- mice-discuss - lists.micemn.net

Re: Mice routes via Northern Lights GigaPoP

by Matthew Beckwell

Yeahhh... It's by choice-- there are (old/outdated) static prefix filters on Zayo's peering session to the Gigapop. With the addition of MICE to AS57-- there's a lot more diverse traffic headed that direction than there used to be. I'll start a dialog with my contacts over there and see if we can get them to take more of a standard "transit" approach to that session. We have the same problem with our (relatively new) IPv4 prefix...MICE out...Level3/XO return... ~Matthew On Aug 31, 2011, at 3:28 PM, Jeremy Lumby wrote: > I have a case where I am seeing 199.199.0.0/16 in BGP via MICE/Northern Lights GigaPoP. I have noticed that traffic to this network takes MICE, however the return traffic is coming in across one of my public Internet connections. I am assuming that either by choice, or by accident that they are not accepting my route via MICE/Northern Lights GigaPoP. I am wondering who would be the best person to chat with about this since MICE does not list a peering contact for Northern Lights GigaPoP in the participants page, and I realize that the correct peering contact might be another level or two deeper. > > Thanks, > Jeremy > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 1, 2011

Re: Mice routes via Northern Lights GigaPoP

by Richard Laager

On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 19:26 -0500, Mike Horwath wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 03:28:00PM -0500, Jeremy Lumby wrote: > > I have a case where I am seeing 199.199.0.0/16 in BGP via > > MICE/Northern Lights GigaPoP. I have noticed that traffic to this > > network takes MICE, however the return traffic is coming in across > > one of my public Internet connections. I am assuming that either by > > choice, or by accident that they are not accepting my route via > > MICE/Northern Lights GigaPoP. I am wondering who would be the best > > person to chat with about this since MICE does not list a peering > > contact for Northern Lights GigaPoP in the participants page, and I > > realize that the correct peering contact might be another level or > > two deeper. > > Zayo (old Onvoy) network. > > Didn't we see something like this before when UMN connected things up > with Zayo not accepting the route updates/insertions? FWIW: I'm seeing another possible problem the opposite way. I'm a customer of Zayo and my routes to minnesota.edu go through the UMN, but the return traffic goes to Zayo via Level3. Richard ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 1, 2011

Re: Mice routes via Northern Lights GigaPoP

by Mike Horwath

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 03:28:00PM -0500, Jeremy Lumby wrote: > I have a case where I am seeing 199.199.0.0/16 in BGP via > MICE/Northern Lights GigaPoP. I have noticed that traffic to this > network takes MICE, however the return traffic is coming in across > one of my public Internet connections. I am assuming that either by > choice, or by accident that they are not accepting my route via > MICE/Northern Lights GigaPoP. I am wondering who would be the best > person to chat with about this since MICE does not list a peering > contact for Northern Lights GigaPoP in the participants page, and I > realize that the correct peering contact might be another level or > two deeper. Zayo (old Onvoy) network. Didn't we see something like this before when UMN connected things up with Zayo not accepting the route updates/insertions? -- Mike Horwath ipHouse - Welcome home! drechsau(a)iphouse.net The universe is an island, surrounded by whatever it is that surrounds universes. - Berkeley Fortune ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Sept. 1, 2011

Mice routes via Northern Lights GigaPoP

by Jeremy Lumby

I have a case where I am seeing 199.199.0.0/16 in BGP via MICE/Northern Lights GigaPoP. I have noticed that traffic to this network takes MICE, however the return traffic is coming in across one of my public Internet connections. I am assuming that either by choice, or by accident that they are not accepting my route via MICE/Northern Lights GigaPoP. I am wondering who would be the best person to chat with about this since MICE does not list a peering contact for Northern Lights GigaPoP in the participants page, and I realize that the correct peering contact might be another level or two deeper. Thanks, Jeremy ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Aug. 31, 2011

Re: IPv6 Route Server Check-in

by Owen DeLong

Check your IPv6 MaxPrefixes limit. Owen On Aug 30, 2011, at 1:41 PM, Doug McIntyre wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 03:23:46PM -0500, Matthew Beckwell wrote: >> I just noticed both of our IPv6 sessions to the route servers are down. (2607:fe10:ffff::1, 2607:fe10:ffff::2). IPv4 is fine....other IPv6 sessions seem ok. >> (Although I'm not sure for how long-- my logging wasn't setup yet). >> >> Just doing a "DownForEveryoneOrJustMe" check... > > Hmm, up for us. > ... > 2607:fe10:ffff::1 > 4 53679 144213 126038 0 0 0 02w5d00h 19 > 2607:fe10:ffff::2 > 4 53679 144120 126038 0 0 0 02w5d00h 19 > > > And.. > > [merlyn@micemn-01 /]$ ping6 2607:fe10:ffff::25 > PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2607:fe10:ffff::1 --> 2607:fe10:ffff::25 > > ^C > > [merlyn@micemn-01 /]$ telnet 2607:fe10:ffff::25 bgp > Trying 2607:fe10:ffff::25... > telnet: connect to address 2607:fe10:ffff::25: Host is down > telnet: Unable to connect to remote host > > > Check your IPv6 stack? > > > > -- > Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> > -- ipHouse/Goldengate/Bitstream/ProNS -- > Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Aug. 30, 2011

