Andrew’s theory about uplinks is correct: Ridgeview 3/35 and Po1 are part of its link to 511-7804 And 511-7504 po11 and 6/36 are part of its link to 511-7804 I don’t have any theories but spent a little time looking around, my notes so far: The usual background of non-unicast packets jumped from ~100/sec to ~250/sec rom 14:10 to 15:01 They were egressing lots of ports but po4 (Charter) is the only ingress port I’ve found so far - but I don’t think it’s volume accounts for it all. A number of members had traffic volumes change but the only ones who stopped all together that I see are: Integris and Hoyos on your remote WiscNet on their remote Conversely Xcel Entergy had a spike in traffic at around that time. And then we had trouble graphing NOCIX remote ports during that time too, which is odd. From: Andrew Hoyos <hoyosa@gmail.com> Date: Wednesday, April 30, 2025 at 4:08 PM To: Jay Hanke <jayhanke@southfront.io> Cc: Sergii Polishchuk <sergi@infotec.ca>, Ryan Nelson <ryan.nelson@integrisit.com>, "mice-discuss@lists.micemn.net" <mice-discuss@lists.micemn.net> Subject: Re: MICE connectivity issues / elevated multicast traffic We are, but saw issues to all peers (non BFD peers as well) There was definitely some uptick in non-unicast traffic in a few spots. I’m sure some are switch to switch links... 7804 - 3/2/1 -> ridgeview http://micelg.usinternet.com/cacti/graph.php?action=view&local_graph_id=4027... -> Ridgeview 3/35/1 + po1 7504 - po11 + 6/36/1 http://micelg.usinternet.com/cacti/graph.php?action=view&local_graph_id=1859... Andrew Hoyos hoyosa@gmail.com On Apr 30, 2025, at 15:52, Jay Hanke via mice-discuss <mice-discuss@lists.micemn.net> wrote: Is everyone with issues running BFD? On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 3:48 PM Sergii Polishchuk <sergi@infotec.ca<mailto:sergi@infotec.ca>> wrote: We lost connection with both route-servers for a minute and direct peering with some members (but not all): Apr 30 14:02:18: %BGP-5-NBR_RESET: Neighbor 206.108.255.2 reset (BFD adjacency down) Apr 30 14:02:19: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 206.108.255.2 Down BFD adjacency down Apr 30 14:02:19: %BGP_SESSION-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 206.108.255.2 IPv4 Unicast topology base removed from session BFD adjacency down Apr 30 14:02:35: %BGP-5-NBR_RESET: Neighbor 206.108.255.2 active reset (Peer closed the session) Apr 30 14:03:13: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 206.108.255.2 Up Ping to AS42: <image009.png> Ping to AS6939: <image010.png> <image002.png><https://www.facebook.com/InfotecManitoba> <image003.png><https://twitter.com/InfotecManitoba> <image004.png><https://www.linkedin.com/in/sergip/> <image005.png> Sergi Infotec Manitoba <image006.png> (844) 777-3744 <tel:(844)%20777-3744> <image007.png> sergi@infotec.ca<mailto:sergi@infotec.ca> <image008.png> https://infotec.ca<https://infotec.ca/> From: Ryan Nelson via mice-discuss <mice-discuss@lists.micemn.net<mailto:mice-discuss@lists.micemn.net>> Sent: April 30, 2025 15:02 To: mice-discuss@lists.micemn.net<mailto:mice-discuss@lists.micemn.net> Subject: MICE connectivity issues / elevated multicast traffic Anyone else seeing some connectivity issues over MICE coinciding with an uptick in multicast traffic coming from the core starting at around 2:10pm CDT? Ryan Nelson Architect, Platform Services Office: (218) 336-2220<tel:(218)%20336-2220> ryan.nelson@integrisit.com<mailto:ryan.nelson@integrisit.com> <image001.png><https://integrisit.com/> Integris Engage<https://integrisit.com/resources/>: Check out upcoming Education, Training & Networking _______________________________________________ mice-discuss mailing list -- mice-discuss@lists.micemn.net<mailto:mice-discuss@lists.micemn.net> To unsubscribe send an email to mice-discuss-leave@lists.micemn.net<mailto:mice-discuss-leave@lists.micemn.net> _______________________________________________ mice-discuss mailing list -- mice-discuss@lists.micemn.net To unsubscribe send an email to mice-discuss-leave@lists.micemn.net