May 2011 - mice-discuss - lists.micemn.net

Re: New Member's Configured on BIRD

by Andrew Hoyos

On May 25, 2011, at 3:13 PM, Koch, Andrew wrote: >>> Farmer, which one is correct? Northern Lights Gigapop or UMN? >> >> I bet former. >> >> Later is AS217 if memory serves... >> > > > The names in whois make it, oh, so clear :-) :) If RADB objects are right: aut-num: AS57 as-name: NL-GIGAPOP descr: Northern Lights GigaPOP aut-num: AS217 as-name: ASN-UMN descr: University of Minnesota ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

May 25, 2011

Re: New Member's Configured on BIRD

by Koch, Andrew

> -----Original Message----- > From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of > Mike Horwath > Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011 2:52 PM > To: MICE-DISCUSS(a)LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET > Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] New Member's Configured on BIRD > > On 5/25/11 2:40 PM, "Jay Hanke" <jayhanke(a)MANKATONETWORKS.NET> wrote: > > >> Then fix0r! > >> > >> You has the power! > > > >Farmer, which one is correct? Northern Lights Gigapop or UMN? > > I bet former. > > Later is AS217 if memory serves... > The names in whois make it, oh, so clear :-) [elm:usrako]: whois -h whois.arin.net " a 57 " # # The following results may also be obtained via: # http://whois.arin.net/rest/asns;q=57?showDetails=true # ASNumber: 57 ASName: UMN-REI-UC ASHandle: AS57 RegDate: 1985-12-18 Updated: 2010-07-14 Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/asn/AS57 OrgName: University of Minnesota OrgId: UNIVER-233-Z Address: 2218 Univ Ave SE City: Minneapolis StateProv: MN PostalCode: 55455 Country: US RegDate: 2009-10-13 Updated: 2010-02-02 Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/org/UNIVER-233-Z ... [elm:usrako]: whois -h whois.arin.net " a 217 " # # The following results may also be obtained via: # http://whois.arin.net/rest/asns;q=217?showDetails=true # ASNumber: 217 ASName: UMN-AGS-NET-AS ASHandle: AS217 RegDate: 1988-07-25 Updated: 2010-02-02 Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/asn/AS217 OrgName: University of Minnesota OrgId: UNIVER-233-Z Address: 2218 Univ Ave SE City: Minneapolis StateProv: MN PostalCode: 55455 Country: US RegDate: 2009-10-13 Updated: 2010-02-02 Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/org/UNIVER-233-Z ... [elm:usrako]: whois -h whois.arin.net " a 1703 " # # The following results may also be obtained via: # http://whois.arin.net/rest/asns;q=1703?showDetails=true # ASNumber: 1703 ASName: MIX ASHandle: AS1703 RegDate: 1992-02-13 Updated: 2010-02-02 Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/asn/AS1703 OrgName: University of Minnesota OrgId: UNIVER-233-Z Address: 2218 Univ Ave SE City: Minneapolis StateProv: MN PostalCode: 55455 Country: US RegDate: 2009-10-13 Updated: 2010-02-02 Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/org/UNIVER-233-Z ... ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

May 25, 2011

Re: New Member's Configured on BIRD

by Mike Horwath

On 5/25/11 2:40 PM, "Jay Hanke" <jayhanke(a)MANKATONETWORKS.NET> wrote: >> Then fix0r! >> >> You has the power! > >Farmer, which one is correct? Northern Lights Gigapop or UMN? I bet former. Later is AS217 if memory serves... -- Mike Horwath ipHouse - Welcome home! drechsau(a)iphouse.net The universe is an island, surrounded by whatever it is that surrounds universes. - Berkeley Fortune ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

May 25, 2011

Re: New Member's Configured on BIRD

by Jay Hanke

> Then fix0r! > > You has the power! Farmer, which one is correct? Northern Lights Gigapop or UMN? jay ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

May 25, 2011

Re: Cacti Graph using SNMPv1?

by Mike Horwath

On 5/25/11 2:24 PM, "Steve Howard" <showard(a)PAULBUNYAN.NET> wrote: >On 05/25/2011 02:15 PM, Mike Horwath wrote: >> On 5/25/11 11:39 AM, "Andrew Hoyos" <hoyosa(a)GMAIL.COM> wrote: >> >>> On May 25, 2011, at 11:33 AM, David Farmer wrote: >>> >>>> On 5/25/11 11:07 CDT, Jay Hanke wrote: >>>>>> Did you check that the Data Source for the graph is also using the >>>>>> 64-bit counters? >>>>>> >>>>>>> Nothing special in logs either showing a problem. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Steve - your own monitoring showing problems at all with data >>>>> Are you looking at Gi-0/2? >>>> it is possible this is a problem on the Cisco side too, that port >>>> Gi-0/2 on the 3560E got changed to being in a port channel sometime >>>>this >>>> creates weird issues. They usually go away after a reboot. >>> Yeah, I've seen this same thing on a few occasions when adding/removing >>> interfaces from port channels. >>> >>> Also, double check you've got "snmp-server ifindex persist" set in the >>> config, as you might be polling something else too. >> Shit, that's a great point! >> >> We aways have that set. >> >> Steve, can you check that? >> >> Could very well be a different port now :( >> >> But once you set it to persist (if it wasn't set), I can look into >>things >> further. >> > >It was not there. It is now. Super duper, I'll have it 'rescan' things. Hope it donut scrwed up things! -- Mike Horwath ipHouse - Welcome home! drechsau(a)iphouse.net The universe is an island, surrounded by whatever it is that surrounds universes. - Berkeley Fortune ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

