I ran a couple of trace routes to "Minnesota Content". http://mankatonetworks.com/wordpress/?p=68 Hickorytech isn't currently exchanging traffic on the exchange. Would a couple of you who are forward looking run some traces to various Minnesota content and post results? jay ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
Seeing the same issue heading to netins in Iowa. I think ( Not the data guy here) Tracing route to www.netins.net [167.142.226.220] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 4 ms 1 ms 2 ms 198-174-42-254.windomnet.com [198.174.42.254] 2 6 ms 8 ms 8 ms 199.199.48.53 3 22 ms 20 ms 22 ms ge-6-16.car1.Minneapolis1.Level3.net [4.79.160.9] 4 21 ms 22 ms 23 ms vlan51.ebr1.chicago2.level3.net [4.69.138.158] 5 22 ms 21 ms 33 ms ae-6-6.ebr1.chicago1.level3.net [4.69.140.189] 6 25 ms 26 ms 25 ms ae-4-4.car1.minneapolis1.level3.net [4.69.136.105] 7 31 ms 30 ms 31 ms ae-11-11.car2.minneapolis1.level3.net [4.69.136.102] 8 36 ms 38 ms 38 ms nbc-communi.car2.minneapolis1.level3.net [4.59.66.2] 9 * * * Request timed out. 10 * * * Request timed out. 11 36 ms 33 ms 34 ms ins-db1-et-12-1.desm.netins.net [167.142.67.6] 12 34 ms 32 ms 34 ms webhosting.netins.net [167.142.226.220] Trace complete. Dan Olsen Operations Manager Windomnet City OF Windom 443 10th St PO Box 38 Windom MN 56101 507-832-8007 _____ From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Jay Hanke Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 3:07 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Chicago Problem for MN content I ran a couple of trace routes to "Minnesota Content". http://mankatonetworks.com/wordpress/?p=68 Hickorytech isn't currently exchanging traffic on the exchange. Would a couple of you who are forward looking run some traces to various Minnesota content and post results? jay ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS <http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1> &A=1 _____ No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1321 / Virus Database: 1500/3568 - Release Date: 04/12/11 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Dan Olsen <Dano@windomnet.com> wrote:
Seeing the same issue heading to netins in Iowa. I think ( Not the data guy here)
That's awful, did I read that right? Windom->Minneapolis->Chicago->Minneapolis (ON THE SAME CARRRIER!)->?->Iowa I think all of my routing is going to be doughnut from now on... Even C!@#%! can route locally in Minneapolis. ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 04:07:08PM -0500, Jay Hanke wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Dan Olsen <Dano@windomnet.com> wrote:
Seeing the same issue heading to netins in Iowa. I think ( Not the data guy here)
That's awful, did I read that right?
Windom->Minneapolis->Chicago->Minneapolis (ON THE SAME CARRRIER!)->?->Iowa
I think all of my routing is going to be doughnut from now on... Even C!@#%! can route locally in Minneapolis.
Pretty much the same here.. This one heads out to TX same as you mtr connectmn.org Packets Pings Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1. gw-ext-176-88.staff.iphouse.net 0.0% 2 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.0 2. ge0-2-0.m20-2.mpls.iphouse.net 0.0% 2 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.1 3. POS3-3.GW2.MSP3.ALTER.NET 0.0% 2 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.0 4. 0.so-1-2-0.XL4.MSP1.ALTER.NET 0.0% 2 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.0 5. 0.so-7-1-0.XL4.CHI13.ALTER.NET 0.0% 2 10.2 10.1 10.0 10.2 0.1 6. 0.ae4.BR3.CHI13.ALTER.NET 0.0% 1 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 0.0 7. 204.255.168.154 0.0% 1 10.2 10.2 10.2 10.2 0.0 8. ASPEN-COMMUNICATIONS.GigabitEthe 0.0% 1 37.9 37.9 37.9 37.9 0.0 9. H101-230-94-69.adstx.net 0.0% 1 36.6 36.6 36.6 36.6 0.0 10. 