- mice-discuss - lists.micemn.net

Peering with research orgs

by Frank Bulk

Does MICE have a policy regarding peering its router reflectors with research/data gathering orgs like Cymru, Dyn, Norse, ThousandEyes, QRator, etc. Frank

Oct. 27, 2016

Re: BFD support on BGP sessions

by Doug McIntyre

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 02:11:20PM -0500, Andrew Hoyos wrote: > Looks as expected here. Thanks for getting this set up on rs1. > Maybe let buck for a few days and we can confirm no issues on either side? Yep, I'll let it run, and check on it and announce it to the list for whoever wants to, and then see if we want to default to everybody. -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> ~.~ ipHouse ~.~ Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades

Oct. 25, 2016

Re: MICE Port Runout

by Andrew Hoyos

Also, just a note on this for those thinking in 501(c)3 lines. My understanding of a 501(c)6 is that the donations/contributions from outside parties to MICE are *not* tax deductible for the contributor. https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/other-non-profits/tax-treatment-o… -- Andrew Hoyos hoyosa(a)gmail.com > On Oct 24, 2016, at 9:56 PM, Larry Patterson <larry(a)atomicdata.com> wrote: > > So assuming paperwork happens in a timely fashion, donations after the filing date would be tax deductible for 2016? Is that the agreed upon direction? If so, I would suggest we get some end of year charitable giving going on. I would be interested in participating. What do the lawyers say about 2016 vs. 2017 status? > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Larry Patterson > Chief Technology Officer > ---- > Atomic Data® // Safe. Simple. Smart.™ > 615 North 3rd Street > Minneapolis, MN 55401 > Main // 612.466.2000 > Direct // 612.466.2080 > > It's official. We're SOC 3 Certified, again! > > > > On Oct 24, 2016, at 21:47, Richard Laager <rlaager(a)WIKTEL.COM> wrote: > > > >> On 10/24/2016 08:54 PM, Larry Patterson wrote: > >> Is MICE a non-profit yet or will it be by End of year? > > > > Not yet, and I can't guarantee it. > > > > I'm currently waiting on the Minnesota Secretary of State's office to > > accept a filing. I expected it to be done last week. I'm doing some > > overnight maintenance, so my schedule is off-cycle of normal business > > hours. I've emailed them just now to inquire about the status. > > > > Once that is done, I'll request certified copies, which I expect to take > > a few days. Assuming the rest of the board has no objections, I'll sign > > and file the IRS form. > > > > I'm gone for a couple weeks starting next week. So this may get delayed > > until I'm back. But worst case, this really should be mailed to the IRS > > no later than November 18th. > > > > -- > > Richard > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 >

Oct. 25, 2016

Re: Please welcome Fastly to MICE!

by Levi Pederson

Andrew, We have an IXP Manager (they just simplified their install a great deal) setup running now for just the metrics. Except for bursty MAX bits feeds it's pretty good (Real max of 25, system shows full burst max at 28 still working on why it's less consistent than our cacti). I am going to attempt a roll out of the Route Servers config additions in the next couple of weekends. Thank you, *Levi Pederson* Mankato Networks LLC cell | 612.481.0769 work | 612.787.7392 levipederson(a)mankatonetworks.net On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Andrew Hoyos <hoyosa(a)gmail.com> wrote: > The folks on NWAX are using IXPManager (https://github.com/inex/IXP- > Manager), as well as others. AFAIK, this automates lots of this process > (DNS, route-servers, etc) and pulls things from PeeringDB. > Might be worth a look. > > -- > Andrew Hoyos > hoyosa(a)gmail.com > > > > > On Oct 25, 2016, at 2:00 PM, Jason Hanke <jayhanke(a)NEUTRALPATH.NET> > wrote: > > > > There is also a peeringDB API. > > > > It might be time for a database driven documentation. Then we could > > export/import to dns or switch configs. > > > > An online request form might be a good start. > > > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Richard Laager <rlaager(a)wiktel.com> > wrote: > >> The exchange only cares about the max prefix value if it's larger than > >> our default route server limit of 1000. That's a big network, and I > >> think we've only hit that once. I'm not sure we need to bother getting > >> an explicit number from every network on turn-up. > >> > >> On the PeeringDB thing... I've thought about that before too. Is > >> *requiring* an entry going too far? I'm on the fence about that. > >> > >> I see that SIX links the AS number in the participants list to PeeringDB > >> rather than bgp.he.net. I like the bgp.he.net links, but I should see > if > >> I can find some place on the list to put a PeeringDB link. > >> > >> -- > >> Richard > > > > > > > > -- > > Jay Hanke > > CTO > > Neutral Path Communications > > 3 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 204 > > Mankato, MN 56001 > > (507) 327-2398 mobile > > jayhanke(a)neutralpath.net > > www.neutralpath.net >

Oct. 25, 2016

Re: BFD support on BGP sessions

by Andrew Hoyos

On Oct 25, 2016, at 1:15 PM, Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> wrote: > >> Sure, feel free to enable on the v6 sessions facing 53597, and I can >> fire up on this side and see if it works. > > Sure, I've added that to your IPv6 neighbor area. Looks as expected here. Thanks for getting this set up on rs1. hoyosa(a)er1.511.msp> show bfd session | match d1af 2001:504:27::d1af:0:1 Up xe-0/0/0.0 1.500 0.500 3 2001:504:27::d1af:0:2 Down xe-0/0/0.0 0.000 2.000 3 Maybe let buck for a few days and we can confirm no issues on either side? -- Andrew Hoyos hoyosa(a)gmail.com

