I have a customer who's ISP is TTM and they are buying from Zayo, as well as Level3. My route to and from them is currently going through MICE to the GigaPOP to Onvoy/Zayo to TTM. I am experiencing about 4% packet loss to them when I take this route, as opposed to going across Level3 to get to them is clean. I can cleanly get to 69.147.218.51 however the next hop of 192.35.86.49 is showing the same 4% packet loss that I am seeing to my end customer. Can anyone help clean up this link. I love the low latency (approx 2ms) to them, however the loss is not acceptable. Thanks, Jeremy ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
Jeremy, On 08/17/2012 01:45 PM, Jeremy Lumby wrote:
I have a customer who's ISP is TTM and they are buying from Zayo, as well as Level3. My route to and from them is currently going through MICE to the GigaPOP to Onvoy/Zayo to TTM. I am experiencing about 4% packet loss to them when I take this route, as opposed to going across Level3 to get to them is clean. I can cleanly get to 69.147.218.51 however the next hop of 192.35.86.49 is showing the same 4% packet loss that I am seeing to my end customer. Can anyone help clean up this link. I love the low latency (approx 2ms) to them, however the loss is not acceptable.
I'm glad that you mentioned this. We received a call yesterday from a State of MN customer who was experiencing trouble also with traffic to/from the GigaPOP via Onvoy/Zayo. They also saw trouble at 192.35.86.49. Seems something is broken there... Thanks, Steve ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 14:06 -0500, Steve Howard wrote:
I'm glad that you mentioned this. We received a call yesterday from a State of MN customer who was experiencing trouble also with traffic to/from the GigaPOP via Onvoy/Zayo. They also saw trouble at 192.35.86.49. Seems something is broken there...
I didn't personally verify the reports of packet loss, but I sent a message to the Zayo IP NOC to give them a heads-up on the issue. -- Richard ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 02:10:22PM -0500, Richard Laager wrote:
I didn't personally verify the reports of packet loss, but I sent a message to the Zayo IP NOC to give them a heads-up on the issue.
Would you share the output when/if you get some? -- Mike Horwath ipHouse - Welcome home! drechsau@iphouse.net The universe is an island, surrounded by whatever it is that surrounds universes. - Berkeley Fortune ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
We also have a case with Zayo on behalf of a State of Mn connector whose traffic is losing -20% of their packets. When Zayo Bandwidth resolves our issue, it may resolve yours. Cordially, Frank Sent from my iPhone On Aug 17, 2012, at 1:45 PM, Jeremy Lumby <jlumby@MNVOIP.COM> wrote:
I have a customer who's ISP is TTM and they are buying from Zayo, as well as Level3. My route to and from them is currently going through MICE to the GigaPOP to Onvoy/Zayo to TTM. I am experiencing about 4% packet loss to them when I take this route, as opposed to going across Level3 to get to them is clean. I can cleanly get to 69.147.218.51 however the next hop of 192.35.86.49 is showing the same 4% packet loss that I am seeing to my end customer. Can anyone help clean up this link. I love the low latency (approx 2ms) to them, however the loss is not acceptable.
Thanks, Jeremy
########################################################################
To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
Mike@Arvig and I have been troubleshooting an issue since yesterday that seems like it's going to fit this thread as well. By the looks of my graphs the problem seems to clear up during low-traffic times. Does anyone have a good feel for when the issue started? Anthony Anderberg Sr. Systems Analyst 320-234-5239 anthonyanderberg@nu-telecom.net -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Frank DiGravina Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 2:09 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Packetloss between GigaPOP and Onvoy/Zayo We also have a case with Zayo on behalf of a State of Mn connector whose traffic is losing -20% of their packets. When Zayo Bandwidth resolves our issue, it may resolve yours. Cordially, Frank Sent from my iPhone On Aug 17, 2012, at 1:45 PM, Jeremy Lumby <jlumby@MNVOIP.COM> wrote:
I have a customer who's ISP is TTM and they are buying from Zayo, as well as Level3. My route to and from them is currently going through MICE to the GigaPOP to Onvoy/Zayo to TTM. I am experiencing about 4% packet loss to them when I take this route, as opposed to going across Level3 to get to them is clean. I can cleanly get to 69.147.218.51 however the next hop of 192.35.86.49 is showing the same 4% packet loss that I am seeing to my end customer. Can anyone help clean up this link. I love the low latency (approx 2ms) to them, however the loss is not acceptable.
Thanks, Jeremy
###################################################################### ##
To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
I have a feeling it has been going on for months, today is just the first I have spent some time to gather some concrete evidence -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Anthony Anderberg Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 2:51 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Packetloss between GigaPOP and Onvoy/Zayo Mike@Arvig and I have been troubleshooting an issue since yesterday that seems like it's going to fit this thread as well. By the looks of my graphs the problem seems to clear up during low-traffic times. Does anyone have a good feel for when the issue started? Anthony Anderberg Sr. Systems Analyst 320-234-5239 anthonyanderberg@nu-telecom.net -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Frank DiGravina Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 2:09 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Packetloss between GigaPOP and Onvoy/Zayo We also have a case with Zayo on behalf of a State of Mn connector whose traffic is losing -20% of their packets. When Zayo Bandwidth resolves our issue, it may resolve yours. Cordially, Frank Sent from my iPhone On Aug 17, 2012, at 1:45 PM, Jeremy Lumby <jlumby@MNVOIP.COM> wrote:
I have a customer who's ISP is TTM and they are buying from Zayo, as well as Level3. My route to and from them is currently going through MICE to the GigaPOP to Onvoy/Zayo to TTM. I am experiencing about 4% packet loss to them when I take this route, as opposed to going across Level3 to get to them is clean. I can cleanly get to 69.147.218.51 however the next hop of 192.35.86.49 is showing the same 4% packet loss that I am seeing to my end customer. Can anyone help clean up this link. I love the low latency (approx 2ms) to them, however the loss is not acceptable.
Thanks, Jeremy
###################################################################### ##
To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
participants (6)
-
Anthony Anderberg
-
Frank DiGravina
-
Jeremy Lumby
-
Mike Horwath
-
Richard Laager
-
Steve Howard