- mice-discuss - lists.micemn.net

Re: Google Ports to MICE

by Mike Horwath

On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 07:59:14AM -0800, Dave Schwartz wrote: > Hello MICE Members Hello! Thanks for the update! -- Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau(a)Geeks.ORG

Jan. 11, 2021

Google Ports to MICE

by Dave Schwartz

Hello MICE Members I hope this message finds you well. We have heard from a number of MICE members about congestion on Google's port to MICE so I wanted to provide a brief update to our peers on what our plans are. We are aware of the congestion on our current 100G port to MICE and started planning for a 2nd 100G port back in Q3 of 2020. For those of you not aware, the Google router that is connected to MICE is located in Chicago and we use a third party vendor to reach the MICE switch. We have been experiencing long delays with our vendor for our 2nd 100G wave and currently plan to have the 2nd 100G up at MICE in early February. This 2nd 100G link will be on a diverse Google router with a separate IP and plan to peer with the route server on this new link. While our port is congested you may see traffic inbound to your network on indirect paths. While we attempt to deliver all traffic directly, we can't offer any guarantee on where traffic will come from during congestion. If you happen to experience quality problems with any Google service over MICE during this congestion please do report these product specific issues to noc(a)google.com so we can investigate. Our CDN is normally able to handle congestion so we would like to be aware if any members are experiencing any degradation of Google services. Many Thanks, Dave -- Dave Schwartz Customer Engineering Manager Network Specialist Team Google Cloud Platform daveschwartz(a)google.com +1-424-625-9129

Jan. 11, 2021

FW: [outages] High packet loss on Spectrum in Southern Minnesota

by Frank Bulk

Cross-posting as this may interest some in this group. Frank From: Outages <outages-bounces(a)outages.org> On Behalf Of Abhi Devireddy via Outages Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2021 3:46 PM To: Outages(a)outages.org; Goli, Matthew W. <Matthew.Goli(a)waupacafoundry.com> Subject: Re: [outages] High packet loss on Spectrum in Southern Minnesota Update: It's a backbone fiber between MN and WI that was impacted in Mazomanie, WI and Duluth, MN. Teams were dispatched and one's arrived on site. Still no confirmed ETR. Abhi ________________________________ From: Outages <outages-bounces(a)outages.org<mailto:outages-bounces@outages.org>> on behalf of Goli, Matthew W. via Outages <outages(a)outages.org<mailto:outages@outages.org>> Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2021 2:36 PM To: Outages(a)outages.org<mailto:Outages@outages.org> <Outages(a)outages.org<mailto:Outages@outages.org>> Subject: Re: [outages] High packet loss on Spectrum in Southern Minnesota Hello, We're in central Wisconsin and we're impacted by this outage. Just received communication from Spectrum stating there is a confirmed fiber cut. Fiber recovery teams have been engaged but there is no ETR at this time. From: Outages <outages-bounces(a)outages.org<mailto:outages-bounces@outages.org>> On Behalf Of John Knutson via Outages Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2021 2:29 PM To: Abhi Devireddy <abhi(a)devireddy.com<mailto:abhi@devireddy.com>> Cc: outages(a)outages.org<mailto:outages@outages.org> Subject: Re: [outages] High packet loss on Spectrum in Southern Minnesota CAUTION!! This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I've got a coworker in Elk River, MN who has no connectivity. I am on Spectrum in Dayton, MN about 10 miles south of that and mine has been working fine so far. Both are residential cable connections. On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 1:36 PM Abhi Devireddy via Outages <outages(a)outages.org<mailto:outages@outages.org>> wrote: No v4/v6 connectivity in Northern MN. Looks like our peering traffic with them dropped to zero as well. Abhi ________________________________ From: Outages <outages-bounces(a)outages.org<mailto:outages-bounces@outages.org>> on behalf of Nathan Engelhardt via Outages <outages(a)outages.org<mailto:outages@outages.org>> Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2021 12:56 PM To: outages(a)outages.org<mailto:outages@outages.org> <outages(a)outages.org<mailto:outages@outages.org>> Subject: Re: [outages] High packet loss on Spectrum in Southern Minnesota Update/additional info: Losses are only occurring over IPv4. IPv6 is performing normally, for what it's worth. From: Outages <outages-bounces(a)outages.org<mailto:outages-bounces@outages.org>> On Behalf Of Nathan Engelhardt via Outages Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2021 12:45 PM To: outages(a)outages.org<mailto:outages@outages.org> Subject: [outages] High packet loss on Spectrum in Southern Minnesota A few of my coworkers and I, all WFH and on Spectrum, are seeing high packet loss. South-Central Minnesota. _______________________________________________ Outages mailing list Outages(a)outages.org<mailto:Outages@outages.org> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages [puck.nether.net]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_mailma…> CONFIDENTIALITY AND LEGAL NOTICE This electronic mail transmission is confidential, may be privileged and should be read or retained only by the intended recipient. If the reader of this transmission is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any distribution or copying hereof is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender and remove it from your system. E-mail is not necessarily a secure communication method, therefore the sender shall not be responsible for any changes that occur during its transfer. All e-mails are scanned for viruses, however, files attached to this e-mail may contain viruses that could harm the systems of the recipient. Any opinions expressed in this email must be confirmed in writing and signed by the sender to have legal validity.

