August 2011 - mice-discuss - lists.micemn.net

Mice routes via Northern Lights GigaPoP

by Jeremy Lumby

I have a case where I am seeing 199.199.0.0/16 in BGP via MICE/Northern Lights GigaPoP. I have noticed that traffic to this network takes MICE, however the return traffic is coming in across one of my public Internet connections. I am assuming that either by choice, or by accident that they are not accepting my route via MICE/Northern Lights GigaPoP. I am wondering who would be the best person to chat with about this since MICE does not list a peering contact for Northern Lights GigaPoP in the participants page, and I realize that the correct peering contact might be another level or two deeper. Thanks, Jeremy ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Aug. 31, 2011

Re: IPv6 Route Server Check-in

by Owen DeLong

Check your IPv6 MaxPrefixes limit. Owen On Aug 30, 2011, at 1:41 PM, Doug McIntyre wrote: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 03:23:46PM -0500, Matthew Beckwell wrote: >> I just noticed both of our IPv6 sessions to the route servers are down. (2607:fe10:ffff::1, 2607:fe10:ffff::2). IPv4 is fine....other IPv6 sessions seem ok. >> (Although I'm not sure for how long-- my logging wasn't setup yet). >> >> Just doing a "DownForEveryoneOrJustMe" check... > > Hmm, up for us. > ... > 2607:fe10:ffff::1 > 4 53679 144213 126038 0 0 0 02w5d00h 19 > 2607:fe10:ffff::2 > 4 53679 144120 126038 0 0 0 02w5d00h 19 > > > And.. > > [merlyn@micemn-01 /]$ ping6 2607:fe10:ffff::25 > PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2607:fe10:ffff::1 --> 2607:fe10:ffff::25 > > ^C > > [merlyn@micemn-01 /]$ telnet 2607:fe10:ffff::25 bgp > Trying 2607:fe10:ffff::25... > telnet: connect to address 2607:fe10:ffff::25: Host is down > telnet: Unable to connect to remote host > > > Check your IPv6 stack? > > > > -- > Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> > -- ipHouse/Goldengate/Bitstream/ProNS -- > Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Aug. 30, 2011

Re: IPv6 Route Server Check-in

by Matthew Beckwell

Found a typo on the ACL. Thanks for the extra eyes. ~Matthew -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Doug McIntyre Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 3:41 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] IPv6 Route Server Check-in On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 03:23:46PM -0500, Matthew Beckwell wrote: > I just noticed both of our IPv6 sessions to the route servers are down. (2607:fe10:ffff::1, 2607:fe10:ffff::2). IPv4 is fine....other IPv6 sessions seem ok. > (Although I'm not sure for how long-- my logging wasn't setup yet). > > Just doing a "DownForEveryoneOrJustMe" check... Hmm, up for us. ... 2607:fe10:ffff::1 4 53679 144213 126038 0 0 0 02w5d00h 19 2607:fe10:ffff::2 4 53679 144120 126038 0 0 0 02w5d00h 19 And.. [merlyn@micemn-01 /]$ ping6 2607:fe10:ffff::25 PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2607:fe10:ffff::1 --> 2607:fe10:ffff::25 ^C [merlyn@micemn-01 /]$ telnet 2607:fe10:ffff::25 bgp Trying 2607:fe10:ffff::25... telnet: connect to address 2607:fe10:ffff::25: Host is down telnet: Unable to connect to remote host Check your IPv6 stack? -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> -- ipHouse/Goldengate/Bitstream/ProNS -- Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Aug. 30, 2011

Re: IPv6 Route Server Check-in

by Doug McIntyre

On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 03:23:46PM -0500, Matthew Beckwell wrote: > I just noticed both of our IPv6 sessions to the route servers are down. (2607:fe10:ffff::1, 2607:fe10:ffff::2). IPv4 is fine....other IPv6 sessions seem ok. > (Although I'm not sure for how long-- my logging wasn't setup yet). > > Just doing a "DownForEveryoneOrJustMe" check... Hmm, up for us. ... 2607:fe10:ffff::1 4 53679 144213 126038 0 0 0 02w5d00h 19 2607:fe10:ffff::2 4 53679 144120 126038 0 0 0 02w5d00h 19 And.. [merlyn@micemn-01 /]$ ping6 2607:fe10:ffff::25 PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2607:fe10:ffff::1 --> 2607:fe10:ffff::25 ^C [merlyn@micemn-01 /]$ telnet 2607:fe10:ffff::25 bgp Trying 2607:fe10:ffff::25... telnet: connect to address 2607:fe10:ffff::25: Host is down telnet: Unable to connect to remote host Check your IPv6 stack? -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn(a)iphouse.net> -- ipHouse/Goldengate/Bitstream/ProNS -- Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Aug. 30, 2011

