- mice-discuss - lists.micemn.net

Re: Cacti Graphing problem

by David Farmer

Ok, I thought that might be the case. Thanks. On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 4:00 PM, anthonyanderberg(a)nu-telecom.net < anthonyanderberg(a)nu-telecom.net> wrote: > Oh sorry I wasn’t clear: those data points are lost because they were > above the RRD’s maximum expected value and so weren’t recorded (as if they > were bogus data.) I’ve edited your RRD file to increased that max value > so it’ll accept higher values going forward. > > > > > > Cheers, > > anthony > > > > *Anthony Anderberg* > > Sr. Systems Analyst > > [image: NUtel_email_logo_1] > > 320-234-5239 <(320)%20234-5239> > > anthonyanderberg(a)nu-telecom.net > > *www.nutelecom.net <http://www.nutelecom.net>* > > > > *From:* MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] *On Behalf > Of *David Farmer > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 14, 2017 3:37 PM > *To:* MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET > *Subject:* Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Cacti Graphing problem > > > > Still seems to be the same, or do we have to wait until we break 34G or so > again. > > > > But, thanks for looking at it, though. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 3:21 PM, anthonyanderberg(a)nu-telecom.net < > anthonyanderberg(a)nu-telecom.net> wrote: > > That’s a side effect of retaining everyone’s RRD history, I’ve had to edit > a couple RRD files to reflect their interface’s new order-of-magnitude > speed increases - have done yours now too. > > > > Cheers, > > anthony > > > > > > *Anthony Anderberg* > > Sr. Systems Analyst > > [image: NUtel_email_logo_1] > > 320-234-5239 <(320)%20234-5239> > > anthonyanderberg(a)nu-telecom.net > > *www.nutelecom.net <http://www.nutelecom.net>* > > > > *From:* MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] *On Behalf > Of *David Farmer > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 14, 2017 2:36 PM > *To:* MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET > *Subject:* [MICE-DISCUSS] Cacti Graphing problem > > > > Our graph on cacti I being cut off, see the following, we moved from a 30G > lag to a 100G a few week ago and today are significantly exceeding 30G for > the first time. > > > > Thanks > > > > [image: Inline image 1] > > > > -- > > =============================================== > David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu > Networking & Telecommunication Services > Office of Information Technology > University of Minnesota > 2218 University Ave SE > <https://maps.google.com/?q=2218+University+Ave+SE&entry=gmail&source=g> > Phone: 612-626-0815 <(612)%20626-0815> > Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 <(612)%20812-9952> > =============================================== > > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > > > > > -- > > =============================================== > David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu > Networking & Telecommunication Services > Office of Information Technology > University of Minnesota > 2218 University Ave SE > <https://maps.google.com/?q=2218+University+Ave+SE&entry=gmail&source=g> > Phone: 612-626-0815 <(612)%20626-0815> > Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 <(612)%20812-9952> > =============================================== > > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > -- =============================================== David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 ===============================================

Nov. 14, 2017

Re: Cacti Graphing problem

by anthonyanderberg＠nu-telecom.net

Oh sorry I wasn’t clear: those data points are lost because they were above the RRD’s maximum expected value and so weren’t recorded (as if they were bogus data.) I’ve edited your RRD file to increased that max value so it’ll accept higher values going forward. Cheers, anthony Anthony Anderberg Sr. Systems Analyst [NUtel_email_logo_1] 320-234-5239 anthonyanderberg(a)nu-telecom.net<mailto:anthonyanderberg@nu-telecom.net> www.nutelecom.net<http://www.nutelecom.net> From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of David Farmer Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 3:37 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Cacti Graphing problem Still seems to be the same, or do we have to wait until we break 34G or so again. But, thanks for looking at it, though. On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 3:21 PM, anthonyanderberg(a)nu-telecom.net<mailto:anthonyanderberg@nu-telecom.net> <anthonyanderberg(a)nu-telecom.net<mailto:anthonyanderberg@nu-telecom.net>> wrote: That’s a side effect of retaining everyone’s RRD history, I’ve had to edit a couple RRD files to reflect their interface’s new order-of-magnitude speed increases - have done yours now too. Cheers, anthony Anthony Anderberg Sr. Systems Analyst [NUtel_email_logo_1] 320-234-5239<tel:(320)%20234-5239> anthonyanderberg(a)nu-telecom.net<mailto:anthonyanderberg@nu-telecom.net> www.nutelecom.net<http://www.nutelecom.net> From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET<mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET>] On Behalf Of David Farmer Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 2:36 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET<mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Cacti Graphing problem Our graph on cacti I being cut off, see the following, we moved from a 30G lag to a 100G a few week ago and today are significantly exceeding 30G for the first time. Thanks [Inline image 1] -- =============================================== David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu<mailto:Email%3Afarmer@umn.edu> Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE<https://maps.google.com/?q=2218+University+Ave+SE&entry=gmail&source=g> Phone: 612-626-0815<tel:(612)%20626-0815> Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952<tel:(612)%20812-9952> =============================================== ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 -- =============================================== David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu<mailto:Email%3Afarmer@umn.edu> Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 =============================================== ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Nov. 14, 2017

