My minutes and attendance log from our last UG meeting are attached. Cheers, anthony Anthony Anderberg Sr. Systems Analyst [NUtel_email_logo_1] 320-234-5239 anthonyanderberg@nu-telecom.net<mailto:anthonyanderberg@nu-telecom.net> www.nutelecom.net<http://www.nutelecom.net>
From the minutes:
"Jay Hanke commented that other exchanges have reported their switch's internal queues overflowing when there was more than 2 orders of difference in the traffic volume between the largest and smallest members." How do we go about measuring for that? Frank From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of anthonyanderberg@nu-telecom.net Sent: Friday, November 04, 2016 1:33 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] UG21 Minutes and Attendance Notes My minutes and attendance log from our last UG meeting are attached. Cheers, anthony Anthony Anderberg Sr. Systems Analyst [NUtel_email_logo_1] 320-234-5239 anthonyanderberg@nu-telecom.net<mailto:anthonyanderberg@nu-telecom.net> www.nutelecom.net<http://www.nutelecom.net> ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
I think Jay's point was that our smaller members have 1G interfaces and we're talking about the next generation of switch having 100G interfaces. I bet many of us had similar queue experiences with older platforms during our early 10G migrations, and larger exchanges that are at the 100G level may be seeing queue drops in even modern hardware. So we'll want to interrogate potential switch vendors and be mindful of the issue. Sorry if that wasn't clear. Cheers, anthony Anthony Anderberg Sr. Systems Analyst [NUtel_email_logo_1] 320-234-5239 anthonyanderberg@nu-telecom.net<mailto:anthonyanderberg@nu-telecom.net> www.nutelecom.net<http://www.nutelecom.net> From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2016 7:23 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] UG21 Minutes and Attendance Notes
From the minutes:
"Jay Hanke commented that other exchanges have reported their switch's internal queues overflowing when there was more than 2 orders of difference in the traffic volume between the largest and smallest members." How do we go about measuring for that? Frank From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of anthonyanderberg@nu-telecom.net Sent: Friday, November 04, 2016 1:33 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] UG21 Minutes and Attendance Notes My minutes and attendance log from our last UG meeting are attached. Cheers, anthony Anthony Anderberg Sr. Systems Analyst [NUtel_email_logo_1] 320-234-5239 anthonyanderberg@nu-telecom.net<mailto:anthonyanderberg@nu-telecom.net> www.nutelecom.net<http://www.nutelecom.net> ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
Were there any additional details regarding these issues? Do these issues begin to affect all traffic (some kind of queue exhaustion) or are they typically only experienced when passing traffic from the high bandwidth 100G links to the "low" bandwidth 1G links, or vice versa? Ben Wiechman Network Engineer IV | Arvig Direct: 320.256.0184 Cell: 320.247.3224 Office: 320.256.7471 ben.wiechman@arvig.com On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:52 PM, anthonyanderberg@nu-telecom.net < anthonyanderberg@nu-telecom.net> wrote:
I think Jay’s point was that our smaller members have 1G interfaces and we’re talking about the next generation of switch having 100G interfaces. I bet many of us had similar queue experiences with older platforms during our early 10G migrations, and larger exchanges that are at the 100G level may be seeing queue drops in even modern hardware. So we’ll want to interrogate potential switch vendors and be mindful of the issue. Sorry if that wasn’t clear.
Cheers,
anthony
*Anthony Anderberg*
Sr. Systems Analyst
[image: NUtel_email_logo_1]
320-234-5239
anthonyanderberg@nu-telecom.net
*www.nutelecom.net <http://www.nutelecom.net>*
*From:* MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] *On Behalf Of *Frank Bulk *Sent:* Saturday, November 05, 2016 7:23 PM *To:* MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET *Subject:* Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] UG21 Minutes and Attendance Notes
From the minutes:
“Jay Hanke commented that other exchanges have reported their switch’s internal queues overflowing when there was more than 2 orders of difference in the traffic volume between the largest and smallest members.“
How do we go about measuring for that?
Frank
*From:* MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] *On Behalf Of *anthonyanderberg@nu-telecom.net *Sent:* Friday, November 04, 2016 1:33 PM *To:* MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET *Subject:* [MICE-DISCUSS] UG21 Minutes and Attendance Notes
My minutes and attendance log from our last UG meeting are attached.
Cheers,
anthony
*Anthony Anderberg*
Sr. Systems Analyst
[image: NUtel_email_logo_1]
320-234-5239
anthonyanderberg@nu-telecom.net
*www.nutelecom.net <http://www.nutelecom.net>*
------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
participants (4)
-
anthonyanderberg＠nu-telecom.net -
Ben Wiechman -
Frank Bulk -
Richard Laager