74.113.21.164 0.0% 1 37.2 37.2 37.2 37.2 0.0 But this is the same mtr www.511.org Packets Pings Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1. gw-ext-176-88.staff.iphouse.net 0.0% 8 1.0 1.4 0.7 5.3 1.6 2. ge0-2-0.m20-2.mpls.iphouse.net 0.0% 8 0.6 5.0 0.4 31.5 10.9 3. 207-67-87-137.static.twtelecom.n 0.0% 8 0.8 1.1 0.7 3.2 0.9 4. chi2-pr1-ge-7-1-0-0.us.twtelecom 0.0% 8 10.2 10.2 10.1 10.4 0.1 5. tg9-2.cr01.chcgildt.integra.net 0.0% 8 211.5 178.0 64.8 266.4 79.1 6. tg9-3.cr01.mplsmncd.integra.net 0.0% 8 171.0 188.5 132.4 263.0 49.3 7. te9-4.cr02.mplsmncd.integra.net 0.0% 8 66.2 117.6 66.2 178.7 40.9 8. tg13-2.cr02.sttlwatw.integra.net 0.0% 8 94.8 171.6 94.8 251.7 60.2 9. tg13-4.cr01.sttlwatw.integra.net 0.0% 7 206.0 161.2 88.1 230.5 54.3 10. tg13-1.cr01.ptleorte.integra.net 0.0% 7 105.3 116.8 64.9 194.0 46.9 11. tg9-1.ar10.ptldorfj.integra.net 0.0% 7 64.9 69.8 64.0 103.5 14.9 12. 67.51.66.253 0.0% 7 64.4 64.2 64.1 64.4 0.1 That seems to be Integra only peering in Chicago producing that result. Several different networks all backending to mplsmncd.integra.net (in 511??) Still need that Gigapop connection too.. mtr www.state.mn.us Packets Pings Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1. gw-ext-176-88.staff.iphouse.net 0.0% 21 0.8 0.9 0.7 1.7 0.2 2. ge0-2-0.m20-1.mpls.iphouse.net 0.0% 21 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.0 3. ge-6-10.car2.Minneapolis1.Level3 0.0% 21 9.9 10.0 9.8 11.1 0.3 4. ae-5-5.ebr2.Denver1.Level3.net 0.0% 21 49.1 42.0 36.4 49.5 4.6 5. ae-4-4.car2.KansasCity1.Level3.n 0.0% 21 40.4 42.2 40.2 79.3 8.5 6. ??? 7. amesia-gr-01-po-2.northernlights 0.0% 21 20.9 20.9 20.7 21.3 0.2 8. mtc-gr-01-po-2.northernlights.gi 0.0% 21 20.9 21.6 20.6 36.9 3.5 9. statecob-gr-01-te-2-2-3001.north 0.0% 21 20.6 21.0 20.6 22.4 0.5 10. som-thor-te-3-3-3001.northernlig 0.0% 21 20.9 20.8 20.5 21.5 0.2 11. cobnhagar-hub-Gi2-9.r.state.mn.u 0.0% 20 20.9 21.2 20.6 27.9 1.6 12. cobnlbsw1-sh-V52.r.state.mn.us 0.0% 20 20.7 20.9 20.7 21.2 0.1 13. www.state.mn.us 0.0% 20 20.9 21.0 20.7 22.7 0.4 Or perhaps Qwest too.. mtr www.ci.minneapolis.mn.us Packets Pings Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev 1. gw-ext-176-88.staff.iphouse.net 0.0% 17 0.8 1.4 0.7 10.2 2.3 2. ge0-2-0.m20-2.mpls.iphouse.net 0.0% 17 0.4 2.3 0.3 30.5 7.3 3. ge0-2-0.m20-1.mpls.iphouse.net 0.0% 17 0.4 0.8 0.4 5.2 1.2 4. ge-6-10.car2.Minneapolis1.Level3 0.0% 17 10.0 10.0 9.8 10.6 0.2 5. ae-11-11.car1.Minneapolis1.Level 0.0% 17 9.8 9.9 9.7 10.0 0.1 6. ae-4-4.ebr1.Chicago1.Level3.net 0.0% 17 13.5 14.1 9.8 22.1 4.0 7. ae-6-6.ebr1.Chicago2.Level3.net 0.0% 17 10.2 10.0 9.8 10.2 0.1 8. ae-1-51.edge4.Chicago3.Level3.ne 0.0% 17 9.8 9.9 9.8 10.3 0.1 9. chp-brdr-03.inet.qwest.net 0.0% 17 10.1 10.0 9.8 10.1 0.1 10. min-core-02.inet.qwest.net 0.0% 16 19.9 19.9 19.7 20.2 0.2 11. min-edge-10.inet.qwest.net 0.0% 16 19.8 19.8 19.7 20.0 0.1 12. 65.126.82.250 0.0% 16 23.2 32.1 20.8 127.2 27.6 13. www.ci.minneapolis.mn.us 0.0% 16 23.9 22.5 20.8 32.6 2.9 -- Doug McIntyre <merlyn@iphouse.net> -- ipHouse/Goldengate/Bitstream/ProNS -- Network Engineer/Provisioning/Jack of all Trades ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
