Hi all - does anyone have experience with NAT64/PT and opinions on what might be the best hardware platform to use to do it? Thanks! Dave Williams Founder / Visionary Revelation Network Management, Inc. O:763-367-6161 C:763-670-5558
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 05:56:48PM +0000, Dave Williams wrote:
Hi all - does anyone have experience with NAT64/PT and opinions on what might be the best hardware platform to use to do it?
I have only done this via Fortinet gear. It works. Query: why not go native? -- Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau@Geeks.ORG
+1 Dual stack /48 to sub with private v4 on the outside assuming you're out of ipv4. the transition technologies bring in a lot of complexity. On Feb 10, 2018 7:16 AM, "Mike Horwath" <drechsau@geeks.org> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 05:56:48PM +0000, Dave Williams wrote:
Hi all - does anyone have experience with NAT64/PT and opinions on what might be the best hardware platform to use to do it?
I have only done this via Fortinet gear.
It works.
Query: why not go native?
-- Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau@Geeks.ORG
Was hoping to just do v6 to the client, then translate to v4 on the edge… but dual stack with private v4 would work, just more complex. From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Jason Hanke Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 7:39 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] NAT64/NATPT +1 Dual stack /48 to sub with private v4 on the outside assuming you're out of ipv4. the transition technologies bring in a lot of complexity. On Feb 10, 2018 7:16 AM, "Mike Horwath" <drechsau@geeks.org<mailto:drechsau@geeks.org>> wrote: On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 05:56:48PM +0000, Dave Williams wrote:
Hi all - does anyone have experience with NAT64/PT and opinions on what might be the best hardware platform to use to do it?
I have only done this via Fortinet gear. It works. Query: why not go native? -- Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau@Geeks.ORG<mailto:drechsau@Geeks.ORG> ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
If you control the CPE you could also look at DS-Lite. The v4 is tunneled back and then natted. There are open source as well as commercial implementations. Your choice is more about where to put the complexity. On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 7:59 AM, Dave Williams <dave@revnetdata.com> wrote:
Was hoping to just do v6 to the client, then translate to v4 on the edge… but dual stack with private v4 would work, just more complex.
*From:* MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] *On Behalf Of *Jason Hanke *Sent:* Monday, February 12, 2018 7:39 AM *To:* MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET *Subject:* Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] NAT64/NATPT
+1 Dual stack /48 to sub with private v4 on the outside assuming you're out of ipv4.
the transition technologies bring in a lot of complexity.
On Feb 10, 2018 7:16 AM, "Mike Horwath" <drechsau@geeks.org> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 05:56:48PM +0000, Dave Williams wrote:
Hi all - does anyone have experience with NAT64/PT and opinions on what might be the best hardware platform to use to do it?
I have only done this via Fortinet gear.
It works.
Query: why not go native?
-- Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau@Geeks.ORG
------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
-- Jay Hanke CTO Neutral Path Communications 3 Civic Center Plaza, Suite 204 Mankato, MN 56001 (507) 327-2398 mobile jayhanke@neutralpath.net www.neutralpath.net
Last October at the Internet2 Tech Exchange we had an IPv6 only SSID, with DNS64/NAT64 and CLAT. Alan Whinery from U-Hawaii was one of the drivers behind it. This is Alan's talk about it and other related things from his campus; http://ipv6hawaii.org/?p=372 This is the Sunday hands-on workshop where we did more in-depth look at the issues; https://youtu.be/5Kc4haaJ-n8 On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 7:59 AM, Dave Williams <dave@revnetdata.com> wrote:
Was hoping to just do v6 to the client, then translate to v4 on the edge… but dual stack with private v4 would work, just more complex.
*From:* MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] *On Behalf Of *Jason Hanke *Sent:* Monday, February 12, 2018 7:39 AM *To:* MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET *Subject:* Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] NAT64/NATPT
+1 Dual stack /48 to sub with private v4 on the outside assuming you're out of ipv4.
the transition technologies bring in a lot of complexity.
On Feb 10, 2018 7:16 AM, "Mike Horwath" <drechsau@geeks.org> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 05:56:48PM +0000, Dave Williams wrote:
Hi all - does anyone have experience with NAT64/PT and opinions on what might be the best hardware platform to use to do it?
I have only done this via Fortinet gear.
It works.
Query: why not go native?
-- Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau@Geeks.ORG
------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
-- =============================================== David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 <(612)%20626-0815> Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 <(612)%20812-9952> ===============================================
SDN Deployed A10 Thunder to do V6 to V4 and V4 to V4 gary.glissendorf@sdncommunications.com <mailto:gary.glissendorf@sdncommunications.com> 2900 W. 10th St. | Sioux Falls, SD 57104 (w) 605.978.3558 | (c) 605.359-3737 | (tf) 800.247.1442 SDN NOC 877.287.8023 NOC Support email: sdnsupport@sdncommunications.com<mailto:sdnsupport@sdncommunications.com> "Be Excellent to Each Other" From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Dave Williams Sent: Friday, February 9, 2018 11:57 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] NAT64/NATPT Hi all - does anyone have experience with NAT64/PT and opinions on what might be the best hardware platform to use to do it? Thanks! Dave Williams Founder / Visionary Revelation Network Management, Inc. O:763-367-6161 C:763-670-5558 ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ________________________________ ***This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, disclosure, copying, use or distribution of the information included in this message is prohibited -- Please immediately and permanently delete.***
participants (5)
-
Dave Williams -
David Farmer -
Gary Glissendorf -
Jason Hanke -
Mike Horwath