Re: IPv6 Route Server Check-in

by Steve Howard

Our IPv6 sessions to MICE are both up and stable. On 08/30/2011 03:23 PM, Matthew Beckwell wrote: > I just noticed both of our IPv6 sessions to the route servers are down. (2607:fe10:ffff::1, 2607:fe10:ffff::2). IPv4 is fine....other IPv6 sessions seem ok. > (Although I'm not sure for how long-- my logging wasn't setup yet). > > Just doing a "DownForEveryoneOrJustMe" check... > ~Matthew > ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Aug. 30, 2011

IPv6 Route Server Check-in

by Matthew Beckwell

I just noticed both of our IPv6 sessions to the route servers are down. (2607:fe10:ffff::1, 2607:fe10:ffff::2). IPv4 is fine....other IPv6 sessions seem ok. (Although I'm not sure for how long-- my logging wasn't setup yet). Just doing a "DownForEveryoneOrJustMe" check... ~Matthew -- Matthew Beckwell - Senior Network and Application Engineer Advanced Integrated Technologies Office: 952-829-5511 x204 matthewb(a)aitech.net ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Aug. 30, 2011

"carrier choice" verbiage

by Ryan Goldberg

I've got a customer moving into a building where the building owners/management is attempting to enforce carrier exclusivity; they are in bed with another carrier. I already have the customer's other two sites on-net. This would be a third, new site. My fiber is just outside of the building, and I want to be in it. The owners of the company (my customer) have a pretty strong hand, and are looking for verbiage to add to the lease basically stating they can use whatever carrier they want. Does anyone have something like this handy? Thanks! Ryan ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Aug. 25, 2011

Re: cogent

by Andrew Hoyos

Might be coincidence, but we had a big fiber cut (AT&T/TA 288 ct + DOT 36 ct) in the Madison area yesterday afternoon. I know BoreasNet got taken out headed up towards EauClaire, so maybe they are in that same fiber cable headed that way on the Interstate. I would *hope* that 174 isn't single-pathed back down to Chicago on that cable, but I guess it wouldn't surprise me :-) On Aug 24, 2011, at 9:45 AM, Reid Knuttila wrote: > We had our link to Cogent in 511 go down yesterday, Aug 23 , at 14:39:07 . Still not up! > > Reid Knuttila > > From: Ryan Goldberg <RGoldberg(a)COMPUDYNE.NET> > Reply-To: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> > Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 20:16:23 +0000 > To: <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> > Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] cogent > > I’m guessing someone else here is using Cogent – from 11:42 to 12:28 today everything going over cogent suffered pretty bad loss. My physical and logical infrastructure to MICE is the same as to cogent, and my MICE traffic was unaffected. Did anyone else notice anything like this? > > Thanks! > Ryan > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Aug. 24, 2011

Re: cogent

by Jeff Bartig

That matches up close with a fiber cut we had yesterday down here in Madison, WI. We saw an interruption about 14:45 and then a complete outage of our long-haul fiber at 15:11. This is a fiber path that was originally installed by AT&T, Touch America, and Velocita. Maybe Cogent is using some of this fiber to get from Chicago to Minneapolis? Our pairs were restored early this morning. Jeff On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 02:45:53PM +0000, Reid Knuttila wrote: > We had our link to Cogent in 511 go down yesterday, Aug 23 , at 14:39:07 . Still not up! > > Reid Knuttila > > From: Ryan Goldberg <RGoldberg(a)COMPUDYNE.NET<mailto:RGoldberg@COMPUDYNE.NET>> > Reply-To: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET<mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET>> > Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 20:16:23 +0000 > To: <MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET<mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET>> > Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] cogent > > I?m guessing someone else here is using Cogent ? from 11:42 to 12:28 today everything going over cogent suffered pretty bad loss. My physical and logical infrastructure to MICE is the same as to cogent, and my MICE traffic was unaffected. Did anyone else notice anything like this? > > Thanks! > Ryan > > ________________________________ > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 > > ######################################################################## > > To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: > http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 -- Jeff Bartig | University of Wisconsin - Madison jeffb(a)doit.wisc.edu | Division of Information Technology (608) 262-8336 | Network Services/WAN Engineering/WiscNet GTalk/AIM/Yahoo: jbartig | ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Aug. 24, 2011

Re: cogent

by Russell Berg

Our Cogent GigE out of 511 has been rock solid recently... can't recall any noticeable issues within the past 6-12 months on the graphs. Russell Berg Senior Director - Products and Services Airstream Communications Wisconsin Independent Network 800 Wisconsin Street, Suite 219 Building D02, Mailbox 107 Eau Claire, WI 54703 O: 715-832-3726 C: 715-579-8227 F: 715-832-3755 berg(a)wins.net www.wins.net ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

Aug. 24, 2011