Pretty much the same from the other direction. Anyone have a good contact at Level3? Frank From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Dan Olsen Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 3:57 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Chicago Problem for MN content Seeing the same issue heading to netins in Iowa. I think ( Not the data guy here) Tracing route to www.netins.net<http://www.netins.net> [167.142.226.220] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 4 ms 1 ms 2 ms 198-174-42-254.windomnet.com [198.174.42.254] 2 6 ms 8 ms 8 ms 199.199.48.53 3 22 ms 20 ms 22 ms ge-6-16.car1.Minneapolis1.Level3.net [4.79.160.9] 4 21 ms 22 ms 23 ms vlan51.ebr1.chicago2.level3.net [4.69.138.158] 5 22 ms 21 ms 33 ms ae-6-6.ebr1.chicago1.level3.net [4.69.140.189] 6 25 ms 26 ms 25 ms ae-4-4.car1.minneapolis1.level3.net [4.69.136.105] 7 31 ms 30 ms 31 ms ae-11-11.car2.minneapolis1.level3.net [4.69.136.102] 8 36 ms 38 ms 38 ms nbc-communi.car2.minneapolis1.level3.net [4.59.66.2] 9 * * * Request timed out. 10 * * * Request timed out. 11 36 ms 33 ms 34 ms ins-db1-et-12-1.desm.netins.net [167.142.67.6] 12 34 ms 32 ms 34 ms webhosting.netins.net [167.142.226.220] Trace complete. Dan Olsen Operations Manager Windomnet City OF Windom 443 10th St PO Box 38 Windom MN 56101 507-832-8007 ________________________________ From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Jay Hanke Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 3:07 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Chicago Problem for MN content I ran a couple of trace routes to "Minnesota Content". http://mankatonetworks.com/wordpress/?p=68 Hickorytech isn't currently exchanging traffic on the exchange. Would a couple of you who are forward looking run some traces to various Minnesota content and post results? jay ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ________________________________ No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com> Version: 10.0.1321 / Virus Database: 1500/3568 - Release Date: 04/12/11 ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
I asked INS to ask Level3 -- turns out that the hop labeled "ge-6-16.car1.Minneapolis1.Level3.net [4.79.160.9]" just has a wrong PTR, and is actually in Chicago. The updated DNS should be reflected in a few hours. Frank -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Jay Hanke Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 3:07 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: [MICE-DISCUSS] Chicago Problem for MN content I ran a couple of trace routes to "Minnesota Content". http://mankatonetworks.com/wordpress/?p=68 Hickorytech isn't currently exchanging traffic on the exchange. Would a couple of you who are forward looking run some traces to various Minnesota content and post results? jay ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Frank Bulk <fbulk@mypremieronline.com> wrote:
I asked INS to ask Level3 -- turns out that the hop labeled "ge-6-16.car1.Minneapolis1.Level3.net [4.79.160.9]" just has a wrong PTR, and is actually in Chicago. The updated DNS should be reflected in a few hours.
Thanks for following up. I'm pretty sure it is still bouncing back and forth between Chicago and Minneapolis because Zayo (hop 2) is in Minneapolis. It must be that Zayo is picking up L3 in Chicago. I wonder if the issue is that a couple of the "Legacy networks" never got integrated. Zayo and INS could fix this by connecting to MICE.... :) Jay ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
Perhaps RTT can be a hint as to the distance between hops. As of a few minutes ago, traffic to 198-174-42-254.windomnet.com is now going via Qwest instead of Level3. Frank -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Jay Hanke Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 9:12 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Chicago Problem for MN content On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Frank Bulk <fbulk@mypremieronline.com> wrote:
I asked INS to ask Level3 -- turns out that the hop labeled "ge-6-16.car1.Minneapolis1.Level3.net [4.79.160.9]" just has a wrong PTR, and is actually in Chicago. The updated DNS should be reflected in a few hours.