Oct. 25, 2016

Re: Please welcome Fastly to MICE!

by Andrew Hoyos

The folks on NWAX are using IXPManager (https://github.com/inex/IXP-Manager) as well as others. AFAIK, this automates lots of this process (DNS, route-servers, etc) and pulls things from PeeringDB. Might be worth a look. -- Andrew Hoyos hoyosa(a)gmail.com > On Oct 25, 2016, at 2:00 PM, Jason Hanke <jayhanke(a)NEUTRALPATH.NET> wrote: > > There is also a peeringDB API. > > It might be time for a database driven documentation. Then we could > export/import to dns or switch configs. > > An online request form might be a good start. > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Richard Laager <rlaager(a)wiktel.com> wrote: >> The exchange only cares about the max prefix value if it's larger than >> our default route server limit of 1000. That's a big network, and I >> think we've only hit that once. I'm not sure we need to bother getting >> an explicit number from every network on turn-up. >> >> On the PeeringDB thing... I've thought about that before too. Is >> *requiring* an entry going too far? I'm on the fence about that. >> >> I see that SIX links the AS number in the participants list to PeeringDB >> rather than bgp.he.net. I like the bgp.he.net links, but I should see if >> I can find some place on the list to put a PeeringDB link. >> >> -- >> Richard > > > > -- > Jay Hanke > CTO > Neutral Path Communications > 3 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 204 > Mankato, MN 56001 > (507) 327-2398 mobile > jayhanke(a)neutralpath.net > www.neutralpath.net

Oct. 25, 2016

Re: Please welcome Fastly to MICE!

by Jason Hanke

There is also a peeringDB API. It might be time for a database driven documentation. Then we could export/import to dns or switch configs. An online request form might be a good start. On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Richard Laager <rlaager(a)wiktel.com> wrote: > The exchange only cares about the max prefix value if it's larger than > our default route server limit of 1000. That's a big network, and I > think we've only hit that once. I'm not sure we need to bother getting > an explicit number from every network on turn-up. > > On the PeeringDB thing... I've thought about that before too. Is > *requiring* an entry going too far? I'm on the fence about that. > > I see that SIX links the AS number in the participants list to PeeringDB > rather than bgp.he.net. I like the bgp.he.net links, but I should see if > I can find some place on the list to put a PeeringDB link. > > -- > Richard -- Jay Hanke CTO Neutral Path Communications 3 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 204 Mankato, MN 56001 (507) 327-2398 mobile jayhanke(a)neutralpath.net www.neutralpath.net

Oct. 25, 2016

Re: MICE core switch maintenance window - 10/27/2016 12:30AM-1:00AM CDT

by Richard Laager

On 10/25/2016 09:40 AM, Andrew Hoyos wrote: > My suggestion would be for the formal creation of a technical committee by the board This is something I intend to work on soon, but the tax-exempt thing is higher priority. I'm envisioning: 1) making a page on the MICE website like the following page: https://www.seattleix.net/whos-who 2) asking the board to ACK its contents 3) asking for a MICE-TECH and/or MICE-OPS list be created (depending on whether we have distinct groups and what those people want). I expect at least one list will be closed to members only. -- Richard

Oct. 25, 2016

Re: Please welcome Fastly to MICE!

by Richard Laager

The exchange only cares about the max prefix value if it's larger than our default route server limit of 1000. That's a big network, and I think we've only hit that once. I'm not sure we need to bother getting an explicit number from every network on turn-up. On the PeeringDB thing... I've thought about that before too. Is *requiring* an entry going too far? I'm on the fence about that. I see that SIX links the AS number in the participants list to PeeringDB rather than bgp.he.net. I like the bgp.he.net links, but I should see if I can find some place on the list to put a PeeringDB link. -- Richard

Oct. 25, 2016

Re: Please Welcome Unggoy Broadband to MICE!

by Jason Hanke

Assignment sheet updated On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 01:28:27PM -0500, Richard Laager wrote: >> On 10/25/2016 01:15 PM, anthonyanderberg(a)nu-telecom.net wrote: >> > Anyway NU-Telecom is in 2/0/7 now >> >> The original (off-list) email about the bad port swap said 2/0/2. (I >> checked.) Given that NU-Telecom is actually in 2/0/7, I've fixed that on >> the website. >> >> Unless we hear differently from Jay, the obvious answer is that Unggoy >> Broadband is now assigned 2/0/2. That's what I put on the website, but >> obviously I can change it if need be. > > > Sounds good to me, I updated the port description since there aren't > optics in xe-2/0/2, and we'll leave xe-2/0/7 to NU-Telecom. > > -- > Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> > ~.~ ipHouse ~.~ > Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades -- Jay Hanke CTO Neutral Path Communications 3 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 204 Mankato, MN 56001 (507) 327-2398 mobile jayhanke(a)neutralpath.net www.neutralpath.net

Oct. 25, 2016