May 25, 2011

Re: Cacti Graph using SNMPv1?

by Steve Howard

On 05/25/2011 02:15 PM, Mike Horwath wrote: > On 5/25/11 11:39 AM, "Andrew Hoyos" <hoyosa(a)GMAIL.COM> wrote: > >> On May 25, 2011, at 11:33 AM, David Farmer wrote: >> >>> On 5/25/11 11:07 CDT, Jay Hanke wrote: >>>>> Did you check that the Data Source for the graph is also using the >>>>> 64-bit counters? >>>>> >>>>>> Nothing special in logs either showing a problem. >>>>>> >>>>>> Steve - your own monitoring showing problems at all with data >>>> Are you looking at Gi-0/2? >>> it is possible this is a problem on the Cisco side too, that port >>> Gi-0/2 on the 3560E got changed to being in a port channel sometime this >>> creates weird issues. They usually go away after a reboot. >> Yeah, I've seen this same thing on a few occasions when adding/removing >> interfaces from port channels. >> >> Also, double check you've got "snmp-server ifindex persist" set in the >> config, as you might be polling something else too. > Shit, that's a great point! > > We aways have that set. > > Steve, can you check that? > > Could very well be a different port now :( > > But once you set it to persist (if it wasn't set), I can look into things > further. > It was not there. It is now. ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

May 25, 2011

Re: Cacti Graph using SNMPv1?

by Mike Horwath

On 5/25/11 11:39 AM, "Andrew Hoyos" <hoyosa(a)GMAIL.COM> wrote: >On May 25, 2011, at 11:33 AM, David Farmer wrote: > >> On 5/25/11 11:07 CDT, Jay Hanke wrote: >>>> Did you check that the Data Source for the graph is also using the >>>> 64-bit counters? >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Nothing special in logs either showing a problem. >>>>> >>>>> Steve - your own monitoring showing problems at all with data >>> >>> Are you looking at Gi-0/2? >> >> it is possible this is a problem on the Cisco side too, that port >>Gi-0/2 on the 3560E got changed to being in a port channel sometime this >>creates weird issues. They usually go away after a reboot. > >Yeah, I've seen this same thing on a few occasions when adding/removing >interfaces from port channels. > >Also, double check you've got "snmp-server ifindex persist" set in the >config, as you might be polling something else too. Shit, that's a great point! We aways have that set. Steve, can you check that? Could very well be a different port now :( But once you set it to persist (if it wasn't set), I can look into things further. -- Mike Horwath ipHouse - Welcome home! drechsau(a)iphouse.net The universe is an island, surrounded by whatever it is that surrounds universes. - Berkeley Fortune ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

May 25, 2011

Re: Cacti Graph using SNMPv1?

by Mike Horwath

On 5/25/11 11:01 AM, "Justin Krejci" <jkrejci(a)USINTERNET.COM> wrote: >On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 15:53 +0000, Mike Horwath wrote: >> On 5/24/11 6:28 PM, "Justin Krejci" <jkrejci(a)USINTERNET.COM> wrote: >> >> > >> >'micemn-gateway-2.micemn.net - Traffic - Gi0/2' in Cacti is exhibiting >> >signs of using SNMPv1 counters (frequent gaps at higher bandwidth >>usage) >> > >> >Is this a known issue? If not I presume someone at iphouse can fix this >> >easily. >> > >> >The "Fix64bit" plugin for Cacti is great for correcting this condition >>on >> >the fly if my assumption on the problem is correct. >> >> Your assumption is wrong unfortunately. >> >> I wish I had made a mistake, but stats.micemn.net's Cacti config is >>64bit >> for gathering of stuff. >> >> And using SNMPv2 according to the configuration. > >Did you check that the Data Source for the graph is also using the >64-bit counters? Verified! -- Mike Horwath ipHouse - Welcome home! drechsau(a)iphouse.net The universe is an island, surrounded by whatever it is that surrounds universes. - Berkeley Fortune ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

May 25, 2011

Re: New Member's Configured on BIRD

by Mike Horwath

On 5/25/11 11:46 AM, "James Montz" <jamesmontz(a)MANKATONETWORKS.NET> wrote: >Added IPv4 and IPv6 Configuration for City of Windomw (ASN: 46692). >Welcome! >Also noticed that IPv6 config for UMN (ASN: 57) was not in, so added that >as well. > >Maybe its a matter of semantics, but the website lists Northern Lights >GigaPoP as ASN: 57, NOT UMN. Then fix0r! You has the power! -- Mike Horwath ipHouse - Welcome home! drechsau(a)iphouse.net The universe is an island, surrounded by whatever it is that surrounds universes. - Berkeley Fortune ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

May 25, 2011

New Member's Configured on BIRD

by James Montz

Added IPv4 and IPv6 Configuration for City of Windomw (ASN: 46692). Welcome! Also noticed that IPv6 config for UMN (ASN: 57) was not in, so added that as well. Maybe its a matter of semantics, but the website lists Northern Lights GigaPoP as ASN: 57, NOT UMN. --------------------------------------------------- *James C. Montz* Senior Consultant *Mankato Networks LLC* <http://www.mankatonetworks.net/>320 East Liberty Street <http://maps.google.com/maps?q=320+East+Liberty+Street%2CMankato%2CMN+56001&…>Mankato, MN 56001 *Phone:* *(320)-496-6689* *Email: jamesmontz(a)mankatonetworks.net* *Web: http://www.mankatonetworks.net Skype: james.montz* * http://www.linkedin.com/in/jmontz* ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

May 25, 2011