- mice-discuss - lists.micemn.net

Re: EX4200 (1G Switch) Packet Loss -> 10G Participants

by Jeremy Lumby

2PM -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Mike Horwath Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 9:07 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] EX4200 (1G Switch) Packet Loss -> 10G Participants On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 03:45:55PM -0500, Jason Hanke wrote: > Please allocate ge-2/0/0 to route server 2. There is no change in IP address. > > I'm blocked from announce. Can someone else get the notification > together for the announce list? I can do that. What time Tuesday afternoon? -- Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau(a)Geeks.ORG

Sept. 30, 2016

Re: Election

by Richard Laager

On 09/27/2016 05:03 PM, DeLong, Owen wrote: > Congratulations, Richard. On 09/27/2016 05:12 PM, Levi Pederson wrote: > Congrats On 09/28/2016 08:15 AM, John Unger wrote: > Congrats Richard!!! Thanks everyone! I am grateful for this opportunity to help the exchange. -- Richard

Sept. 30, 2016

Re: EX4200 (1G Switch) Packet Loss -> 10G Participants

by Richard Laager

On 09/29/2016 09:34 PM, Jeremy Lumby wrote: > On the new 4200 side ae0 is made up of xe-0/1/0 and xe-0/1/2 > On the existing stack ae11 is made up of xe-0/2/2 and xe-2/0/16 > xe-0/1/0 is connected to xe-0/2/2 and xe-0/1/2 is connected to xe-2/0/16 via 10G DAC cables (which I donated) > With the exception of the 4 SFP ports and route server #2 that Jay mentioned, all moves will be to the same numbered port on the switch. In the old stack, they are all ge-1/0/x, and on the new 4200, they will all be ge-0/0/x I will keep the x the same so I moved my port from ge-1/0/11 to ge-0/0/11 and the looking glass has also been moved to ge-0/0/0 All other moves will happen during the Tuesday afternoon maintenance window. Thanks! I've updated the website. And thanks for the donation of the DAC cables! -- Richard

Sept. 30, 2016

Re: EX4200 (1G Switch) Packet Loss -> 10G Participants

by Mike Horwath

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 09:34:00PM -0500, Jeremy Lumby wrote: > All other moves will happen during the Tuesday afternoon maintenance > window. When? 1200-1700? (trolling for someone to commit to a time so I can get the announcement posted) -- Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau(a)Geeks.ORG

Sept. 30, 2016

Re: EX4200 (1G Switch) Packet Loss -> 10G Participants

by Jeremy Lumby

On the new 4200 side ae0 is made up of xe-0/1/0 and xe-0/1/2 On the existing stack ae11 is made up of xe-0/2/2 and xe-2/0/16 xe-0/1/0 is connected to xe-0/2/2 and xe-0/1/2 is connected to xe-2/0/16 via 10G DAC cables (which I donated) With the exception of the 4 SFP ports and route server #2 that Jay mentioned, all moves will be to the same numbered port on the switch. In the old stack, they are all ge-1/0/x, and on the new 4200, they will all be ge-0/0/x I will keep the x the same so I moved my port from ge-1/0/11 to ge-0/0/11 and the looking glass has also been moved to ge-0/0/0 All other moves will happen during the Tuesday afternoon maintenance window. -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Richard Laager Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 8:59 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] EX4200 (1G Switch) Packet Loss -> 10G Participants I'm assuming these are named "ge-0/0/X", for X in 0 to 23 inclusive; is that correct? Jeremy, which port are you (well, Minnesota VoIP) using on the new switch? What are the port names of two 10G uplinks on the new switch? Of those, which 10G port on the new switch is connected to xe-0/2/2 in the core stack and which is connected to xe-2/0/16? What is the name of the LAG on the new EX4200-24T switch (the other side of ae11 on the core stack)? Is it ae0? -- Richard

Sept. 30, 2016

Re: EX4200 (1G Switch) Packet Loss -> 10G Participants

by Mike Horwath

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 03:45:55PM -0500, Jason Hanke wrote: > Please allocate ge-2/0/0 to route server 2. There is no change in IP address. > > I'm blocked from announce. Can someone else get the notification > together for the announce list? I can do that. What time Tuesday afternoon? -- Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau(a)Geeks.ORG

Sept. 30, 2016

Re: EX4200 (1G Switch) Packet Loss -> 10G Participants

by Mike Horwath

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:15:00AM -0500, Jeremy Lumby wrote: > Jay, > > Can we get new port assignments for the 4 1G optical > ports on the 4200 to move them to the 4550. Also I would propose > plugging one of the route servers into the 4500 to spread them > across 2 stacks, so if you agree, please assign a port for that as > well. Also if you have permission, can you post the maintenance to > the Announce list? I'll need to do some maintenance on the list configuration with the loss of Shaun. -- Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau(a)Geeks.ORG

Sept. 30, 2016

Re: EX4200 (1G Switch) Packet Loss -> 10G Participants

by Richard Laager

I'm assuming these are named "ge-0/0/X", for X in 0 to 23 inclusive; is that correct? Jeremy, which port are you (well, Minnesota VoIP) using on the new switch? What are the port names of two 10G uplinks on the new switch? Of those, which 10G port on the new switch is connected to xe-0/2/2 in the core stack and which is connected to xe-2/0/16? What is the name of the LAG on the new EX4200-24T switch (the other side of ae11 on the core stack)? Is it ae0? -- Richard

Sept. 30, 2016

Re: 1G Fiber Port Moves

by Richard Laager

On 09/29/2016 03:32 PM, Jason Hanke wrote: > The following ports will be moved from the existing EX4200-24T to the EX4550 > > from ge-1/1/0 to ge-2/0/28 --- 5 Nines 1G SFP > from ge-1/1/1 to ge-2/0/29 --- ClaimLynx 1G SFP > from ge-1/1/2 to ge-2/0/30 --- CDW Berbee 1G SFP > from ge-1/1/3 to ge-2/0/31 --- Velocity Telephone 1G SFP I've updated the website. Unlike participant-initiated moves (where I document both ports until the move is verified complete), I'm treating these (and the route server #2 move) as if they are already complete. I'm doing this to reduce the website-updating work for myself, based on the assumption that these will be completed very soon (in the scheduled maintenance). If anyone thinks this is a bad idea, please let me know and I'll adjust accordingly. I also need to know how the ports are moving from the existing 1G switch to the new 1G switch in the maintenance. -- Richard

Sept. 30, 2016

Re: NebraskaLink LAG Migration

by Richard Laager

On 09/29/2016 08:37 PM, Richard Laager wrote: > On 09/29/2016 04:34 PM, Jason Hanke wrote: >> Nebraskalink is adding a second 10G to their MICE connection. >> >> The additional port is xe-0/0/4 > > Will this be ae12 or non-LAG? Sorry, I see this is on the Neutral Path switch. Let me rephrase accordingly: Which ae interface is this, or is this non-LAG? -- Richard

Sept. 30, 2016