- mice-discuss - lists.micemn.net

packet loss today

by James Urwiller

Greetings all, I have been noticing packet loss today similar to how it was a few weeks back before Zayo replaced a card. I know they had a fiber cut yesterday in Omaha south of where I hop on to get to the exchange, I was unaffected by that but today I just have a lot of packet loss. Anyone else? James Urwiller Network Architect Stealth Broadband james.urwiller(a)stealthbroadband.com [image: stealth300]

Nov. 22, 2019

Re: Please Welcome PhirePhly Design to MICE!

by Doug McIntyre

On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 01:44:37PM -0600, Jay Hanke wrote: >Name: PhirePhly Design >Port: Ethernet 11 MN Voip Remote Switch >ASN: 7034 >IPv4: 206.108.255.152/24 >IPv6: 2001:504:27:0:0:1b7a::1/64 >Peering Contact: kenneth(a)phirephly.design >Route Servers- YES >BFD: No Okay, the RS's are all set up for them. Welcome! -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> ~.~ ipHouse ~.~ Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades

Nov. 21, 2019

Please Welcome PhirePhly Design to MICE!

by Jay Hanke

Name: PhirePhly Design Port: Ethernet 11 MN Voip Remote Switch ASN: 7034 IPv4: 206.108.255.152/24 IPv6: 2001:504:27:0:0:1b7a::1/64 Peering Contact: kenneth(a)phirephly.design Route Servers- YES BFD: No Welcome Aboard! -- Jay Hanke, President South Front Networks jayhanke(a)southfront.io Phone 612-204-0000

Nov. 21, 2019

Re: [ADV] [MICE-DISCUSS] Additional WIN 10G Port

by Doug McIntyre

On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 08:31:03AM -0600, Jay Hanke wrote: >Port 4/43 on the main switch has been allocated to WIN. Please add this >port to their existing LAG group. > >Welcome aboard! Okay, port 4/43 has been added to Port Channel 8 for WINS/Airstream. -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> ~.~ ipHouse ~.~ Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades

Nov. 20, 2019

Additional WIN 10G Port

by Jay Hanke

Port 4/43 on the main switch has been allocated to WIN. Please add this port to their existing LAG group. Welcome aboard! -- Jay Hanke, President South Front Networks jayhanke(a)southfront.io Phone 612-204-0000

Nov. 20, 2019

Re: MICE Limelight Upgrade/Route Server addition

by Doug McIntyre

On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 07:42:49PM -0600, Jay Hanke wrote: >Limelight is moving from their existing 2x10G LAG to 1x100G LAG on >main switch port 3/15/1. The existing 10G ports will be vacated. This >move was competed this afternoon. > >Limelight is also adding an additional 100G port to the MN VoIP remote >switch with an additional IP assignment. > >Name: Limelight (New additional) >Port: MN VoIP Port 2 (100G Switch) >ASN: 22882 >IPv4: 206.108.255.151 >IPv6: 2001:504:27:0:0:5926::2 > >Limelight has also requested RS sessions for both of their IP assignments. > >The following Limelight IPs need RS sessions created or verified >IPv4: 206.108.255.43 >IPv6: 2001:504:27:0:0:5926::1 Both of these have been added to both RSs. They should be all set to go. -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> ~.~ ipHouse ~.~ Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades

Nov. 19, 2019

Re: Google Issues?

by David Farmer

Looks like it came back just before 04:00. On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 8:35 PM Jeff Dahna <jeff.dahna(a)windommn.com> wrote: > Apparently it is a fiber cut on Level3 as per previous message. > -- =============================================== David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 ===============================================

Nov. 19, 2019

Re: Google Issues?

by Richard Laager

On 11/18/19 8:30 PM, Nathan Beard wrote: > Google peering sessions via MICE have been down for nearly 8 hours at > this point for multiple customers including Stellar Association. For networks that have Google caches, are you advertising only customer routes to them, or also advertising peer routes? The latter supposedly enables peer-to-peer cache fill, which may be helpful, especially in times like this. https://support.google.com/interconnect/answer/7658603 > What should I advertise to the GGC node? > You should advertise all your user prefixes. If you have peers and > downstream customers, you may advertise their prefixes too. https://support.google.com/interconnect/answer/7658593 > Can GGC nodes cache-fill from other GGC nodes? > Yes. We refer to this as peer-to-peer cache-fill. It can lead to > substantial improvements in resilience, and reduction in transit or > AS15169 peering traffic. > > To enable peer-to-peer traffic, the IP prefix of the GGC servers must > be advertised to all GGC nodes that you want to be candidates to be > cache-fill sources. These other nodes can be in your network or nodes > hosted by your peers. > > It is possible for cache-fill traffic to flow in both directions > between two nodes, or between two ASNs. -- Richard

Nov. 19, 2019

Re: Google Issues?

by Jeff Dahna

Apparently it is a fiber cut on Level3 as per previous message.

Nov. 19, 2019

Google Issues?

by Nathan Beard

All, Google peering sessions via MICE have been down for nearly 8 hours at this point for multiple customers including Stellar Association. Is anybody aware of an issue? I don't recall seeing an update for any work being completed but it's possible that I missed something... *Nathan Beard* *7Sigma Systems, Inc.* Network Engineer (218) 820-7636 www.7sigma.com

Nov. 19, 2019