June 2021 - mice-discuss - lists.micemn.net

Re: Please Welcome Involta to MICE!

by Doug McIntyre

On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 11:58:04AM -0500, Jay Hanke wrote: >Name: Involta >Switch: Compudyne Duluth Remote >Port: xe-0/0/3 >ASN: 14230 >IPv4: 206.108.255.180/24 >IPv6: 2001:504:27::3796:0:1/64 >Peering Contact: peering(a)involta.com >Route Servers- Yes >BFD: NO I've got them added into the RR's. Welcome!

June 24, 2021

Please Welcome Involta to MICE!

by Jay Hanke

Name: Involta Switch: Compudyne Duluth Remote Port: xe-0/0/3 ASN: 14230 IPv4: 206.108.255.180/24 IPv6: 2001:504:27::3796:0:1/64 Peering Contact: peering(a)involta.com Route Servers- Yes BFD: NO Welcome aboard! -- Jay Hanke, President South Front Networks jayhanke(a)southfront.io Phone 612-204-0000

June 24, 2021

Re: EIDG

by AnthonyAnderberg＠nuvera.net

Done, and I copied the original single-port data over the top of the po4 interface data to preserve a sense of history. Cheers, anthony On 6/22/21, 7:21 AM, "MICE Discuss on behalf of Jay Hanke" <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET on behalf of jayhanke(a)SOUTHFRONT.IO> wrote: EIDG has completed the upgrade to 1x2x10G SFN Remote Switch Eth9 Eth15 Port Channel 4 Anthony, could you update graphing? -- Jay Hanke, President South Front Networks jayhanke(a)southfront.io Phone 612-204-0000

June 22, 2021

EIDG

by Jay Hanke

EIDG has completed the upgrade to 1x2x10G SFN Remote Switch Eth9 Eth15 Port Channel 4 Anthony, could you update graphing? -- Jay Hanke, President South Front Networks jayhanke(a)southfront.io Phone 612-204-0000

June 22, 2021

Re: Twins Game After MICE Meeting?

by AnthonyAnderberg＠nuvera.net

I just purchased Section 4 Row 9 Seats 9-11 for my wife and I plus one for whoever else might want. Looks like there are two seats left on that side in Row 10, and 4 in row 12. On 6/19/21, 8:40 AM, "MICE Discuss on behalf of Mike Johnston" <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET on behalf of mjohnston(a)WIKTEL.COM> wrote: My wife has acquired tickets for her, me, and my younger daughter. Section 4, Row 9, Seats 12,13,14. Mike Johnston Wiktel

June 22, 2021

Re: Jumbo Frames

by Jamison Masters

Thanks everyone. Safe word: “1500 bytes.“ Gratefully, Jamison From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> On Behalf Of Ben Wiechman Sent: Friday, June 18, 2021 2:57 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Jumbo Frames I use MTU 9000* on all my router-to-router links because I need to be able to carry larger-than-1500-byte circuit traffic. If nothing else, circuit VLANs all need to be a bit over 1500 bytes on the outside (i.e. with my tags and possibly tags of other carriers involved) so that they are 1500 bytes on the inside. * Maybe I should/will-need-to change this to 9000 + a bit to allow for 9000 inside. We don't typically see carriers looking for anything greater than about 2000 bytes in practice, though we also follow a similar 9000 byte configuration on our internal transport links. 1500 to the internet edge. You could fiddle with the MTU to eek out a few extra bytes for circuits, but what you're doing today already ~4x the real world use cases that we've seen. Maybe experiences differ for providers that carry a lot of traffic between data centers. Ben Wiechman Director of IP Strategy and Engineering 320.247.3224 | ben.wiechman(a)arvig.com<mailto:ben.wiechman@arvig.com> Arvig | 224 East Main Street | Melrose, MN 56352 | arvig.com<http://arvig.com> On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 2:53 PM Richard Laager <rlaager(a)wiktel.com<mailto:rlaager@wiktel.com>> wrote: On 6/18/21 2:16 PM, Jonathan Stewart wrote: Finally, views do differ, i'm sure others have opinions that do not match mine. I don't see anything wrong in what you said. I'll add some detail on what we're doing in case it's helpful (or if someone can educate me if I'm doing something bad): I use MTU 9000 on my transit connections, coordinated with the transit provider, because there seems to be no harm in doing that. I use MTU 9000* on all my router-to-router links because I need to be able to carry larger-than-1500-byte circuit traffic. If nothing else, circuit VLANs all need to be a bit over 1500 bytes on the outside (i.e. with my tags and possibly tags of other carriers involved) so that they are 1500 bytes on the inside. * Maybe I should/will-need-to change this to 9000 + a bit to allow for 9000 inside. I'm 1500 bytes at the customer edge for Internet. I'm also 1500 bytes at IXes. -- Richard ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

June 19, 2021

Re: Twins Game After MICE Meeting?

by Travis Fincham

We have 4 that would be coming Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> ________________________________ From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> on behalf of Mike Johnston <mjohnston(a)WIKTEL.COM> Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2021 8:40:23 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> Subject: [EXTERNAL]Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Twins Game After MICE Meeting? Warning: This email originated from outside of Key Cooperative. DO NOT click on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. My wife has acquired tickets for her, me, and my younger daughter. Section 4, Row 9, Seats 12,13,14. Mike Johnston Wiktel ________________________________ NOTICE: This message (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2510-2521, is CONFIDENTIAL, and is intended only for the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the named addressee or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the named addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, retention, dissemination, distribution, copying or use of this communication is strictly prohibited. Please reply to the sender that you received this message in error and then delete it.

June 19, 2021

Re: Twins Game After MICE Meeting?

by Mike Johnston

My wife has acquired tickets for her, me, and my younger daughter. Section 4, Row 9, Seats 12,13,14. Mike Johnston Wiktel

June 19, 2021

Re: Twins Game After MICE Meeting?

by Mike Johnston

Has anybody else shown interest? Travis Fincham?

June 19, 2021

Re: Twins Game After MICE Meeting?

by Reid Fishler

No, I was waiting to see who wanted to come... Reid On Fri, Jun 18, 2021, 11:28 PM Mike Johnston <mjohnston(a)wiktel.com> wrote: > Have you already purchased some tickets? If so, where are your seats? > > mjohnston(a)wiktel.com if you want to go off-list. > > > On 2021-06-18 22:18, Reid Fishler wrote: > > There are seats RIGHT behind the twins dugout. On the twins site. > > Reid > > On Fri, Jun 18, 2021, 11:15 PM Mike Johnston <mjohnston(a)wiktel.com> wrote: > >> Good idea! Me, my wife, and one of my daughters are interested in >> going. I suppose it would be best if all interested MICEonians have >> adjacent seats. My wife is fussy...she wants good seats. >> >> > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 >

June 19, 2021