Jan. 6, 2021

Re: config assistance?

by James Urwiller

Thanks, ill give that a whirl! James Urwiller Network Architect Stealth Broadband james.urwiller(a)stealthbroadband.com -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> On Behalf Of Jeremy Lumby Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2020 14:23 To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] config assistance? James, Arista is very similar to Cisco where you need to issue no bgp enforce-first-as or a slight variation of it (if I do not have my Arista syntax exactly correct). Jeremy From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of James Urwiller Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2020 2:14 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] config assistance? Greetings all! I just realized that my peer sessions with the route servers are not receiving any prefix’s since the change. My direct peers through the exchange are working as intended. Is there another filter someplace that needs updated? James Urwiller Network Architect Stealth Broadband james.urwiller(a)stealthbroadband.com From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> On Behalf Of Jeremy Lumby Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 12:16 To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] config assistance? James, This is because Zayo is a non-compliant extension switch operator. There have been several things approved by the MICE board that Zayo has become non-responsive on implementing. As a result we needed to put a MAC filter in place on Zayo’s link to the MICE core. You can let me know your new MAC address, and I can update the filter. Also there are some other things related to route server security coming up shortly that will become an issue on the Zayo extension switch. If you have a good contact there, we would love to have them work with us. Jeremy From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of James Urwiller Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 12:04 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] config assistance? Greetings all, Last night I cutover to a new Arista for BGP services facing MICE and a few other peers. All my other peers are up and functioning properly, but I cannot reach any of the MICE peers. Since I am connected to the Zayo remote switch in Belle Plaine, I had Zayo bounce my port thinking it was a mac-limit issue. Even before they did this, I can see MICE peers in ARP and in the MAC-Table, but I cant ping any of them, like the traffic is filtered in one direction. Zayo’s port bouncing had no effect. Any ideas Arista/MICE guru’s? James Urwiller Network Architect Stealth Broadband james.urwiller(a)stealthbroadband.com ________________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ________________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ________________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Dec. 30, 2020

Re: config assistance?

by Jeremy Lumby

James, Arista is very similar to Cisco where you need to issue no bgp enforce-first-as or a slight variation of it (if I do not have my Arista syntax exactly correct). Jeremy From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of James Urwiller Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2020 2:14 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] config assistance? Greetings all! I just realized that my peer sessions with the route servers are not receiving any prefix’s since the change. My direct peers through the exchange are working as intended. Is there another filter someplace that needs updated? James Urwiller Network Architect Stealth Broadband james.urwiller(a)stealthbroadband.com From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> On Behalf Of Jeremy Lumby Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 12:16 To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] config assistance? James, This is because Zayo is a non-compliant extension switch operator. There have been several things approved by the MICE board that Zayo has become non-responsive on implementing. As a result we needed to put a MAC filter in place on Zayo’s link to the MICE core. You can let me know your new MAC address, and I can update the filter. Also there are some other things related to route server security coming up shortly that will become an issue on the Zayo extension switch. If you have a good contact there, we would love to have them work with us. Jeremy From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of James Urwiller Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 12:04 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] config assistance? Greetings all, Last night I cutover to a new Arista for BGP services facing MICE and a few other peers. All my other peers are up and functioning properly, but I cannot reach any of the MICE peers. Since I am connected to the Zayo remote switch in Belle Plaine, I had Zayo bounce my port thinking it was a mac-limit issue. Even before they did this, I can see MICE peers in ARP and in the MAC-Table, but I cant ping any of them, like the traffic is filtered in one direction. Zayo’s port bouncing had no effect. Any ideas Arista/MICE guru’s? James Urwiller Network Architect Stealth Broadband james.urwiller(a)stealthbroadband.com ________________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ________________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ________________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Dec. 30, 2020

Re: config assistance?

by James Urwiller

Greetings all! I just realized that my peer sessions with the route servers are not receiving any prefix’s since the change. My direct peers through the exchange are working as intended. Is there another filter someplace that needs updated? James Urwiller Network Architect Stealth Broadband james.urwiller(a)stealthbroadband.com *From:* MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> *On Behalf Of *Jeremy Lumby *Sent:* Tuesday, December 29, 2020 12:16 *To:* MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET *Subject:* Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] config assistance? James, This is because Zayo is a non-compliant extension switch operator. There have been several things approved by the MICE board that Zayo has become non-responsive on implementing. As a result we needed to put a MAC filter in place on Zayo’s link to the MICE core. You can let me know your new MAC address, and I can update the filter. Also there are some other things related to route server security coming up shortly that will become an issue on the Zayo extension switch. If you have a good contact there, we would love to have them work with us. Jeremy *From:* MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET>] *On Behalf Of *James Urwiller *Sent:* Tuesday, December 29, 2020 12:04 PM *To:* MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET *Subject:* [MICE-DISCUSS] config assistance? Greetings all, Last night I cutover to a new Arista for BGP services facing MICE and a few other peers. All my other peers are up and functioning properly, but I cannot reach any of the MICE peers. Since I am connected to the Zayo remote switch in Belle Plaine, I had Zayo bounce my port thinking it was a mac-limit issue. Even before they did this, I can see MICE peers in ARP and in the MAC-Table, but I cant ping any of them, like the traffic is filtered in one direction. Zayo’s port bouncing had no effect. Any ideas Arista/MICE guru’s? James Urwiller Network Architect Stealth Broadband james.urwiller(a)stealthbroadband.com ------------------------------ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ------------------------------ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Dec. 30, 2020

