- mice-discuss - lists.micemn.net

Re: Google Global Cache Interest?

by Reid Fishler

I am already on Netflix also...just not as good results yet. I am working on it. Reid On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Nathan Beard <nbeard(a)stellarllc.net> wrote: > I for one would have interest in utilizing a Google cache server if MICE > were to implement this. > > Also, are there any updates regarding a potential MICE to Netflix peering > solution? I know that 511 isn't listed as a public peering location on the > Netflix Open Connect website, but I seem to recall that discussions have > been underway for some time in an attempt to make this happen. I would be > very interested if somebody had information to share on this, since it is > something that be of great benefit to Stellar. > > Thanks! > > > On 02/21/2014 04:19 PM, Russell Berg wrote: > > Some MICE peers already have Google (and other) caches, so you may have to poll to see who would be participating in a Google cache at MICE to get more accurate bandwidth measurements. > > Russ > Airstream Communications > > -----Original Message----- > From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET>] On Behalf Of Brady Kittel > Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 9:11 AM > To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET > Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Google Global Cache Interest? > > Not sure if maybe someone has already looked into this. On a wild hair I filled out the inquiry form for looking at a Google Global Cache cluster for our site and also mentioned there is an IX they might be able to connect to as an alternative option. We're a bit below their peak cachable content requirements however I have no doubt MICE would far exceed them. Would there be any interest in placing one on MICE for members to share? > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > -- Reid Fishler Director Hurricane Electric +1-510-580-4178 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Feb. 21, 2014

Re: Netflix

by Jeremy Lumby

I have had conversations with Netflix about peering in Minneapolis, and they have said that the project has existed for years, however it keeps getting bumped back for other projects (European expansion is one that they mentioned). I do not have a great direct contact to do some arm twisting with. From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Nathan Beard Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 4:35 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Google Global Cache Interest? I for one would have interest in utilizing a Google cache server if MICE were to implement this. Also, are there any updates regarding a potential MICE to Netflix peering solution? I know that 511 isn't listed as a public peering location on the Netflix Open Connect website, but I seem to recall that discussions have been underway for some time in an attempt to make this happen. I would be very interested if somebody had information to share on this, since it is something that be of great benefit to Stellar. Thanks! On 02/21/2014 04:19 PM, Russell Berg wrote: Some MICE peers already have Google (and other) caches, so you may have to poll to see who would be participating in a Google cache at MICE to get more accurate bandwidth measurements.RussAirstream Communications-----Original Message-----From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Brady KittelSent: Friday, February 21, 2014 9:11 AMTo: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NETSubject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Google Global Cache Interest?Not sure if maybe someone has already looked into this. On a wild hair I filled out the inquiry form for looking at a Google Global Cache cluster for our site and also mentioned there is an IX they might be able to connect to as an alternative option. We're a bit below their peak cachable content requirements however I have no doubt MICE would far exceed them. Would there be any interest in placing one on MICE for members to share?########################################################################To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1###########… unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Feb. 21, 2014

Re: Google Global Cache Interest?

by Brady Kittel

Sounds like Reid is already on this. Their tipping point is 1Gbps of cachable traffic to Google. We're doing 200Mbps ourselves so I'd guess MICE would easily tip the scales. On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Russell Berg <berg(a)wins.net> wrote: > Some MICE peers already have Google (and other) caches, so you may have to > poll to see who would be participating in a Google cache at MICE to get > more accurate bandwidth measurements. > > Russ > Airstream Communications > > -----Original Message----- > From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of > Brady Kittel > Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 9:11 AM > To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET > Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Google Global Cache Interest? > > Not sure if maybe someone has already looked into this. On a wild hair I > filled out the inquiry form for looking at a Google Global Cache cluster > for our site and also mentioned there is an IX they might be able to > connect to as an alternative option. We're a bit below their peak cachable > content requirements however I have no doubt MICE would far exceed them. > Would there be any interest in placing one on MICE for members to share? > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Feb. 21, 2014

Re: Google Global Cache Interest?

