- mice-discuss - lists.micemn.net

Zayo Fiber Cut

by AnthonyAnderberg＠nuvera.net

Looks like there is a fiber cut on the Zayo (formerly Neutral Path) fiber path to 511 from the Western twin cities. I jump on near Cologne so the cut must be East of there. [signature_252921654]

June 4, 2020

Re: AS34553- Nate Sales Disconnect

by Nate Sales

I bet it is a record for fastest disconnection! Unfortunately there were a few issues in my application relating to personal information that ended up being prohibitive for my connection. Nate On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 9:51 AM Dean Bahls <dean.bahls(a)cooperative-networks.com> wrote: > > Joined on Thursday....Disconnected on Monday. That must be a record. > > What happened BTW? > > Dean > > > -----Original Message----- > From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> On Behalf Of Doug > McIntyre > Sent: Monday, June 1, 2020 11:46 AM > To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET > Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] AS34553- Nate Sales Disconnect > > On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 10:23:00AM -0500, Jay Hanke wrote: > >AS34553 Nate Sales has disconnected from MICE. > > > >Please remove route server sessions and assignments. > > Sure, RR configs removed. > > -- > Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> > ~.~ ipHouse ~.~ > Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades

June 1, 2020

Re: AS34553- Nate Sales Disconnect

by Dean Bahls

Joined on Thursday....Disconnected on Monday. That must be a record. What happened BTW? Dean -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> On Behalf Of Doug McIntyre Sent: Monday, June 1, 2020 11:46 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] AS34553- Nate Sales Disconnect On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 10:23:00AM -0500, Jay Hanke wrote: >AS34553 Nate Sales has disconnected from MICE. > >Please remove route server sessions and assignments. Sure, RR configs removed. -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> ~.~ ipHouse ~.~ Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades

June 1, 2020

Re: AS34553- Nate Sales Disconnect

by Doug McIntyre

On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 10:23:00AM -0500, Jay Hanke wrote: >AS34553 Nate Sales has disconnected from MICE. > >Please remove route server sessions and assignments. Sure, RR configs removed. -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> ~.~ ipHouse ~.~ Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades

June 1, 2020

AS34553- Nate Sales Disconnect

by Jay Hanke

AS34553 Nate Sales has disconnected from MICE. Please remove route server sessions and assignments. Thanks! -- Jay Hanke, President South Front Networks jayhanke(a)southfront.io Phone 612-204-0000

June 1, 2020

Re: Please Welcome Nate Sales to MICE!

by Nate Sales

Oops, I committed the session update but not the address assignment. Established now. Thanks! On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 9:31 AM Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> wrote: > > Thanks. I've got the changes in, although your router IPv6 addresses > don't seem to have changed yet. > > (ie. I can ping6 2001:504:27:0:6:86f9::1, but I can't ping6 2001:504:27:0:0:86f9::1 > > > > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 09:27:13AM -0700, Nate Sales wrote: > >Ok, got it. I've updated the sessions to the correct address so you're free > >to push the config. > > > >Nate > > > >On Thu, May 28, 2020, 9:22 AM Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> wrote: > > > >> Because the Route servers were setup with the incorrect data. The > >> IPv6 address should be your ASN. The :6: probably crept in from some > >> previous member that has a 32-bit ASN, as those overflow the one field > >> into the next. > >> > >> It would be best to get change to get all on the same page and be the > >> standard setup. > >> > >> Can I go reconfig now? Or did you want to schedule it with me? > >> > >> > >> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 09:08:07AM -0700, Nate Sales wrote: > >> >The participants page on the website lists the zero in the address > >> >(2001:504:27:0:0:86f9::1) but i'm established with the route servers using > >> >the 6 address (2001:504:27:0:6:86f9::1). > >> > > >> >Should I switch to the zero one? > >> > > >> >Additionally, the order form was sent to peering(a)micemn.ne > >> ><peering(a)micemn.net>t. > >> > > >> >Thanks, > >> >Nate > >> > > >> >On Wed, May 27, 2020, 11:34 PM Richard Laager <rlaager(a)wiktel.com> wrote: > >> > > >> >> On 5/27/20 9:35 AM, Jay Hanke wrote: > >> >> > Name: Nate Sales > >> >> > Port: MN VoIP Remote > >> >> > ASN: 34553 > >> >> > IPv4: 206.108.255.166/24 > >> >> > IPv6: 2001:504:27:0:6:86f9::1/64 > >> >> > >> >> Typo: 6 should be 0? 2001:504:27:0:0:86f9::1 > >> >> > >> >> > Peering Contact: peering(a)natesales.net > >> >> > Route Servers- YES > >> >> > BFD: No > >> >> > > >> >> > Welcome Aboard! > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Richard > >> >> > >> > >> -- > >> Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> > >> ~.~ ipHouse ~.~ > >> Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades > >> > > -- > Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> > ~.~ ipHouse ~.~ > Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades

May 28, 2020

Re: Please Welcome Nate Sales to MICE!

