Was hoping to just do v6 to the client, then translate to v4 on the edge… but dual stack with private v4 would work, just more complex. From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Jason Hanke Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 7:39 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] NAT64/NATPT +1 Dual stack /48 to sub with private v4 on the outside assuming you're out of ipv4. the transition technologies bring in a lot of complexity. On Feb 10, 2018 7:16 AM, "Mike Horwath" <drechsau@geeks.org<mailto:drechsau@geeks.org>> wrote: On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 05:56:48PM +0000, Dave Williams wrote:
Hi all - does anyone have experience with NAT64/PT and opinions on what might be the best hardware platform to use to do it?
I have only done this via Fortinet gear. It works. Query: why not go native? -- Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau@Geeks.ORG<mailto:drechsau@Geeks.ORG> ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1