If you take a look some of the others that publicly report bandwidth levels, as an example: https://www.seattleix.net/statistics/ https://www.netnod.se/ix-stats/sums/All.html https://www.torix.ca/traffic-statistics/ https://ix-denver.org/traffic/ http://www.kcix.net/ All seem to be reporting/collecting both in/out, but not stacking them together. I’d agree that the 500gbps seems “double counted”. — Andrew Hoyos hoyosa@gmail.com
On Jan 3, 2019, at 3:48 PM, David Farmer <farmer@UMN.EDU> wrote:
I did a Linkedin Post on it
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6486075016726269952 <https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6486075016726269952>
It has 67 likes, 7 comments, and just over 3000 views as of right now.
The main reason I'm mentioning it is some comments about using ingress+egress for traffic level.
As I think I've said before, we should use one or the other, not the sum of them.
On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 8:35 PM Jeremy Lumby <jlumby@mnvoip.com <mailto:jlumby@mnvoip.com>> wrote: Just wanted to congratulate all MICE members for crossing the 500Gig mark tonight for the first time.
-- =============================================== David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu <mailto:Email%3Afarmer@umn.edu> Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 ===============================================
To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 <http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1>