1 53679 ESTAB 38d 2h48m 1831 0 > 49 0 > > 206.108.255.2 53679 ESTAB 0h 0m39s 5167 0 > 49 0 > > telnet@Premier's_MLXe-4_facing_Spencer# > > Reid, can let us know how many IPv4 and IPv6 prefixes you’ll be > sending, so we can adjust our limits? > > Frank > > *From:*MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] *On Behalf > Of *Reid Fishler > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 28, 2016 1:50 PM > *To:* MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET > *Subject:* [MICE-DISCUSS] Hurricane and route servers > > Hurricane will begin to send routes to the route servers within the > next few days. Approximately 40k routes will be sent, so watch your > filters! Happy peering! > > Reid > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 >

Sept. 28, 2016

Re: Hurricane and route servers

by Frank Bulk

Just saw our BGP session go down …. I’m guessing someone added something already. Sep 28 14:02:56 192.168.0.85 BGP: No. of prefix received from BGP Peer 206.108.255.2: exceeds warning limit 1980 Sep 28 14:02:57 192.168.0.85 BGP: No. of prefix received from BGP Peer 206.108.255.2 exceeds maximum prefix limit...shutdown Sep 28 14:02:57 192.168.0.85 BGP: Peer 206.108.255.2 DOWN (Peer had exceeded the prefix limit) Removed limits for now. telnet@Premier's_MLXe-4_facing_Spencer#show ip bgp summary <snip> Neighbor Address AS# State Time Rt:Accepted Filtered Sent ToSend 206.108.255.1 53679 ESTAB 38d 2h48m 1831 0 49 0 206.108.255.2 53679 ESTAB 0h 0m39s 5167 0 49 0 telnet@Premier's_MLXe-4_facing_Spencer# Reid, can let us know how many IPv4 and IPv6 prefixes you’ll be sending, so we can adjust our limits? Frank From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Reid Fishler Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 1:50 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Hurricane and route servers Hurricane will begin to send routes to the route servers within the next few days. Approximately 40k routes will be sent, so watch your filters! Happy peering! Reid ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 28, 2016

Re: Hurricane and route servers

by Mike Horwath

On Sep 28, 2016, at 1:57 PM, Rob Mosher <rmosher(a)HE.NET> wrote: > > Yes. Please raise max-prefix limits as necessary. We'll start off with a small set of routes now, and after everyone has a chance to update, we'll announce about 40k routes. So..care to fill us in on the changes? Nerds need data! -- Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau(a)Geeks.ORG

Sept. 28, 2016

Re: Hurricane and route servers

by Reid Fishler

Yes On Sep 28, 2016 1:54 PM, "Jason Hanke" <jayhanke(a)neutralpath.net> wrote: > These are IPv4 routes? > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Reid Fishler <rfishler(a)he.net> wrote: > >> Hurricane will begin to send routes to the route servers within the next >> few days. Approximately 40k routes will be sent, so watch your filters! >> Happy peering! >> >> Reid >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: >> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 >> > > > > -- > Jay Hanke > CTO > Neutral Path Communications > 3 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 204 > Mankato, MN 56001 > (507) 327-2398 mobile > jayhanke(a)neutralpath.net > www.neutralpath.net > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 >

Sept. 28, 2016

Re: Hurricane and route servers

by Rob Mosher

Yes. Please raise max-prefix limits as necessary. We'll start off with a small set of routes now, and after everyone has a chance to update, we'll announce about 40k routes. -- Rob Mosher Senior Network and Software Engineer Hurricane Electric / AS6939 On 9/28/2016 2:54 PM, Jason Hanke wrote: > These are IPv4 routes? > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Reid Fishler <rfishler(a)he.net > <mailto:rfishler@he.net>> wrote: > > Hurricane will begin to send routes to the route servers within > the next few days. Approximately 40k routes will be sent, so > watch your filters! Happy peering! > > Reid > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > <http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1> > > > > > -- > Jay Hanke > CTO > Neutral Path Communications > 3 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 204 > Mankato, MN 56001 > (507) 327-2398 mobile > jayhanke(a)neutralpath.net <mailto:jayhanke@neutralpath.net> > www.neutralpath.net <http://www.neutralpath.net> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 >