Re: Cacti Graphing problem

by David Farmer

Still seems to be the same, or do we have to wait until we break 34G or so again. But, thanks for looking at it, though. On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 3:21 PM, anthonyanderberg(a)nu-telecom.net < anthonyanderberg(a)nu-telecom.net> wrote: > That’s a side effect of retaining everyone’s RRD history, I’ve had to edit > a couple RRD files to reflect their interface’s new order-of-magnitude > speed increases - have done yours now too. > > > > Cheers, > > anthony > > > > > > *Anthony Anderberg* > > Sr. Systems Analyst > > [image: NUtel_email_logo_1] > > 320-234-5239 <(320)%20234-5239> > > anthonyanderberg(a)nu-telecom.net > > *www.nutelecom.net <http://www.nutelecom.net>* > > > > *From:* MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] *On Behalf > Of *David Farmer > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 14, 2017 2:36 PM > *To:* MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET > *Subject:* [MICE-DISCUSS] Cacti Graphing problem > > > > Our graph on cacti I being cut off, see the following, we moved from a 30G > lag to a 100G a few week ago and today are significantly exceeding 30G for > the first time. > > > > Thanks > > > > [image: Inline image 1] > > > > -- > > =============================================== > David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu > Networking & Telecommunication Services > Office of Information Technology > University of Minnesota > 2218 University Ave SE > <https://maps.google.com/?q=2218+University+Ave+SE&entry=gmail&source=g> > Phone: 612-626-0815 <(612)%20626-0815> > Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 <(612)%20812-9952> > =============================================== > > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > -- =============================================== David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 ===============================================

Nov. 14, 2017

Re: Cacti Graphing problem

by anthonyanderberg＠nu-telecom.net

That’s a side effect of retaining everyone’s RRD history, I’ve had to edit a couple RRD files to reflect their interface’s new order-of-magnitude speed increases - have done yours now too. Cheers, anthony Anthony Anderberg Sr. Systems Analyst [NUtel_email_logo_1] 320-234-5239 anthonyanderberg(a)nu-telecom.net<mailto:anthonyanderberg@nu-telecom.net> www.nutelecom.net<http://www.nutelecom.net> From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of David Farmer Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 2:36 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Cacti Graphing problem Our graph on cacti I being cut off, see the following, we moved from a 30G lag to a 100G a few week ago and today are significantly exceeding 30G for the first time. Thanks [Inline image 1] -- =============================================== David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu<mailto:Email%3Afarmer@umn.edu> Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 =============================================== ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Nov. 14, 2017

Cacti Graphing problem

by David Farmer

Our graph on cacti I being cut off, see the following, we moved from a 30G lag to a 100G a few week ago and today are significantly exceeding 30G for the first time. Thanks [image: Inline image 1] -- =============================================== David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 ===============================================

Nov. 14, 2017

Looks like Yahoo had blip

by Frank Bulk

[cid:image001.png@01D35B11.0E5E7780] Nov 11 17:00:50 192.168.0.85 BGP: Peer 206.108.255.58 DOWN (Hold Timer Expired) Nov 11 17:00:51 192.168.0.85 BGP: Peer 2001:504:27::2846:0:2 DOWN (Hold Timer Expired) Nov 11 17:00:54 192.168.0.85 BGP: Peer 206.108.255.59 DOWN (Hold Timer Expired) Nov 11 17:00:55 192.168.0.85 BGP: Peer 2001:504:27::2846:0:1 DOWN (Hold Timer Expired) Nov 11 17:05:33 192.168.0.85 BGP: Peer 206.108.255.58 UP (ESTABLISHED) Nov 11 17:05:34 192.168.0.85 BGP: Peer 206.108.255.59 UP (ESTABLISHED) Nov 11 17:05:43 192.168.0.85 BGP: Peer 2001:504:27::2846:0:2 UP (ESTABLISHED) Nov 11 17:05:43 192.168.0.85 BGP: Peer 2001:504:27::2846:0:1 UP (ESTABLISHED)

