I don't do anything with MICE's Cacti. -- Richard

On Mar 29, 2017, at 07:33, Dean Bahls <dean.bahls@COOPERATIVE-NETWORKS.COM> wrote:

Yeah, sorry about that guys. We did just that. We might have some tweaks to complete on the switch if Richard or Anthony can’t connect to it.

Thanks,

Dean

From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Jeremy Lumby Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 5:55 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] CNS Remote switch traffic not reporting

They upgraded their switch, Anthony just needs to update SNMP monitoring to reflect the new port numbers

Jeremy Lumby Minnesota VoIP 9217 17th Ave S Suite 216 Bloomington MN 55425 612.355.7740 Main 612.392.6814 Direct 952.873.7425 EFax jlumby@mnvoip.com

-------- Original message -------- From: Jason Hanke <jayhanke@NEUTRALPATH.NET> Date: 3/28/17 5:52 PM (GMT-06:00) To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] CNS Remote switch traffic not reporting

From : Jason Hanke [jayhanke@NEUTRALPATH.NET] To : MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET [MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] Date : Tuesday, March 28 2017 17:52:45 It looks like the traffic stopped reporting a couple of days ago on the CNS remote. Is everything ok?

-- Jay Hanke CTO Neutral Path Communications 3 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 204 Mankato, MN 56001 (507) 327-2398 mobile jayhanke@neutralpath.net www.neutralpath.net

To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

I believe the community string is the same but the ifId numbers have all changed, I'll noodle through that this afternoon. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 29, 2017, at 8:32 AM, Justin Krejci <JKrejci@USINTERNET.COM<mailto:JKrejci@USINTERNET.COM>> wrote: I can check it out today if Anthony is unable to. Did the IP or snmp strings change? -----Original Message----- From: Richard Laager [rlaager@WIKTEL.COM<mailto:rlaager@WIKTEL.COM>] Received: Wednesday, 29 Mar 2017, 8:03AM To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET<mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> [MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET<mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET>] Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] CNS Remote switch traffic not reporting I don't do anything with MICE's Cacti. -- Richard On Mar 29, 2017, at 07:33, Dean Bahls <dean.bahls@COOPERATIVE-NETWORKS.COM<mailto:dean.bahls@COOPERATIVE-NETWORKS.COM>> wrote: Yeah, sorry about that guys. We did just that. We might have some tweaks to complete on the switch if Richard or Anthony can’t connect to it. Thanks, Dean From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Jeremy Lumby Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 5:55 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET<mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] CNS Remote switch traffic not reporting They upgraded their switch, Anthony just needs to update SNMP monitoring to reflect the new port numbers Jeremy Lumby Minnesota VoIP 9217 17th Ave S Suite 216 Bloomington MN 55425 612.355.7740 Main 612.392.6814 Direct 952.873.7425 EFax jlumby@mnvoip.com<mailto:jlumby@mnvoip.com> -------- Original message -------- From: Jason Hanke <jayhanke@NEUTRALPATH.NET<mailto:jayhanke@NEUTRALPATH.NET>> Date: 3/28/17 5:52 PM (GMT-06:00) To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET<mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] CNS Remote switch traffic not reporting ________________________________

From : Jason Hanke [jayhanke@NEUTRALPATH.NET<mailto:jayhanke@NEUTRALPATH.NET>] To : MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET<mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> [MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET<mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET>] Date : Tuesday, March 28 2017 17:52:45

It looks like the traffic stopped reporting a couple of days ago on the CNS remote. Is everything ok? -- Jay Hanke CTO Neutral Path Communications 3 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 204 Mankato, MN 56001 (507) 327-2398 mobile jayhanke@neutralpath.net<mailto:jayhanke@neutralpath.net> www.neutralpath.net<http://www.neutralpath.net> ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

On 03/29/2017 08:47 AM, Andrew Hoyos wrote:

How does the community feel about something other than cacti, so you don’t have to click 8000 times when an interface changes? :)

Observium could do the same thing here (perhaps with even more information than we have now), and aggregate could automatically be generated based on an interface description tag (i.e.: “Peering: SomeISP [10g]” )

I would happily volunteer VM/time/effort to help make this morebetter.

I am certainly a fan of this system when compared to cacti. For those who have not used it, once you add the host it pretty much auto discovers everything and stays up to date. The interface description parsing bit that Andrew mentioned is especially nice. PHP Weathermap is currently integrating with Cacti, there is a way to do that with Observium as well, but requires some pointing and clicking (or manual file manipulation). -- Chris Wopat Network Engineer, WiscNet wopat@wiscnet.net 608-210-3965

On Mar 29, 2017, at 1:22 PM, David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu> wrote:

Can Observium produce aggregate graphs? I was googling but found mixed answers to the question.