Sept. 28, 2016

Re: Hurricane and route servers

by Jason Hanke

These are IPv4 routes? On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Reid Fishler <rfishler(a)he.net> wrote: > Hurricane will begin to send routes to the route servers within the next > few days. Approximately 40k routes will be sent, so watch your filters! > Happy peering! > > Reid > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > -- Jay Hanke CTO Neutral Path Communications 3 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 204 Mankato, MN 56001 (507) 327-2398 mobile jayhanke(a)neutralpath.net www.neutralpath.net

Sept. 28, 2016

Hurricane and route servers

by Reid Fishler

Hurricane will begin to send routes to the route servers within the next few days. Approximately 40k routes will be sent, so watch your filters! Happy peering! Reid

Sept. 28, 2016

Re: What's happening with MICE bandwidth this evening?

by Frank Bulk

Traffic started ramping up at 7:45. Thanks to all who worked on this. Frank -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Andrew Hoyos Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 11:00 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] What's happening with MICE bandwidth this evening? That’s what we’re seeing too: er1.511.msp rpd[1461]: bgp_read_v4_message:10672: NOTIFICATION received from 206.108.255.37 (External AS 36040): code 6 (Cease) subcode 6 (Other Configuration Change) (which on JunOS, actually flaps the session) -- Andrew Hoyos hoyosa(a)gmail.com > On Sep 27, 2016, at 10:56 PM, anthonyanderberg(a)nu-telecom.net <anthonyanderberg(a)NU-TELECOM.NET> wrote: > > Looks the same as yesterday on both servers: > 206.108.255.37 BGP master up 22:38:09 Established > 2001:504:27:0:0:8cc8::1 BGP master start 22:42:34 Idle Received: Maximum number of prefixes reached > > But I see we've started getting these BIRD log messages: > 016-09-26 17:28:45 <RMT> NASN_36040: Received: Other configuration change > > Additionally my ping generated a "We're actively troubleshooting this issue" reply, so it all seems to fit together. > > Cheers, > anthony > > > Anthony Anderberg > Sr. Systems Analyst > 320-234-5239 > anthonyanderberg(a)nu-telecom.net > www.nutelecom.net > > > -----Original Message----- > From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Andrew Hoyos > Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 10:40 PM > To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET > Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] What's happening with MICE bandwidth this evening? > > We have bilateral sessions to them, not sure on the route reflectors. Can someone check logs/BGP uptime there? > > -- > Andrew Hoyos > hoyosa(a)gmail.com > > > >> On Sep 27, 2016, at 10:25 PM, Frank Bulk <fbulk(a)mypremieronline.com> wrote: >> >> Thanks for reaching out to your Google contacts. >> >> Are you saying that MICE's route reflectors have been seeing their BGP sessions to Google's cache boxes flapping over the last few days? >> >> Frank >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Andrew Hoyos >> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 10:16 PM >> To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET >> Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] What's happening with MICE bandwidth this evening? >> >> We’ve had some issues with our sessions to the Google cache boxes flapping over the last few days. >> Checking with a few internal folks to Google, seemed like maybe there were a few other open tickets related to these cache boxes too. >> >> -- >> Andrew Hoyos >> hoyosa(a)gmail.com >> >> >> >>> On Sep 27, 2016, at 10:09 PM, Frank Bulk <fbulk(a)MYPREMIERONLINE.COM> wrote: >>> >>> Looks like it’s the Google LAG: >>> >>> <image001.png> >>> >>> From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk >>> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 10:07 PM >>> To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET >>> Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] What's happening with MICE bandwidth this evening? >>> >>> Saw our own MICE-facing traffic drop down, and I see MICE’s own aggregate is the same. >>> >>> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: >>> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 >>> >>

Sept. 28, 2016

Re: Election

by John Unger

Congrats Richard!!! Vaultas Team From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Reid Fishler Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 5:02 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Election The winner of today's election is Richard Laager. We thank all candidates, and we thank Shaun for his service! Reid and Jay ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 28, 2016

Re: What's happening with MICE bandwidth this evening?