Thanks for following up. I'm pretty sure it is still bouncing back and forth between Chicago and Minneapolis because Zayo (hop 2) is in Minneapolis. It must be that Zayo is picking up L3 in Chicago. I wonder if the issue is that a couple of the "Legacy networks" never got integrated. Zayo and INS could fix this by connecting to MICE.... :) Jay ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
1 3 ms 2 ms 2 ms 198-174-42-254.windomnet.com [198.174.42.254] 2 7 ms 8 ms 7 ms 199.199.48.53 3 44 ms 25 ms 22 ms ae6.100-ONVOY-INC.edge2.chi2.net [4.79.160.9] 4 21 ms 29 ms 25 ms ae-2-52.edge4.chicago3.level3.net [4.69.138.166] 5 17 ms 22 ms 17 ms 63.146.27.17 6 * * * Request timed out. 7 57 ms 58 ms 58 ms 63-234-167-238.dia.static.qwest.net [63.234.167.238] 8 53 ms 53 ms 56 ms ins-db1-et-12-1.desm.netins.net [167.142.67.6] 9 105 ms 129 ms 132 ms webhosting.netins.net [167.142.226.220] race complete. :\Users\Dano> Dan Olsen Operations Manager Windomnet City OF Windom 443 10th St PO Box 38 Windom MN 56101 507-832-8007 -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 9:19 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Chicago Problem for MN content Perhaps RTT can be a hint as to the distance between hops. As of a few minutes ago, traffic to 198-174-42-254.windomnet.com is now going via Qwest instead of Level3. Frank -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Jay Hanke Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 9:12 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Chicago Problem for MN content On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Frank Bulk <fbulk@mypremieronline.com> wrote:
I asked INS to ask Level3 -- turns out that the hop labeled "ge-6-16.car1.Minneapolis1.Level3.net [4.79.160.9]" just has a wrong PTR, and is actually in Chicago. The updated DNS should be reflected in a few hours.
Thanks for following up. I'm pretty sure it is still bouncing back and forth between Chicago and Minneapolis because Zayo (hop 2) is in Minneapolis. It must be that Zayo is picking up L3 in Chicago. I wonder if the issue is that a couple of the "Legacy networks" never got integrated. Zayo and INS could fix this by connecting to MICE.... :) Jay ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1321 / Virus Database: 1500/3573 - Release Date: 04/14/11 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
What do you think? This just changed back to this route now. Seems like the 3 hop Is new today. And yes we are working on becoming a MICE affiliate. 1 3 ms 2 ms 8 ms 198-174-42-254.windomnet.com [198.174.42.254] 2 18 ms 11 ms 12 ms 199.199.48.53 3 65 ms 61 ms 49 ms ae6.100-ONVOY-INC.edge2.chi2.net [4.79.160.9] 4 27 ms 24 ms 28 ms vlan51.ebr1.chicago2.level3.net [4.69.138.158] 5 41 ms 46 ms 24 ms ae-6-6.ebr1.chicago1.level3.net [4.69.140.189] 6 85 ms 77 ms 68 ms ae-4-4.car1.Minneapolis1.Level3.net [4.69.136.105] 7 38 ms 52 ms 32 ms ae-11-11.car2.Minneapolis1.Level3.net [4.69.136.102] 8 38 ms 36 ms 45 ms NBC-COMMUNI.car2.Minneapolis1.Level3.net [4.59.66.2] 9 * * * Request timed out. 10 * * * Request timed out. 11 121 ms 114 ms 118 ms ins-db1-et-12-1.desm.netins.net [167.142.67.6] 12 65 ms 67 ms 68 ms webhosting.netins.net [167.142.226.220] race complete. -----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Jay Hanke Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 9:12 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Chicago Problem for MN content On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Frank Bulk <fbulk@mypremieronline.com> wrote:
I asked INS to ask Level3 -- turns out that the hop labeled "ge-6-16.car1.Minneapolis1.Level3.net [4.79.160.9]" just has a wrong PTR, and is actually in Chicago. The updated DNS should be reflected in a few hours.
Thanks for following up. I'm pretty sure it is still bouncing back and forth between Chicago and Minneapolis because Zayo (hop 2) is in Minneapolis. It must be that Zayo is picking up L3 in Chicago. I wonder if the issue is that a couple of the "Legacy networks" never got integrated. Zayo and INS could fix this by connecting to MICE.... :) Jay ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1321 / Virus Database: 1500/3573 - Release Date: 04/14/11 ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Dan Olsen <Dano@windomnet.com> wrote:
What do you think? This just changed back to this route now. Seems like the 3 hop Is new today.