by Doug McIntyre

Thanks. I've got the changes in, although your router IPv6 addresses don't seem to have changed yet. (ie. I can ping6 2001:504:27:0:6:86f9::1, but I can't ping6 2001:504:27:0:0:86f9::1 On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 09:27:13AM -0700, Nate Sales wrote: >Ok, got it. I've updated the sessions to the correct address so you're free >to push the config. > >Nate > >On Thu, May 28, 2020, 9:22 AM Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> wrote: > >> Because the Route servers were setup with the incorrect data. The >> IPv6 address should be your ASN. The :6: probably crept in from some >> previous member that has a 32-bit ASN, as those overflow the one field >> into the next. >> >> It would be best to get change to get all on the same page and be the >> standard setup. >> >> Can I go reconfig now? Or did you want to schedule it with me? >> >> >> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 09:08:07AM -0700, Nate Sales wrote: >> >The participants page on the website lists the zero in the address >> >(2001:504:27:0:0:86f9::1) but i'm established with the route servers using >> >the 6 address (2001:504:27:0:6:86f9::1). >> > >> >Should I switch to the zero one? >> > >> >Additionally, the order form was sent to peering(a)micemn.ne >> ><peering(a)micemn.net>t. >> > >> >Thanks, >> >Nate >> > >> >On Wed, May 27, 2020, 11:34 PM Richard Laager <rlaager(a)wiktel.com> wrote: >> > >> >> On 5/27/20 9:35 AM, Jay Hanke wrote: >> >> > Name: Nate Sales >> >> > Port: MN VoIP Remote >> >> > ASN: 34553 >> >> > IPv4: 206.108.255.166/24 >> >> > IPv6: 2001:504:27:0:6:86f9::1/64 >> >> >> >> Typo: 6 should be 0? 2001:504:27:0:0:86f9::1 >> >> >> >> > Peering Contact: peering(a)natesales.net >> >> > Route Servers- YES >> >> > BFD: No >> >> > >> >> > Welcome Aboard! >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Richard >> >> >> >> -- >> Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> >> ~.~ ipHouse ~.~ >> Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades >> -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> ~.~ ipHouse ~.~ Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades

May 28, 2020

Re: Please Welcome Nate Sales to MICE!

by Nate Sales

Ok, got it. I've updated the sessions to the correct address so you're free to push the config. Nate On Thu, May 28, 2020, 9:22 AM Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> wrote: > Because the Route servers were setup with the incorrect data. The > IPv6 address should be your ASN. The :6: probably crept in from some > previous member that has a 32-bit ASN, as those overflow the one field > into the next. > > It would be best to get change to get all on the same page and be the > standard setup. > > Can I go reconfig now? Or did you want to schedule it with me? > > > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 09:08:07AM -0700, Nate Sales wrote: > >The participants page on the website lists the zero in the address > >(2001:504:27:0:0:86f9::1) but i'm established with the route servers using > >the 6 address (2001:504:27:0:6:86f9::1). > > > >Should I switch to the zero one? > > > >Additionally, the order form was sent to peering(a)micemn.ne > ><peering(a)micemn.net>t. > > > >Thanks, > >Nate > > > >On Wed, May 27, 2020, 11:34 PM Richard Laager <rlaager(a)wiktel.com> wrote: > > > >> On 5/27/20 9:35 AM, Jay Hanke wrote: > >> > Name: Nate Sales > >> > Port: MN VoIP Remote > >> > ASN: 34553 > >> > IPv4: 206.108.255.166/24 > >> > IPv6: 2001:504:27:0:6:86f9::1/64 > >> > >> Typo: 6 should be 0? 2001:504:27:0:0:86f9::1 > >> > >> > Peering Contact: peering(a)natesales.net > >> > Route Servers- YES > >> > BFD: No > >> > > >> > Welcome Aboard! > >> > > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Richard > >> > > -- > Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> > ~.~ ipHouse ~.~ > Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades >

May 28, 2020

Re: Please Welcome Nate Sales to MICE!

by Doug McIntyre

Because the Route servers were setup with the incorrect data. The IPv6 address should be your ASN. The :6: probably crept in from some previous member that has a 32-bit ASN, as those overflow the one field into the next. It would be best to get change to get all on the same page and be the standard setup. Can I go reconfig now? Or did you want to schedule it with me? On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 09:08:07AM -0700, Nate Sales wrote: >The participants page on the website lists the zero in the address >(2001:504:27:0:0:86f9::1) but i'm established with the route servers using >the 6 address (2001:504:27:0:6:86f9::1). > >Should I switch to the zero one? > >Additionally, the order form was sent to peering(a)micemn.ne ><peering(a)micemn.net>t. > >Thanks, >Nate > >On Wed, May 27, 2020, 11:34 PM Richard Laager <rlaager(a)wiktel.com> wrote: > >> On 5/27/20 9:35 AM, Jay Hanke wrote: >> > Name: Nate Sales >> > Port: MN VoIP Remote >> > ASN: 34553 >> > IPv4: 206.108.255.166/24 >> > IPv6: 2001:504:27:0:6:86f9::1/64 >> >> Typo: 6 should be 0? 2001:504:27:0:0:86f9::1 >> >> > Peering Contact: peering(a)natesales.net >> > Route Servers- YES >> > BFD: No >> > >> > Welcome Aboard! >> > >> >> >> -- >> Richard >> -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> ~.~ ipHouse ~.~ Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades

May 28, 2020

Re: Please Welcome Nate Sales to MICE!

by Nate Sales

The participants page on the website lists the zero in the address (2001:504:27:0:0:86f9::1) but i'm established with the route servers using the 6 address (2001:504:27:0:6:86f9::1). Should I switch to the zero one? Additionally, the order form was sent to peering(a)micemn.ne <peering(a)micemn.net>t. Thanks, Nate On Wed, May 27, 2020, 11:34 PM Richard Laager <rlaager(a)wiktel.com> wrote: > On 5/27/20 9:35 AM, Jay Hanke wrote: > > Name: Nate Sales > > Port: MN VoIP Remote > > ASN: 34553 > > IPv4: 206.108.255.166/24 > > IPv6: 2001:504:27:0:6:86f9::1/64 > > Typo: 6 should be 0? 2001:504:27:0:0:86f9::1 > > > Peering Contact: peering(a)natesales.net > > Route Servers- YES > > BFD: No > > > > Welcome Aboard! > > > > > -- > Richard >

May 28, 2020