by Andrew Hoyos

That’s what we’re seeing too: er1.511.msp rpd[1461]: bgp_read_v4_message:10672: NOTIFICATION received from 206.108.255.37 (External AS 36040): code 6 (Cease) subcode 6 (Other Configuration Change) (which on JunOS, actually flaps the session) -- Andrew Hoyos hoyosa(a)gmail.com > On Sep 27, 2016, at 10:56 PM, anthonyanderberg(a)nu-telecom.net <anthonyanderberg(a)NU-TELECOM.NET> wrote: > > Looks the same as yesterday on both servers: > 206.108.255.37 BGP master up 22:38:09 Established > 2001:504:27:0:0:8cc8::1 BGP master start 22:42:34 Idle Received: Maximum number of prefixes reached > > But I see we've started getting these BIRD log messages: > 016-09-26 17:28:45 <RMT> NASN_36040: Received: Other configuration change > > Additionally my ping generated a "We're actively troubleshooting this issue" reply, so it all seems to fit together. > > Cheers, > anthony > > > Anthony Anderberg > Sr. Systems Analyst > 320-234-5239 > anthonyanderberg(a)nu-telecom.net > www.nutelecom.net > > > -----Original Message----- > From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Andrew Hoyos > Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 10:40 PM > To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET > Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] What's happening with MICE bandwidth this evening? > > We have bilateral sessions to them, not sure on the route reflectors. Can someone check logs/BGP uptime there? > > -- > Andrew Hoyos > hoyosa(a)gmail.com > > > >> On Sep 27, 2016, at 10:25 PM, Frank Bulk <fbulk(a)mypremieronline.com> wrote: >> >> Thanks for reaching out to your Google contacts. >> >> Are you saying that MICE's route reflectors have been seeing their BGP sessions to Google's cache boxes flapping over the last few days? >> >> Frank >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Andrew Hoyos >> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 10:16 PM >> To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET >> Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] What's happening with MICE bandwidth this evening? >> >> We’ve had some issues with our sessions to the Google cache boxes flapping over the last few days. >> Checking with a few internal folks to Google, seemed like maybe there were a few other open tickets related to these cache boxes too. >> >> -- >> Andrew Hoyos >> hoyosa(a)gmail.com >> >> >> >>> On Sep 27, 2016, at 10:09 PM, Frank Bulk <fbulk(a)MYPREMIERONLINE.COM> wrote: >>> >>> Looks like it’s the Google LAG: >>> >>> <image001.png> >>> >>> From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk >>> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 10:07 PM >>> To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET >>> Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] What's happening with MICE bandwidth this evening? >>> >>> Saw our own MICE-facing traffic drop down, and I see MICE’s own aggregate is the same. >>> >>> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: >>> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 >>> >>

Sept. 28, 2016

Re: What's happening with MICE bandwidth this evening?

by anthonyanderberg＠nu-telecom.net

Looks the same as yesterday on both servers: 206.108.255.37 BGP master up 22:38:09 Established 2001:504:27:0:0:8cc8::1 BGP master start 22:42:34 Idle Received: Maximum number of prefixes reached But I see we've started getting these BIRD log messages: 016-09-26 17:28:45 <RMT> NASN_36040: Received: Other configuration change Additionally my ping generated a "We're actively troubleshooting this issue" reply, so it all seems to fit together. Cheers, anthony Anthony Anderberg Sr. Systems Analyst 320-234-5239 anthonyanderberg(a)nu-telecom.net www.nutelecom.net -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Andrew Hoyos Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 10:40 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] What's happening with MICE bandwidth this evening? We have bilateral sessions to them, not sure on the route reflectors. Can someone check logs/BGP uptime there? -- Andrew Hoyos hoyosa(a)gmail.com > On Sep 27, 2016, at 10:25 PM, Frank Bulk <fbulk(a)mypremieronline.com> wrote: > > Thanks for reaching out to your Google contacts. > > Are you saying that MICE's route reflectors have been seeing their BGP sessions to Google's cache boxes flapping over the last few days? > > Frank > > -----Original Message----- > From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Andrew Hoyos > Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 10:16 PM > To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET > Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] What's happening with MICE bandwidth this evening? > > We’ve had some issues with our sessions to the Google cache boxes flapping over the last few days. > Checking with a few internal folks to Google, seemed like maybe there were a few other open tickets related to these cache boxes too. > > -- > Andrew Hoyos > hoyosa(a)gmail.com > > > >> On Sep 27, 2016, at 10:09 PM, Frank Bulk <fbulk(a)MYPREMIERONLINE.COM> wrote: >> >> Looks like it’s the Google LAG: >> >> <image001.png> >> >> From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk >> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 10:07 PM >> To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET >> Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] What's happening with MICE bandwidth this evening? >> >> Saw our own MICE-facing traffic drop down, and I see MICE’s own aggregate is the same. >> >> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: >> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 >> >

