Politicians aren’t Internet savvy. So it ends up in the wrong place. *sigh* Dean From: MICE Discuss <MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET> On Behalf Of Jay Hanke Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2019 5:34 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] MICE attached compliance speed test server Interesting, I wonder how they came up with St Paul (no public IXP). Also Omaha is missing last I looked, Omaha was larger than KCIX. If someone implements something in St. Paul. I have some networks looking for test locations. It might bring more eyeballs to mice. On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 5:00 PM Richard Laager <rlaager@wiktel.com <mailto:rlaager@wiktel.com> > wrote: On 2/24/19 4:43 PM, Jay Hanke wrote:
Is there a public FCC doc someplace?
I think this is the one, but I'm really not positive on that. FCC stuff isn't my area of expertise. https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-18-710A1.pdf -- Richard -- Jay Hanke, President South Front Networks jayhanke@southfront.io <mailto:jayhanke@southfront.io> Phone 612-204-0000 _____ To unsubscribe from the MICE-DISCUSS list, click the following link: http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS <http://lists.iphouse.net/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=MICE-DISCUSS&A=1> &A=1