Nov. 11, 2017

Re: Looking glass

by Frank Bulk

That would be great if a *new* router could be put in place. The old one wouldn't have to be turned down until the graphing stuff is all worked out with the new one. Frank -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Justin Krejci Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2017 11:04 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Looking glass There is an old Cisco router in place now as the LG router. If a network topology change is being considered for the router, it seems like it would be a good time to swap over the *new* router, the one Jeremy and I mounted (less old hardware, less old IOS, and a bit more beefy hardware specs) a few months ago into the MICE cabinet with essentially a duplicate config. It can obviously handle multi-homing so one gig interface could be on the MICE network (as it currently sits) and one gig interface could go somewhere else (eg iphouse, USI, etc) with full Internet reachability. Especially given the bandwidth needs of such a router are quite minimal, I doubt anyone would have problems with donation. Heck, could even spin up a separate MICE VLAN for this second interface in order to just use existing cross-connects if so desired. Side note, changing out the router may require a few tweaks to the current traffic graphing scripts used for BGP route collections and what not, possibly other things/record keeping might be needed as well: DNS records, device/network documentation, some ACL's on the router for the possible new Interface being used, other things my tired brain isn't conceiving at the moment, etc. ________________________________________ From: MICE Discuss [MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] on behalf of Nevin Lyne [nevin(a)ENGINEHOSTING.COM] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2017 1:14 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Looking glass On Thursday, November 9, 2017 1:02pm, "DeLong, Owen" <00000005a669d12e-dmarc-request(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> said: > Seems to me that putting a port on the LG server on the same network as the MICE > web site wouldn't be a bad plan if there's appropriate physical > proximity to make this easy. > > Owen The MICE web site hosting is donated/provided by us, but we are not directly on the exchange, our connection to MICE is provided by IPHouse's peering on MICE. So I don't see that working for the LG. -- Nevin Lyne -- Founder & Director of Technology -- Arcustech, LLC. - arcustech.com -- Gippy's Internet Solutions, LLC. - enginehosting.com

Nov. 11, 2017

Re: Looking glass

by Justin Krejci

There is an old Cisco router in place now as the LG router. If a network topology change is being considered for the router, it seems like it would be a good time to swap over the *new* router, the one Jeremy and I mounted (less old hardware, less old IOS, and a bit more beefy hardware specs) a few months ago into the MICE cabinet with essentially a duplicate config. It can obviously handle multi-homing so one gig interface could be on the MICE network (as it currently sits) and one gig interface could go somewhere else (eg iphouse, USI, etc) with full Internet reachability. Especially given the bandwidth needs of such a router are quite minimal, I doubt anyone would have problems with donation. Heck, could even spin up a separate MICE VLAN for this second interface in order to just use existing cross-connects if so desired. Side note, changing out the router may require a few tweaks to the current traffic graphing scripts used for BGP route collections and what not, possibly other things/record keeping might be needed as well: DNS records, device/network documentation, some ACL's on the router for the possible new Interface being used, other things my tired brain isn't conceiving at the moment, etc. ________________________________________ From: MICE Discuss [MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] on behalf of Nevin Lyne [nevin(a)ENGINEHOSTING.COM] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2017 1:14 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Looking glass On Thursday, November 9, 2017 1:02pm, "DeLong, Owen" <00000005a669d12e-dmarc-request(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> said: > Seems to me that putting a port on the LG server on the same network as the MICE > web site wouldn’t be a bad plan if there’s appropriate physical > proximity to make this easy. > > Owen The MICE web site hosting is donated/provided by us, but we are not directly on the exchange, our connection to MICE is provided by IPHouse's peering on MICE. So I don't see that working for the LG. -- Nevin Lyne -- Founder & Director of Technology -- Arcustech, LLC. - arcustech.com -- Gippy's Internet Solutions, LLC. - enginehosting.com

Nov. 10, 2017

Re: Looking glass

by Nevin Lyne

On Thursday, November 9, 2017 1:02pm, "DeLong, Owen" <00000005a669d12e-dmarc-request(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> said: > Seems to me that putting a port on the LG server on the same network as the MICE > web site wouldn’t be a bad plan if there’s appropriate physical > proximity to make this easy. > > Owen The MICE web site hosting is donated/provided by us, but we are not directly on the exchange, our connection to MICE is provided by IPHouse's peering on MICE. So I don't see that working for the LG. -- Nevin Lyne -- Founder & Director of Technology -- Arcustech, LLC. - arcustech.com -- Gippy's Internet Solutions, LLC. - enginehosting.com

Nov. 9, 2017

Re: Looking glass

by DeLong, Owen

Seems to me that putting a port on the LG server on the same network as the MICE web site wouldn’t be a bad plan if there’s appropriate physical proximity to make this easy. Owen > On Nov 3, 2017, at 10:30 , Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)IPHOUSE.NET> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 11:01:49AM -0500, Andrew Hoyos wrote: >> Does MICE itself have general use transit available for website, OOB, graphing servers, etc, where this LG (or at least 1 leg of it) could live instead? > > > ipHouse has donated some transit for MICE use in the past. It can > still keep doing that if this is desired to be moved to a transitable > IP address. > -- > Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> > ~.~ ipHouse ~.~ > Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades

Nov. 9, 2017