Re: IPv6 Route Server Check-in

by Matthew Beckwell

Found a typo on the ACL. Thanks for the extra eyes. ~Matthew -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Doug McIntyre Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 3:41 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] IPv6 Route Server Check-in On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 03:23:46PM -0500, Matthew Beckwell wrote: > I just noticed both of our IPv6 sessions to the route servers are down. (2607:fe10:ffff::1, 2607:fe10:ffff::2). IPv4 is fine....other IPv6 sessions seem ok. > (Although I'm not sure for how long-- my logging wasn't setup yet). > > Just doing a "DownForEveryoneOrJustMe" check... Hmm, up for us. ... 2607:fe10:ffff::1 4 53679 144213 126038 0 0 0 02w5d00h 19 2607:fe10:ffff::2 4 53679 144120 126038 0 0 0 02w5d00h 19 And.. [merlyn@micemn-01 /]$ ping6 2607:fe10:ffff::25 PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2607:fe10:ffff::1 --> 2607:fe10:ffff::25 ^C [merlyn@micemn-01 /]$ telnet 2607:fe10:ffff::25 bgp Trying 2607:fe10:ffff::25... telnet: connect to address 2607:fe10:ffff::25: Host is down telnet: Unable to connect to remote host Check your IPv6 stack? -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> -- ipHouse/Goldengate/Bitstream/ProNS -- Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Aug. 30, 2011

Re: IPv6 Route Server Check-in

by Doug McIntyre

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 03:23:46PM -0500, Matthew Beckwell wrote: > I just noticed both of our IPv6 sessions to the route servers are down. (2607:fe10:ffff::1, 2607:fe10:ffff::2). IPv4 is fine....other IPv6 sessions seem ok. > (Although I'm not sure for how long-- my logging wasn't setup yet). > > Just doing a "DownForEveryoneOrJustMe" check... Hmm, up for us. ... 2607:fe10:ffff::1 4 53679 144213 126038 0 0 0 02w5d00h 19 2607:fe10:ffff::2 4 53679 144120 126038 0 0 0 02w5d00h 19 And.. [merlyn@micemn-01 /]$ ping6 2607:fe10:ffff::25 PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2607:fe10:ffff::1 --> 2607:fe10:ffff::25 ^C [merlyn@micemn-01 /]$ telnet 2607:fe10:ffff::25 bgp Trying 2607:fe10:ffff::25... telnet: connect to address 2607:fe10:ffff::25: Host is down telnet: Unable to connect to remote host Check your IPv6 stack? -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> -- ipHouse/Goldengate/Bitstream/ProNS -- Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Aug. 30, 2011

Re: IPv6 Route Server Check-in

by Steve Howard

Our IPv6 sessions to MICE are both up and stable. On 08/30/2011 03:23 PM, Matthew Beckwell wrote: > I just noticed both of our IPv6 sessions to the route servers are down. (2607:fe10:ffff::1, 2607:fe10:ffff::2). IPv4 is fine....other IPv6 sessions seem ok. > (Although I'm not sure for how long-- my logging wasn't setup yet). > > Just doing a "DownForEveryoneOrJustMe" check... > ~Matthew > ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Aug. 30, 2011

IPv6 Route Server Check-in

by Matthew Beckwell

I just noticed both of our IPv6 sessions to the route servers are down. (2607:fe10:ffff::1, 2607:fe10:ffff::2). IPv4 is fine....other IPv6 sessions seem ok. (Although I'm not sure for how long-- my logging wasn't setup yet). Just doing a "DownForEveryoneOrJustMe" check... ~Matthew -- Matthew Beckwell - Senior Network and Application Engineer Advanced Integrated Technologies Office: 952-829-5511 x204 matthewb(a)aitech.net ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Aug. 30, 2011

"carrier choice" verbiage

by Ryan Goldberg

I've got a customer moving into a building where the building owners/management is attempting to enforce carrier exclusivity; they are in bed with another carrier. I already have the customer's other two sites on-net. This would be a third, new site. My fiber is just outside of the building, and I want to be in it. The owners of the company (my customer) have a pretty strong hand, and are looking for verbiage to add to the lease basically stating they can use whatever carrier they want. Does anyone have something like this handy? Thanks! Ryan ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Aug. 25, 2011