Can't folks just specify which IRR in their IRR entry if desired? Ie ARIN::AS1234 FWIW we only use RADB but are fine if the common IRR's (but not legacy arin) are used. Also is there any reason at all to use non-ARIN teritory IRR data? Do any MICE participants have anything in RIPE for example? --Chris On 5/11/23 10:01, Jeremy Lumby wrote:
External
I do not see a need for per participant IRR, I would rather that they all just default to your example below.
*From:*MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> *On Behalf Of *Richard Laager *Sent:* Thursday, May 11, 2023 3:58 AM *To:* MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET *Subject:* Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] IRR Mandatory at MICE / New Route Servers
On 2023-05-09 14:01, August Yang wrote:
Should I reorder RADB,ARIN to be ARIN,RADB?
Definitely. We have objects registered in all databases feasible to prevent AS-SET squatting, which has occurred in the past, while only RADB has the actual members listed. Turns out correct prefix list can be generated using bgpq4 regardless of the order, so it's better to prioritize authenticated sources.
In thinking about this some more... Is IXP Manager's behavior of per-participant IRR sources actually useful? In other words, what's wrong with just setting everyone to: ARIN,RIPE,LACNIC,APNIC,AFRINIC,RADB,LEVEL3?
--
Richard
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 <http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1 <http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1>
-- Chris Wopat Network Engineer, WiscNet wopat@wiscnet.net 608-210-3965