Zayo is must be connected to L3 in Chicago so I has to bounce back and forth. It's slightly less dirty that Level3 doing the bouncing on their own. If I run to ipHouse from my office on Hickorytech it stays local. Jerry, are we ready to turn up the MICE connection? Jay ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
Jay, On 04/14/2011 09:12 AM, Jay Hanke wrote:
Zayo and INS could fix this by connecting to MICE.... :)
Agreed. If the State would connect, I think that would get Zayo/Onvoy connectivity. This neat little website from VISI indicates that Onvoy/Zayo is connected to the GigaPOP: http://noc.visi.com/cgi-bin/nllxp Dave, how is the connection coming along? Is there anything that we can do to help you get it done? Thanks, Steve ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
On Apr 14, 2011, at 10:15 AM, Steve Howard wrote:
If the State would connect, I think that would get Zayo/Onvoy connectivity. This neat little website from VISI indicates that Onvoy/Zayo is connected to the GigaPOP: http://noc.visi.com/cgi-bin/nllxp
That would imply that UofM/State of MN would be providing transit for Zayo/Onvoy between the NLLXP and MICE, as well as advertising commercial routes learned at NLLXP to peers at MICE. I wouldn't think that would be the case, although, someone can correct me if I'm wrong. ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
On 04/14/2011 10:24 AM, Andrew Hoyos wrote:
On Apr 14, 2011, at 10:15 AM, Steve Howard wrote:
If the State would connect, I think that would get Zayo/Onvoy connectivity. This neat little website from VISI indicates that Onvoy/Zayo is connected to the GigaPOP: http://noc.visi.com/cgi-bin/nllxp That would imply that UofM/State of MN would be providing transit for Zayo/Onvoy between the NLLXP and MICE, as well as advertising commercial routes learned at NLLXP to peers at MICE. I wouldn't think that would be the case, although, someone can correct me if I'm wrong.
Good point. Perhaps Dave can clarify? If those routes won't be advertised to MICE, then perhaps we should start trying to get some of those organizations to connect directly to MICE...? Thanks, Steve ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
On Apr 14, 2011, at 10:36 AM, Steve Howard wrote:
On 04/14/2011 10:24 AM, Andrew Hoyos wrote:
On Apr 14, 2011, at 10:15 AM, Steve Howard wrote:
If the State would connect, I think that would get Zayo/Onvoy connectivity. This neat little website from VISI indicates that Onvoy/Zayo is connected to the GigaPOP: http://noc.visi.com/cgi-bin/nllxp That would imply that UofM/State of MN would be providing transit for Zayo/Onvoy between the NLLXP and MICE, as well as advertising commercial routes learned at NLLXP to peers at MICE. I wouldn't think that would be the case, although, someone can correct me if I'm wrong.
Good point. Perhaps Dave can clarify? If those routes won't be advertised to MICE, then perhaps we should start trying to get some of those organizations to connect directly to MICE...?
My idea: Contact those networks and ask them to connect, remind them that if the GigaPop owners (UMN) would connect that this issue would be resolved. :) (sorry, Dave, need to put on pressure, there isn't any reason things aren't done that I can come up with right now that aren't purely negative) -- Mike Horwath drechsau@iphouse.net The universe is an island, surrounded by whatever it is that surrounds universes. - Berkely Fortune ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
On Apr 14, 2011, at 10:15 AM, Steve Howard wrote:
Jay,
On 04/14/2011 09:12 AM, Jay Hanke wrote:
Zayo and INS could fix this by connecting to MICE.... :)
Agreed.
If the State would connect, I think that would get Zayo/Onvoy connectivity. This neat little website from VISI indicates that Onvoy/Zayo is connected to the GigaPOP: http://noc.visi.com/cgi-bin/nllxp
Dave, how is the connection coming along? Is there anything that we can do to help you get it done?
If only the gigapop would connect. Mr. Farmer, where we at with this? -- Mike Horwath drechsau@iphouse.net The universe is an island, surrounded by whatever it is that surrounds universes. - Berkely Fortune ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
participants (7)
-
Andrew Hoyos -
Dan Olsen -
Doug McIntyre -
Frank Bulk -
Jay Hanke -
Mike Horwath -
Steve Howard