On 10/04/2016 8:35 PM, Michael Hare wrote:
Call it a Madison thing; AS 3128 would also like to BFD peer with interested parties. I like Andrew's "Y/N" column idea.
-Michael
+1 on all counts.. For any of the folks also at MadIX, I'll do BFD with you there as well. Can we add BFD as a column on its' KB as well? For MICE though, it would be *great* if one of the route servers could be setup with BFD support that way everyone could benefit and withdraw routes faster once it was rolled out to both. It still wouldn't insure that A can talk directly to B, only bilateral peering can solve that. BIRD appears to have a "passive" setting for it too, so it wouldn't try to do BFD unless the other side initiated. -James
-----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Colin Baker Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 4:21 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] BFD support on BGP sessions
On 04.10.2016 16:09, Andrew Hoyos wrote:
+1 to this. We (AS53597) will happy enable BFD to anyone that supports. Shoot us an email at noc@hoyosconsulting.com.
Perhaps we can add a column to the participants page for a Y/N flag there?
Meee tooo
Email peering@supranet.net (AS4150) and we'll be happy to get this added.