Sept. 28, 2016

Re: What's happening with MICE bandwidth this evening?

by Andrew Hoyos

We have bilateral sessions to them, not sure on the route reflectors. Can someone check logs/BGP uptime there? -- Andrew Hoyos hoyosa(a)gmail.com > On Sep 27, 2016, at 10:25 PM, Frank Bulk <fbulk(a)mypremieronline.com> wrote: > > Thanks for reaching out to your Google contacts. > > Are you saying that MICE's route reflectors have been seeing their BGP sessions to Google's cache boxes flapping over the last few days? > > Frank > > -----Original Message----- > From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Andrew Hoyos > Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 10:16 PM > To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET > Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] What's happening with MICE bandwidth this evening? > > We’ve had some issues with our sessions to the Google cache boxes flapping over the last few days. > Checking with a few internal folks to Google, seemed like maybe there were a few other open tickets related to these cache boxes too. > > -- > Andrew Hoyos > hoyosa(a)gmail.com > > > >> On Sep 27, 2016, at 10:09 PM, Frank Bulk <fbulk(a)MYPREMIERONLINE.COM> wrote: >> >> Looks like it’s the Google LAG: >> >> <image001.png> >> >> From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk >> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 10:07 PM >> To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET >> Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] What's happening with MICE bandwidth this evening? >> >> Saw our own MICE-facing traffic drop down, and I see MICE’s own aggregate is the same. >> >> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: >> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 >> >

Sept. 28, 2016

Re: What's happening with MICE bandwidth this evening?

by Frank Bulk

Thanks for reaching out to your Google contacts. Are you saying that MICE's route reflectors have been seeing their BGP sessions to Google's cache boxes flapping over the last few days? Frank -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Andrew Hoyos Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 10:16 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] What's happening with MICE bandwidth this evening? We’ve had some issues with our sessions to the Google cache boxes flapping over the last few days. Checking with a few internal folks to Google, seemed like maybe there were a few other open tickets related to these cache boxes too. -- Andrew Hoyos hoyosa(a)gmail.com > On Sep 27, 2016, at 10:09 PM, Frank Bulk <fbulk(a)MYPREMIERONLINE.COM> wrote: > > Looks like it’s the Google LAG: > > <image001.png> > > From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk > Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 10:07 PM > To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET > Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] What's happening with MICE bandwidth this evening? > > Saw our own MICE-facing traffic drop down, and I see MICE’s own aggregate is the same. > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 >

Sept. 28, 2016

Re: What's happening with MICE bandwidth this evening?

by anthonyanderberg＠nu-telecom.net

Yesterday I noticed they were running into a limit to the number of IPv6 prefixes they'd accept from MICE (now over 15K) but hadn't seen any issues beyond that. Their GGC team said they were looking into it this morning, I'll ping them and mention these issues as well. Anthony Anderberg Sr. Systems Analyst 320-234-5239 anthonyanderberg(a)nu-telecom.net www.nutelecom.net -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Andrew Hoyos Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 10:16 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] What's happening with MICE bandwidth this evening? We’ve had some issues with our sessions to the Google cache boxes flapping over the last few days. Checking with a few internal folks to Google, seemed like maybe there were a few other open tickets related to these cache boxes too. -- Andrew Hoyos hoyosa(a)gmail.com > On Sep 27, 2016, at 10:09 PM, Frank Bulk <fbulk(a)MYPREMIERONLINE.COM> wrote: > > Looks like it’s the Google LAG: > > <image001.png> > > From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk > Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 10:07 PM > To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET > Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] What's happening with MICE bandwidth this evening? > > Saw our own MICE-facing traffic drop down, and I see MICE’s own aggregate is the same. > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 >