Re: config assistance?

by James Urwiller

Thanks all for the help! We are back up and runnin. James Urwiller Network Architect Stealth Broadband james.urwiller(a)stealthbroadband.com -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> On Behalf Of Richard Laager Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 14:09 To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] config assistance? On 12/29/20 1:44 PM, Andrew Hoyos wrote: > May be good to add to these pages as a note that explicit MAC address > filtering is in place for the Zayo switch: Done. Thanks for the suggestion! -- Richard

Dec. 29, 2020

Re: config assistance?

by Richard Laager

On 12/29/20 1:44 PM, Andrew Hoyos wrote: > May be good to add to these pages as a note that explicit MAC address > filtering is in place for the Zayo switch: Done. Thanks for the suggestion! -- Richard

Dec. 29, 2020

Re: config assistance?

by Andrew Hoyos

May be good to add to these pages as a note that explicit MAC address filtering is in place for the Zayo switch: http://micemn.net/technical.html <http://micemn.net/technical.html> and http://micemn.net/participants.html#zayo <http://micemn.net/participants.html#zayo> > On Dec 29, 2020, at 12:16 PM, Jeremy Lumby <jlumby(a)MNVOIP.COM> wrote: > > James, > > This is because Zayo is a non-compliant extension switch operator. There have been several things approved by the MICE board that Zayo has become non-responsive on implementing. As a result we needed to put a MAC filter in place on Zayo’s link to the MICE core. You can let me know your new MAC address, and I can update the filter. Also there are some other things related to route server security coming up shortly that will become an issue on the Zayo extension switch. If you have a good contact there, we would love to have them work with us. > > Jeremy > > From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET <mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET>] On Behalf Of James Urwiller > Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 12:04 PM > To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET <mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> > Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] config assistance? > > Greetings all, > Last night I cutover to a new Arista for BGP services facing MICE and a few other peers. All my other peers are up and functioning properly, but I cannot reach any of the MICE peers. Since I am connected to the Zayo remote switch in Belle Plaine, I had Zayo bounce my port thinking it was a mac-limit issue. Even before they did this, I can see MICE peers in ARP and in the MAC-Table, but I cant ping any of them, like the traffic is filtered in one direction. Zayo’s port bouncing had no effect. > > Any ideas Arista/MICE guru’s? > > James Urwiller > Network Architect > Stealth Broadband > james.urwiller(a)stealthbroadband.com <mailto:james.urwiller@stealthbroadband.com> > <image001.jpg> > > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 <http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1> > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 <http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1>

Dec. 29, 2020

Re: config assistance?

by Jeremy Lumby

James, The MAC has been added. I can ping your interface. I will use your ticket to see if we can get some traction. Jeremy From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of James Urwiller Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 12:25 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] config assistance? Jeremy, Thanks for the info! The MAC of my interface is now 98:5d:82:b7:07:87. I have a guy @ Zayo that seems to know what he is doing on my ticket, but admitted that this was all new to him and took all night for them to be able to access their MICE remote switch (they actually had to dispatch someone to belle plaine to bounce my port, but they now have remote access working) Joseph is the guys name, and my Zayo Ticket is 0004680143 if you need to reference that to get the right Joseph 😊 James Urwiller Network Architect Stealth Broadband james.urwiller(a)stealthbroadband.com From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> On Behalf Of Jeremy Lumby Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 12:16 To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] config assistance? James, This is because Zayo is a non-compliant extension switch operator. There have been several things approved by the MICE board that Zayo has become non-responsive on implementing. As a result we needed to put a MAC filter in place on Zayo’s link to the MICE core. You can let me know your new MAC address, and I can update the filter. Also there are some other things related to route server security coming up shortly that will become an issue on the Zayo extension switch. If you have a good contact there, we would love to have them work with us. Jeremy From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of James Urwiller Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 12:04 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] config assistance? Greetings all, Last night I cutover to a new Arista for BGP services facing MICE and a few other peers. All my other peers are up and functioning properly, but I cannot reach any of the MICE peers. Since I am connected to the Zayo remote switch in Belle Plaine, I had Zayo bounce my port thinking it was a mac-limit issue. Even before they did this, I can see MICE peers in ARP and in the MAC-Table, but I cant ping any of them, like the traffic is filtered in one direction. Zayo’s port bouncing had no effect. Any ideas Arista/MICE guru’s? James Urwiller Network Architect Stealth Broadband james.urwiller(a)stealthbroadband.com To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Dec. 29, 2020