So if that is the case, a carrier can"t commit to just 100Mbps because they'd have to expect traffic levels to increase somewhat equally accross all contributing carriers and the only way it would stay lower would be if more carriers started contributing, correct?

 
Mike Wilker
Chief Technical Officer
Jaguar Communications
507-214-0259
mwilker@jagcom.net



On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Jay Hanke <jayhanke@mankatonetworks.net> wrote:

You would allow the akamai block out to your upstreams.

I think the balancing magic would be to have several carriers open up 1 upstream spreading the load.

On Oct 30, 2011 11:26 AM, "Mike Horwath" <drechsau@iphouse.net> wrote:
Provider independent addressing would sure be fun here...

So, let's say I wanna pump in some bandwidth, how do I?

Assume I'm an idiot.

--
Mike Horwath via iPad 2, electric boogaloo!
########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1


To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1




To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link:
http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1