I'm aware of it, its discussed in RFC 6304, it wouldn't hurt anything. However, as RFC 6761 becomes in more common use the need for this should reduce significantly. It would be better for everyone connected to MICE to implement the recommendations of RFC 6761 with regards to their recursive name servers, than to build a AS112 node for MICE. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6304 http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6761 On 3/7/13 10:55 , Jay Hanke wrote:
Is anyone familiar with the AS112 project?
Would this be worthwhile on MICE?
-- Jay Hanke CTO, CCIE #19093 Mankato Networks LLC PO Box 54 619 S Front St Mankato, MN 56001-3838 Google 530-618-2398 jayhanke@mankatonetworks.net http://www.mankatonetworks.com
########################################################################
To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1
-- ================================================ David Farmer Email: farmer@umn.edu Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 1-612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 1-612-812-9952 ================================================ ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1