by Nathan Beard

I for one would have interest in utilizing a Google cache server if MICE were to implement this. Also, are there any updates regarding a potential MICE to Netflix peering solution? I know that 511 isn't listed as a public peering location on the Netflix Open Connect website, but I seem to recall that discussions have been underway for some time in an attempt to make this happen. I would be very interested if somebody had information to share on this, since it is something that be of great benefit to Stellar. Thanks! On 02/21/2014 04:19 PM, Russell Berg wrote: > Some MICE peers already have Google (and other) caches, so you may have to poll to see who would be participating in a Google cache at MICE to get more accurate bandwidth measurements. > > Russ > Airstream Communications > > -----Original Message----- > From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Brady Kittel > Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 9:11 AM > To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET > Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Google Global Cache Interest? > > Not sure if maybe someone has already looked into this. On a wild hair I filled out the inquiry form for looking at a Google Global Cache cluster for our site and also mentioned there is an IX they might be able to connect to as an alternative option. We're a bit below their peak cachable content requirements however I have no doubt MICE would far exceed them. Would there be any interest in placing one on MICE for members to share? > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Feb. 21, 2014

Re: Google Global Cache Interest?

by Russell Berg

Some MICE peers already have Google (and other) caches, so you may have to poll to see who would be participating in a Google cache at MICE to get more accurate bandwidth measurements. Russ Airstream Communications -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Brady Kittel Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 9:11 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Google Global Cache Interest? Not sure if maybe someone has already looked into this. On a wild hair I filled out the inquiry form for looking at a Google Global Cache cluster for our site and also mentioned there is an IX they might be able to connect to as an alternative option. We're a bit below their peak cachable content requirements however I have no doubt MICE would far exceed them. Would there be any interest in placing one on MICE for members to share? ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Feb. 21, 2014

Re: Google Global Cache Interest?

by Reid Fishler

I believe I have taken the lead with this. :-) Reid On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Brady Kittel <bkittel(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Not sure if maybe someone has already looked into this. On a wild hair I > filled out the inquiry form for looking at a Google Global Cache cluster > for our site and also mentioned there is an IX they might be able to > connect to as an alternative option. We're a bit below their peak cachable > content requirements however I have no doubt MICE would far exceed them. > Would there be any interest in placing one on MICE for members to share? > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > -- Reid Fishler Director Hurricane Electric +1-510-580-4178 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Feb. 21, 2014

Re: Multicast on MICE?

by Danny Meister

Not multicast, but we saw really high utilization on our MICE link for the past few hours, probably due to USA/Canada hockey. Its tapering off now to normal levels. -Danny Danny Meister - Network Engineer, Level II Atomic Data 615 North 3rd Street Minneapolis, MN 55401 612.466.2000 Main Line 612.466.2071 Direct Dial Twitter<http://twitter.com/AtomicData> | Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/AtomicDataCenters> | LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/companies/atomic-data-centers> Simple. Safe. Smart. www.atomicdata.com<http://www.atomicdata.com/> From: Anthony Anderberg <anthonyanderberg(a)NU-TELECOM.NET<mailto:anthonyanderberg@NU-TELECOM.NET>> Reply-To: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET<mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET>> Date: Friday, February 21, 2014 at 12:46 PM To: "MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET<mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET>" <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET<mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET>> Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Multicast on MICE? Is anyone doing substantial IP multicast across MICE today (IPTV, ect)? Anthony Anderberg Sr. Systems Analyst [NUtel_email_logo_1] 320-234-5239 anthonyanderberg(a)nu-telecom.net<mailto:anthonyanderberg@nu-telecom.net> www.nutelecom.net ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Feb. 21, 2014

Multicast on MICE?

by Anthony Anderberg

Is anyone doing substantial IP multicast across MICE today (IPTV, ect)? Anthony Anderberg Sr. Systems Analyst [NUtel_email_logo_1] 320-234-5239 anthonyanderberg(a)nu-telecom.net<mailto:anthonyanderberg@nu-telecom.net> www.nutelecom.net ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Feb. 21, 2014

Google Global Cache Interest?

by Brady Kittel

Not sure if maybe someone has already looked into this. On a wild hair I filled out the inquiry form for looking at a Google Global Cache cluster for our site and also mentioned there is an IX they might be able to connect to as an alternative option. We're a bit below their peak cachable content requirements however I have no doubt MICE would far exceed them. Would there be any interest in placing one on MICE for members to share? ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Feb. 21, 2014

Re: AS33125 (Spiralight) removal from MICE

by Doug McIntyre

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 02:52:35PM -0800, Andrew Hoyos wrote: > As you may know, Wisconsin Independent Network (WIN) recently purchased the most of the assets of Spiralight Network, and they have been working to fold those into their network. > > As such, the AS33125 MICE port was turned off this morning, and will stay down. > > Just a FYI for folks, to clean up sessions/route servers/member info page, etc. Thanks for the heads up, we didn't know, and were wondering where the BGP unilateral peering had gone. There isn't anything configed in the route servers, so nothing to clean up there. -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> ~.~ ipHouse ~.~ Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Feb. 20, 2014