Yes. Few ways to do it, but graph.php + type "multi-port_bits” are the basic pieces. This is what we use to generate graphs here, dynamically: http://www.mkeix.net/traffic/details/

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Chris Wopat <wopat@wiscnet.net> wrote: On 03/29/2017 08:47 AM, Andrew Hoyos wrote: How does the community feel about something other than cacti, so you don’t have to click 8000 times when an interface changes? :)

Observium could do the same thing here (perhaps with even more information than we have now), and aggregate could automatically be generated based on an interface description tag (i.e.: “Peering: SomeISP [10g]” )

I would happily volunteer VM/time/effort to help make this morebetter.

I am certainly a fan of this system when compared to cacti. For those who have not used it, once you add the host it pretty much auto discovers everything and stays up to date.

The interface description parsing bit that Andrew mentioned is especially nice. PHP Weathermap is currently integrating with Cacti, there is a way to do that with Observium as well, but requires some pointing and clicking (or manual file manipulation).

-- Chris Wopat Network Engineer, WiscNet wopat@wiscnet.net 608-210-3965

-- =============================================== David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 ===============================================

To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

On Mar 29, 2017, at 9:06 AM, Jeremy Lumby <jlumby@mnvoip.com> wrote:

Keeping the weathermap, and historical data are my biggest concerns.

We’re going to lose most historical data (at least from a port -> participant level) when we migrate to the Arista anyway, unless someone is going to play RRD masseuse. Now would be the time. As Chris mentioned, PHP Weathermap is easily integrated, similar to the current Cacti methodology. (i.e.: point to RRD file on disk somewhere)

-----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Andrew Hoyos Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 8:48 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] CNS Remote switch traffic not reporting

How does the community feel about something other than cacti, so you don’t have to click 8000 times when an interface changes? :)

Observium could do the same thing here (perhaps with even more information than we have now), and aggregate could automatically be generated based on an interface description tag (i.e.: “Peering: SomeISP [10g]” )

I would happily volunteer VM/time/effort to help make this morebetter.

-- Andrew Hoyos hoyosa@gmail.com

...

On Mar 29, 2017, at 8:43 AM, anthonyanderberg@nu-telecom.net <anthonyanderberg@NU-TELECOM.NET> wrote:

I believe the community string is the same but the ifId numbers have all changed, I'll noodle through that this afternoon.

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 29, 2017, at 8:32 AM, Justin Krejci <JKrejci@USINTERNET.COM> wrote:

...

I can check it out today if Anthony is unable to. Did the IP or snmp strings change?

-----Original Message----- From: Richard Laager [rlaager@WIKTEL.COM] Received: Wednesday, 29 Mar 2017, 8:03AM To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET [MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] CNS Remote switch traffic not reporting

I don't do anything with MICE's Cacti.

-- Richard

On Mar 29, 2017, at 07:33, Dean Bahls <dean.bahls@COOPERATIVE-NETWORKS.COM> wrote:

...

Yeah, sorry about that guys. We did just that. We might have some tweaks to complete on the switch if Richard or Anthony can’t connect to it.

Thanks,

Dean

From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Jeremy Lumby Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 5:55 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] CNS Remote switch traffic not reporting

They upgraded their switch, Anthony just needs to update SNMP monitoring to reflect the new port numbers

Jeremy Lumby Minnesota VoIP 9217 17th Ave S Suite 216 Bloomington MN 55425 612.355.7740 Main 612.392.6814 Direct 952.873.7425 EFax jlumby@mnvoip.com

-------- Original message -------- From: Jason Hanke <jayhanke@NEUTRALPATH.NET> Date: 3/28/17 5:52 PM (GMT-06:00) To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] CNS Remote switch traffic not reporting

From : Jason Hanke [jayhanke@NEUTRALPATH.NET] To : MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET [MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] Date : Tuesday, March 28 2017 17:52:45 It looks like the traffic stopped reporting a couple of days ago on the CNS remote. Is everything ok?

-- Jay Hanke CTO Neutral Path Communications 3 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 204 Mankato, MN 56001 (507) 327-2398 mobile jayhanke@neutralpath.net www.neutralpath.net

To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1

I concur about Anthony! -----Original Message----- From: Richard Laager [rlaager@WIKTEL.COM] Received: Wednesday, 29 Mar 2017, 9:25AM To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET [MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] CNS Remote switch traffic not reporting On 03/29/2017 09:23 AM, Andrew Hoyos wrote:

We’re going to lose most historical data (at least from a port -> participant level) when we migrate to the Arista anyway, unless someone is going to play RRD masseuse.

Anthony routinely copies the RRD files, because he's awesome! :) -- Richard