Agreed on both the passive configuration for the route servers and implementation suggestions. Ben Wiechman Director of IP Strategy and Engineering Direct: 320.256.0184 Cell: 320.247.3224 ben.wiechman@arvig.com 150 Second Street SW | Perham, MN 56573 | arvig.com On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 9:23 AM, Michael Hare <michael.hare@wisc.edu> wrote:
My 2c is proceed but consider the following
1) space out changes the route servers by a day or so. 2) force reset bgp on the changed route server.
As someone who has previously screwed up control plane BGP filters (such that sessions only came up if remove side was active), I believe step #2 will shake out anyone who has their control plane filters wrong. Not really MICE's fault per se, but a nice gesture.
-Michael
-----Original Message----- From: MICE Discuss [mailto:MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] On Behalf Of Richard Laager Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2018 12:56 AM To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Broadcast Traffic
I’d vote for passive BGP sessions (v4/v6) on the route servers across
On 04/02/2018 11:23 PM, Andrew Hoyos wrote: the board, already established or not. Easy solution to the issue at hand and sane default. “Quiet unless spoken to”.
This is what I was thinking too.
-- Richard