This weekend while diligently avoiding my wife's "honey-do list" I wrote a script to parse stats via telnet from Jeremy and Doug's excellent new looking glass. I didn't see any commands that would give the number of MICE peers, so that number is actually the number of gateways in the routing tables... and of course the total number of connected addresses is just for fun. If anyone sees other numbers worth graphing let me know. I also spent a little time on the Weathermap, same username and password as before: http://micelg.usinternet.com/cacti/ Hopefully you'll all be more impressed than my wife was... Anthony Anderberg Sr. Systems Analyst [NUtel_email_logo_1] 320-234-5239 anthonyanderberg@nu-telecom.net<mailto:anthonyanderberg@nu-telecom.net> www.nutelecom.net ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
I appreciate the work, it is looking better all the time. Would it be possible to list the Mice Member's name on the individual graphs? The only other minor thing I could think of to clean things up is to remove the original MICE switch from Cacti since the switch is no longer in the rack. Thanks, Jeremy From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Anthony Anderberg Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 5:04 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] New MICE Looking Glass This weekend while diligently avoiding my wife's "honey-do list" I wrote a script to parse stats via telnet from Jeremy and Doug's excellent new looking glass. I didn't see any commands that would give the number of MICE peers, so that number is actually the number of gateways in the routing tables… and of course the total number of connected addresses is just for fun. If anyone sees other numbers worth graphing let me know. I also spent a little time on the Weathermap, same username and password as before: http://micelg.usinternet.com/cacti/ Hopefully you'll all be more impressed than my wife was… Anthony Anderberg Sr. Systems Analyst 320-234-5239 anthonyanderberg@nu-telecom.net www.nutelecom.net To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 22:03 +0000, Anthony Anderberg wrote:
This weekend while diligently avoiding my wife's "honey-do list" I wrote a script to parse stats via telnet from Jeremy and Doug's excellent new looking glass.
Would you be willing to share those scripts? It seems like it could be useful to graph the number of routes received on my other peering sessions. Richard ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
Might be worth counting unique ASNs as well. Owen Sent from my iPad On Oct 19, 2011, at 12:03 AM, Anthony Anderberg <anthonyanderberg@NU-TELECOM.NET> wrote:
This weekend while diligently avoiding my wife's "honey-do list" I wrote a script to parse stats via telnet from Jeremy and Doug's excellent new looking glass. I didn't see any commands that would give the number of MICE peers, so that number is actually the number of gateways in the routing tables… and of course the total number of connected addresses is just for fun. If anyone sees other numbers worth graphing let me know. I also spent a little time on the Weathermap, same username and password as before: http://micelg.usinternet.com/cacti/
Hopefully you'll all be more impressed than my wife was…
Anthony Anderberg Sr. Systems Analyst <image001.gif> 320-234-5239 anthonyanderberg@nu-telecom.net www.nutelecom.net
To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
Both ASes directly peering and subsidiary customer ASes, or ASes transited to MICE, would be cool too. On 10/18/11 17:33 CDT, Owen DeLong wrote:
Might be worth counting unique ASNs as well.
Owen
Sent from my iPad
On Oct 19, 2011, at 12:03 AM, Anthony Anderberg <anthonyanderberg@NU-TELECOM.NET <mailto:anthonyanderberg@NU-TELECOM.NET>> wrote:
This weekend while diligently avoiding my wife's "honey-do list" I wrote a script to parse stats via telnet from Jeremy and Doug's excellent new looking glass. I didn't see any commands that would give the number of MICE peers, so that number is actually the number of gateways in the routing tables… and of course the total number of connected addresses is just for fun. If anyone sees other numbers worth graphing let me know. I also spent a little time on the Weathermap, same username and password as before:
http://micelg.usinternet.com/cacti/
Hopefully you'll all be more impressed than my wife was…
*Anthony Anderberg*
Sr. Systems Analyst
<image001.gif>
320-234-5239
anthonyanderberg@nu-telecom.net <mailto:anthonyanderberg@nu-telecom.net>
_www.nutelecom.net <http://www.nutelecom.net>_
__
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 <http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 <http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1>
-- =============================================== David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 =============================================== ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 22:03 +0000, Anthony Anderberg wrote:
Did you create the aggregate graph for the MICE home page as well? I'm guessing this is a fairly stock Cacti install. The data appears to be being re-averaged for the yearly graph. For example, there's a peak of 2.86 G on the daily aggregate graph. Here's a zoomed-in link: http://micelg.usinternet.com/cacti/graph.php?action=zoom&local_graph_id=217&rra_id=0&view_type=tree&graph_start=1318989652&graph_end=1318991998&graph_height=150&graph_width=625&title_font_size=10 But the yearly aggregate shows "Max Traffic: 1.47G". If the point of the aggregate graph is to show how big the exchange is, this is a pretty significant difference. My Cacti-fu is pretty weak. I solved this for Wiktel's Cacti installation by only having one RRD per data source. I save 5 years (chosen as a value higher than I would ever care about) of 5 minute samples. Disk space is pretty cheap and I'm at a small ISP, so this works. I'm not sure what the most correct solution for MICE is. Perhaps it would work to set the consolidation function for the yearly RRD to "MAX". Even if that works, I'm not sure how to do that without losing the historical data, though. Richard ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
participants (5)
-
Anthony Anderberg -
David Farmer -
Jeremy Lumby -
Owen DeLong -
Richard Laager