October 2016 - mice-discuss - lists.micemn.net

Re: EX4200 (1G Switch) Packet Loss -> 10G Participants

by Jeremy Lumby

Just to update everyone after yesterday's maintenance. After removing the 4200 from the virtual chassis, unfortunately I am still seeing loss when packets go between the 4500, and the 4550. The good news is removing the 4200 has improved it since the loss is now down to 0.06% on a 6 hour test (previously it was around 0.3%), unfortunately I am 100% sure it is real since I can shut down 1 of the two LAG ports at a time from the 4200, and the loss to the switch with the active lag port is always truly 0, and the other switch is 0.06% When I flip which port on the LAG is shutdown, then the loss flips to the other switch exactly as expected. For the time being, I am going to leave only the connection from the 4200 to the 4500 active since it has the most members, and therefore will show the least overall loss, while we determine our next step in troubleshooting this issue. Jeremy Lumby Minnesota VoIP 9217 17th Ave S Suite 216 Bloomington, MN 55425 Main: 612-355-7740 x211 Direct: 612-392-6814 EFax: 952-873-7425 jlumby(a)mnvoip.com

Oct. 5, 2016

Re: BFD support on BGP sessions

by Colin Baker

On 04.10.2016 20:52, Richard Laager wrote: > Is it implied that BFD is always for bi-lateral sessions only? Or do > some routers allow configuring BFD separately from BGP in some useful > way? (I don't think mine do.) Would have to be per session to be useful. I'm not aware of any IXPs doing BFD on route servers - it's something worth discussing, and it may be fine with fairly conservative timers, but I suspect members interested in utilizing BFD will probably also want to set up bilateral with those peers. > Colin, does Supranet support BFD for both AS4150 and AS5683, or just > the > former? 4150. You can actually remove 5683 from the website - it's not currently connected and we likely won't be bringing it back. -- Colin Baker SupraNet Communications, Inc. (608) 572-7634 colinb(a)supranet.net This message is subject to the SupraNet Email Confidentiality Policy which is located at http://supranet.net/confidentiality

Oct. 5, 2016

Re: BFD support on BGP sessions

by Richard Laager

Is it implied that BFD is always for bi-lateral sessions only? Or do some routers allow configuring BFD separately from BGP in some useful way? (I don't think mine do.) Colin, does Supranet support BFD for both AS4150 and AS5683, or just the former? -- Richard

Oct. 5, 2016

Re: BFD support on BGP sessions

by Michael Hare

Call it a Madison thing; AS 3128 would also like to BFD peer with interested parties. I like Andrew's "Y/N" column idea. -Michael -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Colin Baker Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 4:21 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] BFD support on BGP sessions On 04.10.2016 16:09, Andrew Hoyos wrote: > +1 to this. We (AS53597) will happy enable BFD to anyone that > supports. Shoot us an email at noc(a)hoyosconsulting.com. > > Perhaps we can add a column to the participants page for a Y/N flag > there? > Meee tooo Email peering(a)supranet.net (AS4150) and we'll be happy to get this added. -- Colin Baker SupraNet Communications, Inc. (608) 572-7634 colinb(a)supranet.net This message is subject to the SupraNet Email Confidentiality Policy which is located at http://supranet.net/confidentiality

Oct. 5, 2016

Re: Maintenance Complete

by Jeremy Lumby

For the time being all of the ge-1/x/x ports are completely disconnected, and can be removed from the list, however sometime in the future, I would like to stack it with the new 4200, and in that case, the ge-1/x/x ports will come back mostly for new members, or if we need to free up some 10G ports since we are currently forced to use 5 of them for 1G connections. -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Richard Laager Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2016 6:45 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Maintenance Complete On 10/04/2016 03:32 PM, Jeremy Lumby wrote: > It appears to happened when the old 4200 was removed from the VC So the old 4200 is gone and I should remove all the ge-1/x/x ports from the participants list? -- Richard

Oct. 5, 2016

Re: Maintenance Complete

by Richard Laager

On 10/04/2016 03:32 PM, Jeremy Lumby wrote: > It appears to happened when the old 4200 was removed from the VC So the old 4200 is gone and I should remove all the ge-1/x/x ports from the participants list? -- Richard

