February 2019 - mice-discuss - lists.micemn.net

Re: MICE attached compliance speed test server

by Steve Howard

Feb. 25, 2019

Re: MICE attached compliance speed test server

by Jay Hanke

Steve- Are you open to allowing other cooperatives to use it (beyond CNS attached members)? On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 8:15 AM Steve Howard <showard(a)paulbunyan.net> wrote: > On 02/24/2019 04:36 PM, Richard Laager wrote: > > On 2/24/19 11:13 AM, Jay Hanke wrote: > > Was there any progress on this? > > I believe Steve decided to keep his iperf server private. > > > > We are in the process of replacing our compliance speed test server at > MICE. It is "semi-private". i.e. It is operating on a separate VLAN that > is on the CNS Remote switch. Anybody who is connected to the CNS remote > can request access and we'll set them up. This methodology was chosen due > to several items of concern that were brought up and the last MICE meeting. > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > -- Jay Hanke, President South Front Networks jayhanke(a)southfront.io Phone 612-204-0000

Feb. 25, 2019

Re: MICE attached compliance speed test server

by Steve Howard

Feb. 25, 2019

Re: MICE Google Traffic

by Jeremy Lumby

I agree it does not seem right, however I have talked to Google about it almost 10 times, and they find/fix other unrelated issues many of the times, however they still claim there is nothing limiting traffic below their 100G port speed. From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk Sent: Monday, February 25, 2019 8:11 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE Google Traffic It seems a bit odd that it floats so evenly at ~56 Gbps most of the day: http://micelg.usinternet.com/cacti/graph.php?action=view&local_graph_id=124… Does that seem right? Frank From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> On Behalf Of Mike Wilker Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 9:32 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE Google Traffic Thanks for the update Jeremy. Thank You, Mike Wilker CTO ( Office: (507) 214-0259 - Email: mwilker(a)jagcom.net www.JagCom.net 213 South Oak Avenue Owatonna, MN 55060 On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 7:31 AM Jeremy Lumby <jlumby(a)mnvoip.com> wrote: I just got the official word back from Google that everything should be stable. From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of AnthonyAnderberg(a)nuvera.net Sent: Friday, February 01, 2019 11:44 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE Google Traffic It looks like Google’s MICE traffic levels are significantly higher tonight - not as high as they’d been, but I suspect a lot of us are still suppressing our prefixes to them at MICE. Have they confirmed anything or does anyone who was having trouble and is using Google msp5 at MICE currently still have issues? Thanks, anthony To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Feb. 25, 2019

Re: MICE attached compliance speed test server

by Frank Bulk

I’m not sure how many companies are also interested in this, but if it could be used by Calix or Vantage Point’s CAF II-based broadband testing solutions, we would be interested in financially supporting this. Frank From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> On Behalf Of Jay Hanke Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2019 11:13 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE attached compliance speed test server Was there any progress on this? -- Jay Hanke, President South Front Networks jayhanke(a)southfront.io<mailto:jayhanke@southfront.io> Phone 612-204-0000 ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Feb. 25, 2019

Re: MICE Google Traffic

by Frank Bulk

It seems a bit odd that it floats so evenly at ~56 Gbps most of the day: http://micelg.usinternet.com/cacti/graph.php?action=view&local_graph_id=124… Does that seem right? Frank From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> On Behalf Of Mike Wilker Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 9:32 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE Google Traffic Thanks for the update Jeremy. Thank You, Mike Wilker CTO • Office: (507) 214-0259 • Email: mwilker(a)jagcom.net<mailto:mwilker@jagcom.net> [http://cdn.jagcom.net/images/logos/JaguarLogo2014.png] www.JagCom.net<http://www.jagcom.net/> 213 South Oak Avenue Owatonna, MN 55060 On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 7:31 AM Jeremy Lumby <jlumby(a)mnvoip.com<mailto:jlumby@mnvoip.com>> wrote: I just got the official word back from Google that everything should be stable. From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET<mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET>] On Behalf Of AnthonyAnderberg(a)nuvera.net<mailto:AnthonyAnderberg@nuvera.net> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2019 11:44 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET<mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE Google Traffic It looks like Google’s MICE traffic levels are significantly higher tonight - not as high as they’d been, but I suspect a lot of us are still suppressing our prefixes to them at MICE. Have they confirmed anything or does anyone who was having trouble and is using Google msp5 at MICE currently still have issues? Thanks, anthony [Anthony_Anderberg]<https://www.nuvera.net/> ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Feb. 25, 2019

Re: MICE attached compliance speed test server

by Dean Bahls

Politicians aren’t Internet savvy. So it ends up in the wrong place. *sigh* Dean From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> On Behalf Of Jay Hanke Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2019 5:34 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE attached compliance speed test server Interesting, I wonder how they came up with St Paul (no public IXP). Also Omaha is missing last I looked, Omaha was larger than KCIX. If someone implements something in St. Paul. I have some networks looking for test locations. It might bring more eyeballs to mice. On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 5:00 PM Richard Laager <rlaager(a)wiktel.com <mailto:rlaager@wiktel.com> > wrote: On 2/24/19 4:43 PM, Jay Hanke wrote: > Is there a public FCC doc someplace? I think this is the one, but I'm really not positive on that. FCC stuff isn't my area of expertise. https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-18-710A1.pdf -- Richard -- Jay Hanke, President South Front Networks jayhanke(a)southfront.io <mailto:jayhanke@southfront.io> Phone 612-204-0000 _____ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS <http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1> &A=1

Feb. 25, 2019

Re: MICE attached compliance speed test server

by Jay Hanke

Interesting, I wonder how they came up with St Paul (no public IXP). Also Omaha is missing last I looked, Omaha was larger than KCIX. If someone implements something in St. Paul. I have some networks looking for test locations. It might bring more eyeballs to mice. On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 5:00 PM Richard Laager <rlaager(a)wiktel.com> wrote: > On 2/24/19 4:43 PM, Jay Hanke wrote: > > Is there a public FCC doc someplace? > > I think this is the one, but I'm really not positive on that. FCC stuff > isn't my area of expertise. > https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-18-710A1.pdf > > -- > Richard > -- Jay Hanke, President South Front Networks jayhanke(a)southfront.io Phone 612-204-0000

Feb. 24, 2019

Re: MICE attached compliance speed test server

by Richard Laager

On 2/24/19 4:43 PM, Jay Hanke wrote: > Is there a public FCC doc someplace? I think this is the one, but I'm really not positive on that. FCC stuff isn't my area of expertise. https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-18-710A1.pdf -- Richard

Feb. 24, 2019

Re: MICE attached compliance speed test server

by Jay Hanke

Is there a public FCC doc someplace? On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 4:39 PM Darin Steffl <darin.steffl(a)mnwifi.com> wrote: > US internet ookla server has always given us good results. > > On Sun, Feb 24, 2019, 4:36 PM Richard Laager <rlaager(a)wiktel.com> wrote: > >> On 2/24/19 11:13 AM, Jay Hanke wrote: >> > Was there any progress on this? >> >> I believe Steve decided to keep his iperf server private. >> >> U.S. Internet is connected to MICE and already has a public Ookla >> speedtest.net server (listed as being in Minneapolis). >> >> My understanding is that currently the FCC requirement is for St. Paul, >> so I'm not sure if Minneapolis "counts". >> >> -- >> Richard >> > > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > -- Jay Hanke, President South Front Networks jayhanke(a)southfront.io Phone 612-204-0000

Feb. 24, 2019