Both v4 and v6 sessions to both RR have been looking stable for us as well, 8w5d session uptime for all of them. No anomolous traffic changes to/from the RR's as observed by Cacti over the last two days. ________________________________________ From: MICE Discuss [MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] on behalf of Doug McIntyre [merlyn@IPHOUSE.NET] Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 11:44 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Route Server stability On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 11:39:34AM -0500, Tim Peiffer wrote:

The route reflectors have been bouncing a few times in the last 2 days. The connections had been pretty stable since the route reflectors were swapped out back at the end of March.

206.108.255.5/AS21709.micemn.net

Hmm, anybody else seeing anything? The RR's are up and stable as far as I can see. There were a couple Hold timer expired logs for 46692 & 53480 in the last few days, but otherwise the machines and processes have been up 61 days. My own sessions to them are stable. 206.108.255.1 53679 205718 189672 0 81 8w5d17h Establ inet.0: 730/1247/1246/1 206.108.255.2 53679 210505 189734 0 55 8w5d18h Establ inet.0: 516/1243/1242/1 Just you? -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn@iphouse.net> ~.~ ipHouse ~.~ Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades

On 6/4/15 11:44 AM, Doug McIntyre wrote:

On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 11:39:34AM -0500, Tim Peiffer wrote:

...

The route reflectors have been bouncing a few times in the last 2 days. The connections had been pretty stable since the route reflectors were swapped out back at the end of March.

206.108.255.5/AS21709.micemn.net

Hmm, anybody else seeing anything? The RR's are up and stable as far as I can see.

There were a couple Hold timer expired logs for 46692 & 53480 in the last few days, but otherwise the machines and processes have been up 61 days.

My own sessions to them are stable.

206.108.255.1 53679 205718 189672 0 81 8w5d17h Establ inet.0: 730/1247/1246/1 206.108.255.2 53679 210505 189734 0 55 8w5d18h Establ inet.0: 516/1243/1242/1

Just you? Maybe, but only the one peer is bouncing.

206.108.255.5 4 21709 362 399 9741655 0 0 00:56:29 5 Jun 4 10:57:20: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor 206.108.255.5 4/0 (hold time expired) 0 bytes Jun 4 10:57:20: %BGP-5-NBR_RESET: Neighbor 206.108.255.5 reset (BGP Notification sent) Jun 4 10:57:20: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 206.108.255.5 Down BGP Notification sent Jun 4 10:57:20: %BGP_SESSION-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 206.108.255.5 IPv4 Unicast topology base removed from session BGP Notification sent Jun 4 11:00:41: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 206.108.255.5 Up -- Tim Peiffer Network Support Engineer Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota/NorthernLights GigaPOP +1 612 626-7884 (desk)

Yes. 206.108.255.5 . I apologize for confusing the addresses with the route servers. I will contact implex directly.. again, my apologies. Tim On 6/4/15 11:57 AM, Matthew Beckwell wrote:

Tim, The IP/AS you referenced belongs to Implex...is that the peer you're seeing drop? ~Matthew

On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Tim Peiffer <peiffer@umn.edu <mailto:peiffer@umn.edu>> wrote:

The route reflectors have been bouncing a few times in the last 2 days. The connections had been pretty stable since the route reflectors were swapped out back at the end of March.

206.108.255.5/AS21709.micemn.net <http://206.108.255.5/AS21709.micemn.net>

-- Tim Peiffer Network Support Engineer Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota/NorthernLights GigaPOP

+1 612 626-7884 <tel:%2B1%20612%20626-7884> (desk)

------------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

-- Tim Peiffer Network Support Engineer Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota/NorthernLights GigaPOP +1 612 626-7884 (desk)