I have completed the maintenance of moving everyone off of the old 4200, and onto the new one. Please let me know if you have any issues, I will be staying around 511 for a little while in the event that you do. I pinged each interface IP as I moved it to verify it pinged, then dropped, and then picked back up again once it was in the new switch. Jeremy Lumby Minnesota VoIP 9217 17th Ave S Suite 216 Bloomington, MN 55425 Main: 612-355-7740 x211 Direct: 612-392-6814 EFax: 952-873-7425 jlumby@mnvoip.com
I can't ping 206.108.255.244 from the graph server at 216.17.46.18 or my systems here, I suspect it needs routes like Doug put in for our access. Also, I assume you copied all of the usernames and SNMP stuff from the main switch config. -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Jeremy Lumby Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2016 2:56 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Maintenance Complete I have completed the maintenance of moving everyone off of the old 4200, and onto the new one. Please let me know if you have any issues, I will be staying around 511 for a little while in the event that you do. I pinged each interface IP as I moved it to verify it pinged, then dropped, and then picked back up again once it was in the new switch. Jeremy Lumby Minnesota VoIP 9217 17th Ave S Suite 216 Bloomington, MN 55425 Main: 612-355-7740 x211 Direct: 612-392-6814 EFax: 952-873-7425 jlumby@mnvoip.com
On 10/04/2016 02:56 PM, Jeremy Lumby wrote:
I have completed the maintenance of moving everyone off of the old 4200, and onto the new one. Please let me know if you have any issues, I will be staying around 511 for a little while in the event that you do. I pinged each interface IP as I moved it to verify it pinged, then dropped, and then picked back up again once it was in the new switch.
All of our peering sessions went down at about 14:45. -- Chris Wopat Network Engineer, WiscNet wopat@wiscnet.net 608-210-3965
On Oct 4, 2016, at 3:02 PM, Chris Wopat <wopat@wiscnet.net> wrote:
On 10/04/2016 02:56 PM, Jeremy Lumby wrote:
I have completed the maintenance of moving everyone off of the old 4200, and onto the new one. Please let me know if you have any issues, I will be staying around 511 for a little while in the event that you do. I pinged each interface IP as I moved it to verify it pinged, then dropped, and then picked back up again once it was in the new switch.
All of our peering sessions went down at about 14:45.
We (AS53597) also lost *all* of our sessions, and shouldn’t have been affected by this in theory. Did something happen to the VC fabric to break it while the maintenance was happening? I mean, hold timers are 90 sec on most of these sessions. -- Andrew Hoyos hoyosa@gmail.com
It appears to happened when the old 4200 was removed from the VC -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Andrew Hoyos Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2016 3:29 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Maintenance Complete
On Oct 4, 2016, at 3:02 PM, Chris Wopat <wopat@wiscnet.net> wrote:
On 10/04/2016 02:56 PM, Jeremy Lumby wrote:
I have completed the maintenance of moving everyone off of the old 4200, and onto the new one. Please let me know if you have any issues, I will be staying around 511 for a little while in the event that you do. I pinged each interface IP as I moved it to verify it pinged, then dropped, and then picked back up again once it was in the new switch.
All of our peering sessions went down at about 14:45.
We (AS53597) also lost *all* of our sessions, and shouldn’t have been affected by this in theory. Did something happen to the VC fabric to break it while the maintenance was happening? I mean, hold timers are 90 sec on most of these sessions. -- Andrew Hoyos hoyosa@gmail.com
On 10/04/2016 03:32 PM, Jeremy Lumby wrote:
It appears to happened when the old 4200 was removed from the VC
http://micelg.usinternet.com/export/graph_385.html Is there a looking glass/router proxy that exists somewhere that would allow MICE participants that do not have login credentials to switches to do some troubleshooting? That with a limited set of commands (show interface, show virtual-chassis, etc) OR a read only account could perhaps be quite useful for the community. -- Chris Wopat Network Engineer, WiscNet wopat@wiscnet.net 608-210-3965
Our looking glass is at route-server.micemn.net Use ssh or telnet with the username: rviews We don't have any RO/proxy interfaces to the switches or route servers directly. -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Chris Wopat Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2016 3:39 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Maintenance Complete On 10/04/2016 03:32 PM, Jeremy Lumby wrote:
It appears to happened when the old 4200 was removed from the VC
http://micelg.usinternet.com/export/graph_385.html Is there a looking glass/router proxy that exists somewhere that would allow MICE participants that do not have login credentials to switches to do some troubleshooting? That with a limited set of commands (show interface, show virtual-chassis, etc) OR a read only account could perhaps be quite useful for the community. -- Chris Wopat Network Engineer, WiscNet wopat@wiscnet.net 608-210-3965
On 10/04/2016 03:54 PM, anthonyanderberg@nu-telecom.net wrote:
Our looking glass is at route-server.micemn.net Use ssh or telnet with the username: rviews
Thank you. I didn't find this listed on the website directly, I may have missed it.
We don't have any RO/proxy interfaces to the switches or route servers directly.
This may be useful to have. There are a few open projects out there that actually have recent updates, although I haven't used enough recent ones to endorse https://github.com/GlobalNOC/routerproxy http://mrlg.op-sec.us/ https://github.com/telephone/LookingGlass .. and likely a lot more. -- Chris Wopat Network Engineer, WiscNet wopat@wiscnet.net 608-210-3965
For the time being all of the ge-1/x/x ports are completely disconnected, and can be removed from the list, however sometime in the future, I would like to stack it with the new 4200, and in that case, the ge-1/x/x ports will come back mostly for new members, or if we need to free up some 10G ports since we are currently forced to use 5 of them for 1G connections. -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Richard Laager Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2016 6:45 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Maintenance Complete On 10/04/2016 03:32 PM, Jeremy Lumby wrote:
It appears to happened when the old 4200 was removed from the VC
So the old 4200 is gone and I should remove all the ge-1/x/x ports from the participants list? -- Richard
participants (5)
-
Andrew Hoyos
-
anthonyanderberg@nu-telecom.net
-
Chris Wopat
-
Jeremy Lumby
-
Richard Laager