On Jan 3, 2015, at 14:17, Steve Howard <showard@PAULBUNYAN.NET> wrote:
On 01/02/2015 07:10 PM, Hannigan, Martin wrote: FYI,
http://micelg.usinternet.com/export/graph_385.html shows in+out where http://micelg.usinternet.com/export/graph_384.html shows in/out. Which one should we use?
I'd like to suggest that MICE follow OIX-1 with respect to agg and other stats:
"The IXP MUST publish on a publicly available website the total sum of all incoming and outgoing traffic in bps from all connected networks on the public peering VLAN. The traffic sum MUST include the traffic on customer facing ports only and MUST be made up of 5 min average traffic measurements. A distinction MUST be made between the traffic on the public peering VLAN and any other interconnection service."
Traffic "massiveness" isn't as important as how many ASNs are connected. Traffic is an unpredictable and unreliable indicator of an exchanges size and value. ASN counts are much more granular for potential peers to build a case to join.
I think that each potential peer determines the value of an exchange based upon their situation and business dynamics. For providers like us that mainly serve "eyeball" customers, traffic "massiveness" is probably the most important value indicator. Generally speaking, if my cost/bit is cheaper or higher quality at an exchange than a transit provider, then the more "massive" the better! To the overwhelming majority of our members/customers it doesn't matter whether the traffic comes from one ASN or a thousand ASNs.
Agreed. Aside from mass of traffic and ASNs, a good measure of success (for me) is creation of PNIs. That requires traffic + ASN + good xcon costs (like 0).
I'd like to see us consider including ASN count and total routes/netblocks on the MICE website. I don't know how much "real world" value there is with the route/netblock count, but it looks nice for marketing purposes!
We currently see 44 ASNs and ~62,700 netblocks at MICE. I think that these are great numbers for a relatively new exchange.
Steve
It's definitely a good start. And now with the other data centers being more visible, competitive places to do PNis too. Great stuff. Best, Martin