Just wanted to congratulate all MICE members for crossing the 500Gig mark tonight for the first time.
I did a Linkedin Post on it https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6486075016726269952 It has 67 likes, 7 comments, and just over 3000 views as of right now. The main reason I'm mentioning it is some comments about using ingress+egress for traffic level. As I think I've said before, we should use one or the other, not the sum of them. On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 8:35 PM Jeremy Lumby <jlumby@mnvoip.com> wrote:
Just wanted to congratulate all MICE members for crossing the 500Gig mark tonight for the first time.
-- =============================================== David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 ===============================================
If you take a look some of the others that publicly report bandwidth levels, as an example: https://www.seattleix.net/statistics/ https://www.netnod.se/ix-stats/sums/All.html https://www.torix.ca/traffic-statistics/ https://ix-denver.org/traffic/ http://www.kcix.net/ All seem to be reporting/collecting both in/out, but not stacking them together. I’d agree that the 500gbps seems “double counted”. — Andrew Hoyos hoyosa@gmail.com
On Jan 3, 2019, at 3:48 PM, David Farmer <farmer@UMN.EDU> wrote:
I did a Linkedin Post on it
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6486075016726269952 <https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6486075016726269952>
It has 67 likes, 7 comments, and just over 3000 views as of right now.
The main reason I'm mentioning it is some comments about using ingress+egress for traffic level.
As I think I've said before, we should use one or the other, not the sum of them.
On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 8:35 PM Jeremy Lumby <jlumby@mnvoip.com <mailto:jlumby@mnvoip.com>> wrote: Just wanted to congratulate all MICE members for crossing the 500Gig mark tonight for the first time.
-- =============================================== David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu <mailto:Email%3Afarmer@umn.edu> Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 ===============================================
To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 <http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1>
That was my personal opinion too but many years ago the majority opted for the stacked version, we can chew on it again next week if membership wants. I had actually been creating/exporting two versions of the graph for a long time but the non-stacked one never got referenced so it fell by the wayside during the Arista migration. The non-stacked graph was similar looking to what the folks at Torix do but with a MICEish color scheme: https://www.torix.ca/img/torix-day.png [signature_1212707895] From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> on behalf of David Farmer <farmer@UMN.EDU> Reply-To: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> Date: Thursday, January 3, 2019 at 3:49 PM To: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] New Years Traffic I did a Linkedin Post on it https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6486075016726269952 It has 67 likes, 7 comments, and just over 3000 views as of right now. The main reason I'm mentioning it is some comments about using ingress+egress for traffic level. As I think I've said before, we should use one or the other, not the sum of them. On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 8:35 PM Jeremy Lumby <jlumby@mnvoip.com<mailto:jlumby@mnvoip.com>> wrote: Just wanted to congratulate all MICE members for crossing the 500Gig mark tonight for the first time. -- =============================================== David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu<mailto:Email%3Afarmer@umn.edu> Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 =============================================== ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
FYI, As of right now the LinkedIn post I did 9 days ago, has 104 Likes, 12 Comments, and over 7000 views. https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6486075016726269952 Also, based on the discussion yesterday, this morning I posted the following to the LinkedIn comment thread; @Job Snijders it comes down to the interpretation of the Open-IX standard. ”The IXP MUST publish on a publicly available website the total sum of all incoming and outgoing traffic in bps from all connected networks on the public peering VLAN.” We took that as ”the sum of all ingress and egress [together].” Where it seems others took that as ”the sum of all ingress and [separately the sum of all] egress.” We discussed this at our meeting yesterday, and we are going to stick with our interpretation, at least for now. Our graph is clear; our total number is the sum of both ingress and egress, and it has them both separately identified along with the total of the two. This allows the reader to decide how to interpret the data. open-ix.silkstart.com On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 4:18 PM AnthonyAnderberg@nuvera.net < AnthonyAnderberg@nuvera.net> wrote:
That was my personal opinion too but many years ago the majority opted for the stacked version, we can chew on it again next week if membership wants.
I had actually been creating/exporting two versions of the graph for a long time but the non-stacked one never got referenced so it fell by the wayside during the Arista migration.
The non-stacked graph was similar looking to what the folks at Torix do but with a MICEish color scheme:
https://www.torix.ca/img/torix-day.png
[image: signature_1212707895]
*From: *MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> on behalf of David Farmer <farmer@UMN.EDU> *Reply-To: *MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> *Date: *Thursday, January 3, 2019 at 3:49 PM *To: *MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> *Subject: *Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] New Years Traffic
I did a Linkedin Post on it
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6486075016726269952
It has 67 likes, 7 comments, and just over 3000 views as of right now.
The main reason I'm mentioning it is some comments about using ingress+egress for traffic level.
As I think I've said before, we should use one or the other, not the sum of them.
On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 8:35 PM Jeremy Lumby <jlumby@mnvoip.com> wrote:
Just wanted to congratulate all MICE members for crossing the 500Gig mark tonight for the first time.
--
=============================================== David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 ===============================================
------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
-- =============================================== David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 ===============================================
participants (5)
-
Andrew Hoyos -
AnthonyAnderberg＠nuvera.net -
David Farmer -
Jeremy Lumby -
Reid Fishler