I think Jay’s point was that our smaller members have 1G interfaces and we’re talking about the next generation of switch having 100G interfaces. I bet many of us had similar queue experiences with older platforms during our early 10G migrations, and larger exchanges that are at the 100G level may be seeing queue drops in even modern hardware. So we’ll want to interrogate potential switch vendors and be mindful of the issue. Sorry if that wasn’t clear.

Cheers,

anthony

Anthony Anderberg

Sr. Systems Analyst

320-234-5239

anthonyanderberg@nu-telecom.net

www.nutelecom.net

From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2016 7:23 PM
To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET
Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] UG21 Minutes and Attendance Notes

From the minutes:

“Jay Hanke commented that other exchanges have reported their switch’s internal queues overflowing when there was more than 2 orders of difference in the traffic volume between the largest and smallest members.“

How do we go about measuring for that?

Frank

From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of anthonyanderberg@nu-telecom.net
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2016 1:33 PM
To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET
Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] UG21 Minutes and Attendance Notes

My minutes and attendance log from our last UG meeting are attached.