Sept. 28, 2016

Re: What's happening with MICE bandwidth this evening?

by Jeremy Lumby

The tech team has some open tickets at the moment with Google. They said they were escalating them. -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Andrew Hoyos Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 10:16 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] What's happening with MICE bandwidth this evening? We’ve had some issues with our sessions to the Google cache boxes flapping over the last few days. Checking with a few internal folks to Google, seemed like maybe there were a few other open tickets related to these cache boxes too. -- Andrew Hoyos hoyosa(a)gmail.com > On Sep 27, 2016, at 10:09 PM, Frank Bulk <fbulk(a)MYPREMIERONLINE.COM> wrote: > > Looks like it’s the Google LAG: > > <image001.png> > > From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk > Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 10:07 PM > To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET > Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] What's happening with MICE bandwidth this evening? > > Saw our own MICE-facing traffic drop down, and I see MICE’s own aggregate is the same. > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 >

Sept. 28, 2016

Re: What's happening with MICE bandwidth this evening?

by Andrew Hoyos

We’ve had some issues with our sessions to the Google cache boxes flapping over the last few days. Checking with a few internal folks to Google, seemed like maybe there were a few other open tickets related to these cache boxes too. -- Andrew Hoyos hoyosa(a)gmail.com > On Sep 27, 2016, at 10:09 PM, Frank Bulk <fbulk(a)MYPREMIERONLINE.COM> wrote: > > Looks like it’s the Google LAG: > > <image001.png> > > From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk > Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 10:07 PM > To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET > Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] What's happening with MICE bandwidth this evening? > > Saw our own MICE-facing traffic drop down, and I see MICE’s own aggregate is the same. > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 >

Sept. 28, 2016

Re: What's happening with MICE bandwidth this evening?

by Frank Bulk

Looks like it's the Google LAG: [cid:image001.png@01D2190B.D3667E90] From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 10:07 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] What's happening with MICE bandwidth this evening? Saw our own MICE-facing traffic drop down, and I see MICE's own aggregate is the same.

Sept. 28, 2016

What's happening with MICE bandwidth this evening?

by Frank Bulk

Saw our own MICE-facing traffic drop down, and I see MICE's own aggregate is the same. [cid:image004.jpg@01D2190B.83B53030] [cid:image003.png@01D2190B.83A5EDF0] Frank

Sept. 28, 2016

Re: Election

by Levi Pederson

Congrats *Levi Pederson* Mankato Networks LLC cell | 612.481.0769 work | 612.787.7392 levipederson(a)mankatonetworks.net On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Reid Fishler <rfishler(a)he.net> wrote: > The winner of today's election is Richard Laager. We thank all > candidates, and we thank Shaun for his service! > > Reid and Jay > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 >

Sept. 27, 2016

Re: Election

by DeLong, Owen

Congratulations, Richard. Owen On Sep 27, 2016, at 4:01 PM, Reid Fishler <rfishler(a)HE.NET<mailto:rfishler@he.net>> wrote: The winner of today's election is Richard Laager. We thank all candidates, and we thank Shaun for his service! Reid and Jay ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.iphouse.net_cgi-2…>

Sept. 27, 2016

Election

by Reid Fishler

The winner of today's election is Richard Laager. We thank all candidates, and we thank Shaun for his service! Reid and Jay

Sept. 27, 2016

Corrected Agenda (time is 3 pm)

by Shaun Carlson

Please see attached. s *Shaun Carlson*Director of Information Technology | Arvig ph: (218) 346-8673 | em: shaun.carlson(a)arvig.com

Sept. 27, 2016

Conference Bridge Info

by Jeremy Lumby

For today's meeting, we will have a simple audio only conference bridge for remote participants. 952-562-5400 Pin: 6423 Since it is a very basic bridge, I would encourage remote participants to keep their line muted until they are ready to talk, to reduce background noise.

Sept. 27, 2016