On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 03:21:17PM -0600, Andrew Hoyos wrote:
Just a suggestion: would it make more sense for each of the folks providing space/power for the switches to provide a /29 or /31 for OOB management, rather than inband management within the MICE subnet?
That way, it's kinda separated, and nobody has to worry about static routing stuff different places, or distributing the IX subnet itself.
IX subnet = IX participant routers only then
SUSPENSE IS KILLING ME! :) I'd be happy to provide the switch subnetting requirements for OOB (for switches that have OOB that is). but anyone else can take the helm on that as well. -- Mike Horwath ipHouse - Welcome home! drechsau@iphouse.net The universe is an island, surrounded by whatever it is that surrounds universes. - Berkeley Fortune ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1