Oct. 4, 2016

Re: Hurricane and route servers

by Rob Mosher

Sending the same routes to RS1 now as well -- Rob Mosher Senior Network and Software Engineer Hurricane Electric / AS6939 On 10/4/2016 4:56 PM, Rob Mosher wrote: > We're now announcing just over 38k routes to RS2. I'll be sending the > same set to RS1 shortly unless there are any objections. > -- > Rob Mosher > Senior Network and Software Engineer > Hurricane Electric / AS6939 > On 9/28/2016 3:49 PM, Rob Mosher wrote: >> Negative. We announce our full set of IPv6 routes currently. >> -- >> Rob Mosher >> Senior Network and Software Engineer >> Hurricane Electric / AS6939 >> On 9/28/2016 3:48 PM, Justin Krejci wrote: >>> Will there be any changes to IPv6 prefix counts to/from the route >>> servers? >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> *From:* MICE Discuss [MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] on behalf of >>> Reid Fishler [rfishler(a)HE.NET] >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 28, 2016 1:49 PM >>> *To:* MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET >>> *Subject:* [MICE-DISCUSS] Hurricane and route servers >>> >>> Hurricane will begin to send routes to the route servers within the >>> next few days. Approximately 40k routes will be sent, so watch >>> your filters! Happy peering! >>> >>> Reid >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: >>> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: >>> http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 >>> >> >

Oct. 4, 2016

Re: BFD support on BGP sessions

by Jason Hanke

I believe BFD support is pretty new on BIRD. Is anyone aware of other IXs running BFD with Bird? On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Colin Baker <colinb(a)supranet.net> wrote: > On 04.10.2016 16:09, Andrew Hoyos wrote: >> >> +1 to this. We (AS53597) will happy enable BFD to anyone that >> supports. Shoot us an email at noc(a)hoyosconsulting.com. >> >> Perhaps we can add a column to the participants page for a Y/N flag there? >> > > Meee tooo > > Email peering(a)supranet.net (AS4150) and we'll be happy to get this added. > > -- > Colin Baker > SupraNet Communications, Inc. > (608) 572-7634 > colinb(a)supranet.net > > This message is subject to the SupraNet Email Confidentiality Policy > which is located at http://supranet.net/confidentiality -- Jay Hanke CTO Neutral Path Communications 3 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 204 Mankato, MN 56001 (507) 327-2398 mobile jayhanke(a)neutralpath.net www.neutralpath.net

Oct. 4, 2016

Re: BFD support on BGP sessions

by Colin Baker

On 04.10.2016 16:09, Andrew Hoyos wrote: > +1 to this. We (AS53597) will happy enable BFD to anyone that > supports. Shoot us an email at noc(a)hoyosconsulting.com. > > Perhaps we can add a column to the participants page for a Y/N flag > there? > Meee tooo Email peering(a)supranet.net (AS4150) and we'll be happy to get this added. -- Colin Baker SupraNet Communications, Inc. (608) 572-7634 colinb(a)supranet.net This message is subject to the SupraNet Email Confidentiality Policy which is located at http://supranet.net/confidentiality

Oct. 4, 2016

Re: BFD support on BGP sessions

by Andrew Hoyos

+1 to this. We (AS53597) will happy enable BFD to anyone that supports. Shoot us an email at noc(a)hoyosconsulting.com. Perhaps we can add a column to the participants page for a Y/N flag there? -- Andrew Hoyos hoyosa(a)gmail.com > On Oct 4, 2016, at 4:03 PM, Chris Wopat <wopat(a)wiscnet.net> wrote: > > Topical to today's issues, WiscNet (and likely others) actively utilize BFD on EBGP peering sessions across peering fabric on various IX's where possible. > > This helps by detecting issues across layer2 paths without having to wait for the BGP hold time to expire. > > If anyone would like to enable BFD on our direct sessions, please reach out to us at peering(a)wiscnet.net, or to me directly. > > We use minimum-interval 500, multiplier 3 at various IX's with little issue. > > Cheers, > -- > Chris Wopat > Network Engineer, WiscNet > wopat(a)wiscnet.net 608-210-3965

Oct. 4, 2016